S. SINGLETON.

Greenwich.

_Ancient Tenure of Lands._--I should feel obliged to any of your readers

who would inform me as to the ancient tenure by which estates were held in

this country. For instance, a manor, including within its limits several

hamlets, is held by A, who grants by subinfeudation one of the said hamlets

to B; B dies, leaving a son and successor, who continues in possession of

the hamlet, and grants leases, &c., and thus for several generations. My

question is, did A, in granting to B, relinquish all interest in the

hamlet, or how much did he still retain, since in after years the hamlet is

found to have reverted to him, and no allusion is afterwards made to the

subinfeudatory lords who possessed it for some generations? It is presumed

that in early times lords of a manor were owners of the _lands_ of the

manor of which they were lords; at present an empty title is all that

remains. When did the practice of alienating lands by a piecemeal partition

and sale commence? and did a subinfeudatory lord possess the power of

alienation? In fact, what is the origin of the numerous small freeholds

into which our ancient manors are broken up?

Notes and Queries, Number 226, February 25, 1854 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 80 / 160 题