CHAPTER I.

Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this

file which includes the original illustrations.

See 42855-h.htm or 42855-h.zip:

(https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/42855/pg42855-images.html)

or

(https://www.gutenberg.org/files/42855/42855-h.zip)

Images of the original pages are available through

Internet Archive. See

https://archive.org/details/assassinationof02harr

[Illustration: T. M. Harris]

ASSASSINATION OF LINCOLN

A History of the Great Conspiracy

Trial of the Conspirators by a Military Commission

and a Review of the Trial of John H. Surratt

by

T. M. HARRIS

Late Brigadier-General U. S. V. and Major-General By Brevet

A Member of the Commission

Boston, Mass.

American Citizen Company

7 Bromfield Street

Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1892,

By T. M. HARRIS,

In the Office of the Librarian of Congress at Washington.

All Rights Reserved.

Typography by Fish & Sancton, 198 Washington St., Boston.

EXPLANATION.

It is perhaps necessary that the author should explain the sense in

which the term, "Great Conspiracy," in the title of his book, is used.

It is not at all in the same sense in which it is used by General

Logan in his book. In that it is used as the equivalent of the Great

Rebellion, only that it broadly covers all that led to and culminated

in the war against the government, designated as "The Rebellion." It is

only here used to designate the conspiracy that resorted to the policy

of assassination as a means to give aid to the rebellion; and the

reader who follows the author through will then be able to perceive why

he designates this a "Great Conspiracy."

PREFACE.

It is now more than twenty-seven years since the assassination of

Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States,--an event of the

greatest importance at the time, not only to the people of the United

States, but to the civilized world. The trial of the conspirators by

a military commission created the greatest possible interest; and the

proceedings and testimony were published from day to day by all of the

great newspapers of the country, and read with avidity. The judgment of

those who carefully studied the testimony at the time was formed upon a

competent knowledge of the facts.

And yet, even then, the fate of the prisoners on trial before the

Commission, to be found innocent or guilty according to the evidence,

constituted the great point of interest, and thus tended to divert

attention from the evidence against the other parties charged not only

with being co-conspirators, but as being the instigators of the plot.

Since that time a new generation has come on to the stage of action,

and as the official report of the trial by Ben Pittman, published at

the time, is in the hands of but comparatively few people, a concise

history of this great event, in popular form, but founded on the

evidence, seemed to the writer to be due and called for at the present

time.

The necessity for this has been emphasized by a recent revival of

efforts that have been made from time to time, ever since the

execution of the assassins that were condemned to death, to prejudice

public sentiment against the government by the assumption of the

innocence of one of the parties executed--Mrs. Surratt.

Only a few months since (May 30, 1891), La Salle Institute in New York

City was crowded by an audience that came together expecting to hear

Cardinal Gibbons and Father Walter review the case of Mrs. Surratt.

Neither the cardinal nor the father appeared, but a Mr. Sloane arose

and read to the audience a letter from Father Walter on the subject.

This letter contained nothing new to those who were familiar with the

case at the time of its occurrence. It was substantially the same that

was published over his signature shortly after her execution. After

stating that he was her confessor, and that his priestly vows did not

permit him to reveal the secrets of the confessional, he very calmly

and positively states his belief in her entire innocence, basing that

belief on what he professes to know. He then relates the efforts he

made to get a reprieve and a postponement of her execution for a few

days, and expresses the belief that could he have succeeded in this for

only ten days he could have saved her life.

He then complains of the manner in which he was treated by the

President, Andrew Johnson, and Judge Holt, who referred him back and

forth, each to the other, and that between them he could get nothing

accomplished.

A story has also been gotten up of a Union soldier who was a member of

the conspiracy and knew all of its members and secrets, who affirms

the innocence of Mrs. Surratt. The most rational and, at the same

time, charitable thing to be said about this story is, that this Union

soldier was manufactured for the occasion.

That portion of the press of to-day that inherits the old copper-head

animus, greedily publishes all such things as these, and indulges in

the wildest latitude of editorial comment and false statements. They

have buried all of the members of the Commission but one many times;

have followed all of the principal actors in the scene to violent and

miserable deaths; and have made it manifest that had the Almighty Ruler

of the Universe viewed the matter in their light, and been as swift in

his retributions as they would have had him to be, not one who had any

connection with the arrest, trial, and execution of the assassins of

the great and good President would have been left alive.

