SIXTH ARTICLE [I, Q. 63, Art. 6]

Whether There Was Any Interval Between the Creation and the Fall of

the Angel?

Objection 1: It would seem that there was some interval between the

angel's creation and his fall. For, it is said (Ezech. 28:15): "Thou

didst walk perfect [*Vulg.: 'Thou hast walked in the midst of the

stones of fire; thou wast perfect . . .'] in thy ways from the day of

thy creation until iniquity was found in thee." But since walking is

continuous movement, it requires an interval. Therefore there was some

interval between the devil's creation and his fall.

Obj. 2: Further, Origen says (Hom. i in Ezech.) that "the serpent

of old did not from the first walk upon his breast and belly"; which

refers to his sin. Therefore the devil did not sin at once after the

first instant of his creation.

Obj. 3: Further, capability of sinning is common alike to man and

angel. But there was some delay between man's formation and his sin.

Therefore, for the like reason there was some interval between the

devil's formation and his sin.

Obj. 4: Further, the instant wherein the devil sinned was

distinct from the instant wherein he was created. But there is a

middle time between every two instants. Therefore there was an

interval between his creation and his fall.

_On the contrary,_ It is said of the devil (John 8:44): "He stood not

in the truth": and, as Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xi, 15), "we must

understand this in the sense, that he was in the truth, but did not

remain in it."

_I answer that,_ There is a twofold opinion on this point. But the

more probable one, which is also more in harmony with the teachings

of the Saints, is that the devil sinned at once after the first

instant of his creation. This must be maintained if it be held that

he elicited an act of free-will in the first instant of his creation,

and that he was created in grace; as we have said (Q. 62, A. 3). For

since the angels attain beatitude by one meritorious act, as was said

above (Q. 62, A. 5), if the devil, created in grace, merited in the

first instant, he would at once have received beatitude after that

first instant, if he had not placed an impediment by sinning.

If, however, it be contended that the angel was not created in grace,

or that he could not elicit an act of free-will in the first instant,

then there is nothing to prevent some interval being interposed

between his creation and fall.

Reply Obj. 1: Sometimes in Holy Scripture spiritual instantaneous

movements are represented by corporeal movements which are measured

by time. In this way by "walking" we are to understand the movement

of free-will tending towards good.

Reply Obj. 2: Origen says, "The serpent of old did not from the first

walk upon his breast and belly," because of the first instant in

which he was not wicked.

Reply Obj. 3: An angel has an inflexible free-will after once

choosing; consequently, if after the first instant, in which he had a

natural movement to good, he had not at once placed a barrier to

beatitude, he would have been confirmed in good. It is not so with

man; and therefore the argument does not hold good.

Reply Obj. 4: It is true to say that there is a middle time between

every two instants, so far as time is continuous, as it is proved

_Phys._ vi, text. 2. But in the angels, who are not subject to the

heavenly movement, which is primarily measured by continuous time,

time is taken to mean the succession of their mental acts, or of

their affections. So the first instant in the angels is understood to

respond to the operation of the angelic mind, whereby it introspects

itself by its evening knowledge because on the first day evening is

mentioned, but not morning. This operation was good in them all. From

such operation some of them were converted to the praise of the Word

by their morning knowledge while others, absorbed in themselves,

became night, "swelling up with pride," as Augustine says (Gen. ad

lit. iv, 24). Hence the first act was common to them all; but in

their second they were separated. Consequently they were all of them

good in the first instant; but in the second the good were set apart

from the wicked.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 409 / 722 题