A DISCOVERY

[Illustration]

We are going to tell the truth. It has been on our mind for some

time. We are going to tell it exactly, without any balancing or

trimming or crimped edges. We are weary of talking about

trivialities and are going to come plump and plain to the

adventures of our own mind. These are real adventures, just as

real as the things we see. The green frog that took refuge on our

porch last night was no more real. Perhaps frogs don't care so

much for wet as they are supposed to, for when that excellent

thunderstorm came along and the ceiling of the night was sheeted

with lilac brightness, through which ran quivering threads of

naked fire (not just the soft, tame, flabby fire of the domestic

hearth, but the real core and marrow of flame, its hungry,

terrible, destroying self), our friend the frog came hopping up

on the porch where we stood, apparently to take shelter. How

brilliant was his black and silver eye when we picked him up! His

direct and honourable regard somehow made us feel ashamed, we

know not why. And yet we have plenty to be ashamed about--but how

did he know? He was still on the porch this morning. Equally real

was the catbird on the hedge as we came down toward the station.

She--we call her so, for there was unmistakable ladyhood in her

delicately tailored trimness--she bickered at us in a cheerful

way, on top of those bushes which were so loaded with the night's

rainfall that they shone a blurred cobweb gray in the lifting

light. Her eye was also dark and polished and lucid, like a bead

of ink. It also had the same effect of tribulation on our spirit.

Neither the catbird nor the frog, we said to ourself, would have

tormented their souls trying to "invent" something to write

about. They would have told what happened to them, and let it go

at that. So, as we walked along under an arcade of maple trees,

admiring the little green seed-biplanes brought down by the

thrash of the rain--they look rather as though they would make

good coathangers for fairies--we asked ourself why we could not

be as straightforward as the bird and the frog, and talk about

what was in our mind.

The most exciting thing that happened to us when we got to New

York last February was finding a book in a yellow wrapper. Its

title was "Old Junk," which appealed to us. The name of the

author was H. M. Tomlinson, which immediately became to us a name

of honour and great meaning. All day and every day intelligent

men find themselves surrounded by oceans of what is quaintly

called "reading matter." Most of it is turgid, lumpy, fuzzy in

texture, squalid in intellect. The rewards of the literary

world--that is, the tangible, potable, spendable rewards--go

mostly to the cheapjack and the mountebank. And yet here was a

man who in every paragraph spoke to the keenest intellectual

sense--who, ten times a page, enchanted the reader with the

surprising and delicious pang given by the critically chosen

word. We sat up late at night reading that book, marvelling at

our good fortune. We wanted to cry aloud (to such as cared to

understand), "Rejoice and be exceeding glad, for here is born a

man who knows how to write!" In our exuberance we seized a pen

and wrote in the stern of our copy: "Here speaks the Lord God of

prose; here is the clear eye, the ironic mind, the compassionate

heart; the thrilling honesty and (apparent) simplicity of great

work." Then we set about making the book known to our friends. We

propelled them into bookshops and made them buy it. We took our

own copy down to William McFee on S.S. _Turrialba_ and a glad

heart was ours when he, too, said it was "the real thing." This

is a small matter, you say? When the discovery of an honest pen

becomes a small matter life will lose something of its savour.

Those who understand will understand; let the others spend their

time in the smoker playing pinochle. Those who care about these

things can get the book for themselves.

Of Mr. Tomlinson in person: he is a London newspaperman, we

understand, and now on the staff of the London _Nation_. (Trust

Mr. Massingham, the editor of that journal, to know an honest

writer when he sees him.) Mr. Tomlinson says of himself:

My life is like my portrait. It won't bear investigation. I am

not conscious of having done anything that would interest either

a policeman or the young lady of the kind who dotes on Daddy Long

Legs; worse luck. It's about time I got down to business and did

something interesting either to one or the other. That is why it

won't bear investigation, this record of mine. I am about as

entertaining as one of the crowd coming out of the factory gates

with his full dinner pail. All my adventures have been no more

than keeping that pail moderately full. I've been doing that

since I was twelve, in all sorts of ways. I was an office boy and

a clerk among London's ships, in the last days of the clippers.

And I am forced to recall some of the things--such as bookkeeping

in a jam factory and stoking on a tramp steamer--I can understand

why I and my fellows, without wanting to, drifted about in

indecision till we drifted into war and drifted into peace. And

of course, I've been a journalist. I am still; and so have seen

much of Africa, America, and Europe, without knowing exactly why.

