THE DUKE OF ACQUITAINE ORDERS THE PRISONERS TO BE LIBERATED.--THE DUKE

OF BURGUNDY LEAVES PARIS.--SEVERAL PRINCES ARRIVE THERE.--THEIR ACTIONS.

On the 4th day of September, the duke of Acquitaine, in consequence

of the king's commands, caused all the prisoners confined within the

palace to be set at liberty; and, shortly after, the whole of the

furniture of John de Troyes, then keeper of the palace, and who had

gone abroad for some private affairs, was carried out of the same, in

pursuance of the orders of the duke of Acquitaine, by those Parisians

who had usually accompanied him. His office of keeper of the palace

was taken away, and restored to him who had before holden it. In like

manner were several offices in Paris restored to their former holders,

namely, to Anthony des Essars, to the two dukes of Bar and of Bavaria;

the former being reinstated in his government of the Louvre, and the

other in that of the bastille.

When the prisoners had been set at liberty, the duke of Acquitaine

ordered all the bells of the churches to ring together, and two days

and nights were passed in the utmost joy and revelling throughout the

town, for the re-establishment of peace, which was a delightful sight.

The lord de Viefville and sir Charles de Lens, brother to the châtelain

de Lens, were arrested in the hôtel of the duke of Burgundy; but sir

Robinet de Mailly, for fear of being taken, fled,--and the lord de

Viefville, at the entreaty of the duke of Burgundy and his daughter,

the duchess of Acquitaine, obtained his liberty. Sir Charles was

confined in the prisons of the Châtelet,--and the other, who had fled,

was banished the realm.

The lord de Jacqueville, during his absence, was deprived of

his government of Paris; and, hearing of this while he was at

Montereau-faut-Yonne with some of his principal supporters among the

butchers, they all fled to Burgundy: at the same time, Jean Caboche,

master Jean de Troyes and his children, with many others of the

Parisians, hastened into Flanders. Master Eustace de Lactre, the new

chancellor of France, fled like the rest from Paris,--and in his place

was appointed master Arnold de Corbie, who had before been chancellor

of France, but, at his own request, on account of his age, had been

deprived of it, when the first president of the parliament of Paris was

nominated in his stead. Master John Jouemel, king's advocate, was made

chancellor of Acquitaine.

Very many knights, particularly those who had been appointed

commissioners to try the late prisoners, quitted Paris; and the duke

of Burgundy, observing the conduct of his son-in-law the duke of

Acquitaine, began to be apprehensive that he was not well pleased

with his former conduct, and that he would remember the outrages

which had been committed personally against him, as well in his

hôtel as elsewhere, as has been before related, and would have him

arrested. He daily saw the most faithful of his adherents quit Paris

privately, and without taking leave of him: some of them were even made

prisoners,--and he was told that there had been guards placed round his

hôtel of Artois, and that great numbers of those who had been enemies

to the duke of Acquitaine were now reconciled to him.

To prevent any dangerous consequences, and to avoid the perils that

might ensue, he prevailed on the king to hunt in the forest of

Ville-neuve. The lord de St George accompanied him,--and when he found

the opportunity favourable, he took leave of the king, saying, that

he had received such intelligence from Flanders as would force him to

return thither instantly, on account of the important business which he

would have to transact. On saying this, he set off, and passed the wood

of Bondis in much fear: he continued his road without stopping, and

attended by a small company, to St Maixence, where he lay that night.

On the morrow, very early, the lord de Ront came thither to meet him,

with two hundred men at arms, and thence escorted him in a few days to

Lille in Flanders.

When his departure was known, the Parisians and others attached to the

Orleans party began loudly to murmur against him, saying that he had

fled for fear of being arrested. Those of his party who had remained in

Paris were in great alarm; for daily some of them were imprisoned, and

summary justice done upon them. Even the two nephews of Jean Caboche

were executed, after having been for some time dragged through the

streets; and the host of the hôtel of the 'huis de fer,' named Jean de

Troyes, cousin-german to master Jean de Troyes, the surgeon, of whom

mention has been made, suffered in like manner.

