CHAPTER XX.

Dr. Haweis--Mr. Romaine driven from the Chapel of the

Broadway--Lord Dartmouth--Letters from Messrs. Romaine and

Conyers--Sinless Perfection--Letters from Messrs. Romaine

and Wesley--Erasmus, Bishop of Arcadia--Mr. Toplady--Letters

from Messrs. Fletcher and Berridge--Death of Lady Selina

Hastings--Colonel Hastings--Account of Lady Selina’s

Death--Letters from Lord Dartmouth--Mr. Venn--Mr. Fletcher--Mr.

Berridge--Oathall Chapel--Letters from Mr. Berridge--Mr. Venn’s

Complete Duty of Man--Letters from Messrs. Venn and Berridge.

Dr. Haweis was now preaching at the Lock, but the chapel in Broadway,

Westminster, becoming vacant by the death of Mr. Briant, the widow

proposed to let it to the Doctor, who applied to the Dean of

Westminster, then Bishop of Rochester, of which see the chapel was

a peculiar, for a licence. This modest application was ungraciously

refused. In vain did Dr. Haweis remonstrate; he had been oppressively

driven from Oxford, and had preached at the Lock Hospital. These were

his crimes, and an abuse of authority was thought justifiable, in order

to crush him. Happily these repeated insults moved him not one jot from

the line chalked out for him, nor did he cease to proclaim the glory of

that God and Saviour in whom he trusted.

Dr. Haweis withdrew from the contest, but Mr. Romaine, who had already

a licence to preach in the diocese of London, opened the chapel, and

preached with wonderful effect from that pulpit; but before one year

expired the Bishop’s mandate compelled him to desist, under fears of

the terrors of the spiritual court, and to leave the congregation he

had with care collected. These able men were thus denied a privilege

which the most ignorant curate in the kingdom might have enjoyed. And

why? Because they had dared to preach the Gospel, and had offended

thereby those in authority, who loved darkness rather than light.

Lord Dartmouth offered Mr. Romaine a living in the country, and Mr.

Whitefield invited him first, and Dr. Haweis afterwards, to settle at

the great church in Philadelphia; but both had reasons for maintaining

their stand, and rearing the cross on the mount of the Lord’s house.

Mr. Romaine especially felt himself bound, like Cocles, to keep the

pass against Porsenna and his forces; yea, and if the bridge fell, to

leap into the Tiber.

Mr. Romaine wished to assist Lady Huntingdon, and would have succeeded

Mr. Howel Davies at Brighton, but Mr. Madan being refused admission

to his pulpit, and Dr. Haweis being still without a licence, he could

not conveniently leave London. Mr. Downing, who had been with Mr.

Romaine in town, had departed at the very time when Mr. Davies left her

Ladyship at Brighton; and Mr. Tilney, like the Doctor, was without a

licence. To this effect he wrote to Lady Huntingdon, under date of the

5th of February, 1763, from Lambeth; we shall not repeat that part of

the letter of which we have just given the substance; but the following

interesting extract may be acceptable:--

“Our kind love and continual good wishes to Lady Huntingdon.

It would be a great blessing if the Head of the Church should

have more places open to sound his fame and praise in your

neighbourhood; and if he has such a gracious design, there

shall not be wanting heralds to proclaim his style and titles.

Get churches, and you won’t want ministers. For my part, I am

quite fixed, and every day more so, in my present work. I am

called to it, and commanded therein to abide with God. People

say to me, you might be more useful here--or, what a great deal

of good you might do there. Alas! they know me not. What can I

do? Just nothing, except it be marring and spoiling all that I

take in hand: and I do it so entirely, that I want to hide my

face for shame. I don’t know that I ever got up to open my mouth

in public, but my heart smites me; and I am distressed beyond

measure, both with the sorry stuff I utter, and also with the

wretched manner of doing it. Such a very fool surely was never

set up for a preacher. Yea, at times I am so broken down with

the utter abhorrence I have of mine own ministry, that I could

go and live in the country with my mother, and seal up my mouth.

