LETTER XXXI.

Geneva.

In obedience to your request, I shall give you my opinion freely with

regard to Lord ——’s scheme of sending his two sons to be educated at

Geneva.

The eldest, if I remember right, is not more than nine years of age; and

they have advanced no farther in their education than being able to read

English tolerably well. His Lordship’s idea is, that when they shall have

acquired a perfect knowledge of the French language, they may be taught

Latin through the medium of that language, and pursue any other study

that may be thought proper.

I have attended to his Lordship’s objections against the public schools

in England, and after due consideration, and weighing every circumstance,

I remain of opinion, that no country but Great Britain is proper for

the education of a British subject, who proposes to pass his life in

his own country. The most important point, in my mind, to be secured in

the education of a young man of rank of our country, is to make him an

Englishman; and this can be done nowhere so effectually as in England.

He will there acquire those sentiments, that particular taste and turn of

mind, which will make him prefer the government, and relish the manners,

the diversions, and general way of living, which prevail in England.

He will there acquire that character, which distinguishes Englishmen

from the natives of all the other countries of Europe, and which once

attained, however it may be afterwards embellished or deformed, can never

be entirely effaced.

If it could be proved, that this character is not the most amiable, it

does not follow that it is not the most expedient. It is sufficient,

that it is upon the whole most approved of in England. For I hold it as

indisputable, that the good opinion of a man’s countrymen is of more

importance to him than that of all the rest of mankind: Indeed, without

the first, he very rarely can enjoy the second.

It is thought, that, by an early foreign education, all ridiculous

English prejudices will be avoided. This may be true;—but other

prejudices, perhaps as ridiculous, and much more detrimental, will be

formed. The first cannot be attended with many inconveniencies; the

second may render the young people unhappy in their own country when

they return, and disagreeable to their countrymen all the rest of their

lives.

It is true, that the French manners are adopted in almost every country

of Europe: they prevail all over Germany and the northern courts. They

are gaining ground, though with a slower pace, in Spain, and in the

Italian states.—This is not the case in England.—The English manners are

universal in the provinces, prevail in the capital, and are to be found

uncontaminated even at court.

In all the countries above mentioned, the body of the people behold this

preference to foreign manners with disgust. But in all those countries,

the sentiments of the people are disregarded; whereas, in England,

popularity is of real importance; and the higher a man’s rank is, the

more he will feel the loss of it.

Besides, a prejudice against French manners is not confined to the lower

ranks in England:—It is diffused over the whole nation. Even those who

have none of the usual prejudices;—who do all manner of justice to

the talents and ingenuity of their neighbours;—who approve of French

manners in French people; yet cannot suffer them when grafted on their

countrymen. Should an English gentleman think this kind of grafting at

all admissible, it will be in some of the lowest classes with whom he is

connected, as his tailor, barber, valet-de-chambre, or cook;—but never in

his friend.

I can scarcely remember an instance of an Englishman of fashion, who has

evinced in his dress or style of living a preference to French manners,

who did not lose by it in the opinion of his countrymen.

What I have said of French manners is applicable to foreign manners

in general, which are all in some degree French, and the particular

differences are not distinguished by the English.

The sentiments of the citizens of Geneva are more analogous in many

respects to the turn of thinking in England, than to the general opinions

in France. Yet a Genevois in London will universally pass for a Frenchman.

An English boy, sent to Geneva at an early period of life, and remaining

there six or seven years, if his parents be not along with him, will

probably, in the eyes of the English, appear a kind of Frenchman all his

life after. This is an inconvenience which ought to be avoided with the

greatest attention.

With regard to the objections against public schools, they are in many

respects applicable to those of every country. But I freely own, they

never appeared to me sufficient to overbalance the advantages which

attend that method of education; particularly as it is conducted in

English public schools.

I have perceived a certain hardihood and manliness of character in boys

who have had a public education, superior to what appears in those of the

same age educated privately.

At a public school, though a general attention is paid to the whole, in

many particulars each boy is necessitated to decide and act for himself.

His reputation among his companions depends solely on his own conduct.

This gradually strengthens the mind, inspires firmness and decision, and

prevents that wavering imbecility observable in those who have been long

accustomed to rely upon the assistance and opinion of others.

The original impressions which sink into the heart and mind, and form

the character, never change.—The objects of our attention vary in the

different periods of life.—This is sometimes mistaken for a change of

character, which in reality remains essentially the same.—He who is

reserved, deceitful, cruel, or avaricious, when a boy, will not, in any

future period of life, become open, faithful, compassionate, or generous.

The young mind has, at a public school, the best chance of receiving

those sentiments which incline the heart to friendship, and correct

selfishness. They are drawn in by observation, which is infinitely more

powerful than precept.

