And, in October, 1892, the “sporting” newspapers recorded that:—

“Women are gradually coming to the fore as bicycle riders. Miss

Dudley, a well-known rider, has just accomplished a feat which would

have seemed wonderful for any rider not long ago. She has ridden from

a spot near Hitchin to Lincoln, a distance of 100 miles, in little

more than seven hours, or at the average speed of about fourteen miles

an hour. Mr. and Mrs. Smith are well-known as tandem riders, and they

have won many races together; but this is, perhaps, the first recorded

instance of a woman cyclist holding her own so well, unaided, in a

long road ride.”

See also “The Lancashire pit-brow women,” Note XVIII., 8.

7.—“_Of differing sex no thought inept intrudes_,”

“I have conversed, as man with man, with medical men on anatomical

subjects, and compared the proportions of the human body with

artists—yet such modesty did I meet with that I was never reminded by

word or look of my sex, and the absurd rules which make modesty a

pharisaical cloak of weakness.”—Mary Wollstonecraft (“The Rights of

Woman,” p. 278).

“As a careful observer remarks, true modesty lies in the entire absence

of thought upon the subject. Among medical students and artists the nude

causes no extraordinary emotion; indeed, Flaxman asserted that the

students in entering the Academy seemed to hang up their passions along

with their hats.”—Westermarck (“History of Human Marriage,” p. 194).

_Id._... “This is strikingly exemplified in the curious conversation

recorded in Lylie’s ‘Euphues’ and his ‘England,’ edit. 1605, 4to,

signature X—Z 2, where young unmarried people of both sexes meet

together and discuss without reserve the ticklish metaphysics of love.

But though treading on such slippery ground, it is remarkable that they

never, even by allusion, fall into grossness. Their delicate propriety

is not improbably the effect of their liberty.”—Buckle (“Common-place

Book,” No. 856).

8.—“_Their purpose calmly sure all errant aim excludes_.”

“We point to a present remedy for undergraduate excesses, which, resting

on the soundest theory, has also the demonstration of unquestioned fact.

It is co-education. Cease to separate human beings because of sex. They

are conjoined in the family, in the primary and grammar schools, in

society, and, after the degree rewards four years of monastic student

existence, in the whole career of life.

“Throw open the doors of Harvard to women on equal terms, absorb the

annexe into the college proper, and as the night follows the day,

scholarship will rise, and dissipation fall by the law of gravitation.

The moral atmosphere will find immediate purification, and the daily

association of brothers and sisters in intellectual pursuits impart a

breadth of view which is an education in itself. The professors may then

be left safely to their themes, John Harvard’s statue may cease to dread

defilement, the regent will find his censorial duties fully as

perfunctory as he seems to have made them in the past, and character

will crowd out profligacy.”—William Lloyd Garrison (in _Woman’s

Journal_, Boston, U.S., 6th February, 1892).

“Whatsoever is ultimately decided by the wisdom of ages to be the best

possible form of culture for one human nature, must be so for another,

for one common humanity lies deeper in all and is more essential in each

than any difference.”—Sophia Jex-Blake, M.D.

Woman free · 第 120 / 146 题