This is a good town to study human nature in, Henry, and you would do

well to come here before your vacation is over, just to see what kind of

people the Lord allows to encumber the earth. It will show you how many

human brutes there are loose in the world who don't try any longer to

appear decent when they think their identity is swallowed up in the

multitude of a great city. There are just as selfish folks in the

smaller towns, but they are afraid to give themselves up to it, because

somebody in the crowd would be sure to recognize them. Here a man has

the advantage of a perpetual _nom de plume_, and he is tempted to see

how pusillanimous he can be even when he is just here on a visit. I'm

going home next week, before I completely wreck my immortal soul.

I left your mother pretty comfortable at home, but I haven't heard from

her since I left.

Your father,

BILL NYE.

THE AUTOMATIC BELL BOY

XXVIII

Little did B. Franklin wot when he baited his pin hook with a good

conductor and tapped the low browed and bellowing storm nimbus with his

buoyant kite, thus crudely acquiring a pickle jar of electricity, that

the little start he then made would be the egg from which inventors and

scientists would hatch out the system which now not only encircles the

globe with messages swifter than the flight of Phoebus, but that anon

the light of day would be filtered through a cloud of cables loaded with

destruction sufficient for a whole army, and the air be filled with

death-dealing, dangling wires.

Little did he know that he was bottling an agent which has since pulled

out the stopper with its teeth and grown till it overspreads the sky,

planting its bare, bleak telegraph poles along every highway, carrying

day messages by night and night messages when it gets ready, filling the

air with its rusty wings--provided, of course, that such agents wear

wings--and with the harsh, metallic, ghoulish laughter of the

signal-key, all the while resting one foot on the neck of the sender and

one on the neck of the recipient, defying aggregated humanity to do its

worst, and commanding all civilization, in terse, well-chosen terms, to

either fish, cut bait or go ashore.

Could Benjamin have known all this at the time, possibly he might have

considered it wisdom to go in when it rained.

I am not an old fogy, though I may have that appearance, and I rejoice

to see the world move on. One by one I have laid aside my own

encumbering prejudices in order to keep up with the procession. Have I

not gradually adopted everything that would in any way enhance my

opportunities for advancement, even through tedious evolution, from the

paper collar up to the finger bowl, eyether, and nyether?

This should convince the reader that I am not seeking to clog the

wheels of progress. I simply look with apprehension upon any great

centralization of wealth or power in the hands of any one man who not

only does as he pleases with said wealth and power, but who, as I am

informed, does not read my timely suggestions as to how he shall use

them.

To return, however, to the subject of electricity. I have recently

sought to fathom the style and _motif_ of a new system which is to be

introduced into private residences, hotels, and police headquarters. In

private houses it will be used as a burglar's welcome. In hotels it will

take the mental strain off the bell-boy, relieving him also of a portion

of his burdensome salary at the same time. In the police department it

will do almost everything but eat peanuts from the corner stands.

I saw this system on exhibition in a large room, with the signals or

boxes on one side and the annunciator or central station on the other.

By walking from one to the other, a distance in all of thirty or forty

miles, I was enabled to get a slight idea of the principle.

[Illustration: In hotels it will take the mental strain off the

bell-boy, relieving him also of a portion of his burdensome salary at

the same time (Page 256)]

It is certainly a very intelligent system. I never felt my own

inferiority any more than I did in the presence of this wonderful

invention. It is able to do nearly anything, it seems to me, and the

main drawback appears to be its great versatility, on account of which

it is so complex that in order to become at all intimate with it a

policeman ought to put in two years at Yale and at least a year at

Leipsic. An extended course of study would perfect him in this line, but

he would not then be content to act as a policeman. He would aspire to

be a scientist, with dandruff on his coat collar and a far-away look in

his eye.

Then, again, take the hotel scheme, for instance. We go to a dial which

is marked Room 32. There we find that by treating it in a certain way it

will announce to the clerk that Room 32 wants a fire, ice-water, pens,

ink, paper, lemons, towels, fire-escape, Milwaukee Sec, pillow-shams, a

copy of this book, menu, croton frappe, carriage, laundry, physician,

sleeping-car ticket, berth-mark for same, Halford sauce, hot flat-iron

for ironing trousers, baggage, blotter, tidy for chair, or any of those

things. In fact, I have not given half the list on this barometer

because I could not remember them, though I may have added others which

are not there. The message arrives at the office, but the clerk is

engaged in conversation with a lady. He does not jump when the alarm

sounds, but continues the dialogue. Another guest wires the office that

he would like a copy of the _Congressional Record_. The message is filed

away automatically, and the thrilling conversation goes on. Then No.

