The Horror of the Perpetual Holiday

It will be said here that, on the contrary, heaven is always conceived

as a perpetual holiday, and that whoever is not born to an independent

income is striving for one or longing for one because it gives holidays

for life. To which I reply, first, that heaven, as conventionally

conceived, is a place so inane, so dull, so useless, so miserable,

that nobody has ever ventured to describe a whole day in heaven, though

plenty of people have described a day at the seaside; and that the

genuine popular verdict on it is expressed in the proverb "Heaven for

holiness and Hell for company." Second, I point out that the wretched

people who have independent incomes and no useful occupation, do the

most amazingly disagreeable and dangerous things to make themselves

tired and hungry in the evening. When they are not involved in what they

call sport, they are doing aimlessly what other people have to be paid

to do: driving horses and motor cars; trying on dresses and walking up

and down to shew them off; and acting as footmen and housemaids to royal

personages. The sole and obvious cause of the notion that idleness is

delightful and that heaven is a place where there is nothing to be done,

is our school system and our industrial system. The school is a prison

in which work is a punishment and a curse. In avowed prisons, hard

labor, the only alleviation of a prisoner's lot, is treated as an

aggravation of his punishment; and everything possible is done to

intensify the prisoner's inculcated and unnatural notion that work is an

evil. In industry we are overworked and underfed prisoners. Under such

absurd circumstances our judgment of things becomes as perverted as our

habits. If we were habitually underworked and overfed, our notion

of heaven would be a place where everybody worked strenuously for

twenty-four hours a day and never got anything to eat.

Once realize that a perpetual holiday is beyond human endurance, and

that "Satan finds some mischief still for idle hands to do" and it will

be seen that we have no right to impose a perpetual holiday on children.

If we did, they would soon outdo the Labor Party in their claim for a

Right to Work Bill.

In any case no child should be brought up to suppose that its food and

clothes come down from heaven or are miraculously conjured from empty

space by papa. Loathsome as we have made the idea of duty (like the idea

of work) we must habituate children to a sense of repayable obligation

to the community for what they consume and enjoy, and inculcate the

repayment as a point of honor. If we did that today--and nothing but

flat dishonesty prevents us from doing it--we should have no idle rich

and indeed probably no rich, since there is no distinction in being

rich if you have to pay scot and lot in personal effort like the working

folk. Therefore, if for only half an hour a day, a child should do

something serviceable to the community.

Productive work for children has the advantage that its discipline is

the discipline of impersonal necessity, not that of wanton personal

coercion. The eagerness of children in our industrial districts to

escape from school to the factory is not caused by lighter tasks or

shorter hours in the factory, nor altogether by the temptation of wages,

nor even by the desire for novelty, but by the dignity of adult work,

the exchange of the factitious personal tyranny of the schoolmaster,

from which the grown-ups are free, for the stern but entirely dignified

Laws of Life to which all flesh is subject.

Treatise on Parents and Children · 第 22 / 65 题