FOURTH ARTICLE [I, Q. 20, Art. 4]

Whether God Always Loves More the Better Things?

Objection 1: It seems that God does not always love more the better

things. For it is manifest that Christ is better than the whole human

race, being God and man. But God loved the human race more than He

loved Christ; for it is said: "He spared not His own Son, but

delivered Him up for us all" (Rom. 8:32). Therefore God does not

always love more the better things.

Obj. 2: Further, an angel is better than a man. Hence it is said of

man: "Thou hast made him a little less than the angels" (Ps. 8:6).

But God loved men more than He loved the angels, for it is said:

"Nowhere doth He take hold of the angels, but of the seed of Abraham

He taketh hold" (Heb. 2:16). Therefore God does not always love more

the better things.

Obj. 3: Further, Peter was better than John, since he loved Christ

more. Hence the Lord, knowing this to be true, asked Peter, saying:

"Simon, son of John, lovest thou Me more than these?" Yet Christ

loved John more than He loved Peter. For as Augustine says,

commenting on the words, "Simon, son of John, lovest thou Me?": "By

this very mark is John distinguished from the other disciples, not

that He loved him only, but that He loved him more than the rest."

Therefore God does not always love more the better things.

Obj. 4: Further, the innocent man is better than the repentant, since

repentance is, as Jerome says (Cap. 3 in Isa.), "a second plank after

shipwreck." But God loves the penitent more than the innocent; since

He rejoices over him the more. For it is said: "I say to you that

there shall be joy in heaven upon the one sinner that doth penance,

more than upon ninety-nine just who need not penance" (Luke 15:7).

Therefore God does not always love more the better things.

Obj. 5: Further, the just man who is foreknown is better than the

predestined sinner. Now God loves more the predestined sinner, since

He wills for him a greater good, life eternal. Therefore God does not

always love more the better things.

_On the contrary,_ Everything loves what is like it, as appears from

(Ecclus. 13:19): "Every beast loveth its like." Now the better a thing

is, the more like is it to God. Therefore the better things are more

loved by God.

_I answer that,_ It must needs be, according to what has been said

before, that God loves more the better things. For it has been shown

(AA. 2, 3), that God's loving one thing more than another is nothing

else than His willing for that thing a greater good: because God's

will is the cause of goodness in things; and the reason why some

things are better than others, is that God wills for them a greater

good. Hence it follows that He loves more the better things.

Reply Obj. 1: God loves Christ not only more than He loves the whole

human race, but more than He loves the entire created universe:

because He willed for Him the greater good in giving Him "a name that

is above all names," in so far as He was true God. Nor did anything

of His excellence diminish when God delivered Him up to death for the

salvation of the human race; rather did He become thereby a glorious

conqueror: "The government was placed upon His shoulder," according

to Isa. 9:6.

Reply Obj. 2: God loves the human nature assumed by the Word of God

in the person of Christ more than He loves all the angels; for that

nature is better, especially on the ground of the union with the

Godhead. But speaking of human nature in general, and comparing it

with the angelic, the two are found equal, in the order of grace and

of glory: since according to Rev 21:17, the measure of a man and of

an angel is the same. Yet so that, in this respect, some angels are

found nobler than some men, and some men nobler than some angels. But

as to natural condition an angel is better than a man. God therefore

did not assume human nature because He loved man, absolutely

speaking, more; but because the needs of man were greater; just as

the master of a house may give some costly delicacy to a sick

servant, that he does not give to his own son in sound health.

Reply Obj. 3: This doubt concerning Peter and John has been solved in

various ways. Augustine interprets it mystically, and says that the

active life, signified by Peter, loves God more than the

contemplative signified by John, because the former is more conscious

of the miseries of this present life, and therefore the more ardently

desires to be freed from them, and depart to God. God, he says, loves

more the contemplative life, since He preserves it longer. For it

does not end, as the active life does, with the life of the body.

Some say that Peter loved Christ more in His members, and therefore

was loved more by Christ also, for which reason He gave him the care

of the Church; but that John loved Christ more in Himself, and so was

loved more by Him; on which account Christ commended His mother to his

care. Others say that it is uncertain which of them loved Christ more

with the love of charity, and uncertain also which of them God loved

more and ordained to a greater degree of glory in eternal life. Peter

is said to have loved more, in regard to a certain promptness and

fervor; but John to have been more loved, with respect to certain

marks of familiarity which Christ showed to him rather than to others,

on account of his youth and purity. While others say that Christ loved

Peter more, from his more excellent gift of charity; but John more,

from his gifts of intellect. Hence, absolutely speaking, Peter was the

better and more beloved; but, in a certain sense, John was the better,

and was loved the more. However, it may seem presumptuous to pass

judgment on these matters; since "the Lord" and no other "is the

weigher of spirits" (Prov. 16:2).

Reply Obj. 4: The penitent and the innocent are related as exceeding

and exceeded. For whether innocent or penitent, those are the better

and better loved who have most grace. Other things being equal,

innocence is the nobler thing and the more beloved. God is said to

rejoice more over the penitent than over the innocent, because often

penitents rise from sin more cautious, humble, and fervent. Hence

Gregory commenting on these words (Hom. 34 in Ev.) says that, "In

battle the general loves the soldier who after flight returns and

bravely pursues the enemy, more than him who has never fled, but has

never done a brave deed."

Or it may be answered that gifts of grace, equal in themselves, are

more as conferred on the penitent, who deserved punishment, than as

conferred on the innocent, to whom no punishment was due; just as a

hundred pounds [marcoe] are a greater gift to a poor man than to a

king.

Reply Obj. 5: Since God's will is the cause of goodness in things,

the goodness of one who is loved by God is to be reckoned according

to the time when some good is to be given to him by divine goodness.

According therefore to the time, when there is to be given by the

divine will to the predestined sinner a greater good, the sinner is

better; although according to some other time he is the worse;

because even according to some time he is neither good nor bad.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 168 / 722 题