REV. W. BALLENTINE, A. M.

I see in the BEE JOURNAL, under the above caption, a question

from Mr. H. G. Colwell, of Columbus, Ohio, relative to the

effects of honey eaten by the Grecian troops, under Xenophon,

as they passed through Colchia in their famous retreat

homeward. In regard to this, you propose a query, “Why did

the ancient Colchian honey cause the above disorder?” I have

frequently had my attention turned to this subject in reading

Xenophon's Anabasis in the original, from which the extract

by Mr. Colwell is taken. From the best sources of information

at my command, the following seems to be the most rational.

The honey of Asia Minor in many localities appears to be

gathered from the flowers of the order Apocynoceæ, or

dog's-bane. Of this order, Prof. Wilson, in his botany,

page 588, observes: “These plants possess active, and often

suspicious qualities, residing in the white juice with which

the order is pervaded, and in the seeds, which are often

deadly poisons. The alkaloid _strychnine_, or _strychinea_,

one of the most violent poisons, is the active principle

of the Strychorea Nux-vomica, of India. It is sometimes

administered as a medicine, but with doubtful success; a

single seed of one species is sufficient to kill 20 persons.

The order is generally emetic.”

In corroboration of this, I will give you the opinion of the

celebrated Ainsworth, who traveled over the route of the

Grecians, and took notes of all the localities and incidents

recorded by Xenophon. He observes that “this fact of the

honey of Asia Minor being, in certain places, and at certain

seasons, of a poisonous nature, was known to all antiquity,

and is very common at the present day, so much so, that I

have known the peasants to inquire if we would prefer the

bitter or the sweet honey, for the honey so qualified has a

slight, but not unpleasant, bitterness, and is preferred by

many, from producing, when taken in moderate quantities, the

effect of slight intoxication. Pliny notices two kinds of

honey, one found at Heraclea, in Pontus, and another among

the Sanni or Mocrones. The first he supposed to be produced

by a plant called Ægolethron, or goatsbane; the second by a

species of rhododendron. Dioscorides, Diodorus, Siculus and

Aristotle, all notice the honey of Heraclea Pontica. The

celebrated botanist, Tournefort, ascertained on the spot,

that the honey of bees feeding on the Azalea Pontica, as

also on the Rhododendron Ponticum, possessed mischievous

properties; but as the bitter and intoxicating honey is

found in many parts of Asia Minor, where these plants do

not flower, it is extremely probable that these peculiar

properties are further derived from the flower of the Nerium

Oleander, or common rose-laurel, the leaves of which are

known to be acrid and poisonous. The natural family to which

the rose-laurel belongs (Apocynaceæ) is distinguished by

plants endued with dangerous and fatal properties, and these

act on the nerves so as to produce stupefaction. Rhodoraceæ

also possesses narcotic properties, but in a less marked

degree.”

It appears from this, that the honey gathered by the bees

from these poisonous plants, possessed some of the inherent

qualities of the plants themselves, and operated like a

narcotic or opiate on the nerves, producing stupefaction

and intoxication. If you see proper you can give the above

a place in the Weekly, with which I am, so far, very well

pleased.

Sago, Ohio.

For the American Bee Journal.

Combined Summer and Winter Stand.

The American Bee Journal. Volume XVII No. 11, March 1881 · 第 3 / 126 题