But then my dear tender Master gives me a cordial, and tells me

’tis good for me to be kept thus low, and his own glory shall

not be hurt by it. The poorness of the minister shall not make

the Gospel of none effect, but out of the mouths of babes and

sucklings he will perfect praise. Upon which I begin again to

lisp out his praises as well as I can, but at the very best I

am ashamed. I have such a view of the person of Christ, and of

his offices, and graces, and salvation, that when I attempt to

speak of them I know the highest description cannot come up to

their true merit and dignity, they being altogether divine and

infinite: and then I am quite discouraged, till I recollect that

all the tongues in heaven can only show forth half his praise,

and therefore I hope he will forgive me my poor thoughts of him,

and poor discourses, and poor doings for him. I see I must live

upon him in all things, as my Saviour, and then I get well.”

The following is the letter of Dr. Conyers, dated Helmsley, February 8,

1763:--

“Madam--It is with the utmost satisfaction and with the most

sincere affection that I now sit down to write to your Ladyship.

’Tis true, I never had the happiness of seeing you, but in the

bowels of Jesus Christ do I love you; and it is with the most

longing desire that I look forward to that happy, happy time

when I trust to be with your Ladyship FOR EVER. O that

blessed God! that out of mere free grace has opened my poor

blind eyes in some measure to see his exceeding great love in

his dear Son. It constrains my heart to love him--it binds my

affections to him--and I trust the same grace that laid hold

upon me will help me to the end, and preserve me to his heavenly

kingdom. When I examine the condition into which sin had brought

me, when I look at, one by one, the wants of my soul--my

guilt, my filthiness, my weakness, my nakedness, and my utter

wretchedness--and then contemplate the graces of the Redeemer

as they are held out to me in the Scriptures of truth--when I

look at myself, and then at him, O what my heart feels! how I

admire! how I adore and love! Now I know, O thou great and holy

Lord God, that thou lovest me, seeing thou hast not withheld thy

Son, thine only Son, from me. If I judge aright, Madam, I am

pouring out my heart to one who is no stranger to the language

of Canaan. Your Ladyship is a sinner as well as I. I know you

feel it, and therefore will not be angry with me for saying so;

and I know that I am now talking with one who will not accuse

me of running out too far, as the world calls it, in the great

Redeemer’s praises, but who will join with me, nay, far, very

far outdo me in love and gratitude, in thankfulness and praise,

to that precious Lamb of God who loved us and gave himself

for us, that he might make us, miserable worms of the earth,

partakers of his own eternity. O thou adorable Lord Jesus!

what should we talk of, or think of, or write of, or glory in

else, but thy blessed self, who art altogether lovely? What can

I do--what can your Ladyship do--what can any one do without

him?--and what can they not do that have him? We are complete

in him--look by faith to him who hung upon the cross, and every

mouth of every enemy is stopped, every accusation is silenced;

there is peace without and peace within, and peace with God that

passeth understanding. Dear Lady, if we are so happy in his love

when we cannot see him, O what shall we be when we are made like

him, and shall see him as he is?

“I thank your Ladyship for your kind solicitude for my health.

God be praised, it is much better--I can preach again now; and

O may I no longer live than I preach and love Jesus Christ! Mr.

Bentley has been ill, but is much better; he sends his humblest

regards to your Ladyship. The work of God grows here. I beg your

Ladyship’s prayers that it may grow more and more; and for me,

that utterance may be given unto me, that I may be preserved

from evil spirits and evil men, and from my own exceedingly evil

heart.

“O Madam! you know not what need I stand in of your prayers--do

let me have the comfort of them--do pray that I may go with you

to the kingdom of the dear Lord Jesus. I am, your Ladyship’s

most obedient and affectionate servant in our common Lord,

“Helmsley, Feb. 8, 1763. “RICHARD CONYERS.”

With a laudable desire of enlarging the circle of his usefulness, and

with a hope that the air of the place might have a beneficial effect

on his health, Lady Huntingdon invited Dr. Conyers to Brighton; but

he modestly declined her invitation, observing that “the duties of

his parish, which was very extensive, demanded all his abilities, all

his zeal, and all his strength; and that he was fearful of venturing

where so many great and eloquent servants of Christ had so successfully

proclaimed his grace and salvation.”[172]

On the subject of these disputes concerning perfection, we append a

letter without date--rather a remarkable circumstance for the very

regular and generally accurate writer--but it is inscribed in the

handwriting of Lady Huntingdon--“Received at Brighthelmstone, March 21,

1763, S. H.,” which is the reason of its postponement to this place:--

“My Lady--For a considerable time I have had it upon my mind

to write a few lines to your Ladyship, although I cannot learn

that your Ladyship ever enquired whether I was living or dead.

