OPERATIC NOTES.

_Last Nights of the Season._--_Monday._--"By General Desire," the

Second and Third Acts of DE LARA-Boom-de-ay's Opera, called _La Luce

dell' Asia_, followed by _Cavalleria Rusticana_. Was "by general

desire" applied to the entire programme, or only to its first part?

Well, we may take for granted that everyone wanted to hear and see

again--but especially to hear--the _Cavalleria_. So the "special

desire" must apply to _La Luce_ solely and only. If so, then from this

wording we gather that the general and uncontrollable desire to hear

the Second and Third Acts of DE LA-RA-Boom's Opera did not extend to

its Prologue, First Act, Fourth Act (if any), and Epilogue. But is

it complimentary to a Composer to express a general wish to hear only

certain portions of his work, implying thereby that the generally

un-expressed desire is rather against than for re-hearing the other

portions? All the same Sir COVENT GARDENIUS exercises a _sound_

discretion in thus dealing with this particular Opera.

_Tuesday._--BEMBERG's New Opera, _Elaine_.

_Chorus._--Why was _Elaine_

Given again?

O DRURIOLAN-

US, please explain!

And he did so, by saying in the programme "[fist] In consequence of

its Great Success and by general desire." Ha! ha! look at the hand,

with index-finger outstretched! By this sign, Sir DRURIOLANUS would

have us to understand that "this Opera was not one which ever went

_without a hand_." Moreover, Sir ORACLE tells us of its "Great

Success;" note the capitals, and note also, the expression itself,

which was not found in the announcement of the repetition of the

Second and Third Acts of the Light Asian Opera on Monday. Isn't

this an artful way of pitting Admirable BEMBERG against our own

accomplished DE-LARA-Boom? "We" were not there either Monday or

Tuesday, which, as far as the inimitable _intermezzo_ of the "Rustic

Chivalry" goes, was distinctly "our" loss. But they were going to do

without us, and they did so; but whether ill or well, this deponent,

meaning "We," knoweth not; and so, we're like Brer Rabbit, who lay low

and said nothin'. Brer Wolf sezzee were kinder sorry he was unable to

go Satterday arternoon for to hear Brer Fox's new Opera, _Nydia, the

Blind Girl_.

_Friday._--_Don Giovanni._--Madame DOTTI, in taking the _rôle_

of _Donna Anna_, "took the cake." Not going "a bit dotty," but in

excellent form.

* * * * *

[Illustration]

BE-LITTLER-ING MR. GLADSTONE'S MAJORITY.--Not that the G.O.M. is

"coming of age in the olden times,"--as somebody's picture has

it,--but that he is coming in with a mixed Majority of atoms difficult

to be assimilated. This much exercises the wigorous brain of Mr.

R.D.M. LITTLER, Q.C. writing to the _Times_. Of course R.D.M. LITTLER,

Q.C.--which initials, being interpreted, may mean, "Railway Directors'

Man"--is the Conservativest of Conservatives--"but that's another

Tory," as one may say, adapting RUDYARD KIPLING's phrase,--and,

difficult as the G.O.M. may find it to get on with the aid of a Little

Majority, he couldn't get on any better with the aid of a Littler.

* * * * *

NOTE.--The Guide to Wild West Kensington should announce the objects

of interest in this Buffalo Bill Show, not as "classified," but

"Codyfied."

* * * * *

[Illustration: THINGS ONE WOULD RATHER HAVE EXPRESSED OTHERWISE.

_Host._ "TAKE A LITTLE WHISKEY BEFORE YOU GO, JONES!"

_Jones_ (_after helping himself_). "THANKS! MAY I POUR YOU OUT SOME?"

_Host._ "PLEASE--NOT TOO MUCH--JUST ABOUT HALF WHAT YOU'VE GIVEN

YOURSELF!"]

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 103, July 30, 1892 · 第 7 / 26 题