They have manifested an especial venom of feeling against the then

Secretary of War, Hon. E. M. Stanton, iterating and reiterating the

absurd and false statement that he died from the violence of his own

hand, being crazed with remorse. Why they should thus select Mr.

Stanton as the especial object of their hatred cannot be seen from

any connection he had with this case. His part, though important and

involving great responsibility, was, in fact, a very subordinate

one. He selected the officers to be embraced in the order of detail

for the Commission, under the order of the President, that was all.

Judge Holt conducted the trial and recorded the proceedings under the

President's order, and when he handed that record over to the President

his connection with the case ended. President Johnson then held the

temporal destiny of this woman, as well as that of all the others

convicted, in his own hand. He and he alone was responsible.

From all this it appears that the time has come when a clear, concise

history of this conspiracy and trial should be given to the world. To

this task the writer has addressed himself, and he offers this volume

as the result of his labors. The facts herein narrated in regard to

the assassination, as well as to the parts enacted by each of the

individual members of the conspiracy, are drawn from the testimony

before the Commission. They have been thrown into the form of a

connected narrative, and there has been nothing stated as a fact but

what is fully sustained by the evidence which formed the basis of

the decisions of the Commission. Nothing has been admitted into this

narrative but what rests on the specific testimony of unimpeachable

witnesses. The author only deems it necessary that the opinion, or

belief, of Father Walter, and all others of his persuasion, shall be

confronted by the testimony in the case, in order that an intelligent

judgment shall be reached. At the time of this trial there were just

two classes of people in this country--the friends and the enemies of

the government. The former were united and determined in their purpose

and effort to preserve and perpetuate the government established

by our fathers under the constitution that included in its purpose

and provisions the union of the states and made us a nation. The

latter were madly bent on its overthrow, and so judged favorably or

unfavorably of the occurrences of the times, as they tended to favor

or hinder the accomplishment of their purposes. The feelings of both

parties had been wrought up to the highest pitch of intensity because

the matters at issue had been submitted to the arbitrament of the

sword. The result of this appeal was clearly foreshadowed at the time

of the assassination of the President, and before the conclusion of

the trial of his murderers the cause of the Confederacy had collapsed.

The rebellion was virtually overcome. The deep political scheme to

give it a new lease of life and bring to its aid new elements of

success by the assassinations that had been planned, had been too

long delayed, and its execution had become utterly impracticable. The

soldiers of the rebellion had fought their fight--a brave and plucky

and protracted fight. They realized the hopelessness of their cause

and, though greatly disappointed and mortified at their failure, they

had the consciousness that they had done all that brave men could do

to win success, and so were ready to accept the result, return to their

homes, and resume citizenship under the government they were unable to

overthrow. Not so with the secret active enemies of the government.

They were not willing to accept defeat, but were, nevertheless (happily

for the country), in a condition that they could only show their

enmity by maligning and villifying the authorities they were unable

to overthrow; and of this privilege they fully availed themselves.

Thus it has come to pass that the magnitude, scope, and purpose of

the assassination conspiracy are unknown to the present generation.

All that a large majority of those who have come upon the stage of

action since that time know of this, in many respects, one of the most

important trials that has ever occurred in our history, is what they

have learned through the efforts of these vituperators; and they have

never seen it referred to other than as the trial of Mrs. Surratt.

The Commission was not called upon to render a decision as to the

innocence or guilt of the persons charged by the government with being

co-conspirators with John H. Surratt and John Wilkes Booth, who were

not in the custody of the government and so not before the Commission;

but the government, having assumed the responsibility of charging

Jefferson Davis, George N. Sanders, Beverly Tucker, Jacob Thompson,

William C. Cleary, Clement C. Clay, George Harper, George Young, and

others, with thus conspiring to kill and murder Abraham Lincoln, Andrew

Johnson, Wm. H. Seward, and Ulysses S. Grant, was under the necessity

of vindicating its honor and dignity before the world by presenting

the evidence in its possession on which its charge was founded. It

will be my purpose to present this evidence, and to show the full

significance and purpose of the plot, and with whom it originated.

