HIS MAD-JESTY AT THE LYCEUM.

Except when HENRY IRVING impersonated the hapless victim of false

imprisonment in the Bastille, whence he issued forth after twenty

years of durance, never has he been so curiously and wonderfully

made-up as now, when he represents _Lear_, monarch of all he surveys.

Bless thee, HENRY, how art thou transformed!

[Illustration: Rather mixed. Mr. Irving as "Ophe-Lear."]

Sure such a _King Lear_ was never seen on any stage, so perfect in

appearance, so entirely the ideal of SHAKSPEARE'S ancient King.

It must have been a vision of IRVING in this character that the

divinely-inspired poet and dramatist saw when he had a _Lear_ in his

eye. For a moment, too, he reminded me of BOOTH--the "General," not

the "particular" American tragedian,--and when he appeared in thunder,

lightning, hail, and rain, he suggested an embodiment of the "_Moses_"

of MICHAEL ANGELO.

A strange weird play; much for an audience, and more for an actor, all

on his own shoulders, to bear. A one-part play it is too, for of the

sweet _Cordelia_,--and sweet did ELLEN TERRY look and so tenderly did

she play!--little is seen or heard. With _Goneril_ and _Regan_, the

two proud and wicked sisters,--associated in the mind of the modernest

British Public with Messrs. HERBERT CAMPBELL and HARRY NICHOLLS, as is

also _Cordelia_ associated either with _Cinderella_ or with _Beauty_

in the story of _Beauty and the Beast_--we have two fine commanding

figures; and well are these parts played by Miss ADA DYAS and Miss

MAUD MILTON. The audience can have no sympathy with the two wicked

Princesses, and except in _Goneril's_ brief Lady-Macbethian scene with

her husband, neither of the Misses LEAR has much dramatic chance. Pity

that Mrs. LEAR--his Queen and their mother, wasn't alive! Let us hope

she resembled her youngest daughter _Cordelia_, otherwise poor _Lear_

must have had a hard life of it as a married man.

Why should not Mr. IRVING give the first part of this play

reconsideration? Why not just once a week try him as a different sort

of _Lear_? For instance, suppose, to begin with, that he had had a bad

time of it with his wife, that for many years as a widower he had been

seeking for the opportunity of disposing of his daughters, handing

over to them and to their husbands the lease and goodwill of "The

Crown and Sceptre," while he would be, as King, "retired from

business," and going out for a lark generally. Thus jovially would he

commence the play, a rollicking, gay, old dog, ready for anything, up

to anything, and, like old Anchises, when he jumped on to the back of

Æneas, "a wonderful man for his years." In fact, _Lear_ might begin

like an old King Cole, "a merry old soul," a "jolly old cock!" And

then--"Oh, what a difference in the morning!"--when all his plans

for a gay career had been shipwrecked by _Cordelia's_ capricious and

unnatural affectation.

[Illustration: Mr. Terriss as the Good Fairy.]

Then must commence his senility; then he would begin to break up. A

struggle, to show that there was life in the old dog yet, could be

seen when the old dog had been out hunting, in Act II., and had shot

some strange animal, something between a stag and a dromedary, which

no doubt was a native of Britain in those good old sporting days.

However, more of this anon. Suffice it to say now, that our HENRY

IRVING'S _Lear_ is a triumph in every respect, and that the audience

only wanted a little more of _Cordelia_, which is the fault of the

immortal and unequal Bard.

To those unacquainted with this play, Mr. TERRISS'S sudden appearance

in somewhat anti-Lord-Chamberlain attire, as he bounded on, with a

wand, and struck an attitude, was suggestive of the Good Fairy in

the pantomime; and his subsequent proceedings, when he didn't change

anybody into Harlequin, Clown, and so forth, puzzled the unlearned

spectators considerably. But Mr. TERRISS came out all right, and

acquitted himself (being his own judge and jury) to the satisfaction

of the public. His speech about Dover Cliff, generally supposed to

convey some allusion to the Channel Tunnel, was excellently delivered,

and certainly after _Lear_, "on the spear side," Mr. TERRISS must take

the Goodeley Cake.

Next to him in order of merit comes Mr. FRANK COOPER, as the

wicked _Edmund_, on whom the good EDMUND, "Edmundus Mundi," smiled

benignantly from a private box. There was on the first night a great

reception given to HOWE--the veteran actor, not the wreck, and very

far from it--who took the small part of an old Evicted Tenant of the

_Earl of Glo'ster_, a character very carefully played by Mr. ALFRED

BISHOP, _Floreat Henricus!_ "Our HENRY" has his work cut out for him

in this "Titanic work," as in his before-curtain and after-play speech

he termed it. This particular "Titanic work" is (or certainly was that

night) in favour with "the gods," who "very much applauded what he'd

done." But the gods of old were not quite so favourable to "Titanic

work" generally, and punished eternally Titanic workmen. To-night gods

and groundlings applaud to the echo, and then everyone goes home as

best he can in about as beautiful a specimen of a November fog as ever

delighted a Jack-o'-Lantern or disgusted

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 103, November 19, 1892 · 第 14 / 30 题