CHAPTER XV

SPEECHES AND LECTURES

Miss Marie Corelli’s career as a public speaker has been a short one,

but, so far as it has gone, full of promise. She has a good enunciation

and a sweet, penetrating voice; she takes the platform with the whole of

her address clearly mapped out in her mind, her only aids to memory

being a few notes scribbled on slips of paper, which at first glance

look like a number of broad spills. Consulting these occasionally by way

of mental refreshment, she says what she has to say with easy

self-possession, never hesitating for lack of a suitable word or phrase.

The novelist’s first speech in public was made in connection with a

bazaar at Henley-in-Arden, Warwickshire, in July, 1899. The announcement

that Miss Corelli was to open the proceedings attracted a large number

of people to this picturesque little town, which is situated some eight

miles from Stratford-on-Avon, on the high road to Birmingham.

When Miss Corelli had mounted the improvised platform, she first thanked

the organizers of the bazaar for the compliment that had been paid her

in their invitation, and then proceeded as follows:

“I think we all know very well what a bazaar is. It is peculiar and

distinctive; it is a way of charming the money out of our pockets.

We wish it to be charmed to-day, because we always know when such

money is obtained it is for a good purpose. Sometimes it is for a

hospital, frequently it is for the restoration of a parish church.

That is our object this afternoon. Now, there are some people who

say that a parish church does not always require repair, but in

this special case you cannot possibly offer that as an excuse for

not spending your money. The parish church of Henley-in-Arden is in

a very sad state; indeed, there are holes in the wooden floor

through which rats and mice, quite uninvited, may come to prayers.

Also the pavement of the central aisle is so broken up that it has

literally risen in wrath, and become divided against itself. I hope

this day you will come forward with your money and make the parish

church a thing of beauty and a joy forever. It is a very old

building. It is, I believe, five or six hundred years old, and all

that time it has been a place of prayer and praise. I am sure you

will not allow it to suffer, or fall into neglect and ruin at your

hands. Now, I want you to set your hearts to the tune of generosity

this afternoon, and I want you to spend regardless of expense; I

want you to be absolutely extravagant and reckless. The bazaar is

full of very pretty things, some useful, some not useful, but all

ornamental; and I can only recommend you to buy everything in the

place. In the words of the Immortal Bard, whose very spirit

permeates the whole of your beautiful county,

Leave not a wrack behind!

Set your hearts to the task, your wills to the deed, spend your

money, and make the whole thing a great and triumphant success.

Ladies and gentlemen, may your purses to-day be like this bazaar,

which I have now the honor to declare open!”

An excellent example of what an address to workingmen should be, was

delivered by Miss Corelli, at Stratford-on-Avon on January 6th, 1901.

The lecture was entitled, “The Secret of Happiness.” After some

preliminary observations on the birth of the New Century, Miss Corelli

said:

“The twentieth century finds us all on the same old search, asking

the same old question: How to be happy? Some of the distinguished

persons who have written in the newspapers on this subject declare

we have lost the art of being happy in the old simple ways, and

that all the brightness and mirth which used to make our England

‘Merry England’ have gone forever. I think there is some little

truth in these statements, and the reason is not very far distant.

We think too much of ourselves and too little of our neighbors.

