CHARACTERISTICS OF THE EAST INDIA COMPANY (1788).

=Source.=--_Speech in the Impeachment of Warren Hastings, Esq._ Edmund

Burke. Vol. vii. of his Collected Works. London: G. Bell and Sons. 1911.

I must however remark, before I go further, that there is something

in the representation of the East-India Company, in their oriental

territory, different from that, perhaps, of any other nation that has

ever transported any part of its power from one country to another. The

East-India Company, in India, is not properly a branch of the British

nation, it is only a deputation of individuals. When the Tartars

entered into China, when the Arabs and Tartars successively entered

into Hindostan, when the Goths and Vandals penetrated into Europe, when

the Normans forced their way into England, indeed in all conquests,

migrations, settlements, and colonizations, the new people came as the

offset of a nation. The Company in India does not exist as a national

colony. In effect and substance, nobody can go thither that does not

go in its service. The English in India are nothing but a seminary

for the succession of officers. They are a nation of placemen;--they

are a commonwealth without a people; they are a state made up wholly

of magistrates. There is nothing to be in propriety called people, to

watch, to inspect, to balance against the power of office. The power of

office, so far as the English nation is concerned, is the sole power

in the country. The consequence of which is, that being a kingdom of

magistrates, what is commonly called the _esprit du corps_ is strong

in it. This spirit of the body predominates equally in all parts; by

which the members must consider themselves as having a common interest,

and that common interest separated both from that of the country which

sent them out, and from that of the country in which they act. No

control upon them exists; none, I mean, in persons who understand their

language, who understood their manners, or can apply their conduct to

the laws. Therefore, in a body so constituted confederacy is easy, and

has been general. Your lordships are not to expect that that should

happen in such a body which never happened in any body or corporation,

that is, that they should in any instance be a proper check and control

upon themselves. It is not in the nature of things. The fundamental

principle of the whole of the East-India Company’s system is monopoly

in some sense or other. The same principle predominates in the service

abroad and the service at home; and both systems are united into one,

animated with the same spirit, that is, with the corporate spirit. The

whole, taken together, is such as has not been seen in the examples of

the Moors, the Portuguese, the Spaniards, the Romans; in no old, in no

recent examples. The Dutch may resemble it, but they have not an empire

properly so denominated. By means of this peculiar circumstance it has

not been difficult for Mr. Hastings to embody abuse, and to put himself

at the head of a regular system of corruption.

Another circumstance in that service is deserving of notice. Except

in the highest parts of all, the emoluments of office do not in

any degree correspond with the trust, nor the nature of the office

with its name. In other official systems the style, in general, is

above the function; here is it the reverse. Under the name of junior

merchant, senior merchant, writer, and other petty appellations of

the counting-house, you have magistrates of high dignity, you have

administrators of revenues truly royal;--you have judges civil, and in

some respects criminal, who pass judgment upon the greatest properties

of a great country. The legal public emoluments that belong to them are

very often so inadequate to the real dignity of the character, that

it is impossible, almost absolutely impossible, for the subordinate

parts of it, which though subordinate are stations of power, to exist

as Englishmen who look at a fortune to be enjoyed at home as their

ultimate object, and to exist in a state of perfect incorruption in

that service.

In some parts of Europe it is true that the greatest situations are

often attended with but little emolument; yet still they are filled.

Why? Because reputation, glory, fame, the esteem, the love, the tears

of joy which flow from happy sensibility, the honest applauses of a

grateful country, sometimes pay the cares, anxieties, and toils which

wait on great situations in the commonwealth: and in these, they pay in

money what cannot be paid in fame and reputation. It is the reverse in

the service of the India Company. Glory is not the lot of subordinated

merit; and all the subordinate parts of the gradation are officers

who, in comparison with the offices and duties intrusted with them,

are miserably provided for; whereas the chief of each great presidency

has emoluments securing him against every mode of temptation. But if

this has not secured the head, we may easily judge how the members

are to be coerced. Mr. Hastings at the head of the service, with high

legal emoluments, has fouled his hands and sullied his government with

bribes. He has substituted oppression and tyranny in the place of

legal government. With all that unbounded, licentious power which he

has assumed over the public revenues, instead of endeavouring to find

a series of gradual, progressive, honourable, and adequate rewards

for the persons who serve the public in the subordinate but powerful

situations, he has left them to prey upon the people without the

smallest degree of control. In default of honest emolument, there is

the unbounded license of power; and (as one of the honestest and ablest

servants of the Company said to me in conversation) the civil service

of the Company resembled the military service of the Mahrattas--little

pay, but unbounded license to plunder. I do not say that some of

the salaries given in India would not sound well here; but when you

consider the nature of the trusts, the dignity of the situation,

whatever the name of them may be, the powers that are granted, the

hopes that every man has of establishing himself at home,--I repeat, it

is a source of infinite grievance--of infinite abuse: of which source

of corrupt power we charge Mr. Hastings with having availed himself in

filling up the void of direct pay, by finding out and countenancing

every kind of oblique and unjust emolument; though it must be confessed

that he is far from being solely guilty of this offence.

Another circumstance which distinguishes the East-India Company is the

youth of the persons who are employed in the system of that service.

The servants have almost universally been sent out to begin their

progress and career in active occupation, and in the exercise of

high authority, at that period of life which in all other places has

been employed in the course of a rigid education. To put the matter

in a few words, they are transferred from slippery youth to perilous

independence, from perilous independence to inordinate expectations,

from inordinate expectations to boundless power. School-boys without

tutors, minors without guardians, the world is let loose upon them,

with all its temptations; and they are let loose upon the world, with

all the powers that despotism involves.

American Independence and the French Revolution (1760-1801) · 第 82 / 106 题