By the mercy of God I am still alive, and following the work to

which he has called me, although without any help, even in the

most trying times, from those I might have expected it from.

Their voice seemed to be rather, ‘_Down with him--down with

him; even to the ground_.’ I mean (for I use no ceremony or

circumlocution) Mr. Madan, Mr. Haweis, Mr. Berridge, and (I am

sorry to say it) Mr. Whitefield. Only Mr. Romaine has shown a

truly sympathizing spirit, and acted the part of a brother. I

am the more surprised at this, because he owed me nothing, only

the love which we all owe one another. He was not my son in the

Gospel, neither do I know that he ever received any help through

me. So much the more welcome was his kindness now. The Lord

repay it sevenfold into his bosom.

“As to the prophecies of these poor wild men, George Bell and

half a dozen more, I am not a jot more accountable for them

than Mr. Whitefield is, having never countenanced them in any

degree, but opposed them from the moment I heard them; neither

have these extravagances any foundation in any doctrine which I

teach. The loving God with all our heart, soul, and strength,

and the loving all men as Christ loved us, is, and ever was, for

these thirty years, the sum of what I deliver, as pure religion

and undefiled.

“However, if I am bereaved of my children, I am bereaved! The

will of the Lord be done!

‘Poor and helpless as I am, Thou dost for my vileness care!

Thou hast called me by my name! Thou dost all my burdens bear,’

“Wishing your Ladyship a continual increase of all blessings, I

am, my Lady, your Ladyship’s servant for Christ’s sake,

“JOHN WESLEY.”

A letter from Mr. Romaine, dated Lambeth, March 26, 1763 (five days

after), appears, in some degree, at variance with that of Mr. Wesley.

It runs thus:--

“Madam--Thanks to your Ladyship for your kind remembrance of me

in your last. I rejoice in your joy, and am always glad to hear

of the prosperity of your family: for yours the dear people are,

and are as nearly related as your own children are. They are

also to me tied in the best bonds, and what is in my power shall

not be wanting for them. I do not despair of seeing them for a

few days before the summer.

“Enclosed is poor Mr. John’s (Wesley’s) letter. The contents

of it, as far as I am concerned, surprised me: for no one has

spoken more freely of what is now passing among the people

than myself. Indeed, I have not preached so much as others

whose names he mentions, nor could I. My subject is one, and

I dare not vary from it. The more I read and preach upon the

all-sufficiency of the adorable Jesus, the more I am determined

to know nothing but him, and him crucified. But whatever stands

in my way of exalting him I would tread upon it as the merest

dross and dung. A perfection out of Christ, call it grace, and

say it is grace from him, yet with me it is all rank pride and

damnable sin. Oh! Madam, we should be careful of his glory,

and not give it to another, least of all to ourselves. Depend

upon it, man cannot be laid too low, nor Christ set too high. I

would, therefore, always aim, as good brother Grimshaw expresses

it, to get the old gentleman down, and keep him down: and then

Christ reigns like himself, when he is ALL, and man is

nothing!

“I pity Mr. John from my heart. His societies are in great

confusion; and the point which brought them into the wilderness

of rant and madness is still insisted on as much as ever. I fear

the end of this delusion. As the late alarming Providence has

not had its proper effect, and _perfection_ is still the cry,

God will certainly give them up to some more dreadful thing. May

their eyes be opened before it be too late!

“I am glad we shall see you so soon. I rejoice for myself;

but I fear you will not stay long. Things are not here as at

Brighthelmstone. We have many precious souls, but we really

want LOVE. The _Foundry_, the _Tabernacle_, the _Lock_, the

_Meeting_, yea, _St. Dunstan’s_, has each its party, and

brotherly love is almost lost in our disputes. Thank God, I

am out of them. I wish them all well, and love them all; and

where we differ, there is exercise for my charity. But I condemn

none that will not subscribe to my creed. By the grace of God

I am what I am. My wife joins me in duty and affection to your

Ladyship, and we are your faithful servants in our most dear and

eternally precious Jesus,

“W. ROMAINE.”