There is nothing so depressing as a constant contemplation of one’s

self, and the greatest moral cowardice in the world’s opinion comes

from consulting one’s own personal convenience. It is just as if a

man were asked to look at a beautiful garden full of flowers, and,

instead of accepting the invitation, sat down with the Röntgen rays

to look at his own bones. His bones concern no one but himself, and

are a dull entertainment at best. To be truly happy we must set

ourselves on one side, and think of all the good we can do, all the

love we can show to our neighbors. This is our work and our

business, and, by performing that work thoroughly well, we shall

not lose the secret of happiness; we shall find it. The harming,

the slandering, the over-reaching, the plucking down of our

neighbors is not our business, and if we indulge in that kind of

thing we shall never be happy. It is to a great extent true, as

some of the newspapers tell us, that the twentieth century still

finds us very far from the best ideals and hopes. War still hangs

like a cloud across the country. Drink is still a curse, and large

sections of trade are being taken from us by American and foreign

rivals. This, if it goes on, will mean much ruin and misery and

want to many of our English artisans and workmen, and this brings

me to another point in the secret of happiness, which is Work. Not

what we call scamp work; not work which drops its tools at the

first sound of the dinner bell and runs across to the public-house,

but good, conscientious, thorough work, of which the workman

himself may be justly proud. Why should Americans take work which

Englishmen, if they like, can do infinitely better? Simply because

they are smart, cute, up to time, and take less early closing and

fewer bank holidays. I am a very hard worker myself, and I am not

speaking without knowing what I am talking about, and I say from my

own experience--and I have worked ever since I reached my sixteenth

year--that work is happiness. No one can take my work from me and

therefore no one can take my happiness from me. I defy any one to

upset, worry, or put me out in the least so long as I have my work

to do. Take away my work, and I am lost. Show me a lazy, loafing

person, man or woman, and I will show you a discontented grumbler,

who is a misery in his or her home, and a misery to him or her

self. Nothing is idle in God’s universe; the smallest observation

will prove that. If there were early closing up there (_pointing

upwards_) there would soon be an end to us all. The flower works,

as it pushes its way through the soil to bud and blossom; the tree

works as it breaks into beautiful foliage; the whole earth works

incessantly to produce its fruits. The sun works; it never rests;

it rises and sets with perfect regularity. In fact, everything we

see about us in nature is in constant, steady, splendid, perfect

work. The idle person is, therefore, out of tune with the plan of

God’s creation and action. A great millionaire whom I know said to

his son: ‘If you can’t find anything to do I will disinherit you,

so that you may work as hard as I did. That will make a man of

you.’ In this beautiful world, with a thousand opportunities of

doing good every day and all day, and with the light of the

Christian faith spread about us like perpetual sunshine, no one

should be really unhappy. To your society, which has done so much

good already, which is doing so much good, and will continue to do

so much good, I would say, if I may be permitted to offer any

advice: Cultivate among yourselves a spirit of cheerfulness,

light-heartedness, and content, which shall spread the influence of

moral and mental sunshine all through this dear little town in

which you dwell. Let those who don’t belong to your society see

that you can be merry and wise without needing any other stimulant

than your own cheery natures, and that the Christian faith is to

you a healthy and active working daily principle, the heart, life,

and soul. Show all your friends--and enemies too--that you have the

secret of happiness by holding up a firm faith in the goodness of

God; by keeping the welfare of others always in sight, and loving

your neighbor not only as yourself, but even more than yourself;

and by carrying out whatever you have to do, no matter how trivial

it be, so thoroughly and so perfectly that you can feel proud of

it. Such pride is true pride, and thoroughly justifiable, and the

independence that comes from work thoroughly well done is a noble

independence. I would not change such independence as that to be a

king and be waited on by courtiers all day long. To me the honest

workman is a thousand times better than the king. The king can do

no work. It is all done for him,--poor king! He can hardly call his

soul his own. He is not allowed to put his own coat on, and do you

call him an independent man! I call him a slave! I would rather

have a man here in Stratford, who could do something of his own

accord, turn out a piece of work, perfect--carving, finishing, or

anything of that sort--and say, ‘That is mine! The king can’t do

that, but I can!’ Money is nothing; pride, independence, and

self-respect are everything; and money gained by bad work is bad

money. You can’t make it anything else. Good work always commands

good money, and good money brings a blessing with it. We are told

that the danger of the twentieth century is greed of gold. Our

upper classes are all craving for yet still more money, and as much

money is spent in a single night on a dinner in London as would

keep nearly all Stratford. We are told that England will lose her

prestige through the money-craving mania of her people. More than

one great empire has fallen from an excessive love of luxury and

self-indulgence, but we will hope that no such mischief will come

to our beloved England. At any rate, in this little corner of

it--Shakespeare’s greenwood--where the greatest of thinkers,

philosophers, and poets was born, and to which he was content to

return, when he had made sufficient means, and die among his own

people--here, I say, let us try and keep up high ideals of mutual

help, love, and labor. Let us keep them up to their highest spirit.