In respect to the queen, the dukes of Acquitaine, Berry, Bar and

Bavaria, they were perfectly pleased and happy that the duke of

Burgundy had quitted Paris, as were many of the great lords: in short,

the whole town was now turned against him both in words and deeds.

It was not long before the dukes of Orleans and of Bourbon, the

counts d'Alençon, de Vertus, d'Eu, de Vaudemont and de Dammartin, the

archbishop of Sens, friar Jacques le Grand, and the borgne Foucault,

came in handsome array to Paris; and the dukes of Berry, Bar and

Bavaria, the bishop of Paris, with many nobles and citizens, went out

on horseback to meet them, and escorted them, with every sign of joy,

to the palace, where the king, the queen, and the duke of Acquitaine

were waiting to receive them.

Their reception by the royal family was very gracious, and they all

supped at the palace, after which they retired to their different

hôtels in the town. On the morrow, the lord Charles d'Albreth came to

Paris, when the office of constable was instantly restored to him.

On the 8th day of September following, the king, at the instance of

the aforesaid lords, held a grand council in the usual chamber of

parliament, and issued the following edict, which was proclaimed

throughout his realm.

'Charles, by the grace of God, king of France, to all to whom these

presents shall come, greeting.

'Whereas, during the discords and dissensions that took place between

several of our blood and kindred, many damnable falsehoods have been

reported to us; under pretext of which our council have been very much

constrained, and our city of Paris did not enjoy its usual freedom, and

ourself was not advised so loyally as we ought to have been for the

honour and general welfare of the public, as it has since appeared, for

several acts have been done that were partial and irregular. Others of

our subjects were under the greatest alarm (and this happened to some

of tried courage), for they saw that those were in danger of losing

every thing dear to them who should utter the truth. In fact, several

of our prelates, nobles, and members of our council were wrongfully

arrested, robbed of their wealth, and forced to pay ransoms for their

liberty, which caused many of our well wishers to absent themselves

from our council, and even to fly from Paris.

'Many letters patent were unjustly and damnably obtained in our name,

sealed with our seal, and sent to our sovereign father, the head of

Christian princes, at the holy college of Rome, and to other monarchs,

declaring that these letters were sent with our full knowledge and

approbation.

'We have lately been well informed from papers that have been

discovered, and laid before us in council, of a fact of which indeed we

had our suspicions, that envy and malice were the grounds on which our

uncle John de Berry, our nephews Charles of Orleans and his brothers,

John de Bourbon, John d'Alençon, Charles d'Albreth, our cousins, and

Bernard d'Armagnac, with their accomplices and supporters, were charged

with the wicked and treasonable design of depriving us and all our

descendants of our royal authority, and expelling us our kingdom, which

God forbid! and also with the design of making a new king of France,

which is an abominable thing to hear of, and must be painful even

in the recital to the hearts of all our loyal subjects. In regard,

therefore, to such charges, those who have made them are guilty of

iniquitously imposing upon us, and are culpable of enormous crimes as

well treasonable as otherwise.

'Very many defamatory libels have been written and affixed to the doors

of churches, as well as distributed to several persons, and published

in different places, to the great dishonour and contempt of some of

the highest of our blood, such as our very dear and well-beloved son,

our well-beloved nephews and cousins, the dukes of Orleans and of

Bourbon, the counts de Vertus, d'Alençon, d'Armagnac, and d'Albreth,

constable of France, and against other nobles and barons, our

wellwishers, consequently against ourself and our government.

'We, therefore, for these causes, do by these letters patent give

permission to our said uncle, nephews, cousins, and to their adherents,

to seize on and destroy the lands and property of all who may have been

guilty of the aforesaid acts, declaring them to have forfeited to us

both their bodies and estates.

'We the more readily consent to their being thus sorely oppressed,

because they, under pretence of an ancient bull which had been issued

against the free companies forty years ago, without any permission and

authority, did raise and assemble companies of men at arms against

us and against our realm. This bull could not any way refer, as the

simple inspection of it would show, to our said son, uncle, nephew,

or cousins, but was applied to them, through wicked counsel, without

any authority from our said sovereign father the pope, without any

deliberations holden on the subject,--nor was any suit instituted,

as was usual in such cases; but without any forms of proceeding that

should have been observed, or any preceding admonitions, they were

illegally, through force and partiality, condemned as excommunicated,

with all their adherents and friends,--which sentence was, in defiance

of truth, publicly proclaimed throughout our kingdom.

