SAFEGUARDING OUR YOUTHS FROM PRISON

BY A PRISON GRADUATE

[Written for The Delinquent by a “Long-Termer.”]

One dull grey morning during the closing days of September, 1912, I

sat poring over the records of the ---- State Prison at a desk in the

administrative offices where I was employed, when the shrill voice

of a woman rang out on the street directly outside my barred window,

attracting the startled attention of the prison clerk, the doorkeeper

and myself. They rushed into the room past me and raised the sash. And

what a sight met our eyes! There, beneath the stone ledge, stood a poor

wild-eyed Slav woman, tying a stout rope from behind both wrists of her

son, a lad of about twelve years, punctuating each knot with cuffs on

his ears and wild gesticulations and admonitions in her native tongue

and in broken English.

“Now you go to school, huh?” the woman cried when she had tied the last

knot behind the lad’s back. But the little fellow seemed as unmoved

and dogged as she was excited and persistent. With another cuff behind

his ear she sent him sprawling along the sidewalk. But never a whimper

from the lad. The doorkeeper, accustomed as he is to the hardest of

characters that pass in and out the grey prison doors, and to pathetic

scenes on visiting days, melted at the sight.

“What are you doing to that boy?” he shouted at the woman from the

prison window. She turned quickly, and with eyes ablaze, retorted:

“Dot’s not you’ business!” and then gave her attention to the boy,

cuffing and pushing him on ahead of her. “You’ll get arrested, if you

don’t stop treating your boy that way!” the doorkeeper warned her. But

the woman kept on cuffing and pushing the little fellow while shouting

back over her shoulder as she moved away: “Dot’s not you’ business!”

The doorkeeper and clerk shook their heads, looked at each other and

left the office in silence. We were stunned by what we had seen, and

marvelled that such a thing could happen in the capital city of one

of our foremost states in this civilized century which boasts its

wonderful advancement in every branch of life.

“Is that mother right?” I asked myself. “Will her boy bend and become

a dutiful son and worthy citizen? Or will he mistake his mother’s good

intentions, administered so cruelly, run away from home and finally

land here in prison?”

From whatever side I viewed it, the situation was pathetic. The poor

mother, no doubt, had great hopes for her boy through giving him an

education which, perhaps, she and her laboring husband were denied.

But what boy, with his misdirected faculties ahunger for adventure and

mischief, can see things with the mature eyes of an ambitious parent?

Would that the Slav woman might have known how much of the rod (in this

case the rope) to administer and how much to spare in her boy’s case!

But what parent knows?

I kept thinking of that Slav mother dragging her child along the

street on the end of a rope; thinking of the stubbornness of a boy,

so tender in years, yet so indifferent to such barbarous treatment.

I thought also of how much good so self-willed a lad was capable if

properly guided; how much harm, if nourished by evil influences.

My mind travelled into the interior of the prison, whither so many

men and women have drifted and are still drifting, from just such a

start as that truant boy’s. Not that their parents had tried to put

their good intentions into execution so barbarously, but the fatal

misunderstanding between parent and child was there just the same. I

have seen men come in, serve their time, go out and then come back

again and again for similar offenses. And yet they were once good

innocent boys, born of good, industrious and well-meaning parents, who

had great hopes for their future careers. In the end Society suffered

from the repeated damage they had done, their parents grieved in

disappointment and sorrow, and the erring boys finally become social

outcasts and parasites, of no use to themselves nor to any one else.

Surely, thought I, there must be something radically wrong or stupid

with a world that permits so much damage and misery to go on unchecked.

I thought of the terrible destruction caused by floods in times past,

and of the wonderful good that came from those same bodies of water

when harnessed to machinery or when floating our great ships, laden

with all the necessaries of life, to all quarters of the globe. The

same is true with respect to the possibilities--good and bad--of all

mankind. The population of our prisons is simply the misguided flood

of Society’s stream, destroying everything that obstructs it, and

polluting itself as it courses along its aimless path. The officials

of penal institutions are doing their best to guide the wayward

and polluted stream into cleaner channels of usefulness; but penal

institutions are, at best, but weak dams, unable to cope with the

situation unless something be done to check the cause, or source, of

the flood. That crime is increasing, criminals becoming bolder, the

prison population becoming larger each year, and new and larger prisons

are being built, is ample proof of this contention. Pondering these

matters, vital to society, to fond and ambitious parents and to growing

children, my thoughts finally crystallized themselves into a plan that

should at least prevent many future youths from swelling Society’s

destructive and polluted stream of crime.