7-5/8 asks to have his mail sent up. No. 25 wants to know what time the

'bus leaves the house for the train going East, and whether that train

will connect at Alliance, Ohio, with a tide-water train for Cleveland in

time to catch the Lake Shore train which will bring him into New York at

7:30, and whether all those trains are reported on time or not, and if

not will the office kindly state why? Other guests also manifest morbid

curiosity through their transmitters, but the clerk does not get

excited, for he knows that all these remarks are filed away in the large

black walnut box at the back of the office. When he gets ready,

provided he has been through a course of study in this brand of

business, he takes one room at a time, and addressing a pale young

"Banister Polisher" by the name of "Front," he begins to scatter to

their destinations, baggage, towels, morning papers, time-tables, etc.,

all over the house.

It is also supposed to be a great time-saver. For instance, No. 8 wants

to know the correct time. He moves an indicator around like the

combination on a safe, reads a few pages of instructions, and then

pushes a button, perhaps. Instead of ringing for a boy and having to

wait some time for him, then asking him to obtain the correct time at

the office and come back with the information, conversing with various

people on his way and expecting compensation for it, the guest can ask

the office and receive the answer without getting out of bed. You leave

a call for a certain hour, and at that time your own private gong will

make it so disagreeable for you that you will be glad to rise. Again, if

you wish to know the amount of your bill, you go through certain

exercises with the large barometer in your room; and, supposing you have

been at the house two days and have had a fire in your room three times,

and your bill is therefore $132.18, the answer will come back and be

announced on your gong as follows: _One_, pause, _three_, pause, _two_,

pause, _one_, pause, _eight_. When there is a cipher in the amount I do

not know what the method is, but by using due care in making up the bill

this need not occur.

For police and fire purposes the system shows a wonderful degree of

intelligence, not only as a speedy means of conveying calls for the fire

department, health department, department of street cleaning, department

of interior and good of the order, but it furnishes also a method of

transmitting emergency calls, so that no citizen--no matter how poor or

unknown--need go without an emergency. The citizen has only to turn the

crank of the little iron marten-house till the gong ceases to ring, then

push on the "Citizens' button," and he can have fun with most any

emergency he likes. Should he decide, however, to shrink from the

emergency before it arrives, he can go away from there, or secrete

himself and watch the surprise of the ambulance driver or the fire

department when no mangled remains or forked fire fiend is found in that

region.

This system is also supposed to keep its eye peeled for policemen and

inform the central station where each patrolman is all the time; also as

to his temperature, pulse, perspiration and breath. It keeps a record of

this at the main office on a ticker of its own, and the information may

be published in the society columns of the papers in the morning. It

enables a citizen to use his own discretion about sounding an alarm. He

has only to be a citizen. He need not be a tax-payer or a vox populi.

Should he be a citizen, or declare his intention to become such, or even

though he be a voter only, without any notion of ever being a citizen,

he can help himself to the fire department or anything else by ringing

up the central station.

Electricity and spiritualism have arrived at that stage of perfection

where a coil of copper wire and a can of credulity will accomplish a

great deal. The time is coming when even more surprising wonders will be

worked, and with electric wires, the rapid transit trains, and the

English sparrows all under the ground, the dawn of a better and brighter

day will be ushered in. The car-driver and the truck-man will then lie

down together, Boston will not rise up against London, he that

heretofore slag shall go forth no more for to slug, and the czar will

put aside his tailor-made boiler-iron underwear and fearlessly canvass

the nihilist wards in the interest of George Kennan and reform, nit.

THE END.

* * * * *

AN ARTICLE ON THE WRITINGS OF

James Whitcomb Riley

BY "CHELIFER"

THE AMBROSIA OF JAMES WHITCOMB RILEY.

"Chelifer" in "The Bookery."--Godey's Magazine.