'They were likewise declared traitors and wicked persons, banished

our kingdom, and deprived of all their possessions and offices. On

this occasion, many injurious reports were industriously spread

abroad against them, and they were themselves treated with the utmost

inhumanity. Several of them were put to death without any attention

being paid to their souls, like to outlaws and beasts, without

administration of the sacraments of the holy church, and then thrown

into ditches, or exposed in the fields, like dogs, to be devoured by

the birds.

'Such acts are damnably wicked and cruel, more especially among

Christians and true Catholics, and have been done at the instigation

of seditious persons, disturbers of the peace, and illwishers to our

said uncle, nephews and cousins, by means of their abominable fictions

in order to gain their false and wicked purposes, as we have since been

more fully and truly informed.

'We therefore, desirous, as is reasonable, that such false accusations

as have been brought against those of our blood and their adherents,

should not remain in the state they are now in, to their great

disgrace, and earnestly wishing that the real truth should be

published, and reparation made for these illegal proceedings, make

known that we are fully persuaded, from the information we have

received, that our said uncle, son, nephews, cousins, prelates, barons,

nobles, and others their partisans, have ever had loyal intentions

toward our person, and have been good relatives and obedient subjects,

such as they ought to be in regard to us, and that all which has

been done has been treacherously, and wickedly, and surreptitiously

contrived against truth and reason, at the instances and importunities

of these aforesaid seditious disturbers of the peace, by whom all

letters and edicts, that any way tend to tarnish their honour, have

been procured under false pretences.

'We declare, by these presents, that such edicts and letters patent

have been wrongfully and surreptitiously issued, and are of no weight,

having been procured by those rebellious disturbers of the peace,

authors of the evils that have afflicted our city of Paris, and whom we

also declare guilty of high treason.

'Being desirous that the truth of these crimes should be made public,

and that all may be acquainted with the real facts, to prevent any

evil consequences that might ensue to us and to our realm, were they

to remain in ignorance, as may happen to any prince who has subjects

to govern, we therefore make known, and assert it for truth, that we

being at our usual residence in Paris, in company with our very dear

and well-beloved consort the queen, our very dear and well beloved

son the duke of Acquitaine, our uncle the duke of Berry, with several

others of our kindred, and such of our servants and councillors as

were accustomed to attend on us,--it happened that on the 27th day of

April last past, sir Elion de Jacqueville, Robinet de Mailly, Charles

de Recourt, called de Lens, knights, William Bareau, at that time a

secretary, a surgeon, named Jean de Troyes, and his children, Thomas

le Goys, and his children, Garnot de Saint Yon, butcher, Symon de

Coutelier, skinner of calf skins, Bau de Bordes, Andrieu Roussel,

Denisot de Chaumont, master Eustace de Lactre, master Pierre Canthon,

master Diusque François, master Nicolle de Saint Hilaire, master Jean

Bon, master Nicolle de Quesnoy, Jean Guerin, Jean Pimorin, Jacques

Laban, Guillaume Gente, Jean Parent, Jacques de Saint Laurent, Jacques

de Rouen, Martin de Neauville, Martin de Coulonniers, master Toussaints

Bangart, master Jean Rapiot, master Hugues de Verdun, master Laurens

Calot, Jean de Rouen, son to a tripe woman of Puys Nôtre Dame, Jean

Maillart, an old clothes-seller, with many others, their accomplices,

of divers ranks and conditions, (who had, before this time, held

frequent assemblies, and secret conspiracies in many places, both in

the day and night-time) appeared in a very large body armed, with

displayed standard, by way of hostility, before our said residence of

Saint Pol, without our having any knowledge of such their disorderly

intent.

'They proceeded thence to the hôtel of our son the duke of Acquitaine,

which they would forcibly enter, and broke open the gates of it

contrary to the will of our said son, his attendants and servants.