Many of the prominent actors in this tragedy have been summoned before

a higher tribunal to answer for the deeds done in the body. There we

are content to leave them, assured that "all things are naked and open

to the eyes of Him with whom they have to do," and that there will be

no mistakes made in the decisions there rendered. And toward those who

yet remain, it is with no feelings of personal enmity that the author

shall write. He only knows them as they are revealed in the testimony,

and by this he shall endeavor to deal fairly and candidly. They made

themselves conspicuous in their connection with public affairs of

the greatest importance, and so their acts belong to the public. If

they have made a bad record, it is due to the truth of history that

their acts shall be fully unfolded. History is a truthful narration

of events that have occurred; and its conclusions must be based on a

consideration of all of the facts, taken in their proper order and

relation to the events. The aim of the writer has been to give a candid

and reliable history of the Great Conspiracy as deduced from the

evidence before the Commission and to be found in the official report

of the proceedings published by Ben Pittman immediately after the trial.

The asperities of the great conflict have been largely obliterated by

the many happy years of peace that have intervened since that unhappy

period. We have but one country and one flag, which almost all have

learned to love as of old. Let us draw wisdom and virtue from the

history of the past, learning as well from our errors and mistakes as

from our virtues, that we may, by a course of well-doing, gain the

favor of Him who holds the destiny of nations in His hands, and who

pulls down one and sets another up.

The stability of a popular government must rest on the virtue and

intelligence of its people. Our institutions were established on this

basis alone, and on this alone can they stand. The divorcement of

Church and State by the framers of our constitution was one of the

wise conclusions which they drew from the past; but it was no part of

their purpose to divorce religion from the State. On the contrary,

their politics was a part of their religion and was deduced from the

teachings of God's word. Let us beware of the effort of the present

time to divorce politics from religion because we rightly divorce the

Church from the State.

There is no morality that can make a man a valuable and a reliable

citizen of a free state except the morality of the Christian religion

as taught in God's word. It is the duty, therefore, of every parent and

every teacher to instill into the minds of our youth this Christian

morality as a basis for the highest patriotism and noblest citizenship.

Let the American flag float over every school-house, and the morality

of the Bible be taught with the authority inherent in God's word. Then

will the days of assassinations, whether political or religious, come

to an end. Owing to a variety of causes, the facts connected with this

most important event in our nation's history have been slurred over

and obscured. Scarcely one in a thousand of our people to-day have any

knowledge of their existence.

The object of the writer will be to revive them and bring them out

clearly to the knowledge of all.

T. M. HARRIS.

RITCHIE C. H., W. Va.

CONTENTS.

EXPLANATION 3

PREFACE 5

CONTENTS 13

CHAPTER I.

INTRODUCTORY 17

CHAPTER II.

PREPARATIONS FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE PLOT 24

CHAPTER III.

ASSASSINATION OF THE PRESIDENT AND ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATION

OF SECRETARY SEWARD 34

CHAPTER IV.

THE NEWS COMMUNICATED TO THE WORLD, AND ITS EFFECT 47

CHAPTER V.

UNRAVELLING THE PLOT--PURSUIT AND CAPTURE OF BOOTH AND

HEROLD--DEATH OF BOOTH 51

CHAPTER VI.

UNRAVELLING THE CONSPIRACY--ARREST OF SPANGLER, O'LAUGHLIN,

ATZERODT, MUDD, AND ARNOLD 60

CHAPTER VII.

QUESTIONS PRELIMINARY TO THE TRIAL--WHAT SORT OF TRIAL

SHOULD BE GIVEN, CIVIL OR MILITARY 82

CHAPTER VIII.

A MILITARY COMMISSION--ITS NATURE, CONSTITUTION, DUTIES,

AND JURISDICTION 96

CHAPTER IX.

CONSTITUTION OF THE COMMISSION, AND TRIAL 98

CHAPTER X.

EVIDENCE IN REGARD TO ATROCITIES NOT EMBRACED IN THE CHARGE

AND SPECIFICATIONS, FOR WHICH DAVIS AND HIS CANADA

CABINET WERE RESPONSIBLE 118

CHAPTER XI.

EVIDENCE PRESENTED BY THE GOVERNMENT TO SUSTAIN ITS CHARGE

AND SPECIFICATIONS 147

CHAPTER XII.

THE GOVERNMENT WITNESSES AGAINST DAVIS AND HIS ASSOCIATES

IN THIS CRIME 163

CHAPTER XIII.

A CRITICISM OF NICOLAY AND HAY 177

CHAPTER XIV.

