CHAPTER X

The beginning of Law’s difficulties.--The Bank’s reserve of specie

begins to be depleted.--Law attempts a remedy by altering

the standard of the coinage, and restricting the currency of

specie.--Temporary success of remedy.--Domiciliary visits

resorted to for detection of hoarded specie.--Bank and

Company United.--Discharge of National Debt.--Use of the Rue

Quincampoix prohibited as a stock market.--The assassination of

a stock-jobber by the Comte de Horn, and the latter’s execution.

[Illustration]

Events now very rapidly developed in the history of the Bank and of

the West India Company. Law’s accession to power marked the beginning

of his difficulties--difficulties which taxed his judgment to the

utmost and forced him into the employment of expedients which he

himself foresaw could not permanently ward off injury to his schemes.

He thought, however, they might serve their purpose until his schemes

assumed a less fluid condition, and that their establishment in good

working order would render them proof against attack from such outside

forces as might array themselves against him.

The first indications of danger were becoming apparent in December, and

by the following month had assumed an alarming aspect. Shares had been

selling at the very high price of 10,000 livres each, but by concerted

action amongst several large holders and speculators that price was

gradually forced up until it reached the unprecedented figure of 20,000

livres. This was now their opportunity. Artificial inflation could not

be carried to greater lengths, and accordingly a process of extensive

unloading commenced. These speculators, however, suspicious of the

stability of the new system, were not satisfied with holding notes,

the value of which might depreciate at any moment, and immediately

presented them at the Bank for their equivalent in specie. Law

perceived that such a process if allowed to run unchecked would soon

deplete the Bank of all its available resources. Refusal to exchange

would be suicidal, and if public confidence could not be maintained

without recourse to artificial means, the currency of the notes would

require to be forced directly or indirectly.

One of the chief offenders was the Prince de Conti, a near relative of

the Regent. This nobleman had amassed great wealth through engaging

in speculation under Law’s guidance, but had alienated the latter by

his insatiable appetite for still greater fortune. Unable again to

enlist the services of Law in his interests, he evinced towards him

that bitterest form of ingratitude, the ingratitude of the man who

is favoured to him who does the favour. He attacked Law in his most

sensitive part by realising great quantities of stock, and converting

the notes he received in payment into money at the Bank, an operation

which required the aid of three waggons. Many speculators who had

preferred specie to paper transmitted their money abroad for safe

investment, and in the course of a few weeks several hundred millions

of livres were sent out of the country. A few also hoarded their wealth

in secret places until the time would come when they could without fear

employ it openly.

The first step taken by Law with a view to placing a check upon this

continuous drain on the reserves of the Bank was the issue of a decree

on 28th January, depreciating the coinage by raising the price of

the silver marc to 54 livres. At the same time the interest of money

was reduced from 4 to 2 per cent. Many people refused to bring their

specie to the Bank for recoinage, and then commenced that system of

domiciliary visits which under subsequent decrees worked with so much

tyranny and for a time absolutely destroyed not only public but also

domestic confidence.

The result of the decree was not so satisfactory as had been

anticipated, and in quick succession other decrees were issued

introducing alterations in the standard of the coinage. The purpose

of this was to discredit specie as far as possible as a medium of

exchange, and by giving the note the appearance of fixity in value

to raise its credit for currency purposes. Payments in specie were

only allowed to the extent of 300 livres in gold, and of 10 livres

of silver, sums respectively equivalent to £12 10s. and 8s. 4d.

in our money. Public offices could only receive payments in bank

notes, except where the amounts of these or the balances were less

than the lowest denomination of the note. And then the employment

of gold and silver for other than coinage purposes was strictly

prohibited without the royal license. These measures, however, were

still unequal to restoring public confidence in the paper of the

Bank, although in addition to those already specified, decrees were

published fixing the value of paper at five per cent. and then at ten

per cent. above the corresponding nominal value of specie. Trade was

now beginning to experience the bad effects of a restricted currency,

and representations were strongly made to Law and to the Regent to

restore the currency to its previous position. This of course Law was

unable to do without facing the consequences of seeing the bulk of the

specie withdrawn altogether not only from circulation but from the

country. A financial and industrial crisis would have at once been

precipitated. To meet the situation, Law resolved upon bold and extreme

measures. On the pretext that there were 1,200,000,000 livres in specie

lying idle in the hands of financiers and successful speculators, an

edict of Council was published on 27th February, which ordered “that

no person, of whatever estate or condition, not even any religious

or ecclesiastical community, should keep more than 500 livres in

coined money or ingots, under pain of confiscation of the excess, and

of a fine of 10,000 livres.” All payments exceeding 100 livres in

amount were to be made without exception in paper, and the purchase

of jewellery, plate and precious stones was declared illegal if made

for purposes of investment. To provide against concealment of specie

informers were promised a reward of half the sums disclosed, and all

government officials were ordered to make search wherever ordered by

the directors of the Bank. This decree was followed on 5th March by one

which further debased the currency by raising the price of the silver

marc to 85 livres, and on 11th March by a third, by which gold specie

was to be withdrawn from the currency from and after 1st May following,

and silver specie, except the smaller pieces which were necessary for

odd change, from and after 1st August following.