Having done this, they entered his apartment in opposition to his

expostulations and prohibitions; and when there, they seized by force

and violence our cousin-german the duke of Bar, the chancellor of our

said son, with many other nobles our chamberlains and counsellors to

our son, and carried them away whithersoever they pleased: some of them

they confined in close imprisonment, where they detained them so long

as they were able. These excesses raised the anger of our son in so

violent a degree that he was in danger of suffering a serious disorder

from it.

'The said seditious rebels, persisting in their wicked courses, came

to us in our hôtel of St Pol, when they proposed, or caused to be

proposed, whatever seemed good to them, positively declaring, however,

that they would have certain persons, whose names were written down in

a small roll, which they had with them, which persons were then in our

company.--Among the number were Louis duke of Bavaria, brother to our

consort the queen, and many other nobles, our knights, counsellors,

the master of our household, with numbers of our servants of different

ranks and conditions. These they arrested by force against our will,

and carried them to prison, or wherever else they pleased, as they had

done to the others.

'After this, they entered the apartments of the queen our consort, and

in her presence, and contrary to her will, they seized many ladies and

damsels, several of whom were of our kindred, and carried them away

to prison, as they had done to the others. This disloyal and indecent

conduct so greatly alarmed our dear consort the queen, that she was in

great danger of losing her life from the illness that ensued.

'After the imprisonment of these several persons of both sexes, the

insurgents proceeded against them, contrary to all law and justice, by

very severe tortures, and even put to death many of the nobility in the

prisons, afterward publishing that they had killed themselves. Their

bodies they hung on gibbets, or flung them into the Seine. Some they

beheaded privately while in prison. With regard to the ladies whom they

had arrested, they treated them most inhumanly; and although they were

urgently pressed to allow the laws to take their course, in regard to

these prisoners, and that the court of parliament, as was reasonable,

should take cognizance of them, they positively refused every request

of the sort, and had letters drawn up as seemed good to them, and

to which they had the great seal of our chancery set by force, and,

besides, constrained our son to sign all their acts with our seals

manual, as approving of their deeds.

'That they might have the chancellor the more under their command,

to seal whatever edicts they should please to have proclaimed, they

dismissed from that office our well-beloved Arnold de Corbie, who

had so long and so faithfully served us, and put in his place master

Eustace de Lactre, by whom letters were sealed and issued contrary to

all truth, but conformable to the acts of these wicked men. We were

deceived by them, from want of able counsellors, and from freedom of

speech not being permitted, as has before been noticed.

'All these letters, therefore, and edicts mandatory that have been

published to the dishonour of our said uncle, nephews, cousins, and

their friends and adherents, we holding a bed of justice in our court

of parliament, in the presence of many of our blood-royal, prelates,

churchmen, as well members of the university of Paris, our daughter,

as from elsewhere, several great barons, and other able persons of our

council, and many principal citizens of Paris, do now annul, condemn

and for ever annihilate. And we forbid all our subjects, under pain of

incurring our highest indignation, to act, by word or deed, any way

hereafter contrary to the strict tenour of this our will and pleasure.

Should any of these disgraceful acts be produced in courts of justice,

we forbid any faith to be placed in them, and order them to be torn and

destroyed wherever they may be found.

'In consequence whereof, we command our beloved and faithful

counsellors of our parliament, our provost of Paris, and all others

our bailiffs, seneschals, provosts and officers of justice, or their

lieutenants, each and all of them to cause this our present edict to

be publicly proclaimed by sound of trumpet in the usual places where

proclamations are made, that none may plead ignorance of this our will.

And we also command, that it be publicly read by all prelates and

clergymen, or such as have usually preached to the people, that in time

to come they may not again be seduced by similar evil machinations.

'We also order, that as full obedience be paid to all copies of these

presents, sealed with our seal, as to the original. In testimony of

which, we have set our seal to these presents. Given in our great

chamber of the parliament of Paris, at a bed of justice holden the 12th

day of September, in the year 1413.

'By the king, holding his bed of justice in his court of parliament.'

Countersigned, 'Baye.'--This ordinance was, consequently, proclaimed in

Amiens[22] on the 15th day of December following.