I was in France in 1914--the August, too, of that year, and woke

up from that nightmare in 1917, after the Vimy Ridge attack, when

I returned to England to sit with my wife and children in a

cellar whenever it was a fine night and listened to the guns and

bombs. God, who knows all, might make something of this sort of

inconsequential drift of one day into the next, but I give it up.

But now we pass to the phase of the matter that puzzles us. How

is it that there are some books which can never have abiding life

until they perish and are born again? We have noticed it so

often. There is a book of a certain sort to which this process

seems inevitable. One need only mention Leonard Merrick or Samuel

Butler as examples. The book, we will suppose, has some peculiar

subtlety or flavour of appeal. (We are thinking at the moment of

William McFee's "Letters From an Ocean Tramp.") It is published

and falls dead. Later on--usually about ten years later--it is

taken up with vigour by some other publisher, the stone is rolled

away from the sepulchre, and it begins to move among its destined

lovers.

This remark is caused by our delighted discovery of a previous

book by the author of "Old Junk." "The Sea and the Jungle" is the

title of it, the tale of a voyage on the tramp steamer _Capella_,

from Swansea to Para in the Brazils, and thence 2,000 miles along

the forests of the Amazon and Madeira rivers. It is the kind of

book whose readers will never forget it; the kind of book that

happens to some happy writers once in a lifetime (and to many

never at all) when the moving hand seems gloriously in gear with

the tremulous and busy mind, and all the spinning earth stands

hearkeningly still waiting for the perfect expression of the

thought. It is the work of a hand trained in laborious task-work

and then set magnificently free, for a few blessed months, under

no burden save that of putting its captaining spirit truthfully

on paper. And this book--in which there is a sea passage that not

even Mr. Conrad has ever bettered--this book, which makes the

utmost self-satisfied heroics of the Prominent Writers of our

market place shrivel uncomfortably in remembrance--this book, we

repeat, though published in this country in 1913, has been long

out of print; and the copy which we were lucky enough to lay hand

on through the courtesy of the State Librarian of Pennsylvania

had not previously been borrowed since November 18, 1913. Someone

asks us if this man can really write. Let us choose a paragraph

for example. This deals with the first day at sea of the tramp

steamer _Capella_:

It was December, but by luck we found a halcyon morning which had

got lost in the year's procession. It was a Sunday morning, and

it had not been ashore. It was still virgin, bearing a vestal

light. It had not been soiled yet by any suspicion of this

trampled planet, this muddy star, which its innocent and tenuous

rays had discovered in the region of night. I thought it still

was regarding us as a lucky find there. Its light was tremulous,

as if with joy and eagerness. I met this discovering morning as

your ambassador while you still slept, and betrayed not, I hope,

any grayness and bleared satiety of ours to its pure, frail, and

lucid regard. That was the last good service I did before leaving

you quite. I was glad to see how well your old earth did meet

such a light, as though it had no difficulty in looking day in

the face. The world was miraculously renewed. It rose, and

received the newborn of Aurora in its arms. There were clouds of

pearl above hills of chrysoprase. The sea ran in volatile flames.

The shadows on the bright deck shot to and fro as we rolled. The

breakfast bell rang not too soon. This was a right beginning.

The above is a paragraph that we have chosen from Mr. Tomlinson's

book almost at random. We could spend the whole afternoon (and a

happy afternoon it would be for us) copying out for you passages

from "The Sea and the Jungle" that would give you the extremity

of pleasure, O high-spirited reader! It is an odd thing, it is a

quaint thing, it is a thing that would seem inconceivable (were

we not tolerably acquainted with the vagaries of the reading

public) that a book of this sort should lie perdu on the shelves

of a few libraries. Yet one must not leap too heartily to the

wrong conclusion. The reading public is avid of good books, but

it does not hear about them. Now we would venture to say that we

know fifty people--nay, two hundred and fifty--who would never

have done thanking us if we could lay a copy of a book of this

sort in their hand. They would think it the greatest favour we

could do them if we could tell them where they could go and lay

down honest money and buy it. And we have to retort that it is

out of print, not procurable.[1] Is it the fault of publishers?

We do not think so--or not very often. For every publisher has

experience of this sort of thing--books that he knows to be of

extraordinary quality and fascination which simply lie like lead

in his stockroom, and people will not listen to what he says

about them. Whose fault is it, then? Heaven knows.

[1] Since this was written, a new edition has been published by

E. P. Dutton & Co.

Pipefuls · 第 61 / 101 题