FOURTH ARTICLE [I, Q. 1, Art. 4]

Whether Sacred Doctrine Is a Practical Science?

Objection 1: It seems that sacred doctrine is a practical science; for

a practical science is that which ends in action according to the

Philosopher (Metaph. ii). But sacred doctrine is ordained to action:

"Be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only" (James 1:22).

Therefore sacred doctrine is a practical science.

Obj. 2: Further, sacred doctrine is divided into the Old and the

New Law. But law implies a moral science which is a practical science.

Therefore sacred doctrine is a practical science.

_On the contrary,_ Every practical science is concerned with human

operations; as moral science is concerned with human acts, and

architecture with buildings. But sacred doctrine is chiefly concerned

with God, whose handiwork is especially man. Therefore it is not a

practical but a speculative science.

_I answer that,_ Sacred doctrine, being one, extends to things which

belong to different philosophical sciences because it considers in

each the same formal aspect, namely, so far as they can be known

through divine revelation. Hence, although among the philosophical

sciences one is speculative and another practical, nevertheless sacred

doctrine includes both; as God, by one and the same science, knows

both Himself and His works. Still, it is speculative rather than

practical because it is more concerned with divine things than with

human acts; though it does treat even of these latter, inasmuch as man

is ordained by them to the perfect knowledge of God in which consists

eternal bliss. This is a sufficient answer to the Objections.

_______________________

Summa Theologica, Part I (Prima Pars) From the Complete American Edition · 第 22 / 722 题