CHAP. XXIV.

THE DUKE OF BRITTANY COMES TO PARIS.--THE DUKE OF BURGUNDY HOLDS A

COUNCIL AT LILLE.--THE ACTIONS OF THE COUNT DE ST POL,--AND OTHER

MATTERS THAT HAPPENED AT THIS TIME.

At this period, John duke of Brittany, son in law to the king, came to

Paris, with his brother the count de Richemont. The duke d'Evreux[23]

and the earl of Rutland arrived there also from England, to treat of

the marriage of their king with Catherine daughter to the king of

France, and to prevent the alliance which the duke of Burgundy was

desirous of forming between the king of England and his daughter[24].

These ambassadors, having explained to the king of France and his

ministers the cause of their coming, returned to England.

The duke of Burgundy, during this time, was holding a grand council at

Lille, which was attended by deputies from Ghent, Bruges, Ypres, the

Quatre Mestiers, and by many nobles: among the latter was count Waleran

de St Pol, constable of France, who had just concluded the negotiation

with the English at Boulogne and Leulinghen. The envoys from England

were the earl of Warwick and the bishop of St Davids, and others, who

were commissioned to treat of a truce between the two kings, which was

agreed on to last until the feast of St John the Baptist next ensuing.

The count de St Pol, when on this business, received letters from

the king of France, ordering him to come to Paris and surrender the

constable's sword. Finding that it was intended to deprive him of this

office, he came to ask advice of the duke of Burgundy, who counselled

him not to obey these orders; and in consequence, he went to his castle

of St Pol en Ternois, where his lady resided, and thence to Amiens, and

there tarried four days.

From Amiens, he sent to Paris, as ambassadors to the king of France,

his nephew the count de Conversen and the vidame of Amiens, attended by

master Robert le Jeusne, advocate at Amiens, to harangue the king on

the subject of their embassy. On their arrival, the advocate opened

his harangue in full council before the king, the chancellor and the

other members of it, saying, that the constable, the count de St Pol,

his lord and master, had never been of any party which had disturbed

the realm; that he had never raised any troops, nor had attacked any of

the king's castles, as several others had done.

When he had finished his speech, he was required to produce those

who would vouch for what he had said, as had been done in similar

cases; but the ambassadors would not support him, and he was instantly

arrested and confined in the prisons of the Châtelet, where he remained

for two days; and it was with great difficulty that the duke of Bar,

brother in law to the count de St Pol, by his entreaties, obtained his

liberty.

On Saturday, the day after the feast of St Mor[26], the count de St Pol

left Amiens, and returned dispirited and melancholy to his own county.

Other royal edicts were now published at Paris and sent to all parts

of the kingdom for proclamation, complaining of the great disorders

that had been committed in the capital by the Parisians, to the great

displeasure of the queen and the duke of Acquitaine.--I shall not

particularise these edicts, for the atrocious acts of the Parisians

have been already sufficiently declared.

Soon after these proclamations, the duke of Orleans, conformably to the

articles of the peace, demanded of the king restitution of his castles

of Pierrefons and Coucy, which the count de St Pol had refused to

surrender to him. His request was granted, and orders were sent to sir

Gasselins du Bos, bailiff of Sens, to go thither and receive the homage

due to the king,--and thus they were restored to the duke of Orleans.

On the following Saturday, the count d'Armagnac, and Clugnet de

Brabant, knight, came to Paris with a numerous company of men at arms,

and were received by the king, lords and barons, with great joy. All,

or the greater part of those who had followed the faction of the duke

of Orleans, now came to Paris,--and the affairs of the nation were

governed according to their good pleasure, for the king and the duke

of Acquitaine were at this time under their management. With regard to

the Burgundy-faction, they were kept at a distance, and could scarcely

ever obtain an audience, how high soever their rank might be, insomuch

that such as had remained in the town were forced to hold down their

heads, and to hear many things that were neither pleasant nor agreeable

to them.

FOOTNOTES:

The Chronicles of Enguerrand de Monstrelet, Vol. 03 [of 13] · 第 10 / 16 段