JACOB THOMPSON'S BANK ACCOUNT--WHAT BECAME OF THE MONEY 182

CHAPTER XV.

THE CASE OF MRS. SURRATT 192

CHAPTER XVI.

FATHER WALTER 204

CHAPTER XVII.

CONCLUSION 211

CHAPTER XVIII.

FLIGHT AND CAPTURE OF JOHN H. SURRATT 212

PART II.

CHAPTER I.

INDICTMENT AND TRIAL 229

CHAPTER II.

A CRITICISM OF THE DEFENSE 253

CHAPTER III.

TREATMENT OF WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE BY THE COUNSEL FOR

THE DEFENSE, AND THEIR ANIMUS TOWARD THE GOVERNMENT

AND APPEALS TO THE POLITICAL PREJUDICES OF JURORS 259

APPENDIX 317

PREFACE TO APPENDIX 319

ARGUMENT OF JOHN A. BINGHAM 325

CONTROVERSY BETWEEN PRESIDENT JOHNSON AND JUDGE HOLT 407

PART I.

ASSASSINATION OF LINCOLN.

[Illustration: A. Lincoln ]

CHAPTER I.

INTRODUCTORY.

The rebellion of the slave-holding states, and the attempt to establish

a separate government by force of arms, was solely in the interest

of the institution of slavery. The Southern Confederacy was to rest

on this institution as its corner-stone. By the establishment of the

Confederacy it was intended to end, forever, the agitation of this

question, and establish the system of human slavery as one of the

permanent institutions of the world. And all this in the nineteenth

century of the Christian era! Preparatory to this the pulpit and the

press had been suborned, the Christian conscience of the country had

been debauched, and the doctrine that slavery was a Divine institution

was taught, and accepted as true, by one-half of the American people.

A doctor of divinity, or even a common preacher, who could prove this

to his own satisfaction, and that of his hearers, at once achieved

popularity, and had his great learning and ability heralded by the

secular press throughout the South land. Neither was this kind of

preaching confined to the South. It found a distinct and earnest echo

in many places in the North. It was argued, and no doubt sincerely

believed, that slavery was the best condition for securing the

happiness and welfare of the African race--the condition in which

the negro could be most useful to the world; that his condition had

been greatly improved by his transplantation from a heathen land and

the environments of barbarism to a Christian land and civilized and

Christian environments; and that subjection to a higher and superior

race was necessary to his deriving the highest benefit from the change.

Slavery, it was taught, was a patriarchal institution, and that it was

only through it that the highest ideal of human civilization could be

attained. It was natural that a people whose judgment had crystalized

around such opinions as these should be intolerant of opposition, as

they had closed the door to discussion on this question; and so for

several generations a contrary opinion was not tolerated, or allowed

to find expression, in the slave-holding states. The agitation of this

question, in its moral aspects, by constantly increasing numbers of

earnest, able men in the North, at last led to the organization of

a political party opposed to this institution, and the question of

slavery thus became a political question.

The friends of the institution instinctively recognized the danger that

thus confronted them, and began to strengthen their fences by most

stringent measures to repress discussion and shut out the light. This

was a tacit admission that they felt themselves unable to stand before

the world in argument. It may be laid down as an axiom, that whenever

a political party forecloses discussion on any subject, but more

especially on a great moral issue, it is not only on the wrong side of

that issue, but has an intuitive perception of that fact.