There are writers that take Pegasus on giddier flights of fancy, and

writers that sit him more grandly, and writers that put him through

daintier paces, and writers that burden him with anguish nearer that of

the dread Rider of the White Horse, and there are writers that make him

a very bucking broncho of wit, but there is no one that turns Pegasus

into just such an ambling nag of lazy peace and pastoral content as

James--I had almost said Joshua Whitcomb--Riley. If you want a panacea

for the bitterness and the fret and the snobbishness and pretension and

unsympathy and the commercial ambition and worry and the other cankers

that gnaw and gnaw the soul, just throw a leg over the back of Riley's

Pegasus, "perfectly safe for family driving," let the reins hang loose

as you sag limply in your saddle, and gaze through drowsy eyes while the

amiable old beast jogs down lanes blissful with rural quietude, through

farmyards full of picturesque rustics and through the streets of quaint

villages. Then utter rest and a peace akin to bliss will possess your

soul.

To make readers content with life and glad to live is one of the most

dazzlingly magnificent deeds in the power of an artist. This is too

little appreciated in the melodramatic theatricism of our life. This

genius for soothing the reader with a pathos that is not anguish and a

humor that is not cynicism, this genius belongs to Mr. Riley in a

degree I have found in no other writer in all literature.

Of course, Mr. Riley is essentially a lyric poet. But his spirit is that

of Walt Whitman; he speaks the universal democracy, the equality of man,

the hatred of assumption and snobbery, that our republic stands for, if

it stands for anything. Now downright didacticism in a poet is an

abomination. But if a poet has no right to ponder the meanings of

things, the feelings of man for man and the higher "criticism of life,"

then no one has. If to Pope's "The proper study of mankind is man," you

add "nature" and "nature's God," you will fairly well outline the poet's

field.

Mere art (Heaven save the "mere"!) is not, and has never been, enough to

place a poet among the great spirits of the world. It has furnished a

number of nimble mandolinists and exquisite dilettants

for lazy moods. But great poetry must always be something more than

sweetmeats; it must be food--temptingly cooked, winningly served, well

spiced and well accompanied, but yet food to strengthen the blood and

the sinews of the soul.

Therefore I make so bold as to insist that even in a lyrist there should

be something more than the prosperity or the dirge of personal _amours_:

there should be a sympathy with the world-joy, the world-suffering, and

the world-kinship. It is this attitude toward lyric poetry that makes me

think Mr. Riley a poet whose exquisite art is lavished on humanity so

deep-sounding as to commend him to the acceptance of immortality among

the highest lyrists.

Horace was an acute thinker and a frank speaker on the problems of life.

This didacticism seems not to have harmed his artistic welfare, for he

has undoubtedly been the most popular poet that ever wrote. Consider the

magnitude and the enthusiasm of his audience! He has been the personal

chum of everyone that ever read Latinity. But Horace, when not exalted

with his inspired preachments on the art of life and the arts of poetry

and love, was a bitter cynic redeemed by great self-depreciation and

joviality. The son of a slave, he was too fond of court life to talk

democracy.

Bobby Burns was a thorough child of the people, and is more like Mr.

Riley in every way than any other poet. Yet he, too, had a vicious

cynicism, and he never had the polished art that enriches some of Mr.

Riley's non-dialectic poetry, as in parts of his fairy fancy, "The

Flying Islands of the Night."

Burns never had the versatility of sympathy that enables Mr. Riley to

write such unpastoral masterpieces as "Anselmo," "The Dead Lover," "A

Scrawl," "The Home-going," some of his sonnets, and the noble verses

beginning

"A monument for the soldiers!

And what will ye build it of?"

Yet it must be owned that Burns is in general Mr. Riley's prototype. Mr.

Riley admits it himself in his charming verses "To Robert Burns."

"Sweet singer, that I lo'e the maist

O' ony, sin' wi' eager haste

I smacket bairn lips ower the taste

O' hinnied sang."

The classic pastoral poets, Theokritos, Vergandil, the others, sang with

an exquisite art, indeed, yet their farm-folk were really Dresden-china

shepherds and shepherdesses speaking with affected simplicity or with

impossible elegance. Theokritos, like Burns and Riley, wrote partly in

dialect and partly in the standard speech, and to those who are never

reconciled to anything that can quote no "authority," there should be

sufficient justification for dialect poetry in this divine Sicilian

musician of whom his own Goatherd might have said:

"Full of fine honey thy beautiful mouth was, Thyrsis, created

Full of the honeycomb; figs AEgilean, too, mayest thou nibble,

Sweet as they are; for ev'n than the locust more bravely thou singest."

I have no room to argue the _pro's_ of dialect here, but it always seems

strange that those lazy critics who are unwilling to take the trouble to

translate the occasional hard words in a dialect form of their own

tongue, should be so inconsistent as ever to study a foreign language.

