FIRST ARTICLE [I, Q. 35, Art. 1]

Whether Image in God Is Said Personally?

Objection 1: It would seem that image is not said personally of God.

For Augustine (Fulgentius, De Fide ad Petrum i) says, "The Godhead

of the Holy Trinity and the Image whereunto man is made are one."

Therefore Image is said of God essentially, and not personally.

Obj. 2: Further, Hilary says (De Synod.): "An image is a like

species of that which it represents." But species or form is said

of God essentially. Therefore so also is Image.

Obj. 3: Further, Image is derived from imitation, which implies

"before" and "after." But in the divine persons there is no "before"

and "after." Therefore Image cannot be a personal name in God.

_On the contrary,_ Augustine says (De Trin. vii, 1): "What is more

absurd than to say that an image is referred to itself?" Therefore

the Image in God is a relation, and is thus a personal name.

_I answer that,_ Image includes the idea of similitude. Still, not

any kind of similitude suffices for the notion of image, but only

similitude of species, or at least of some specific sign. In corporeal

things the specific sign consists chiefly in the figure. For we see

that the species of different animals are of different figures; but

not of different colors. Hence if the color of anything is depicted on

a wall, this is not called an image unless the figure is likewise

depicted. Further, neither the similitude of species or of figure is

enough for an image, which requires also the idea of origin; because,

as Augustine says (QQ. lxxxiii, qu. 74): "One egg is not the image of

another, because it is not derived from it." Therefore for a true

image it is required that one proceeds from another like to it in

species, or at least in specific sign. Now whatever imports procession

or origin in God, belongs to the persons. Hence the name "Image" is a

personal name.

Reply Obj. 1: Image, properly speaking, means whatever proceeds forth

in likeness to another. That to the likeness of which anything

proceeds, is properly speaking called the exemplar, and is improperly

called the image. Nevertheless Augustine (Fulgentius) uses the name

of Image in this sense when he says that the divine nature of the

Holy Trinity is the Image to whom man was made.

Reply Obj. 2: species, as mentioned by Hilary in the definition of

image, means the form derived from one thing to another. In this

sense image is said to be the species of anything, as that which is

assimilated to anything is called its form, inasmuch as it has a like

form.

Reply Obj. 3: Imitation in God does not signify posteriority, but

only assimilation.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 247 / 722 题