In 1889, the Morehead Government had put on the Estimates £1,000,000 for
unspecified railways. This the Opposition, led by Sir Samuel Griffith,
strongly opposed. The sitting developed into a stonewall of 96 hours'
duration. The Government withdrew the item at 10 p.m. on a Saturday
night. Previous to its introduction, I had paired for the session with
an Opposition member, as I was anxious to return home to review my
business operations, and did not suspect any party measures.
At the opening of the 1890 session, I caught a very severe cold in
Brisbane, which developed into "La Grippe," and I was confined to my
room for seven weeks. During this time the Morehead Government
introduced a "Property Tax," which met with strong opposition from
McIlwraith--who was still in the Cabinet--and his supporters, of which I
was one. Morehead carried his proposals by two. He felt that this
majority did not justify his continuing in office, so he retired. The
coalition between Griffith and McIlwraith followed. Both knights offered
me a position in the Cabinet as Honorary Minister, but as I was to be
considered as a Central member, I declined the honour. The House
adjourned for two months. I decided to visit my electorate to inform my
constituents of the position, and at a meeting in Winton they endorsed
my action. I returned to Brisbane overland by coach, _via_ Barcaldine,
thence rail to Jericho, and by coach to Blackall, Tambo, Augathella and
Charleville, and on to Brisbane by rail. This route was in consequence
of the maritime strike, through which all steamers were laid up.
[Illustration: SIR SAMUEL WALKER GRIFFITH]
At the close of the 1890 session, I made a trip to Melbourne, and made
the acquaintance of a gentleman who persuaded me to join him in a trip
to New Zealand. We called at Hobart _en route_, and landed at the Bluff,
proceeding to Invercargill by rail. By this trip I renewed the
acquaintance of bygone years with many old friends from North
Queensland, who had become residents of New Zealand.
Before leaving the Dominion there were rumours of an intended strike of
shearers in Queensland. When I reached Sydney I found this had
eventuated, and as the House was in recess, I proposed visiting my
electorate, but was prevented doing so because of the heavy floods
stopping all traffic.
During the Parliamentary session of 1891, there were many stormy scenes
and debates in connection with the shearers' strike, which took place
throughout the pastoral districts of Queensland and New South Wales. The
causes for the strike and incidents are of public history. It is,
therefore, not necessary for me to do more than to mention it.
After the coalition was formed, Sir Thomas McIlwraith announced his
policy of a ten years' extension of the "Polynesian Act."
Sir Samuel Griffith, as Premier, foreshadowed this would be brought
forward in the session of 1892. I was returned as an opponent of black
labour, and thought it necessary to justify my support of the new
policy. To do so I obtained a letter of introduction to Mr. Neame, the
owner of Macknade, on the Herbert River. I had some practical experience
of what it was to work among cane, but did not give any hint of what
action I was going to take in the House. Eventually, I informed my
constituents of my change of views, and put myself in their hands. From
them I received a free hand to act on my own judgment. I voted for the
extension, and the House passed the bill.
1893 was the year of the great bank smash when so many institutions went
under, and eventually had to undergo reconstruction. In this difficult
time, Sir Hugh Nelson as Treasurer showed himself as an able and capable
financier. He received help and sympathy from the banks which weathered
the storm, but from none more than the General Manager of the
institution which held considerable Government moneys.
Retrenchment was the order of the day. Members salaries were reduced to
£150 per annum. Lively and acrimonious discussions continued during the
session, but Sir Hugh Nelson was firm in his resolutions to restore
confidence, and backed up by the majority of the members, he soon
allayed the panic.
A general election took place in this year, and I was again a candidate.
On arriving at Boulia, where I addressed a meeting, I learnt that Mr.
Wallace Nelson had been nominated by the Labour Party to oppose me, but
when I reached Winton after completion of the tour, I found that I had
been returned unopposed, Mr. Nelson's nomination paper being informal.
At the opening of the session I was twitted by Labour members of having
obtained the seat by an informality.
