CHAPTER XV.

APPLICATION OF THE TWO TESTS, SAID, IN

DEUTERONOMY, TO HAVE BEEN GIVEN BY GOD, AS

DISCRIMINATING A TRUE PROPHET FROM A FALSE ONE,

TO THE CHARACTER AND ACTIONS OF JESUS.

In the 18th chapter of Deuteronomy God says,--“The Prophet

which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not

commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other

gods, even that Prophet shall die. And if thou say in thine heart,

how shall we know (or distinguish,) the word which the Lord hath

not spoken?” Here is the criterion. “When a Prophet speaketh in

the name of the Lord, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass; that

is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken. That Prophet hath

spoken presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him.”

Again, Deuteronomy 13, “If there arise among you a Prophet, or a

dreamer of dreams, and give you a sign or a wonder (i. e. a

miracle,) and the sign or wonder come to pass, whereof he spake

unto thee saying, let us go after other gods, which thou hast not

known, and let us serve them: thou shalt not hearken unto the

words of that Prophet, or that dreamer of dreams; for the Lord

your God proveth (or tryeth) you, to know whether ye love the

Lord your God with all you heart, and with all your soul.”

And now Christian reader, I ask you what you think of miracles, or

“signs and wonders,” as proof of a divine mission, to teach

doctrines novel and innovating, after such clear and unequivocal

language as this, from such high authority? I am sure, that if you

are a sincere lover of truth, you must certainly abandon that ground

as untenable. For, from these direc-tions, the Jews were

commanded these things#. 1. That the Prophet who presumes to

speak a word, as from God, which God hath not commanded him

to speak, must be put to death. 2. That the test, or criterion by

which they are to discern a false prophet from a true one, is this:

not his miracles, but the fulfillment of his words. If what he says

comes to pass, he is a true prophet; if the event foretold does not

take place, he has spoken presump-tuously, and must die the

death. 3. “If any man arise in Israel,” and advise, or teach them to

worship any other besides the Eternal; and in proof of the divinity

of his mission promise a sign, or a wonder, and in fact does bring

to pass the sign or wonder promised, he is nevertheless, not to be

hearkened to; but to be put to death. And these criteria given by

God, or Moses, as the means whereby they might know a true

Prophet from a false one, most exquisitely prove his wisdom and

foresight. For if he had not expressly excluded miracles, or “signs

and wonders,” from being proof of the divinity of doctrines, the

barriers which divided his religion from those of idolaters, must

have been broken down; since, as we have seen, well attested

miracles (meaning always by miracles, “signs and wonders,”

brought to pass by human agency,) are related to have been

performed in proof of the divinity of every religion under Heaven.

But veritable prophecy is, and can he a proof proper only to a true

Revelation, because none can know what is to come but God, and

those sent by him. Accordingly, we find that the Jewish Prophets

were not acknowledged as such, but on account of their foretelling

the truth, or being supposed to do so.

Thus, it is said, 1 Samuel iii. 20, “And all Israel, from Dan even

to Beersheba, knew, that Samuel was established to be a Prophet

of the Lord.” Why? Because he performed miracles? No! he

performed none. But he was known as a Prophet because “the

Lord was with him, and let none of his words fall to the ground,” i.

e. fail of their accomplishment. The same, may be said of all the

Hebrew Prophets, from Nathan to Malachi. For though Elijah and

Elisha performed miracles, yet it was not in proof of their mission,

for that was established before; but these miracles were occasional

acts of beneficence, or protection, but were never considered, or

offered by them as proofs of their being sent from God.

These things being by this time, it is hoped, made plain and

evident, let us now test the character of Jesus as a true Prophet, by

the criteria, by Christians, and by the Jews, believed to be given by

God. If his prophecies were fulfilled, and if he taught the worship

of no other being besides the Eternal, he was, according to the Old

Testament, a true Prophet. But if any of his prophecies were not

fulfilled, or, if he taught the worship of any other Being besides the

Eternal, he was not a true Prophet.

And here it must be recollected, that those prophecies of Jesus

only, can be brought forward in this question, which were

committed to writing, before the event foretold came to pass; and

therefore all Jesus’ prophecies concerning the manner and

circumstances of his death, &c., must be set aside, as all those

events are allowed to have taken place before any of the Gospels

were written; and of course it is not certain that Jesus did actually

foretell them. This is acknowledged by Christians; and accordingly

they confine themselves to bringing forward as conclusive

evidence in their favour, his Prophecy of the Destruction of

Jerusalem, and the events following. Here it is. Luke xxi. 21.