It may also be accepted as an axiom, that the more inconsistent a man's

attitude is on any great moral question the more intolerant will he be

of opposition. Not only were the most stringent laws passed to prevent

the discussion of the institution of slavery in its moral aspects in

the Southern States, but also the most lawless and violent measures

were resorted to, so that it was as much as a man's life was worth to

undertake to make a public argument against slavery in a slave-holding

state, and even to be found earnestly opposed to the institution in

sentiment was to put personal safety in jeopardy. The making of this

question a political question tended largely to de-sectionalize it. No

party could hope to succeed, as a National party, without the vote of

the South, and this could only be secured by concessions to the demands

of the slave holders in the interest of that institution; and so the

party that was willing to concede the most to their demands became the

dominant party in the nation. Thus the leading Democratic politicians,

all over the North, became the staunch advocates of slavery; and we

all know with what blind confidence, and fierce determination, the

masses follow their political leaders. The culmination of the contest

over this question, resulting in the election of Abraham Lincoln

to the Presidency by a party openly opposed to slavery, caused its

friends to take their appeal from the ballot box to the sword; and

this appeal found those who were the friends of the institution from

political party considerations scattered all over the North in quite

formidable numbers, constituting an enemy in the rear of our armies

that gave to the administration of President Lincoln no little anxiety

and embarrassment, making it necessary for him, as early as September,

1862, to proclaim martial law and suspend the writ of _habeas corpus_

in respect to all persons in the United States who were found to be

actively disloyal, and engaged in efforts to aid the rebellion. The

following is a copy of his proclamation:--

GENERAL ORDERS NO. 141.

WAR DEPARTMENT,

ADJUTANT GENERAL'S OFFICE,

WASHINGTON, Sept. 25, 1862.

The following Proclamation by the President is published for

the information and government of the Army and all concerned:

_By the President of the United States of America._

A PROCLAMATION.

Whereas it has become necessary to call into service not only

volunteers but also portions of the militia of the States

by draft, in order to suppress the insurrection existing in

the United States, and disloyal persons are not adequately

restrained by the ordinary processes of law from hindering

this measure and from giving aid and comfort in various ways

to the insurrection: Now, therefore, be it ordered: First,

That during the existing insurrection, and as a necessary

measure for suppressing the same, all rebels and insurgents,

their aiders and abettors, within the United States, and all

persons discouraging volunteer enlistments, resisting militia

drafts, or guilty of any disloyal practice affording aid and

comfort to rebels against the authority of the United States

shall be subject to martial law, and liable to trial and

punishment by court-martial or military commission. Second,

That the writ of _habeas corpus_ is suspended in respect to

all persons arrested, or who are now, or hereafter during the

rebellion shall be, imprisoned in any fort, camp, arsenal,

military prison, or other place of confinement, by any military

authority, or by sentence of any court-martial or military

commission. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand, and

caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.

Done at the city of Washington, this twenty-fourth day of

September, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred

and sixty-two, and of the Independence of the United States the

eighty-seventh.

ABRAHAM LINCOLN.

"By the President,

"WILLIAM H. SEWARD, _Secretary of State_.

By order of the Secretary of War,

"L. THOMAS, _Adjutant General_."

"Official."

This disloyal element was rendered much more formidable by the fact

of its perfect combination, through secret, oath-bound organizations

under the names of Knights of the Golden Circle and Order of American

Knights. These secret orders no doubt had their origin in the South,

preparatory to secession and war; but after the war had been commenced

it was chiefly in the North that they were useful to the rebel cause,

and it was through these that the assassination of the President-elect

was to have been accomplished at Baltimore when on his way to the

Capital in 1861, and thus his inauguration as President was to have

been prevented. We thus see the desperate character of the political

leaders of the rebellion, who were ready to frustrate the expressed

will of the people by resorting to assassination. We need not think

strange that a rebellion which was ready to resort to such means in its

incipiency should finally expire under the weight of this infamy.

By these secret organizations, the enemies of the government, wherever

they might be, possessed the means of a secret recognition amongst

their members. And under whatever circumstances they might be placed,

the obligations of their oath afforded them confidence and security.

They constituted a brotherhood, and by their secret grips, signs,

passwords, etc., they had a guarantee of unity of sentiment and of

purpose, and of faithfulness to each other and to the obligations of

their oath.

These organizations were regarded as allies by the rebel government,

and were counted on as a valuable factor to secure the success of its

arms. This element in the North kept itself in constant communication

with the rebel government and the rebel armies, and thus, in a large

degree, filled the place of spies in giving information. To furnish

facilities for communication with its friends in the North, as also

for various other purposes in aid of the rebel cause, the Confederate

Government sent a number of its ablest civilians to Canada, at an

early period of the war, as its secret agents, who established their

headquarters at Montreal. This cabal consisted of the following

persons: Jacob Thompson, who had been Secretary of the Interior under

Buchanan's administration; Clement C. Clay, who had been a United

States Senator from Alabama; Beverly Tucker, who had been a Circuit

Judge in Virginia; George N. Sanders, William C. Cleary, Prof.