In those days I was not altogether a hardened politician, and felt
somewhat sensitive on the charge. I returned to Winton, called a meeting
to consider whether I should resign and contest another election, or
retain my position. The meeting, which was a large one and
representative, decided that I should retain the seat. I must say that
after taking this course, my opponents made but little allusion to the
way in which I had been elected, and then only in a joking, friendly
manner. The Government of which Sir Hugh Nelson was now Acting
Premier--McIlwraith having gone on a health tour--submitted its railway
proposals to a private meeting of its supporters. Very much to my
dissatisfaction I found that the Hughenden-Winton line was not
included.
I will explain here that during the previous session I was invited by
Sir Thomas McIlwraith to call at his office. He then explained to me
what was in his mind in regard to railways in the west. This was an
extension north-westerly from Charleville towards Barcaldine; from
Longreach and Hughenden to Winton; from Hughenden to Cloncurry; from
Winton to Boulia _via_ Llanrheidol; and from Winton in a north-westerly
direction towards Cloncurry and the Gulf, keeping to the higher country,
but as low down the rivers flowing into the latter as would be safe. The
mineral country which caused the present line to run in a south-westerly
direction from Cloncurry was then unknown.
The terminus on the Gulf was to be on its western side, if possible in
Queensland territory, but if necessary he might negotiate with South
Australia for a port in the Northern Territory, from which, if
advisable, that Colony might join up with Port Darwin. Such a scheme,
Sir Thomas said, would bring the three principal ports, Brisbane,
Rockhampton and Townsville, in touch with their western back country,
which would also have its choice of ports. Queensland would become
connected through its Gulf outlet with the Eastern countries; have a
more direct route to Europe, and be practically independent of Sydney
and Melbourne. He added that whether the scheme would eventuate or not,
it was his intention to have a line from Hughenden to Winton, so as to
bring the district within reach of its natural port--Townsville, instead
of being forced to Rockhampton. He presumed he could count on my
support, which I promised. I submitted the information as being strictly
confidential to Fraser, of Manuka, who, as chairman of my supporting
committee, would at his discretion disclose the matter to such as he
might consider reliable. When I saw Nelson after the meeting, he
disclaimed all knowledge of McIlwraith's promise as regards the Winton
line, and looking at a map from Townsville out, said the line would be
nothing but a "dog-leg business." I explained to him that, acting on
the information given by McIlwraith, and with his knowledge, I had told
my committee, who had built their hopes upon his promise, and informed
Nelson I felt so strongly on the point, that as I could not personally
oppose the Government policy on any other matters, I would resign my
seat. I explained the position to Fraser, who consulted my supporting
committee. It was decided that as the promise given to me by McIlwraith,
who was still Premier, as regards the Hughenden-Winton line was not
kept, and as they could not ask me to sit opposed to the Government,
they considered there was nothing for me but to retire from the House
altogether. I submitted the letter to Nelson, who then laughed, and said
he had gone into the whole question, and found that McIlwraith had
pledged himself. It appeared that Byrnes was in his confidence, and
"looking at it again," Nelson said, "it is a good policy in western
interests, but what a howl there will be in Rockhampton." Finally, when
the railway policy was made public, it was found that the first section
of a line towards Winton was proposed.
I do not think that any railway proposal received such a searching
criticism from its opponents. It was very amusing to see an immense map
of Queensland hung in the chamber, and one of the Central members with a
long pointer showing the boundaries of the several districts, and how
Rockhampton rights would be encroached upon. However, in spite of all,
the line eventually reached Winton, but that was the only part of
McIlwraith's scheme which became finalised, which I think is a matter to
be regretted.
In later years a scheme was adopted which put Sydney as near to the Gulf
Territory of Queensland as Brisbane, and which, if carried out, will
make the first-mentioned the Port of Western Queensland. The
construction of the lines under Denham's and Kidston's schemes, is,
however, making such slow progress that there is a hopeful probability
that they will never be completed.