“When ye shall see Jerusalem com-passed with armies, then

know, that the desolation thereof is nigh. Then let them which are

in Judea flee to the mountains, and let them which are in the midst

of it, depart out, and let not them which are in the counter, enter

thereinto. For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which

are written may be fulfilled. But woe unto them that are with child,

and to them which give suck in those days. For there shall be great

distress in the land, and wrath upon this people. And they shall fall

by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all

nations, and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until

the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. And there shall be signs in

the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars, and upon the earth

distress of nations with perplexity, the sea and waves roaring,

man’s hearts failing them for fear, and for looking after those

things which are coming on the earth: for the powers of the

heavens shall be shaken. And then, shall they see the Son of Man

coming in a cloud, with power, and great glory. And when these

things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads;

for your redemption draweth nigh. And he spake to them a parable,

Behold the fig tree and all the trees. When they now shoot forth, ye

see, and know of your own selves, that summer is now nigh at

hand. So likewise ye, when ye see these things come to pass, know

ye that the kingdom of God is nigh at hand. Verily I say unto you,

this generation shall not pass away till all be fulfilled. Heaven and

earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.”

Such is the prophecy, and on it I would remark, first, that what

Jesus here foretells concerning Jerusalem did in fact come to pass.

But that was not a fulfillment of his prophecy, but of Daniel’s, who

did, as is set down in the 7th chapter of this work, expressly

foretell the utter destruction of the city and the temple. And it was

from Daniel that Jesus obtained his know-ledge of the approach of

that event. For he expressly cites Daniel, Matthew xxiv. 15; Mark

xiii. 14; and you will please to observe reader, that he refers to him

in this quotation from Luke, in the words, “these be the days of

vengeance that all things which are written, may be fulfilled. So

that in foretelling the destruction of Jerusalem he did no more than

any Jew of that age, who attentively read their Scriptures, could

have done, and. been no prophet either.

2. It would have been better for his reputation as a Prophet, if he

had stopped short where Daniel stopped. For what he goes on to

foretell has not been fulfilled. For he proceeds to say, that “there

shall be signs in the sun, and the moon, and the stars,” &c. All this

is taken from the 2nd chapter of Joel, who says that such things

shall take place; not, however, at the destruction of Jerusalem, but

in “the latter days,” at the time of the restoration of Israel. So that

here Jesus has been rather unlucky. For, in truth, there were no

signs in the sun, and the moon, and the stars, at that time; neither

was there upon earth any “great distress of nations,” except in

Judea. Nor were “the powers of heaven” shaken. Certainly, they

did not see Jesus “coming in the clouds of heaven, with power,

and great glory;” and most assuredly, that generation did pass

away, and many others since, and “all these things” have not been

fulfilled.

I know very well, and have very often smiled over the contrivances

by which learned Christians have endeavoured to save the credit of

this prophecy. They say that--it is a figurative prophecy relating

entirely to the destruction of Jerusalem, which did in fact take

place in that generation; that the expressions about the “distress of

nations,” and “the sea and waves roaring,” the “signs in heaven,”

&c., are merely poetical; and that the shaking of the powers of

heaven was merely the shaking and pulling-down the stones of the

temple, figuratively called heaven; and that the glorious coming of

Jesus “in the clouds of heaven, with power, and great glory,”

meant merely, that he sent Titus, and the Romans to destroy,

Jerusalem, or perhaps might have been an invisible spectator

himself.

The reader will easily see, that all this is nonsense. And the

Commentator Grotius, after meddling a great while in this

troublesome business, at length ventures to insinuate, that God

might have suffered Jesus to be in a mistake about the time of his

second coming, and to tell the Apostles what he did, for the sake of

keeping up their spirits!

But to annihilate the figurative hypothesis of these well-meaning

Commentators at once, it will be only necessary to bring forward

the testimony following. 1. The other Evangelists make an express

distinction between the destruction of Jerusalem and the coming of

Jesus; and not only so, but represent him as saying, that after that

event, (i. e., the destruction of Jerusalem, “in those days,” i. e., in

the same era in which that event took place,) “the son of man shall

come,” &c. Witness for me, Mark, chapter xiii. 24:--“But in those

days, after that tribulation, (i. e., the destruction of Jerusalem)

shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light,

and the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven

shall be shaken. And then shall they see the son of man coming in

the clouds, with power and glory; and-then shall he send his

angels, and shall gather his elect from the four winds, from the

uttermost part of the earth, to the uttermost part of heaven Verily, I

say unto you, that this generation shall not pass, till all these things

be accomplished.” This is decisive, and cannot be evaded.

