SECOND ARTICLE [I, Q. 105, Art. 2]

Whether God Can Move a Body Immediately?

Objection 1: It would seem that God cannot move a body immediately.

For as the mover and the moved must exist simultaneously, as the

Philosopher says (Phys. vii, 2), it follows that there must be some

contact between the mover and moved. But there can be no contact

between God and a body; for Dionysius says (Div. Nom. 1): "There is

no contact with God." Therefore God cannot move a body immediately.

Obj. 2: Further, God is the mover unmoved. But such also is the

desirable object when apprehended. Therefore God moves as the object

of desire and apprehension. But He cannot be apprehended except by the

intellect, which is neither a body nor a corporeal power. Therefore

God cannot move a body immediately.

Obj. 3: Further, the Philosopher proves (Phys. viii, 10) that an

infinite power moves instantaneously. But it is impossible for a body

to be moved in one instant; for since every movement is between

opposites, it follows that two opposites would exist at once in the

same subject, which is impossible. Therefore a body cannot be moved

immediately by an infinite power. But God's power is infinite, as we

have explained (Q. 25, A. 2). Therefore God cannot move a body

immediately.

_On the contrary,_ God produced the works of the six days immediately

among which is included the movements of bodies, as is clear from Gen.

1:9 "Let the waters be gathered together into one place." Therefore

God alone can move a body immediately.

_I answer that,_ It is erroneous to say that God cannot Himself

produce all the determinate effects which are produced by any created

cause. Wherefore, since bodies are moved immediately by created

causes, we cannot possibly doubt that God can move immediately any

bodies whatever. This indeed follows from what is above stated (A.

1). For every movement of any body whatever, either results from a

form, as the movements of things heavy and light result from the form

which they have from their generating cause, for which reason the

generator is called the mover; or else tends to a form, as heating

tends to the form of heat. Now it belongs to the same cause, to

imprint a form, to dispose to that form, and to give the movement

which results from that form; for fire not only generates fire, but

it also heats and moves things upwards. Therefore, as God can imprint

form immediately in matter, it follows that He can move any body

whatever in respect of any movement whatever.

Reply Obj. 1: There are two kinds of contact; corporeal contact, when

two bodies touch each other; and virtual contact, as the cause of

sadness is said to touch the one made sad. According to the first

kind of contact, God, as being incorporeal, neither touches, nor is

touched; but according to virtual contact He touches creatures by

moving them; but He is not touched, because the natural power of no

creature can reach up to Him. Thus did Dionysius understand the

words, "There is no contact with God"; that is, so that God Himself

be touched.

Reply Obj. 2: God moves as the object of desire and apprehension; but

it does not follow that He always moves as being desired and

apprehended by that which is moved; but as being desired and known by

Himself; for He does all things for His own goodness.

Reply Obj. 3: The Philosopher (Phys. viii, 10) intends to

prove that the power of the first mover is not a power of the first

mover _of bulk,_ by the following argument. The power of the first

mover is infinite (which he proves from the fact that the first mover

can move in infinite time). Now an infinite power, if it were a power

_of bulk,_ would move without time, which is impossible; therefore the

infinite power of the first mover must be in something which is not

measured by its bulk. Whence it is clear that for a body to be moved

without time can only be the result of an infinite power. The reason

is that every power of bulk moves in its entirety; since it moves by

the necessity of its nature. But an infinite power surpasses out of

all proportion any finite power. Now the greater the power of the

mover, the greater is the velocity of the movement. Therefore, since a

finite power moves in a determinate time, it follows that an infinite

power does not move in any time; for between one time and any other

time there is some proportion. On the other hand, a power which is not

in bulk is the power of an intelligent being, which operates in its

effects according to what is fitting to them; and therefore, since it

cannot be fitting for a body to be moved without time, it does not

follow that it moves without time.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 638 / 722 题