The secret of happiness is to hold fast to such simple,

old-fashioned virtues as love of home, a life of simplicity, and

appreciation of all the beautiful things of Nature, which are so

richly strewn about us in Warwickshire, and never to lose sight of

the best of all things--the great lesson of the pure Christian

faith, the lesson which teaches us how the Divine sacrifice of self

for the sake of others was sufficient to redeem the world! A happy

New Year and a century of hope and good to all of you.”

In November, 1901, Miss Corelli delivered her first lecture in Scotland.

It was called “The Vanishing Gift: an address on the Decay of the

Imagination,” and was listened to with the greatest appreciation by a

crowded audience of the members of the Edinburgh Philosophical

Institution, and their friends, numbering some four thousand persons.

Scotland has ever been a more literary country than England. A novel

that fails in England often sells well in Scotland. Scotch people are

very loyal to the magazines they like, and they always display a keen

interest in literary ventures. Thackeray was a great favorite up there.

“I have had three per cent. of the whole population here,” he wrote from

Edinburgh in November, 1856, “If I could but get three per cent. of

London!” Both Dickens and Thackeray received tangible tokens of regard

from Edinburgh people, Thackeray’s taking the form of a silver

statuette of “Mr. Punch,” designed as an inkstand.

It would seem that to-day, as then, Edinburgh is anxious to give

substantial proof of its appreciation, for, a few days after Miss

Corelli delivered her lecture, whilst ill-health detained her at the

Royal Hotel, a deputation from the Philosophical Institution called and

presented her with a massive silver rose-bowl.

The Chairman of the deputation, in asking her to accept the gift, made a

very eloquent little speech, in which he laid emphasis on the fact that

the last time a similar token of appreciation had been presented by the

Philosophical Institution to any novelist had been in the case of

Charles Dickens. Since then, no one, save Miss Corelli, had received the

unanimous vote of the Committee as meriting such a tribute. The

rose-bowl bears the following inscription:--

“_Presented to Miss Marie Corelli by the Edinburgh Philosophical

Institution, in grateful recognition of the Brilliant Address

delivered by her on 19th November, 1901._”

It is worthy of note that the leading journal of Edinburgh, _The

Scotsman_, made no allusion whatever to this presentation. The omission

caused considerable annoyance to the Committee of the Philosophical

Institution, and the Secretary made inquiry as to why their special

compliment to Miss Marie Corelli had been passed over. The reply was

that they “did not think it was necessary to mention it”; a particularly

lame and inadequate answer, seeing that if such a handsome presentation

on the part of a great Institution had been made to any well-known male

author, the probabilities are that considerable importance would have

been attached to the incident. As it was, _The Scotsman_ was judged to

have committed itself to a singular error of prejudice in the omission,

as also by stating that Miss Corelli’s crowded audience at the Queen’s

Hall were “mostly women,” a perfectly erroneous statement, as by far the

larger half of the assembly was composed of the sterner sex.

Miss Corelli, in the course of the lecture referred to, attributed the

gradual dwindling of Imagination to the feverish unrest and agitation of

the age in which we live. The hurry-skurry of modern life, the morbid

craving for incessant excitement, breed a disinclination to think. Where

there is no time to think, there is less time to imagine; and when there

is neither thought nor imagination, creative work of a high and lasting

quality is not possible. In the world’s earlier days, conceptions of

art were of the loftiest and purest order.

“The thoughts of the ‘old world’ period are written in well-nigh

indelible characters. The colossal architecture of the temples of

ancient Egypt, and that marvelous imaginative creation, the Sphinx,

with its immutable face of mingled scorn and pity; the beautiful

classic forms of old Greece and Rome,--these are all visible

evidences of spiritual aspiration and endeavor; moreover, they are

the expression of a broad, reposeful strength--a dignified

consciousness of power. The glorious poetry of the Hebrew

Scriptures, the swing and rush of Homer’s ‘Iliad,’ the stately

simplicity and profundity of Plato--these also belong to what we

know of the youth of the world. And they are still a part of the

world’s most precious possessions. We, in our day, can do nothing

so great. We have neither the imagination to conceive such work,

nor the calm force necessary to execute it. The artists of a former

time labored with sustained and passionate, yet tranquil, energy;

we can only produce imitations of the greater models with a vast

amount of spasmodic hurry and clamor. So, perchance, we shall leave

to future generations little more than an echo of ‘much ado about

nothing.’ For truly we live at present under a veritable scourge of

mere noise. No king, no statesman, no general, no thinker, no

writer is allowed to follow the course of his duty or work without

the shrieking comment of all sorts and conditions of uninstructed

and misguided persons....”