Her Ladyship was recalled from London, after a very short visit, by the

melancholy intelligence of the serious illness of Lady Selina Hastings,

which obliged her to return to Brighton. The next remarkable incident

of her visit to town was the attempt of a person named Erasmus, a Greek

bishop, whose see was, according to the Patriarch of Constantinople,

Arcadia, in Crete, to introduce himself to her Ladyship. “There is

something singular in this man (writes her Ladyship), and it strikes

me that he is not altogether what he appears or pretends to be. Mr.

Romaine, Mr. Madan, and others, have strong doubts of the reality

of his office.” Mr. Wesley, however, was of another opinion, and

in opposition to the advice of his brother Charles, and against

the opinions of his best friends, obtained orders for some of his

lay-preachers from the Bishop of Arcadia. Mr. Jones and Mr. Staniforth

(the latter had been a soldier in Flanders) were so ordained, but found

their appointment so invidiously regarded that they never exercised

their functions. Others coveted the distinction, and obtained of the

foreign bishop the laying on of hands without Mr. Wesley’s knowledge,

for which contempt of his authority he excluded the so-ordained pastors

from his Connexion. Mr. Toplady, who had great doubts concerning the

authority of Erasmus, Bishop of Arcadia, wrote against his ordination

of ministers of the Church in England, and his objections were, with

Mr. Wesley’s privity, replied to by Mr. Thomas Olivers. Mr. Wesley was

accused of a breach of the oath of supremacy, by thus availing himself

of the powers of a foreign prelate; and he was further charged with

having pressed the bishop to consecrate him, Mr. Wesley himself, a

bishop, that he might have power to ordain whomsoever he would. The

former charge was denied by Mr. Olivers, and the latter justified, on

the ground that the inward call of Mr. Wesley and his followers being

manifest, they naturally desired the outward call also. This being

refused them by the English bishops, justified them, it was believed,

in seeking it wheresoever they pleased.

The Countess, on her return to Brighton, proceeded immediately to

Oathall, and there, on the 12th May, 1763, was visited with the

severest domestic calamity--the loss of her affectionate and amiable

daughter, Lady Selina Hastings, whose unwearied attentions, kindness,

and affection, had been long a source of comfort to the Countess,

amidst the many trials with which she was surrounded. A heavier

infliction could not have been laid upon her. Lady Selina had been ill

sixteen days, having been seized on the 26th of April. She was the

youngest of seven children, four sons and three daughters, and was born

Dec. 3, 1737. Her Ladyship was one of six Earls’ daughters who assisted

the Princess Augusta in supporting the train of Queen Charlotte, at

her coronation, on the 22nd Sept., 1761. She was to have been married,

with the consent of the Countess her mother, and her brother, Francis,

Earl of Huntingdon, to her relative, Colonel George Hastings, son of

Henry, Lord Hastings, as he was called by courtesy, on account of his

affinity to the then bachelor Earl. The Colonel was two years older

than Lady Selina, and had been educated at the expense of her father,

Theophilus,[173] with her brother Francis. He married (after the death

of Lady Selina) Sarah, daughter of Colonel Thomas Hodges, and died in

1802, leaving three sons, two of whom died unmarried, and the third was

Hans Francis, twelfth Earl of Huntingdon, and father of the present

Earl.

The following interesting account of the illness and death of Lady

Selina Hastings was drawn up by the good Countess herself, and it

affords an affecting evidence of her piety and resignation:--

“It pleased our dear God and only Saviour to take from me,

May 12, 1763, at three quarters after four in the morning, my

dearest, my altogether lovely child and daughter, Lady Selina

Hastings, the desire of my eyes and continual pleasure of my

heart. On the 26th of April she was taken ill of a fever, which

lasted obstinate till the 17th day from the time it began. On

her going to bed she said she should never rise from it more;

and from all she said to me through her illness, it was evident

that she continued satisfied she could not live. She said she

did not begin to think about death then, and that she had no

desire to live; ‘therefore, my dear mother, why not now? The

Lord can make me ready for himself in a moment, and if I live

longer I may not be _better prepared; I am a poor creature--I

can do nothing myself--I only hope you will be supported_.’