Then, too, dialect is necessary to truth, to local color, to intimacy

with the character depicted. Besides, it is delicious. There is

something mellow and soul-warming about a plebeian metathesis like

"congergation." What orthoepy could replace lines like these?:

"Worter, shade and all so mixed, don't know which you'd orter

Say, th' _worter_ in the shadder--_shadder_ in the _worter_!"

One thing about Mr. Riley's dialect that may puzzle those not familiar

with the living speech of the Hoosiers, is his spelling, which is

chiefly done as if by the illiterate speaker himself. Thus

"rostneer-time" and "ornry" must be AEolic Greek to those barbarians who

have never heard of "roasting-ears" of corn or of that contemptuous

synonym for "vulgar," "common," which is smoothly elided,

"or(di)n(a)ry." Both of these words could be spelled with a suggestive

and helpful use of apostrophes: "roast'n'-ear," and or'n'ry.

Jumbles like "jevver" for "did you ever?" and the like can hardly be

spelled otherwise than phonetically, but a glossary should be appended

as in Lowell's "Biglow Papers," for the poems are eminently worth even

lexicon-thumbing. Another frequent fault of dialect writers is the

spelling phonetically of words pronounced everywhere alike. Thus

"enough" is spelled "enuff," and "clamor," "clammer," though Dr. Johnson

himself would never have pronounced them otherwise. In these

misspellings, however, Mr. Riley excuses himself by impersonating an

illiterate as well as a crude-speaking poet. But even then he is

inconsistent, and "hollowing" becomes "hollerin'," with an apostrophe to

mark the lost "g"--that abominable imported harshness that ought to be

generally exiled from our none too smooth language. Mr. Riley has

written a good essay in defense of dialect, which enemies of this form

of literature might read with advantage.

But Mr. Riley has written a deal of most excellent verse that is not in

dialect. One whole volume is devoted to a fairy extravaganza called "The

Flying Islands of the Night," a good addition to that quaint literature

of lace to which "The Midsummer Night's Dream," Herrick's "Oberon's

Epithalamium," or whatever it is called, Drake's "Culprit Fay," and

other bits of most exquisite foolery belong. While hardly a complete

success, this diminutive drama contains some curiously delightful

conceits like this "improvisation:"

"Her face--her brow--her hair unfurled!--

And O the oval chin below,

Carved, like a cunning cameo,

With one exquisite dimple, swirled

With swimming shine and shade, and whirled

The daintiest vortex poets know--

The sweetest whirlpool ever twirled

By Cupid's finger-tip--and so,

The deadliest maelstrom in the world!"

It is a strange individuality that Mr. Riley has, suggesting numerous

other masters--whose influence he acknowledges in special odes--and yet

all digested and assimilated into a marked individuality of his own. He

has studied the English poets profoundly and improved himself upon them,

till one is chiefly impressed, in his non-dialectic verse, with his

refinement, subtlety, and ease. He has a large vocabulary, and his

felicity is at times startling. Thus he speaks of water "chuckling,"

which is as good as Horace's ripples that "gnaw" the shore. Note the

mastery of such lines as

"And the dust of the road is like velvet."

"Nothin' but green woods and clear

Skies and unwrit poetry

By the acre!"

"Then God smiled and it was morning!"

Life is "A poor pale yesterday of Death."

"And O I wanted so

To be felt sorry for!"

"Always suddenly they are gone,

The friends we trusted and held secure."

"At utter loaf."

"Knee-deep in June."

--But I can not go on quoting forever.

Technically, Mr. Riley is a master of surpassing finish. His meters are

perfect and varied. They flow as smoothly as his own Indiana streams.

His rimes are almost never imperfect. To prove his own understanding he

has written one _scherzo_ in technic that is a delightful example of bad

rime, bad meter, and the other earmarks of the poor poet. It is "Ezra

House," and begins:

"Come listen, good people, while a story I do tell

Of the sad fate of one I knew so passing well!"

The "do" and the "so" are the unfailing index of crudity. Then we have

rimes like "long" and "along" (it is curious that modern English is the

only tongue that finds this repetition objectionable); "moon" and

"tomb," "well" and "hill," and "said" and "denied" are others, and the

whole thing is an enchanting lesson in How Poetry Should Not be Written.

Mr. Riley is fond of dividing words at the ends of lines, but always in

a comic way, though Horace, you remember, was not unwilling to use it

seriously, as in his

"----U-

Xorius amnis."

