THE OUTBREAK OF WAR BETWEEN ENGLAND AND FRANCE (1293).

+Source.+--_Walter of Hemingburgh's Chronicle_, vol. ii., pp. 40 _et

seqq._ (English Historical Society Publications.)

In the year of our Lord 1293 a shameful quarrel arose between the

English seamen of the Cinque Ports and French seamen from Normandy, in

this wise. A certain ship from the Cinque Ports touched at a port in

Normandy and remained there several days; one day two sailors from this

vessel were going to draw pure water from a spring in the neighbourhood,

when they chanced to meet some Norman sailors, who so irritated them

that they had recourse to abuse and then to blows; finally weapons were

drawn, and one of them was killed; the other fled, and betook himself

with his companions to the ship, where he told what had happened and how

the Normans were hard in pursuit. They sailed out on to the high seas,

hoping there at least to escape, but the enemy followed so as to capture

them. Evading their pursuers with difficulty, they told the news to the

seamen in the Cinque Ports, and besought aid; nor did the rage of the

Normans abate; for they secured reinforcements, and sought out English

vessels on the seas. They happened on one occasion to fall in with six

English ships, which they attacked; two of them they destroyed, hanging

the men with dogs to the yard-arm, and thus sailed over the seas, making

no difference between a dog and an Englishman. When tidings of this

event were brought to the men of the Cinque Ports by those who had

escaped, they straightway gathered together, and, grimly resolving to

avenge the insult, sought out their enemies.

(A fierce naval engagement followed, in which the English were

victorious.)

When Philip, King of France, received the news of this battle, although

his brother Charles had been the cause of it, he sent to the King of

England messengers who vehemently demanded that reparation should be

made, that those responsible for the engagement should be given up for

punishment, and that a great sum of money should be paid as compensation

for loss to his merchants. To these demands our King prudently answered

that he would reply through his own agents; and, by their mouth, asked

the King of France, as his relative and lord, to appoint a day and

place, where they might both agree to be present, to deliberate on the

matter in a friendly fashion, and to do further whatever the state of

the case demanded. The King of France did not accept this proposal, but,

with the advice of his Barons, commanded the King of England, by writ,

to appear in his Court on a certain day to answer for the

above-mentioned damages. When the English King did not appear on the day

appointed, it was decided and ordained by the Court of the King of

France that he should be disseised of all his lands beyond the seas, and

should be summoned to appear on another day, under pain of forfeiture of

his whole continental possessions.

The King of England, fearing a disturbance--having been warned to that

effect by some of his friends--did not come in person, but sent his

brother, the lord Edmund, Earl of Leicester, on each occasion, with

letters empowering him to do whatever was required by justice. When the

latter appeared with a sufficient mandate on behalf of the King of

England, the French Barons did not receive him, but in the Royal Court

adjudged Gascony, and all the lands of the King of England, forfeited

for contempt. The lord Edmund himself, then, in hope of peace, carried

on divers negotiations with the King of France; so that it was commonly

said that our King would marry the sister of the King of France, and by

that means a settlement be arrived at. Meanwhile the Seneschal of the

King of England in Gascony refused to allow the officers of the King of

France to enter in to take possession of the Duchy, and a great dispute

took place; thereupon the King of France, summoning the lord Edmund to

his presence, asked him, as a friend and as the mediator on behalf of

peace, to allow him to possess himself of four or five cities

only--Bordeaux, Bayonne, Langon, and Marmande--and this in the hope of

peace, for he said he could not sign a treaty of peace unless his Barons

saw the sentence of their Court carried into effect; he promised, on his

honour as a King, that complete peace would follow if this request were

granted. Edmund, saying that he could not dare to take it upon himself

so to do, asked to be allowed to seek the opinion and consent of the

King of England himself. Edward, placing full reliance on his brother's

words, replied by letters patent to the effect that he was content with

and would abide by whatever his brother thought should be done regarding

the matter in his name. When these letters had been received and

reported to the King of France, the King promised in all good faith, and

by his word as a King, that he would restore everything in full peace

after a short time, according to his vow. Edmund, guilelessly trusting

him, and ensnared by the royal promise, did not demand security,

believing that the royal word must be of more value than any safeguard

whatever; and he wrote immediately to the Seneschal of Gascony, ordering

him to give seisin of the cities to the officers of the King of France.

Thereupon the French introduced into Gascony first a few men, then a

large number, by stealth, and finally a great army, openly. The lord

Edmund, being informed of this, and fearing rebellion, asked the King of

France to remember his promise and to forbid it; but the King replied:

"Wait a little, until the forty days have passed, when I shall restore

all." When that time was completed, the lord Edmund again brought the

matter before him, only to receive the immediate reply that a decision

of his Court and judgment by twelve peers could not be revoked without

their consent; then, changing his attitude to one of scorn, Philip

departed.

The lord Edmund ... secretly and in haste left the Court, and, coming to

England to his brother the King, recounted everything in order, not

without great anguish of mind, saying that he had been guilty of folly

and self-deception. But the King, although disturbed in mind by the

news, yet gently comforted his brother, and, hastily summoning his

nobles and John, King of Scotland, held a Parliament at London, in which

he narrated in their presence the whole course of events, and sought

their advice and assistance, saying that he himself intended, even had

he no greater following than one boy and one horse, to prosecute his

rights to the death, and to take vengeance on Philip for his insults;

but the magnates replied unanimously that they would follow him to life

or to death.... The King, thus secure of assistance from his own

subjects, sent two brethren of the Order of Friars Preachers with

letters of presentation to the King of France, to renounce his homage to

the said King.

The Growth of Parliament and the War with Scotland (1216-1307) · 第 99 / 120 题