2. CONVERGENT RELIGIOUS MOVEMENTS

In quite a little while the whole world may be alive with this renascent

faith.

For emancipation from the Trinitarian formularies and from a belief in

an infinite God means not merely a great revivification of minds trained

under the decadence of orthodox Christianity, minds which have hitherto

been hopelessly embarrassed by the choice between pseudo-Christian

religion or denial, but also it opens the way towards the completest

understanding and sympathy and participation with the kindred movements

for release and for an intensification of the religious life, that are

going on outside the sphere of the Christian tradition and influence

altogether. Allusion has already been made to the sympathetic devotional

poetry of Rabindranath Tagore; he stands for a movement in Brahminism

parallel with and assimilable to the worship of the true God of mankind.

It is too often supposed that the religious tendency of the East is

entirely towards other-worldness, to a treatment of this life as an evil

entanglement and of death as a release and a blessing. It is too easily

assumed that Eastern teaching is wholly concerned with renunciation, not

merely of self but of being, with the escape from all effort of any sort

into an exalted vacuity. This is indeed neither the spirit of China nor

of Islam nor of the every-day life of any people in the world. It is not

the spirit of the Sikh nor of these newer developments of Hindu thought.

It has never been the spirit of Japan. To-day less than ever does Asia

seem disposed to give up life and the effort of life. Just as readily as

Europeans, do the Asiatics reach out their arms to that fuller life we

can live, that greater intensity of existence, to which we can attain

by escaping from ourselves. All mankind is seeking God. There is not

a nation nor a city in the globe where men are not being urged at this

moment by the spirit of God in them towards the discovery of God. This

is not an age of despair but an age of hope in Asia as in all the world

besides.

Islam is undergoing a process of revision closely parallel to that

which ransacks Christianity. Tradition and mediaeval doctrines are being

thrust aside in a similar way. There is much probing into the spirit and

intention of the Founder. The time is almost ripe for a heart-searching

Dialogue of the Dead, “How we settled our religions for ever and ever,”

between, let us say, Eusebius of Caesarea and one of Nizam-al-Mulk’s

tame theologians. They would be drawn together by the same tribulations;

they would be in the closest sympathy against the temerity of the

moderns; they would have a common courtliness. The Quran is but little

read by Europeans; it is ignorantly supposed to contain many things that

it does not contain; there is much confusion in people’s minds between

its text and the ancient Semitic traditions and usages retained by its

followers; in places it may seem formless and barbaric; but what it has

chiefly to tell of is the leadership of one individualised militant God

who claims the rule of the whole world, who favours neither rank nor

race, who would lead men to righteousness. It is much more free from

sacramentalism, from vestiges of the ancient blood sacrifice, and its

associated sacerdotalism, than Christianity. The religion that

will presently sway mankind can be reached more easily from that

starting-point than from the confused mysteries of Trinitarian theology.

Islam was never saddled with a creed. With the very name “Islam”

(submission to God) there is no quarrel for those who hold the new

faith. . . .

All the world over there is this stirring in the dry bones of the old

beliefs. There is scarcely a religion that has not its Bahaism, its

Modernists, its Brahmo Somaj, its “religion without theology,” its

attempts to escape from old forms and hampering associations to that

living and world-wide spiritual reality upon which the human mind almost

instinctively insists. . . .

It is the same God we all seek; he becomes more and more plainly the

same God.

So that all this religious stir, which seems so multifold and incidental

and disconnected and confused and entirely ineffective to-day, may

be and most probably will be, in quite a few years a great flood

of religious unanimity pouring over and changing all human affairs,

sweeping away the old priesthoods and tabernacles and symbols and

shrines, the last crumb of the Orphic victim and the last rag of the

Serapeum, and turning all men about into one direction, as the ships and

houseboats swing round together in some great river with the uprush of

the tide. . . .

God, the Invisible King · 第 71 / 77 题