These various decrees wrought a revolution in the fiscal arrangements

of the country. No one appreciated more fully their danger than Law

himself, but extraordinary circumstances such as those with which

he was forced demanded the employment of extraordinary methods to

counteract them. He was presented with the alternative of certain

collapse of his schemes if he did not resort to arbitrary measures,

or of a possible chance of saving the situation if he could force

the currency of paper by withdrawing all the specie from circulation

and holding it in the hands of the Bank. Had he succeeded in doing

this, confidence in the notes of the Bank would undoubtedly have

largely been restored since that depends entirely upon the knowledge

of the public that behind them there are liquid reserves available for

conversion whenever required. It is questionable if any other methods

could have been devised than those followed by Law, and in judging

their character it is necessary to bear in mind the ultimate object he

had in view.

It was natural that these tyrannical steps should have had the

immediate effect of rousing a storm of opposition amongst the public

towards Law, and if we are to believe Lord Stair, they also prejudiced

him in the eyes of the Regent, to whom the hostile attitude of the

people was a matter of grave concern. On the day following the issue of

the decree of 11th March, he wrote to Craggs, “The rage of the people

is so violent, that, in the course of one month, he will be pulled to

pieces; or his master will deliver him up to the rage of the people.

You may depend upon it that he is mightily shaken in his master’s

good opinion, who, within these few days last past, has used him most

cruelly to his face, and called him all the names that can be thought

of, ‘Knave and madman,’ &c. He told him he did not know what hindered

him to send him to the Bastille; and that there never was anyone sent

thither deserved it half so well. To make matters better, Law’s head is

so heated that he does not sleep at nights, and he has formal fits of

phrenzy. He gets out of bed almost every night and runs, stark staring

mad, about the room making a terrible noise; sometimes singing and

dancing, at other times swearing, staring and stamping, quite out of

himself. Some nights ago his wife, who had come into the room upon the

noise he made, was forced to ring the bell for people to come to her

assistance. The officer of Law’s guard was the first that came, who

found Law in his shirt, who had set two chairs in the middle of the

room and was dancing round them, quite out of his wits. This scene

the officer of the guard told Le Blanc, from whom it came to me by a

very sure conveyance. Le Blanc is in despair about the state of Law’s

health and discredit in which he stands with the Regent. At the same

time, there is a most formidable party formed against him, and almost

everyone who held their tongues out of fear, now take courage to speak

to the Regent upon his character; so that they believe the Regent is

only withheld by shame from sacrificing him to the resentment of the

nation. Law, on the other hand, says, that if they will give him but a

little time, he will set everything to rights; that he will raise the

credit of the stocks; turn the course of the exchange; sink the stocks

in England, and put everything in that country into such disorder that

it shall plainly appear that he can do everything in that country he

pleases. In order to that, he has prevailed with Croisset, André,

and several other people, who had very great sums in our stocks, to

withdraw their money and to remit the greater part of it back into

France; with the rest, he proposes to turn the course of the exchange

and to carry on his other designs. He proposes further, in order to

alter the course of the exchange, to lower the value of the specie in

France, till the crown is brought down by degrees to three livres; and

this _arret_ is to come out in a few days.”

Law’s object was to a large extent gained so far as it aimed at

replenishing the reserves of coin at the Bank. During the month

of March no less than 300,000,000 livres were deposited, a sum

undoubtedly large but still short of being an adequate security

against the enormous mass of paper afloat, which has been estimated at

2,600,000,000 livres. These deposits were at the same time maintained

in full strength by the operation of the decree of 27th February,

which relieved the Bank of the necessity of repaying at any time more

than 500 livres in specie. Success however limited as it was, was only

secured at considerable cost to Law’s reputation. The domiciliary

visits which were made use of for detecting hoarded coin created

widespread and bitter resentment. A feeling of deep distrust, of

insecurity, and of fear crept through the community. The reward for

information was so great that sons betrayed their parents, brothers

their sisters, servants their masters. Friend betrayed friend, and

enemies had an effective instrument of revenge. “Never before had

sovereign power been so violently exercised, never had it attacked in

such a manner the temporal interests of the community. Therefore was

it by a prodigy, rather than by any effort or act of the government,

that these terribly new ordinances failed to produce the saddest and

most complete revolutions; but there was not even talk of them; and

although there were so many millions of people, either absolutely

ruined or dying of hunger, and of the direst want, without means to

procure their daily subsistence, nothing more than complaints and

groans was heard.”

