SECOND ARTICLE [I, Q. 106, Art. 2]

Whether one angel moves another angel's will?

Objection 1: It would seem that one angel can move another angel's

will. Because, according to Dionysius quoted above (A. 1), as one

angel enlightens another, so does he cleanse and perfect another. But

cleansing and perfecting seem to belong to the will: for the former

seems to point to the stain of sin which appertains to will; while to

be perfected is to obtain an end, which is the object of the will.

Therefore an angel can move another angel's will.

Obj. 2: Further, as Dionysius says (Coel. Hier. vii): "The names of

the angels designate their properties." Now the Seraphim are so

called because they "kindle" or "give heat": and this is by love

which belongs to the will. Therefore one angel moves another angel's

will.

Obj. 3: Further, the Philosopher says (De Anima iii, 11) that the

higher appetite moves the lower. But as the intellect of the superior

angel is higher, so also is his will. It seems, therefore, that the

superior angel can change the will of another angel.

_On the contrary,_ To him it belongs to change the will, to whom it

belongs to bestow righteousness: for righteousness is the rightness

of the will. But God alone bestows righteousness. Therefore one angel

cannot change another angel's will.

_I answer that,_ As was said above (Q. 105, A. 4), the will is

changed in two ways; on the part of the object, and on the part of

the power. On the part of the object, both the good itself which is

the object of the will, moves the will, as the appetible moves the

appetite; and he who points out the object, as, for instance, one

who proves something to be good. But as we have said above (Q. 105,

A. 4), other goods in a measure incline the will, yet nothing

sufficiently moves the will save the universal good, and that is God.

And this good He alone shows, that it may be seen by the blessed,

Who, when Moses asked: "Show me Thy glory," answered: "I will show

thee all good" (Ex. 33:18, 19). Therefore an angel does not move the

will sufficiently, either as the object or as showing the object. But

he inclines the will as something lovable, and as manifesting some

created good ordered to God's goodness. And thus he can incline the

will to the love of the creature or of God, by way of persuasion.

But on the part of the power the will cannot be moved at all save by

God. For the operation of the will is a certain inclination of the

willer to the thing willed. And He alone can change this inclination,

Who bestowed on the creature the power to will: just as that agent

alone can change the natural inclination, which can give the power to

which follows that natural inclination. Now God alone gave to the

creature the power to will, because He alone is the author of the

intellectual nature. Therefore an angel cannot move another angel's

will.

Reply Obj. 1: Cleansing and perfecting are to be understood according

to the mode of enlightenment. And since God enlightens by changing

the intellect and will, He cleanses by removing defects of intellect

and will, and perfects unto the end of the intellect and will. But

the enlightenment caused by an angel concerns the intellect, as

explained above (A. 1); therefore an angel is to be understood as

cleansing from the defect of nescience in the intellect; and as

perfecting unto the consummate end of the intellect, and this is the

knowledge of truth. Thus Dionysius says (Eccl. Hier. vi): that "in

the heavenly hierarchy the chastening of the inferior essence is an

enlightening of things unknown, that leads them to more perfect

knowledge." For instance, we might say that corporeal sight is

cleansed by the removal of darkness; enlightened by the diffusion of

light; and perfected by being brought to the perception of the

colored object.

Reply Obj. 2: One angel can induce another to love God by persuasion

as explained above.

Reply Obj. 3: The Philosopher speaks of the lower sensitive appetite

which can be moved by the superior intellectual appetite, because it

belongs to the same nature of the soul, and because the inferior

appetite is a power in a corporeal organ. But this does not apply to

the angels.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 647 / 722 题