She often desired me to pray by her, and with great earnestness

accompanied me. And at one time she called me and said, ‘_My

dearest mother, come and lie down by me, and let my heart be

laid close to yours, and then I shall get rest_.’ She often

called on the Lord Jesus to have mercy on her, and complained of

her impatience, though no one ever heard a complaint pass her

lips, notwithstanding her sufferings were very great. I said

she was blessed with patience; she replied, ‘_Oh, no!_’

with some tears. During the last four days these sentences at

times fell from her:--‘_Jesus, teach me!--Jesus, wash me,

cleanse me, and purify me!_’ Lying quiet, she said, _two

angels were beckoning her, and she must go, but could not get up

the ladder_. Another time she said--‘_I am as happy as my

heart can desire to be_.’ The day before her death, I came

to her and asked if she knew me? She answered, ‘_My dearest

mother_.’ I then asked if her heart was happy? She replied,

‘_I now well understand you_;’ and raising her head from

the pillow, added, ‘_I am happy_, VERY, VERY

_happy_!’ and then put out her lips to kiss me. She gave

directions to her servant, Catherine Spooner, about the disposal

of some rings, observing that she mentioned it to her, lest it

should shock her dear mother to tell her. She often said, _to

be resigned to God’s will was all, and that she had no hope of

salvation but in the mercy of Jesus Christ alone_. Blessed

are the dead that die in the Lord.”

Mr. Romaine, in a letter to Mrs. Medhurst, of Kippax, the niece of Lady

Huntingdon, and one of his most intimate and attached friends, says--

“The Lord does not leave himself without a witness among us

poor sinners. He has been doing miracles of mercy for Lady

Huntingdon; and as she herself says, _in the midst of judgment

he remembered mercy_. You have heard, I suppose, of Lady

Selina’s illness. She had a violent fever for about seventeen

days, and the physicians did not apprehend she was in any great

danger, although she was near her end. On Thursday morning,

about four o’clock, the Lord took her to himself. O what a

stroke was that, say you, to Lady Huntingdon! No, indeed, it

was all mercy, all love, like the rest of Jesus’s gracious

dealings with his people. During her illness, Lady Huntingdon

had every day many promises given her of God’s kindness to her

daughter; all which she interpreted in a carnal sense, like

the Jews, and thought her daughter would recover, and do well

again. By this means she was wonderfully supported, and her

spirits were kept up to the last. And when the Lord let her see

things were otherwise intended than she thought, then he had

prepared for her a fresh fund of comfort; for such was Lady

Selina’s behaviour, and such her speeches, from the beginning

of her illness, that there is no doubt but she died happy in

the arms of Jesus. My dear friend, if I had time to tell you

all the particulars of her death, your soul would abundantly

rejoice, and all that is within you would bless the God of

your salvation. To him she committed herself, trusted him,

found him faithful, and declared, over and over again, that in

him she was happy. Her last words to her mother, when she took

her leave, were these:--Lady Huntingdon had said, ‘My dearest

child, how do you feel your heart? are you happy?’ Lady Selina

answered, lifting up her head from the pillow, which she had

not done for several days, ‘_I am happy, exceedingly happy in

Jesus_’--then she kissed Lady Huntingdon and presently went

home. Although my Lady bears this so well, yet she feels it. She

is but a woman, and though a gracious one, yet grace does not

destroy nature. She is a parent, and at present incapable of

writing.”

It was Lady Selina’s happiness to be born of a parent who considered a

religious education the highest accomplishment with which her daughter

could be graced, and the most valuable patrimony with which she could

be endowed. Her disposition was naturally amiable, and she studied to

repay maternal affection with an attachment that “grew with her growth,

and strengthened with her strength.” Her religion was the religion of

the heart, and consisted in an habitual intercourse with her God, from

which neither the attractions of youth and fortune, nor the dazzling

splendour of high life, could divert her. Her conduct demonstrated the

reality and energy of a divine principle, always alive and active in

its influence on her mind; and as her life was amiable and useful, so

its closing scenes were highly interesting. Possessing the _grace_

and living the _life_, she had the consolation of departing in the

full enjoyment of _faith_. From the commencement of her illness

to the closing scene she discovered great serenity and composure of

mind, arising from a firm reliance on the mediation, righteousness, and

atonement of the Redeemer--a sweet complacency in the consolations of

the Gospel, and the abounding display of divine mercy to the chief of

sinners, through the method of salvation.