Among those who were ruined in their fortunes at this time was one of

the directors of the Bank itself. A domiciliary visit, prompted by

one of his enemies, resulted in the discovery of 10,000 crowns, which

were confiscated. For failure to declare his hoard and deposit it in

the Bank he was fined 10,000 livres and lost his appointment. The

brothers Pâris were also among the sufferers. They were detected in

the act of conveying 7,000,000 livres into Lorraine, and a visit to

their residences brought into the coffers of the Bank an additional sum

of like amount. These confiscations and many others of more or less

substantial sums were published abroad in order to induce others to

conform to the edict from fear, and in many cases the prospect of loss

of fortune was regarded a less evil than possibility of discovery with

all its attendant penalties. There is in fact every reason to believe

that neither Law nor the Regent anticipated recourse to harsh measures

in carrying out their decree. They relied upon the fear which would be

created by its publication serving their purpose, and in order the

better to accomplish it arranged with several well-known prominent men

to allow themselves to become apparent victims. Thus were many of the

courtiers and public officials intimidated into divesting themselves of

their accumulated wealth, and into exchanging it for paper which was so

soon to lose its value. The largest capture which was made was that of

ex-Chancellor Pontchartrain whose cellars disgorged the enormous sum of

57,000 louis d’or or considerably over £10,000,000. The deep dislike

the Regent had for his own decree is also evinced by his conduct

towards the President Lambert de Vernon, who had sought an interview

for the purpose of informing against some one who was possessed of

500,000 livres in gold. On hearing his message, the Regent in horror

enquired, “What d--d sort of a trade have you taken to?” The President

replied, “Sir, I do nothing more than obey the law, and it is that

which you indirectly treat with such an appellation. As for the rest,

your Royal Highness need not be alarmed, and may do me more justice.

It is myself I come to inform against, in the hope of being allowed to

keep at least a part of this sum, which I prefer to all the bills of

the Bank.” As a result of his appeal, the President was allowed the

reward of an informer and permitted to retain half his fortune.

Law himself was the victim of a somewhat amusing result of his own

methods about this time. Some months before he negotiated with the

President of Novion the purchase of his estates for £400,000 francs.

The President required payment to be made in silver, and Law, who was

anxious to impress everyone with the advantages to be gained by the use

of paper alone, could not of course refuse, declaring that he preferred

to be rid of a metal which was to him a burden on account of its bulk,

and of the embarrassment it caused him. Unfortunately Law was compelled

afterwards to re-transfer the estates to the President’s son to whom

the right of pre-emption had been reserved, and received back the price

in notes which he was bound to accept according to his own decree. Nor

could Law complain of the advantage that had been taken of him without

depreciating the value of his own paper.

A measure of vastly greater importance and destined to lead to much

graver consequences than even those already mentioned was the union

of the Royal Bank and the Indian Company. A meeting was held on

22nd February at the Bank to which had been called the principal

shareholders of the Company, the proposal being formally made and

agreed to. Since the General Bank had been converted, in December,

1718, into a Royal institution, it had carried on its business for

the benefit of the Royal revenues alone. The notes in circulation

carried the guarantee of the King, a guarantee which was still to

remain notwithstanding the amalgamation. For the ostensible purpose

of preventing unlimited issue of additional notes it was provided

that authority must in all cases be first obtained from the Council.

Since the Council was in all its deliberations under the influence

of the Regent, it will be seen later how worthless such a provision

proved as an effective check to arbitrary fabrication of paper. During

the period of the Bank’s existence as a Royal establishment, it had

carried on business with great success, its balance sheet showing on

paper a profit 120,000,000 livres of profit. This profit it was also

arranged should be transferred intact to the company for the benefit

of its shareholders. The object which Law had in view in bringing

about the union could only have been one of expediency. It contained

no feature which promised permanent success to the undertaking, and

showed a singular lack of foresight and real business capacity.

Undoubtedly it gave encouragement to speculators, who were carried

away by the apparent increase of stability given to the Company by the

amalgamation. But even this was of short duration. It was impossible

to conceal for long the elusory nature of the transaction, and it soon

became clear that a false step had been taken inasmuch as the fortunes

of the Bank were now altogether bound up with those of the Company.

Previously to the date of the incorporation of the Bank and the

Company, the note issue in circulation amounted to about 600,000,000

livres. Within three months after that date, an additional

2,000,000,000 livres were fabricated and set afloat. The bulk of the

fresh issues was utilised for the purpose of discharging the national

debt, one of the great objects which Law had in view at the initiation

of his financial schemes. The national creditors were now become

creditors of the Company in respect of the notes they held; and the

state had now nominally discharged her debts in full.