Imagination is an artist’s first necessary. The poet, the painter, the

sculptor, or the musician must be able to make a world of his own, and

live in it, before he can make one for others. When he has evolved such

a world out of his individual consciousness, and has peopled it with the

creations of his fancy, he can turn its “airy substance” into reality

for all time.

“Shakespeare’s world is real; so real that there are not wanting

certain literary impostors who grudge him its reality, and strive

to dispossess him of his own. Walter Scott’s world is real; so real

that you have built him a shrine here in Edinburgh, crowded with

sculptured figures of men and women, most of whom never existed

save in his teeming fancy. What a tribute to the power of

Imagination is that beautiful monument in the centre of Princes

Street, with all the forms evoked from one great mind, lifted high

above us, who consider ourselves ‘real’ people!”

The lecturer proceeded to deplore acts of vandalism such as that which

caused “the pitiful ruin of Loch Katrine” in supplying Glasgow with

water. Further on she lamented the gradual disappearance of “that

idealistic and romantic spirit” which has helped to make Scotland’s

history such a brilliant chronicle of heroism and honor.

In her powerful peroration the novelist graphically told of modern

wonders which were imagined when the world was young.

“What, after all, is Imagination? It is a great many things. It is

a sense of beauty and harmony; it is an instinct of poetry and

prophecy. A Persian poet describes it as an immortal sense of

memory which is always striving to recall the beautiful things the

soul has lost. Another fancy, also from the East, is that it is ‘an

instructive premonition of beautiful things to come.’ Another,

which is perhaps the most accurate description of all, is that it

is ‘the sundial of the soul, on which God flashes the true time of

day.’ This is true, if we bear in mind that Imagination is always

ahead of science, pointing out in advance the great discovery to

come. Shakespeare foretold the whole science of geology in three

words--‘sermons in stones’; and the whole business of the electric

telegram in one line--‘I’ll put a girdle round the earth in forty

minutes.’ One of the Hebrew prophets ‘imagined’ the phonograph when

he wrote, ‘Declare unto me the image of a voice.’ As we all know,

the marks on the wax cylinder in a phonograph are ‘the image of a

voice.’ The airship may prove a very marvelous invention, but the

imagination which saw Aladdin’s palace flying from one country to

another was long before it. All the genii in the ‘Arabian Nights’

stories were only the symbols of the elements which man might

control if he but rubbed the lamp of his intelligence smartly

enough. Every fairy-tale has a meaning; every legend a lesson. The

submarine boat in perfection has been ‘imagined’ by Jules Verne.

Wireless telegraphy appears to have been known in the very remote

days of Egypt, for in a very old book called ‘The History of the

Pyramids,’ translated from the Arabic, and published in France in

1672, we find an account of a certain high priest of Memphis, named

Saurid, who, so says the ancient Arabian chronicler, ‘prepared for

himself a casket, wherein he put magic fire, and, shutting himself

up with the casket, he sent messages with the fire day and night,

over land and sea to all those priests over whom he had command, so

that all the people should be made subject to his will. And he

received answers to his messages without stop or stay, and none

could hold or see the running fire, so that all the land was in

fear by reason of the knowledge of Saurid.’ In the same volume we

find that a priestess, named Borsa, evidently used the telephone;

for, according to her history, ‘she applied her mouth and ears unto

pipes in the wall of her dwelling, and so heard and answered the

requests of the people in the distant city.’

“Thus it would seem that there is nothing new under the sun to that

‘dainty Ariel’ of the mind--Imagination.”