Mr. Riley's animadversions on "Addeliney Bowersox" constitute a

fascinating study in this effect. He is also devoted to dividing an

adjective from its noun by a line-end. This is a trick of Poe's, whose

influence Mr. Riley has greatly profited by. In his dialect poetry Mr.

Riley gets just the effect of the jerky drawl of the Hoosier by using

the end of a line as a knife, thus:

"The wood's

Green again, and sun feels good's

June!"

His masterly use of the caesura is notable, too. See its charming

despotism in "Griggsby Station."

But it is not his technic that makes him ambrosial, not the loving care

_ad unguem_ that smooths the uncouthest dialect into lilting tunefulness

without depriving it of its colloquial verisimilitude--it is none of

these things of mechanical inspiration, but the spirit of the man, his

democracy, his tenderness, the health and wealth of his sympathies. If

he uses "memory" a little too often as a vehicle for his rural pictures,

the utter charm of the pictures is atonement enough. He has caught the

real American. He is the laureate of the bliss of laziness. His child

poems are the next best thing to the child itself; they have all the

infectious essence of gayety, and all the _naivete_, and all the

knife-like appeal. It could not reasonably be demanded that his prose

should equal the perfection of his verse, but nothing more eerie has

ever been done than the little story, "Where is Mary Alice Smith?" with

its strange use of rime at the end.

Of all dialect writers he has been the most versatile. Think of the

author of "The Raggedy Man" or "Orphant Annie" writing one of the finest

sonnets in the language! this one which I must quote here as a noble

ending to my halt praise:

"Being his mother, when he goes away

I would not hold him overlong, and so

Sometimes my yielding sight of him grows O

So quick of tears, I joy he did not stay

To catch the faintest rumor of them! Nay,

Leave always his eyes clear and glad, although

Mine own, dear Lord, do fill to overflow;

"Let his remembered features, as I pray,

Smile ever on me. Ah! what stress of love

Thou givest me to guard with Thee thiswise:

Its fullest speech ever to be denied

Mine own--being his mother! All thereof

Thou knowest only, looking from the skies

As when not Christ alone was crucified."

Life is the more tolerable, the more full of learned sympathy, and

thereby of joy and value, for the very existence of such a man.

* * * * *

LIST OF MR. RILEY'S BOOKS.

A CHILD WORLD. (NEW.) Tales in verse of childhood days. Cloth, 12mo,

$1.25. Half calf, $2.50. Hand-made Paper edition, bound uniform with

"Old Fashioned Roses," $2.

NEGHBORLY POEMS, including "The Old Swimmin' Hole," by Benjamin F.

Johnson, of Boone (James Whitcomb Riley.) Cloth, illustrated, 12mo,

$1.25. Half calf, $2.50.

SKETCHES IN PROSE, and Occasional Verses. Cloth, $1.25. Half calf,

$2.50.

AFTERWHILES. Sixtieth thousand. With Portrait. Cloth, $1.25. Half calf,

$2.50.

PIPES O' PAN AT ZEKESBURY. Five Sketches and fifty Poems. Cloth, $1.25.

Half calf, $2.50.

RHYMES OF CHILDHOOD. Dialect and other Verses. With Portrait. Cloth,

$1.25. Half calf, $2.50.

THE FLYING ISLANDS OF THE NIGHT. A Fantastic Drama in Verse. Cloth,

$1.25. Half calf, $2.50.

GREEN FIELDS AND RUNNING BROOKS. Dialect and Serious Poems. With

Portrait. Cloth, Illustrated, $1.25. Half calf, $2.50.

ARMAZINDY. Hoosier Harvest Airs, Feigned Forms, and Child Rhymes. Cloth,

$1.25. Half calf, $2.50.

OLD FASHIONED ROSES. A selection of popular Poems, from Mr. Riley's

Works. Printed in England. 16mo, uncut, $1.75.

AN OLD SWEETHEART OF MINE. Illustrated in colors. Oblong 4to, $2.50.

A UNIFORM EDITION of Mr. Riley's Works in 9 volumes, 12mo, cloth, per

set, $11.25. Half calf, 9 volumes, 12mo, per set, $22.50. Published by

The Bowen-Merrill Co., Indianapolis and Kansas City. Sent post-paid to

any address on receipt of the price.

A Guest at the Ludlow, and Other Stories · 第 10 / 10 段