A. W. FISK.

The present may be called “trying times” to bee-keepers of

America. Poor honey seasons, hard winters, and the nefarious

warfare against the honey producers of this country in the

vile adulteration of honey, is indeed trying, discouraging

and diabolical. It appears, by the papers, that these glucose

scoundrels are not satisfied with adulterating extracted

honey, but according to this article that I clip from one of

our papers, _The Bushnell Record_, they are manufacturing

comb honey. It reads as follows:

Many singular discoveries have been made among manufacturers

by the census enumerators in the course of their

investigations. For instance, it has long been known that

dealers are in the habit of adulterating honey with glucose

on the plea of thus improving its keeping qualities. In

Boston, however, there is a firm doing a large business

in making honey entirely from glucose much in the same

way as manufacturers elsewhere make butter from suine and

oleo-margarine. The comb is molded out of paraffine in

excellent imitation of the work of bees; then the cells are

filled with clear glucose and sealed by passing a hot iron

over them, and the product is sent to Europe as our best

honey. The busiest Italian bees couldn't compete with this

firm in turning out honey, any more than could a Eurotas-like

Jersey breed compete in butter-making with our deft

manipulators of lard and tallow.

Now, brother bee-men, I believe the time has arrived when

this honey counterfeiting should be stopped; I therefore

suggest that the bee-men of this country come up in solid

phalanx “to the front,” and with Pres. N. P. Allen and the

bee-paper editors as leaders, let us agitate the question,

educate the people, stir up the press, wake up the country,

and vote or petition to Congress until we secure the passage

of a law by Congress against the adulteration of honey,

sugar, syrup, or food of any kind. Many of the leading

journals of our land are battling for the right in this

matter. The _Burlington_ (Iowa) _Hawkeye_ last week expressed

itself as follows:

It is time that stringent legislative enactments are passed,

making the adulteration of so many articles of food a

criminal offense, punishable by severe penalties. If these

things must be done to gratify the inordinate greed of some

men, let it be made obligatory on them that the packages

containing spurious products so proclaim them, under penalty

of confiscation when detected, and the fraud further

punishable by heavy penalty. No man has any right to sell a

compound of honey and glucose as pure honey, nor has he any

right, either moral or legal, to place a compound of butter

and lard, still further “doctored” with drugs, upon the

market as pure butter. If adulterations of food are allowed

to go on in this way, unrebuked, there is not an article of

food known that will not be counterfeited, and oftentimes

with substances very hurtful in character.

I am thankful so many are lending their aid and influence in

the cause of justice and humanity, but we want the united

efforts of honest bee-keepers, and consumers, and fair

dealers, to make a bold front against every adulterator, and

to expose him to the world. In this way I believe the problem

can be solved and the evil remedied.

Bushnell, Ill.

[So far as it refers to the adulteration of comb honey, it

is a false alarm; all bosh! We alluded to this subject more

at length on page 44 of the BEE JOURNAL for Feb. 9th. We

are glad, however, to see the interest being awakened on

the subject of food adulterations, and bee-keepers as well

as all other honest producers, cannot be too out-spoken in

denouncing it.—ED.]

For the American Bee Journal.

The In-and-In Breeding of Bees.

The American Bee Journal. Volume XVII No. 11, March 1881 · 第 11 / 126 题