The Parliamentary session of 1894 was, I think, the most exciting in
happenings and bitter in feelings than any I experienced during my time
in the House. This state of affairs arose out of the shearers' strike,
which existed in the Mitchell, Gregory and Flinders districts. So
serious was the position of affairs in those districts that the Ministry
felt it was absolutely necessary to introduce such exceptional
legislation as would give far-reaching powers to the Government and its
officers for the preservation of peace. Considerable damage had happened
to the property of pastoralists in those districts by fire. In one or
two places firearms were used.
When Nelson asked for the formal leave to introduce the bill, Mr.
Glassey, who was leader of the Labour Party, bitterly opposed the
request. The time and circumstances were very serious, but it was highly
amusing to see the expression of surprise which came over Nelson's face
as he questioned the sincerity of any man who opposed the introduction
of a Bill for the Preservation of Peace. The scope of the bill was
generally known to members, and the Opposition by Glassey at this stage,
and the surprise by Nelson were the usual Parliamentary camouflage.
During the passage of the bill through the Assembly, both in the House
and Committee, it was very difficult to control the members on either
side. There were many suspensions of members on the Labour side, who
were, of course, out to oppose the measure. The stormy passage of this
bill, which, when it became law, did Preserve Peace, may be read in
_Hansard_ of the time.
The Government in 1895 organised a Parliamentary tour of North
Queensland to enable many members to see for the first time that country
for which they assumed they were competent to legislate. The tour was
very successfully carried out, and those who were strangers to the
North, realised that they knew only a small corner of Queensland, which,
compared with what they were visiting, was of comparatively less value.
Amongst the 37 requests made to Mr. Tozer (who was Home Secretary) at
Cooktown, was one to erect a statue to Captain Cook. It was pointed out
a monument had been erected to him, but owing to low finances the scheme
was uncompleted. It was thought Captain Cook deserved a monument at
Cooktown; but Mr. Tozer, in reply, stated that he realised that Cooktown
deserved some recognition of the historical fact that Captain Cook's
only lengthy stay in Australia was in the locality, but, he explained,
"The position is this: down in Brisbane we have deputations of
unemployed asking us for bread; now I have come up here, and you have
asked me for a stone." This reply settled the question.
Returning to Townsville and Bowen, the party visited Cid Harbour, in
Whitsunday Passage. At this place there was a camp of timber-getters.
There were two families of women and children who had not tasted meat
since Christmas. It was now April. Two sheep were given from the ship,
and in return we borrowed their fishing net, with which we caught a
beautiful lot of parrot fish. Weighing anchor at mid-day, Captain South
took us through the Molle passage, where, sounding the whistle, one
could hear the echo reverberating amongst the islands for some minutes
afterwards. It is considered that although Cid Harbour has not the
extent of Sydney Harbour, it is quite its equal in beauty.
During the session, the plans and specifications of a line of railway
from Hughenden towards Winton were laid on the table of the House. This
gave rise to a bitter discussion dealing with interests of Rockhampton
and Townsville, which were in conflict. Those of the western country and
residents were not considered. Nelson consented to the request of Mr.
Archer, member for Rockhampton, for a select committee, to take evidence
as to the desirableness of constructing the line. The Central members on
the committee were Mr. Archer, chairman; Messrs. Murray and Callan,
MM.L.A. This committee was the first to take evidence on a railway
proposed in the Assembly, and formed a precedent afterwards availed of.
The committee sat for a week, and in the evidence adduced the majority
report to the House was in favour of the line.
The Central members, who sent in a minority report, stated that the
Winton district belonged to Rockhampton, and asserted that the settled
policy of the country was that the lines should be extended due west
from the coastal ports. They were apparently oblivious to the fact that
the coast line north from Brisbane trended in a north-westerly
direction, and owing to this trend Winton was 185 miles nearer
Townsville than Rockhampton. The Minister for Railways accepted the
majority report, proposed the building of this section, and then
followed an acrimonious debate, which resulted in an all-night sitting.
I acted as Whip during the night, and allowed my supporters to camp in
the Legislative Council Chambers, whence as they were required for a
division, I brought them in, to the amazement of our opponents, who
thought they had left and gone home.
The proposal was carried at 7.30 the following morning.