2. The Apostles and Primitive Christians believed that Jesus would

come in that generation, as is evident from many passages of the

New Testament. Paul’s Epistles to the Thessalonians prove this,

and contain an argument to them, intended to allay their terrors, or

their impatience. John says in his first Epistle, chapter ii. 18,

“Little children, it is the last hour; and as ye have heard that

Antichrist should come, even now (or already) there are many

Antichrists, whereby know that it is the last hour.” Many passages

of similar import might be brought forward. The meaning of it is

this--It appears from Paul’s 2nd Epistle to the Thessalonians, that

just before the second coming of Jesus, there was a personage to

appear who was to be called Antichrist, i. e., an enemy to the

Messiah. (This notion they got from the interpretation given by the

angel of the vision of the “little horn” in Daniel.) John, therefore,

seeing many Antichrists, i. e., opposers of the pretensions of Jesus,

considered the sign, and thus knew that it was ‘‘the last hour,” and

that his master was soon to appear.

It appears from the 2nd Epistle of Peter, chapter iii., that there

were many in his days who scoffed at his master, saying,

contemptuously, “where is the promise of his coming?” And Peter

replies by telling them that their contempt is misplaced, for that

“one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand

years as one day.” John, in the 1st chapter of Revelations, says,

concerning the coming of Jesus, “Behold he cometh with clouds,

and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him, and

all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him.” And in the last

chapter of Revelations he represents Jesus, as saying, “Surely I

come quickly”!

In short, the Apostles, when they wanted to encourage their

desponding proselytes, they usually did it with such words as

these,--”Be anxious for nothing, the Lord is at hand.”--”Behold!

the Judge standeth before the day.”--“Be patient, therefore,

brethren, (says James) for the coming of the Lord cometh nigh.”

And this persuasion did not end, as might be expected, with that

century; for we find that the heathens frequently laughed at the

expec-tations of the Primitive Christians, who, till the fourth

century, never gave up the expectation of the impending advent of

their master. Nay, so rooted was the idea in their minds, that,

understanding the words of Jesus concerning John, “if I will that

he tarry till I come, what is that to thee,” to mean that that disciple

should not die, but survive till the glorious appearance of his lord,

so far were they from being convinced of the vanity of their

expectations by that Apostle’s actual decease, that they insisted,

that, though he was buried, he was not dead, but only slept, and

that the earth over his body rose and fell with the action of his

breathing!!

It is now hardly necessary to add, that Jesus did not at all answer

the character of a true prophet, when tested by the criterion laid

down in Deuteronomy for ascertaining the truth of the claims of a

prophet to a divine mission.

Let us now see, whether he taught the worship of other beings

beside the Eternal, for if he did, the other test laid down in

Deuteronomy will also decide against him. Now, did he not

command the worship of himself in these words, “All men should

honour the Son, even as they honour the Father?” This, certainly,

commands to render to Jesus the same homage which is rendered

to God. I might prove that his disciples did worship him, by

referring to many passages in the New Testament, especially in the

Revelations, in the latter part of which, Jesus is represented as

saying, “I am the Alpha, and the Omega, the beginning, and the

end, the first, and, the last,” terms applied to the Eternal in Isaiah,

where God says, (as if in express opposition to such doctrine) that

“there is no God with him: He knows not any; there was none

before him, neither shall there be any after him.” I could also

adduce many passages relating to the Eternal of Hosts, quoted

from the Old Testament, and applied in the New to Jesus. Witness

“the following:--John xii. 41, alludes to Isaiah vi. 5; Revelations

i. 8,.11, 17, and ii. 8, to Isaiah xli. 4, xliii. 11, and xliv. 6; John

xxi. 16, 17, and Revelations ii. 23, to 1st Kings viii. 39; John vii.

9, Jeremiah xi. 20, and xvii. 20, Revelations xx. 12,. to Isaiah xl.

10; and, to crown all, Jesus, in Revelations i. 13, 14,15, 16, 17, is

described in almost the same words as is the Supreme God; “the

Ancient of Days” in Daniel, 7th chapter; and were there not other

proofs in abundance to this purpose, this resemblance alone would

decide me.

I now leave it to the cool judgment of the reader, whether Jesus

prophecied truly, or did, or did not, teach the duty of paying

religious homage to other beings besides God? and, if so, it is

consequent, according to the tests by Christians acknowledged to

be given by God himself in Deuteronomy, that if Jesus was not

sent by, or from, him; for if he was--God’s own words would be

contradicted by God’s own deeds.

The Grounds of Christianity Examined by Comparing The New Testament with the Old · 第 15 / 19 章