IV

If capitalism had offered the working class nothing but the crumbs of

middle class liberty, the diatribes of the revolutionaries would be

not without justification. For admittedly, liberty has been gained in

far greater measure by the capitalist employer than by the workman.

But capitalism has done vastly more for labor than this. It has given

rise to that most interesting and important of all modern social

phenomena, the solidarity of labor. As an active, working concept, the

fraternity of labor is just as certainly a product of capitalism as is

social toleration. The latter is the soul of capitalism, as it

manifests itself in the class of employers, the former, as it

manifests itself in the class of employees.

To this statement a Socialist will at once take exception. The

sentiment of brotherhood, the Socialists claim, originates in the

common experiences of poverty and hard labor. But the men at the

passages of the Jordan who slew one another over the pronunciation of

Shibboleth were doubtless manual workers, and were certainly poor. The

merciless strife between Saxon and Celt in England was primarily

between men who were all poor and workers. The participants in the

Sicilian vendettas, in the Scottish clan struggles, in the Kentucky

feuds, might well be honored with the title proletariat, by virtue of

poverty and laboriousness of life. Fraternity is too luxurious a plant

to bloom upon a barren soil of universal labor and poverty. Every one

who reads the documents of middle nineteenth century America is aware

of the uncompromising hostility of the American workingman toward the

distressed Irish seeking an escape from famine. Later, there is

abundant evidence of working class contempt and hostility directed

toward the immigrating workmen from Germany and Scandinavia. Twenty

years ago it was the Dago that experienced the inhospitality of the

workingmen toward their alien brothers; today it is the Wapp--the

collectivity of unfortunates of uncouth ways and unimaginable speech

that seek refuge here from the poverty and oppression of southeastern

Europe. No middle class worshipper of a family tree rooted in the old

colonies can hold the Wapp in more profound detestation than do many

of our recent arrivals. "Zese tam fools [the Wapps], zey ruins zis tam

counthry."

It is the attitude of the unions, we are told, that in the North

represents the chief obstacle to the progress of the negro away from

the menial services and the unskilled employments. It was the working

class that forced, first Chinese, and later Japanese exclusion. It is

working class politics that demands a white Australia, and vexes the

British Empire over the question of emigration from India. "Workingmen

are brothers," say the Socialists. Not by birth and native instincts.

Not by virtue of community in labor and poverty. If there is such a

thing as a fraternity of labor, it is begotten of capitalism.

An active sentiment of brotherhood, does, unquestionably, spring up

under capitalism. Differences of race and religion dwindled to

insignificance among the coal miners in the great strike of 1904. The

Lawrence and Paterson strikes, and the strike in the copper country,

have offered abundant evidence of the growing strength of the feeling

of working class solidarity. It would be difficult to cite a single

recent strike in which men and women of traditionally hostile races

and creeds have not coöperated with the utmost harmony and good will.

No one will deny that the more conscious the workers are of the

pressure of capitalism, the more rapidly does the feeling of

solidarity develop. This is the moral gain that is afforded by labor

disputes. It is a gain which is not to be had without its cost, in the

disorganization of industry, the impoverishment of multitudes of

working families, the destruction of life and property, and the

loosing upon society of evil passions. Is the gain worth its cost? In

the opinion of many observers of our social movement, the cost is

tremendous, but few of these observers attempt to strike a balance

between cost and gain. This is because they have failed to recognize

working class solidarity as a significant step in moral progress.

The development of solidarity among American workingmen is proceeding

rapidly; in other countries its progress is not less manifest. This is

true despite the fact that the problem of creating harmony between

hostile races and religions is more serious where uninterrupted

continuity on the same soil renders easy the survival of ancient

prejudices. The hostility between Czech and German, between Magyar and

Slav, is mitigated when the representatives of these warring races

work side by side in the same factory, oppressed by the same factory

regulations, impoverished by the same crises. Evidence is

accumulating, to prove that the internationalism of labor is becoming

a reality. It may not be true that French workingmen are already so

utterly averse to the idea of shooting down their German brethren as

the Socialistic literature and the spokesmen of Socialist and Labor

parties would have us believe. But there is very much more than a

fervent hope in working class anti-militarism. If French and German

workmen might at present fail to refuse to kill one another in war,

the time is perhaps not far distant when the outcome of an

international war may be rendered problematical through the extension

of working class solidarity.

For the working class, solidarity is producing results quite analogous

to those produced in the class of capitalistic employers by the

pursuit of profit. Solidarity is unthinkable without a measure of

toleration. The American trade unionist learns to tolerate the alien

origin, the broken speech and uncouth manner, the strange religion,

and the unexpected outlook upon life, of the foreign workman who must

either become a brother unionist and faithful ally, or a scab and an

enemy. And out of this toleration is created a sphere of personal

freedom from social encroachment such as no workman of an earlier

epoch ever enjoyed. Fraternity and liberty, these are the positive

acquisitions won by labor out of the very oppression of capitalism. Of

the revolutionary trinity only equality remains beyond the visible

horizon. And even equality may be brought nearer, if not realized,

through the further perfecting of working class liberty and

fraternity.

V

Capitalism is material, gross, ugly. Yes, but it has a

soul--toleration, liberty, fraternity. And this, like most souls, is

not so much in being as in becoming. It is only in the most highly

capitalistic centers that even business has partly freed itself from

elements of personal oppression. There is no state nor city in which

the fraternity of labor is more than an emerging fact. Under

capitalism, workingmen are brothers, but there is still a vast deal of

the Cain and Abel in their feelings toward one another. Remove the

pressure of capitalism at this instant, and the lessons of fraternity

would quickly be forgotten. Relax the profit motive, and mankind would

again stand forth in its pristine narrowness and bigotry and cruelty.

Conceive for a moment that the United States were now under

Socialistic management. With what spirit should we greet the oppressed

of other lands, fleeing to us for refuge? We should probably judge of

the problem in terms of dividend and divisor: so much food, so many

mouths; let not the number of mouths be increased. To be sure, there

is an economic fallacy lurking in this syllogism; but when has an

economic fallacy ever been crushed except by weight of a brute class

interest? Our workingmen are brothers of those of England and France

and Germany, under the pressure of cosmopolitan capitalism. But the

natural attitude of a group of Socialistic nations toward one another

will be a coveting of one another's rich mines and fertile provinces.

At least such will be the natural attitude until fraternity, imposed

by capitalism, has descended from men's lips and entered into their

blood.

There is a wise saying in Karl Marx's _Critique of Political Economy_

(Preface): "No social order ever disappears before all the productive

forces for which there is room in it have been developed; and new

higher relations of production never appear before the material

conditions of their existence have matured in the womb of the old

society." What Marx said of the material embodiment of capitalism, we

can apply to its soul. Capitalism is growing toward liberty and

fraternity. But the immense distance we must traverse before this goal

can be attained is evidence of the vitality that remains in the

system. Were capitalism to be abolished today, the hard-won gains of

the last two centuries would vanish. But by this very fact it is

proved that capitalism cannot be abolished today.

The Unpopular Review Vol. I January-June 1914 · 第 34 / 67 题