To resign into the arms of death so affectionate and dutiful a daughter

was a severe trial to the Countess; but the consideration that it was

ordered by that Being who is too wise to be mistaken, and too good

to be unkind, silenced every opposing thought. “The choicest flowers

we collect from the garden of society, which yields us the richest

fragrance, too often fade in our bosom, drop their leaves, and moulder

in the dust.” The loss of such a child was very sensibly felt by her

afflicted mother; she best knew her worth, and most keenly deplored the

parting stroke. But through the whole of this suffering season, this

time of sorest anguish, she was enabled to look for help and strength

to the Rock of her salvation, to yield implicit submission to the will

of God, to be absolutely resigned to his disposal, and to repress every

murmuring thought. “It is the Lord, let him do what seemeth him good,”

was the prevailing sentiment of her humble, sorrowing, submissive soul.

This was a period much to be remembered by Lady Huntingdon, for the

many affecting testimonies of distress which appeared on every side. A

multitude of consolatory letters were addressed to her Ladyship on this

afflicting event, by friends who were united to her in that intimacy

of heart which is felt only by those who love the brethren for the

truth’s sake. Mr. Whitefield was in Scotland, and just on the eve of

embarking for America, at the time of Lady Selina’s illness and death.

In a letter to Mr. Keene he says, “I rejoice to hear that good Lady

Huntingdon is so supported;” and also to another correspondent--“Yours

to Lady Huntingdon is taken care of. I hear her daughter died well, and

that her Ladyship is comforted and resigned.”

The Earl of Dartmouth writes, under date of Blackheath, May 18, 1763--

“My dear Madam--Permit Lady Dartmouth and myself to sympathize

with you on the recent departure of the amiable and excellent

Lady Selina Hastings. Mr. Romaine was so good as to let me see

your Ladyship’s letter to him, announcing the solemn event,

and detailing the supports and divine consolations which she

enjoyed in her last moments. Little did we imagine, when we had

the pleasure of seeing her so lately in London, that she was so

near the confines of the eternal world. But we know not what

a day or a night may bring forth. Though nature must feel the

loss of such a darling object, now must your Ladyship’s grief

be mingled with joyful satisfaction and complacency that the

noble evidence she gave of the grace and hope of the Gospel, and

the loving-kindness and mercy of the Saviour, manifested in her

dying moments. Oh, my dear Madam, Lady Selina is now singing the

praises of redeeming love before the throne of God and of the

Lamb.

‘She is happy now, and we,

Soon her happiness shall see.’

“Lady Dartmouth feels most sensibly for your Ladyship on this

occasion, and has been deeply affected by the touching close of

your daughter’s earthly course. We are deeply indebted to your

Ladyship, more deeply than we can express. Our obligations are

of a nature never to be repaid by us; but you will be rewarded

openly before an assembled world, when we shall swell that

innumerable train of children which the Lord hath given to you.

There, Madam, we shall hope to meet you and join your beatified

child. God grant you grace to feel resigned and submissive under

this event. To his never-failing kindness and mercy we commend

you--living and dying may you be the Lord’s!

“With a grateful sense of your kindness, I remain, my dear

Madam, your very affectionate, humble servant,

“DARTMOUTH.”

Mr. Venn writes from Huddersfield, May 31, 1763, as follows:--

“Amongst the many in these parts who have a love for your

Ladyship’s name, and a tender sympathy with you, as a member

of Christ, I desire to assure your Ladyship I do not forget to

offer up many prayers, that your present very severe cross may

be sanctified, and the agonizing separation be made supportable,

by larger manifestations of the faithfulness and marvellous

loving-kindness of God our Saviour.

* * * * *

“I was exceedingly glad to hear from Mr. Romaine’s letter to

Mrs. Medhurst, that in the midst of so much grief there is so

much cause to bless God for the manifestation of his love to

your deceased daughter. How truly are we compared to the tender

short-lived flower. In the short time of only nine months, no

less than two of your Ladyship’s visitors at Knaresborough have

been gathered to their long home. Mr. Grimshaw is now before

the throne above, and that very amiable youth your Ladyship was

so kind as to take some notice of, Mr. Thomas Hudson, received

his dismission about two months since. His end, as his life,

was much to the glory of free grace. Very delightful were the

expressions of comfort that dropped from his lips.”[174]