Early in 1902 Miss Corelli again gave an address in Scotland--this time

at Glasgow, where one of the largest audiences ever known in that city

assembled to hear her lecture on “Signs of the Times.” Every seat was

occupied, and up to the last moment numbers were clamoring for only

standing room. All reserved seats had been booked for nearly three weeks

beforehand, and the extraordinary number of applications received proved

that double the accommodation available could have been taken up.

The Address was undeniably daring and spirited, touching on various

social aspects of the hour. The apathy of Parliament on certain pressing

matters of home interest, the new rules of Procedure in the House, the

inrush of undesirable aliens, the traitorous attitude of the pro-Boers,

the crowding out of British industries by an excess of foreign

competition, the German slanders upon our army, the change in the

British uniform to the German model, and the flattering attentions of

Germany towards America, were all touched upon by the novelist with a

force and satire that were entirely new and unexpected. One of her best

points was made in alluding to the words uttered by the Prince of Wales,

on his return from his Colonial tour, in the course of his famous speech

at the Mansion House, _i. e._, “The old country must wake up if she

intends to maintain her old position of pre-eminence in her Colonial

trade against foreign competition.”

She continued:

“I believe it is the first time in all the annals of English

History that any Prince of Wales has deemed it necessary to tell

the old country, which gave him his birth and heir-apparency, to

‘wake up’! It has been called a ‘statesmanlike utterance’ in many

quarters of our own always courteous Press, but by our Continental

neighbors it has been simply taken as a royal and official

statement of British incompetency. It has even been said that no

Prince of Wales should ever have admitted any possible likelihood

of weakness in his own country. We must remember, however, that the

warning of his Royal Highness was directed against foreign

competition, and may have been intended to prepare British trade

for the impending commercial designs of Germany upon South

Africa.... If the British Lion is indeed sleeping, it is time to

wake, but to some of us the Great Creature seems never to have

slept, but to have been caught unsuspectingly in a trap of

restrictive legislation and vested interests, and so bound hand and

foot unawares. The Lion is a generous animal, but in certain old

fables he is represented as being no match for the Fox. If, as the

Prince of Wales says, the old country is to maintain her position

of pre-eminence against foreign competition, she has some right to

demand that she be not swamped and throttled by it under the very

shelter of her own sea wall.”

Referring to what she satirically termed the evidence of our “love” for

Germany, she pointed out that though Germans were guilty of one of the

grossest insults ever recorded in history against our brave army, we,

nevertheless, had clothed that army in the German uniform, and had made

free and independent Tommy Atkins turn himself into a copy of his Teuton

conscript brother. Not only that, we have accepted a German design for

the new postage stamps. She also alluded to the rumor that the

Coronation medal was to be struck from a German design.

Miss Corelli concluded with the following words:--

“The greatest, strongest, most splendid and hopeful ‘sign of the

times’ is the advancing and resistless tide of Truth, which is

approaching steadily--which cannot be kept back, and which in the

first breaking of its great wave shall engulf a whole shore of

weedy shams. A desire for Truth is in the hearts of the people:

Truth in religion, Truth in Life, Truth in work. We are all aiming

for it, pushing towards it, and breaking down obstacles on the way.

And, because God is on the side of Truth, we shall obtain it; more

speedily, perhaps, than we think--especially if we are not too

weakly ready to be led away by the first Anti-Christ of religious,

political, or social example.

“‘Truth, like the sun in the morning skies,

Shall clear the clouds from the days to be;

“Each for himself” is a Gospel of Lies,

That never was issued by God’s decree.’”

Such are a few examples of Miss Corelli’s utterances in public. It is

hardly necessary to add that these speeches were liberally punctuated

with applause by those who had the privilege of listening to them.

If those who condemn the novelist so readily will only take the trouble

to study what she has said, they cannot, if they wish to be regarded as

honest men, deny her possession of many of the qualities that make for

greatness. There are people who fear and dislike this lady because the

attitude she takes up, on many questions, is significant of Battle. She

hits very hard; her enemies wince beneath her blows, and revile her in

wholesale terms because they cannot overcome her in fair combat. But

newspaper sneers will do little to affect the judgment of the Public,

which is, after all, the critic whose opinion is abiding and final.

Marie Corelli: The Writer and the Woman · 第 15 / 18 章