Experience has shown how the reputations of many good men and women

have been blasted in moments of temporary weakness when temptation

beset them. They may have gone through life up to that time with little

or no temptation, knowledge of the wickednesses of the world being

withheld from them by watchful parents. Many have gone on offending for

a long time before they are exposed; while others, tempted on all sides

from youth upwards to commit crime, resist the temptations repeatedly

by sheer force of character and will power. The tendency of youths

in general, however, is in the direction of mischief when curiosity

and temptation beckon; and from the knowledge that our faculties grow

strong in proportion to our exercise of them, we may conclude that

it is far wiser that children be taught to cultivate the power of

resistance to evil than that that knowledge of evil be withheld from

them. We know not how or when temptation may overcome us or those dear

to us; but we do know that in the lives of even the worst of those

that have fallen from grace, _there was a first fall_! And the crucial

time, therefore, to begin crime prevention is _before that first fall_,

during the time of youth.

From what has been said it might be urged that crime prevention should

begin in and be confined to the home. No one will deny that the home

is the most potent factor in preserving the peace and purity of any

community. We know if our youths will but follow the teachings of the

religions of their parents, they will not fall into the error and

follow lives of crime. But religion is not practiced in every home; and

all parents do not know how to influence or control the minds of their

children any more than did the poor Slav woman, when in desperation,

she dragged her boy to school on a rope. Again, many youths turn out

badly in spite of religious parents and good homes, because of vicious

associations abroad. For these reasons, then, I believe that the

problem of crime prevention must be solved in our schools and colleges,

leaving to parents the matter of selecting neighborhood companions of

their children and of selecting respectable neighborhoods in which to

bring them up.

Because the children of our public schools represent so many religious

denominations, it has been deemed politic to exclude religious

teachings therefrom; and the child, in consequence, is seriously

handicapped. There is a common ground, however, upon which all schools

and colleges, private, parochial and public may unite to make up

considerably for this handicap to the habit-forming youth. And that

is by establishing a system wherein teacher and pupil may co-operate

in mutual discussion of the various temptations that befall men and

women from time to time; what one should do under given circumstances;

the penalties of indulgence in evil; and the benefits of following

resistance.

The teachers should not confine themselves to lectures on the abstract

qualities of truth, honesty, purity, justice, etc., as these are

usually wasted when delivered to children. Let them take concrete

examples from the columns of our newspapers and impress upon the

pupils the moral lesson in each selected article, and thereby cause

the press to become a moral agency instead of a contaminator of weak

youthful minds. Let them discuss such matters as quarrelling, slander,

intoxication, fighting (as distinguished from manly defense), gambling,

smuggling, bribery, thefts from parent’s purses, from pantries, from

the family’s storekeepers, picking pockets on the streets, all sorts of

abuses and impurities, and the terrible consequences these lead up to.

There are innumerable examples to choose from in our daily life. The

teacher might formulate a series of real or imaginary situations and

catechise the pupils as to how they would act when confronted by them

in real life. These situations should be made dramatic enough to engage

the full attention of the children’s eyes, ears, minds and wills, so as

to leave lasting impressions upon them.

Parties of children could be formed to visit local jails and prisons,

where the teachers could hold up mirrors to them of young men, husbands

and fathers being torn from their loved ones and thrown into prison;

of the long hours of bitter anguish spent in solitary cells year

after year. Make this penal sacrifice of suffering mortals count for

something more than mere restraint and punishment of crime. Make it

the price paid in advance for the saving of youths in the future. The

pupils should be made to write essays on the subject of temptations met

and resisted, to discuss the traits of one another frankly, to commend

the good and discourage the vicious among their number; thus imbuing

the whole class with a feeling in common of protective fellowship.

It is the right of every child to be safeguarded in a way that it

may not, through ignorance or lack of proper guidance and warning,

be doomed to spend its life behind prison bars. It will surely be an

agreeable and noble task for our teachers to so safeguard the child. In

this way, it may fall to the lot of one of them to prevent that poor

Slav boy from ending his days with another rope about his neck. Who

knows?

The Delinquent (Vol. IV, No. 5), May, 1914 · 第 4 / 20 题