Mr. Berridge writes from Everton, June 23, 1763:--

“My Lady--I received your letter from Brighthelmstone, and

hope you will soon learn to bless your Redeemer for snatching

away your daughter so speedily. Methinks I see great mercy in

the suddenness of her removal, and when your bowels have done

yearning for her you will see it too. O! what is she snatched

from? Why, truly, from the plague of an evil heart, a wicked

world, and a crafty devil--snatched from all such bitter grief

as now overwhelms you--snatched from everything that might

wound her ear, afflict her eye, or pain her heart. And what

is she snatched to? To a land of everlasting peace, where the

voice of the turtle is ever heard, where every inhabitant can

say, ‘I am no more sick!’--no more whim in the head, no more

plague in the heart; but all full of love and full of praise,

ever seeing with enraptured eyes, ever blessing with adoring

hearts, that dear Lamb who has washed them in his blood, and

has now made them kings and priests unto God for ever and ever.

Amen. O Madam! what would you have? Is it not better to sing in

heaven, ‘Worthy is the Lamb that was slain,’ &c., than crying at

Oathall, ‘O wretched woman that I am?’ Is it not better for her

to go before, than to stay after you, and then to be lamenting,

‘Ah, my mother!’ as you now lament, ‘Ah, my daughter?’ Is it not

better to have your Selina taken to heaven, than to have your

heart divided between Christ and Selina? If she was a silver

idol before, might she not have proved a golden one afterwards?

She is gone to pay a most blessed visit, and will see you again

by and by, never to part more. Had she crossed the sea and gone

to Ireland, you could have borne it; but now she is gone to

heaven ’tis almost intolerable. Wonderful strange love this!

Such behaviour in others would not surprise me, but I could

almost beat you for it; and I am sure Selina would beat you too,

if she was called back but one moment from heaven, to gratify

your fond desires. I cannot soothe you, and I must not flatter

you. I am glad the dear creature is gone to heaven before you.

Lament if you please; but glory, glory, glory, be to God, says

“JOHN BERRIDGE.”

Mr. Fletcher’s letter of condolence is dated Madely, September 10,

1763:--

“Blessed be God (he says) for giving us the unspeakable

satisfaction to see Lady Selina safely landed, and out of the

reach of vanity. This is mercy rejoicing over judgment of a

truth. This is an answer to the blood of Jesus and prayers. This

is an earnest of what the Lord will do for my Lady in his time.

“Come, my Lady, let us travel on, sticking close to our heavenly

Guide; let us keep a hold of the hem of his garment, by firmly

believing the arms of his wise providence and everlasting love

are underneath us; let us hasten to our friends in light; and

while we thus stand still, we shall see the salvation, the

_great_ salvation of our God. He that cometh will come, and

will not tarry--even so, Lord Jesus, come quickly, and let us

all be lost together in thy love and praise.”

Another passage from one of Mr. Berridge’s letters, a good specimen

of his epistolary style, cannot be otherwise than acceptable to the

reader. It is dated June 27, 1763:--

“My poor clay ever wants to teach God how to be a good potter;

and may not your Dresden have something in it that resembles my

Delf? You would not, like Uzziah, lay your hand on the ark of

God; but may you not be too solicitous about a driver of the

cart?--and a blinder hobgoblin than myself you need not desire.

Indeed, I am so dissatisfied with my own carting, that, if I

durst, I should throw the whip out of my hands. Every hour I

lose my way--every day forget what I learnt the day before;

neither instruction nor correction mends me. Yea, verily, though

I know myself to be a most stupid ass, yet at times I am a

most conceited one also. Though not fit to drive a dung-cart,

yet at some certain seasons I can fancy myself qualified to be

the King’s coachman. And nothing so much discovers to me the

sovereign hypocrisy of my heart as when any one is so cruelly

kind as to tell me that all the mean things I say of myself are

very true. Nay, if your Ladyship should send me word that you

really think me that hobgoblin which I seem to think myself, and

fully think myself to be, it might put me so much out of conceit

with you as to fancy that your Dresden was now no better than

my Delf. Oh! I am sick, mighty sick of this self. How can you

but rejoice for that happy creature who was delivered from this

self, almost as soon as she felt the curse of it?”

In another letter, dated July 3, Mr. Berridge says:--

“Oh heart! heart! what art thou? a mass of fooleries and

absurdities! the vainest, foolishest, craftiest, wickedest

thing in nature. And yet the Lord Jesus asks me for this heart,

woos me for it, died to win it. O wonderful love! adorable

condescension!

“Take it, Lord, and let it be

Ever closed to all but thee.”