Holcomb, George Harper, and others. Of these, Thompson, Tucker, and

Clay seem to have held semi-official positions, and we will designate

them as Davis's Canada Cabinet. The others named, as also others

unnamed above, appear to have acted as aids, in a subordinate capacity,

in the execution of their plots. They all claimed to be acting as

agents of the Rebel Government upon their oaths on the trial for the

extradition of the St. Alban's raiders.

The proclamation of martial law and suspension of the writ of _habeas

corpus_ in September, 1862, had the effect of restraining the open,

active efforts of these secret disloyal organizations to cripple the

resources at Mr. Lincoln's command for suppressing the rebellion,

inasmuch as any such efforts were met by arrest, military trial, and

imprisonment; yet, inasmuch as they created a necessity for a military

police at all important points in the North, they felt that they were

still rendering valuable service to the rebellion by thus weakening

the force at the front; and whilst it was necessary to conduct their

operations with much more secrecy, their organizations were not

disbanded. They went on to effect a complete military organization,

thoroughly officered and drilled, and in many cases armed, holding

themselves ready to take the field in any emergency that might arise

that would justify so bold a measure. The Canada Cabinet watched over

these organizations with great interest, and directed their operations,

and by many schemes sought to bring about an emergency that would

enable them to bring this army, which they had hidden away in secrecy,

into the field of active operations for the success of their cause.

The officers of these secret military organizations were chosen from

the local political leaders in the different localities where they

existed, and kept themselves in communication with the Canada Cabinet,

and through this medium the Confederate Government was kept informed of

their strength, organization, plans, and purposes. So bold and active

did they become, in spite of the efforts of the military police for

their suppression, that the government finally found it necessary,

through its secret service department, to possess itself of a thorough

knowledge of these organizations, and in this way was enabled to

capture the arms and munitions of war which had been secured and were

hidden away in secrecy by them, and also to arrest the leading officers

of these organizations in several states. Whilst by these means these

treasonable combinations were seriously crippled, they were unchanged

in animus and still struggled to maintain their existence. They kept

themselves in communication with the Canada conspirators, and ready

to co-operate with them for the success of their schemes should the

conditions become sufficiently promising to justify them in declaring

themselves openly.

It was in the summer of 1864 that Jacob Thompson, according to the

testimony before the Commission, declared that he had his friends all

over the Northern States, who were willing to go to any length in order

to serve the cause of the South. Jefferson Davis's Canada Cabinet kept

up a constant correspondence with their chief, through secret agents

who travelled directly through the states, and even through the city of

Washington.

So potent was the aid of secret signs, grips, pass-words, etc., as a

means of recognition, and so universally were the members of these

secret orders diffused over the country, that they could go anywhere.

Should one agent find it necessary to stop his task for fear of

detection, another would take it up; and where men could not go, women

went, to carry communications. The Canada Cabinet was well supplied

with money by the government at Richmond, and in this department of the

service Jacob Thompson seems to have been Secretary of the Treasury.

He kept his deposits largely in the Ontario Bank of Montreal, and his

credits there arose from Southern bills of exchange on London. The

object of the writer in this introductory chapter has been to place

clearly before his readers the formidable character of the conspiracy,

which, with the President of the Confederacy at its head, and organized

by his Canada Cabinet, was intended to throw the loyal North into a

state of chaotic confusion and bring to the aid of their sinking cause

the disloyal element all over the North, by a series of assassinations

which would leave the nation without a civil and military head and

without any constitutional way of electing another President, and

at the same time would deprive the armies of the United States of a

lawful commander. This was the last card of the political leaders of

the rebellion, the last desperate resort to retrieve a cause that had

been manifestly lost in open warfare. It may seem like temerity in the

writer to make such a charge involving a total disregard of the laws of

civilized warfare, and such utter moral depravity on the part of these

conspirators, and to claim for their wicked project the approval of

Jefferson Davis, but the evidence in the possession of the government

and adduced before the Commission, it will be seen, fully justified

the government in making this charge. The persons brought before the

Commission, though in full sympathy in sentiment with their employers,

were merely the tools and hired assassins of the Canada Cabinet, acting

under the advice and sanction of their chief. I shall now proceed to

bring before my readers the denouement of their plot, and, from the

evidence given before the Commission, show that the origin, scope and

purpose of the conspiracy have been truly indicated above.

Assassination of Lincoln: a History of the Great Conspiracy Trial of the Conspirators by a Military Commission, and a Review of the Trial of John H. Surratt · 第 1 / 23 章