One of the difficulties created by the publication of the various

decrees limiting the currency of coin was that of scarcity of notes of

small denomination. On 19th April, accordingly, a decree was registered

by which no less than 438,000,000 livres in notes of 10 to 1000 livres

each were issued in order to facilitate the changing of notes of

greater value and the carrying out of transactions of small amounts.

Although all these expedients failed in their object, the extent to

which speculation was carried was very little affected. The time for

suddenly made fortunes had now gone, but sufficient excitement remained

to render the purchase and sale of shares an occupation attractive to

thousands of speculators. The tendency of the market was distinctly

downwards, but there were intervening fluctuations, which maintained

the mania in almost all its former strength. The Rue Quincampoix was

still crowded from morning till evening. So great were the crowds on

many occasions that scenes of confusion were frequent and sometimes

developed into scenes of violence. It formed a happy hunting ground

for the lowest classes in the community. Robberies and even murders

took place so often that special precautions had necessarily to be

taken by those who carried money on their person. So dangerous had

the street and its environs become that on 22nd March, the council

published an edict prohibiting its use as a stock market, and requiring

all houses and offices wherein share transactions had been hitherto

usually negotiated to be closed in future for such business. No other

locality was assigned to the speculators, and for two months they had

no recognised place of meeting. The wisdom of this decree was dictated

by an unhappy occurrence that took place on the morning of the day of

its issue, in which was involved a young foreigner of noble family,

Comte de Horn, son of Prince Philippe Emmanuel who had served in France

at the sieges of Brizac and of Landau, and at the battles of Spire

and of Ramillies. According to the account given of the incident by

Duclos, it appears that the Count, who had been living a riotous life

in Paris for some time and had contracted extensive debts, along with

two companions, Laurent de Mille, and a sham knight named Lestang,

plotted the assassination of a rich stock-jobber and the theft of his

pocket-book in which he was known to carry large sums of money in

paper. They resorted to the Rue Quincampoix, and under the pretext of

negotiating the purchase of 100,000 crowns worth of shares, took the

stock-jobber to a tavern in the Rue de Venise and stabbed him there.

The unfortunate stock-jobber, in defending himself, made sufficient

noise to attract the attention of a waiter, who, passing at the moment

the door of the room, opened it. Seeing a man lying in a pool of blood,

he immediately closed and locked the door and shouted murder.

The assassins, finding retreat closed against them, escaped through

the window. Lestang, who had been keeping watch on the staircase,

rushed off on hearing the shouts of the waiter to the lodging house

in the Rue de Tournon, where the three of them boarded, took the most

portable luggage and fled. Mille dashed through the crowds in the Rue

Quincampoix, but followed by the people, was at last arrested at the

markets. The Comte de Horn was seized on jumping from the window.

Believing his two accomplices to have succeeded in saving themselves,

he had enough presence of mind to say that he feared he himself would

also have been murdered in trying to defend the stock-jobber. His ruse,

however, proved valueless by the arrest of Mille, who, having been

brought back to the tavern, confessed all. The Comte declared to no

purpose he did not know Mille; and the Commissary of Police took him

to prison. The crime being fully established, the trial did not last

long, and on 26th March both were broken alive on the wheel in the

Place du Grève. The Comte was apparently the author of the plot; for,

while he was still breathing on the wheel, he demanded pardon for his

accomplice, who was executed last.

Before the execution had been carried out, the strongest efforts had

been made to influence the Regent to grant a pardon, or at least a

commutation of the punishment. The crime was so atrocious that they

did not insist on the first, but redoubled their solicitations for

the latter. They represented that the execution by the wheel was so

ignominious, that no daughter of the house of Horn could, until the

third generation, enter any convent. The Regent rejected all prayers

for pardon. They appealed to him on the ground that the culprit was

allied to him, but he replied,--“I shall partake of the shame. That

ought to console the other relatives.” He repeated the words of

Corneille: “The shame is in the crime, not in the scaffold.” The Regent

was inclined however to commute the punishment, but Law and the Abbé

Dubois impressed him with the necessity of preserving the public safety

at a time when everyone carried his wealth about with him. They pointed

out to him that the people would not be satisfied, and would consider

themselves humiliated by a distinction of punishment for a crime so

atrocious.

When his parents lost all hope of pardon from the Regent, the Prince de

Robec Montmorency, and the Marechal d’Isenghen, found means of securing

admission to the prison. They brought poison with them and exhorted

him to take it in order to avoid the shame of the execution, but he

refused. “You wretch,” they declared, leaving him with indignation,

“you are only worthy to die by the hands of the executioner.”

John Law of Lauriston Financier and Statesman, Founder of the Bank of France, Originator of the Mississippi Scheme, Etc. · 第 10 / 12 章