Again, under date of July 9, 1763, he says:--

“Mrs. Bateman has sent me a mighty pretty letter to coax me into

Sussex, and withal acquaints me that your Ladyship has been

ill of a fever, but is now better. I was glad to hear of both.

Nothing expels undue grief of mind like bodily corrections.

Nothing makes the child leave crying like the rod; at least,

I find it so by experience. However, I durst not send such

consolation to many Christians, because they are not able to

see the truth or bear the weight of it. I found your heart was

sorely pained, and I pitied you, but durst not soothe you; for

soothing, though it eases grief for a moment, only makes Lady

Self grow more burdensome, and occasions more tears in the end.

A little whipping from your Father will dry up your tears much

sooner than a thousand pretty lullabies from your brethren. And

I now hope you will be well soon.”

When Lady Huntingdon removed from Brighton to Oathall, in the June

of this year (1763), she was engaged in making arrangements for the

services of her chapel, which had been suspended during the illness and

by the death of Lady Selina. Mr. Berridge could not leave Everton till

relieved by Mr. Madan or Dr. Haweis. Mr. Madan went first to Brighton,

and promised Mr. Berridge to visit Everton on Mr. Romaine’s return from

Yorkshire. The Tottenham congregation would not be deprived of the

services of Mr. Dyer,[175] depending on Mr. Green;[176] and neither the

hospital chaplains[177] nor the vicar of St. Dunstan’s[178] cared (we

quote Mr. Berridge) to peep into the Tottenham pulpit.

In the course of this summer, Mr. Venn, having come from Huddersfield

to London, to superintend the publication of his “Complete Duty of

Man,” proceeded thence to Brighton, on a visit to Lady Huntingdon. He

preached frequently in Brighton, but could not accompany her Ladyship

to Oathall. On the 27th of August, after his return to Huddersfield,

he wrote to acknowledge a letter from the Countess, and observes--“I

desire to be abased, and am filled with the deepest wonder at the

account you send me of the Lord’s prospering my poor attempts to preach

his name among your people. _My visit to your Ladyship was indeed a

great blessing to my own soul._” In the letter he alludes to a visit

which he paid to Ipswich, on his way homeward, to his brother, Dr.

Edward Venn, M.D., of St. John’s College, Cambridge, who settled as a

physician at Ipswich,[179] where, he tells us, his wife’s brother was

minister of the great church.

Mr. Romaine reached Everton on the 1st of August, and Mr. Berridge set

out for Oathall, whence, after a time, he proceeded to London, and

preached at the Tottenham Chapel, and returned to Everton before the

end of a month. In the meanwhile Mr. Madan had succeeded Mr. Romaine

at Everton, and afterwards, by Lady Huntingdon’s desire, extended his

excursion to Yorkshire. Mr. Romaine had by this time reached Brighton.

In Mr. Berridge’s letter to Lady Huntingdon, written after his return

home, and dated Everton, September 2nd, 1763, he says he heard Mr.

Edwards, of Leeds, at the Tabernacle, whom he describes as a sensible

man, who seems alive, but a wonderful admirer of method, and one who

has swallowed John Calvin whole at a mouthful. The congregation at

Tottenham-street, when Mr. Berridge preached, were, he says, “much

like the mien and garb of an undertaker--rather dismal than dolorous.”

He had been hurried from London, he says, by a letter from Mr. Hicks,

of Wrestlingworth, whose wife had died very suddenly. He tells Lady

Huntingdon that Mr. Reeves[180] and Mr. Prior had been elected

afternoon lecturers at Whitechapel--salary, 50_l._ a year; duty, a

sermon alternately on Sunday afternoons. Mr. Maxfield, he says, grows

violent, and Bell recovers his delusion apace, bidding fair for a

greater enthusiast than ever. He speaks highly of Mr. Richardson and

Mr. Tilney, and concludes his long but amusing letter by promising a

speedy return to the Tabernacle.

Lady Huntingdon continued at Brighton. Her friends, Mrs. Cartaret and

Mrs. Cavendish, were her inmates there in the middle of September,

about which period she received another letter from Mr. Berridge, dated

the Tabernacle House, but we do not think it necessary to make any

further extracts from this interesting correspondence.

The life and times of Selina, Countess of Huntingdon, Vol. 1 of 2 · 第 20 / 29 章