A boy perceives, that courage, generosity, gratitude, command the esteem

and applause of all his companions. He cherishes these qualities in his

own breast, and endeavours to connect himself in friendship with those

who possess them.—He sees that meanness of spirit, ingratitude, and

perfidy, are the objects of detestation.—He shuns the boys who display

any indications of these odious qualities. What is the object of applause

or contempt to his school-fellows, he will endeavour to graft into, or

eradicate from, his own character, with ten thousand times more eagerness

than that which was applauded and censured by his tutor or parents.

The admonitions of these last have probably lost their effect by

frequent repetition; or he may imagine their maxims are only applicable

to a former age, and to manners which are obsolete.—But he feels the

sentiments of his companions affect his reputation and fame in the most

sensible manner.

In all the countries of Europe, England excepted, such a deference is

paid to boys of rank at the public schools, that emulation, the chief

spur to diligence, is greatly blunted.—The boys in the middle rank of

life are depressed by the insolence of their titled companions, which

they are not allowed to correct or retaliate.—This has the worst effect

on the minds of both, by rendering these more insolent, and those more

abject.

The public schools in England disdain this mean partiality; and are, on

that account, peculiarly useful to boys of high rank and great fortune.

These young people are exceedingly apt to imbibe false ideas of their

own importance, which in those impartial seminaries will be perfectly

ascertained, and the real merit of the youths weighed in juster scales

than are generally to be found in a parent’s house.

The young peer will be taught by the matters, and still more effectually

by his comrades, this most useful of all lessons,—to expect distinction

and esteem from personal qualities only; because no other can make him

estimable, or even save him from contempt.—He will see a dunce of high

rank flogged with as little ceremony as the son of a tailor; and the

richest coward kicked about by his companions equally with the poorest

poltroon.—He will find that diligence, genius, and spirit, are the true

sources of superiority and applause, both within and without the school.

The active principle of emulation, when allowed full play, as in the

chief schools in England, operates in various ways, and always with a

good effect.—If a boy finds that he falls beneath his companions in

literary merit, he will endeavour to excel them in intrepidity, or some

other accomplishment.—If he be brought to disgrace for neglecting his

exercise, he will try to save himself from contempt by the firmness with

which he bears his punishment.

The listlessness and indolence to be found so frequently among our young

people of rank, are not to be imputed to their education at a public

school, which in reality has the greatest tendency to counteract these

habits, and often does so, and gives an energy to the mind which remains

through life.

Those wretched qualities creep on afterwards, when the youths become

their own masters, and have enfeebled their minds by indulging in all the

pleasures which fortune puts in their power, and luxury presents.

Upon the whole, I am clearly of opinion, that the earliest period of

every Englishman’s education, during which the mind receives the most

lasting impressions, ought to be in England.

If, however, the opinion of relations, or any peculiarity in situation,

prevents his being educated at home, Geneva should be preferred to any

other place. Or if, by some neglect, either of his own or his parents, a

young English gentleman of fortune has allowed the first years of youth

to fly unimproved, and has attained the age of seventeen or eighteen with

little literary knowledge, I know no place where he may have a better

chance of recovering what he has lost than in this city. He may have

a choice of men of eminence, in every branch of literature, to assist

him in his studies, a great proportion of whom are men of genius, and

as amiable in their manners as they are eminent in their particular

professions.

He will have constant opportunities of being in company with very

ingenious people, whose thoughts and conversation turn upon literary

subjects. In such society, a young man will feel the necessity of some

degree of study. This will gradually form a taste for knowledge, which

may remain through life.

It may also be numbered among the advantages of this place, that there

are few objects of dissipation, and hardly any sources of amusement,

besides those derived from the natural beauties of the country, and from

an intimacy with a people by whose conversation a young man can scarce

fail to improve.

_P. S._ An English nobleman and his lady having taken the resolution of

educating their son at Geneva, attended him hither, and have effectually

prevented the inconveniencies above mentioned, by remaining with him for

seven or eight years.

The hospitality, generosity, and benevolent dispositions of this family

had acquired them the highest degree of popularity. I saw them leave the

place. Their carriage could with difficulty move through the multitude,

who were assembled in the streets.—Numbers of the poorer sort, who

had been relieved by their secret charity, unable longer to obey the

injunctions of their benefactors, proclaimed their gratitude aloud.

The young gentleman was obliged to come out again and again to his old

friends and companions, who pressed around the coach to bid him farewel,

and express their sorrow for his departure, and their wishes for his

prosperity. The eyes of the parents overflowed with tears of happiness;

and the whole family carried along with them the affections of the

greater part, and the esteem of all the citizens.

A View of Society and Manners in France, Switzerland, and Germany, Vol. 1 (of 2) With Anecdotes Relating to Some Eminent Characters · 第 52 / 72 题