FIG. 338.—_Portrait of Sir James Young Simpson, M.D._

]

ANÆSTHETICS.

The discovery which is indicated by the somewhat unfamiliar word[16]

which heads this article is perhaps the greatest which has ever been

made in connection with the science of medicine. At least, there is no

other discovery of modern times which has so largely and directly

contributed to the assuagement of human suffering. Nay, in this respect

there is perhaps in the whole annals of the healing art no other which

can rival it, if we except that famous one of Jenner’s which has

arrested the ravages of small-pox. During the last thirty years, all the

more formidable operations of the surgeon have been, in almost every

case, performed with a happy unconsciousness on the part of the patient.

In unconsciousness, induced by the same means, has relief also been

found for severe suffering arising from other causes. The substances

which are denoted by the word “anæsthetics” differ from the drugs which

the older surgeons sometimes administered before an operation, in order

to lull the patient’s sense of pain. They differ in their nature and in

the mode of their administration; by the certainty and completeness of

their action; by the entirely transient effects they produce, which pass

off without leaving a trace.

Footnote 16:

From α (αν), privative, and αισθητικος, capable of perceiving or

feeling.

To the great chemist whose name has already been mentioned as the

discoverer of the metals of the alkalies and alkaline earths we are

indebted for the first of the remarkable class of bodies we are about to

discuss. The first work that Davy published had for its title

“Researches, Chemical and Philosophical, chiefly concerning Nitrous

Oxide and its Respiration.” This was in the year 1800, when the

philosopher had hardly completed his twenty-first year. The work caused

no little sensation in the scientific world, and it was in consequence

of the reputation he acquired by these researches that Davy was

appointed to the chemical professorship at the Royal Institution. Davy

was not the original discoverer of nitrous oxide, but he first entered

upon a full investigation of its properties, and announced the singular

effect produced by its inhalation. The kind of transient intoxication

and propensity to laughter which it excites have obtained for this

compound the familiar name of _laughing gas_. Davy had by experiment on

his own person proved the anæsthetic properties of this gas, for he had

a tooth painlessly extracted when under its influence, and he says in

the work above named that “as nitrous acid gas seems capable of

destroying pain, it could probably be used with advantage in surgical

operations where there is no effusion of blood.” Davy’s observations and

suggestions were destined to lie barren for nearly half a century, but

they nevertheless formed the basis of the great results which have since

been attained.

Before proceeding farther, it will perhaps be well to make the

unscientific reader acquainted with the chemistry of nitrous oxide. We

may presume that he knows that atmospheric air is a _mixture_ of the two

invisible gases, nitrogen and oxygen (the small quantity of carbonic

acid also present need not now be considered). When a known quantity of

air is passed over red-hot copper turnings, contained in a tube, the

whole of the oxygen is seized upon by the copper, and only the nitrogen

issues from the tube, and may be collected. Some of the copper is thus

converted into oxide, and the increase of the weight of the tube’s

contents shows the weight of oxygen contained in the air, while the

weight of nitrogen may be known from the volume collected. In this way

the chemist analyses atmospheric air, and determines that 100 parts by

weight of dry air contain about 79 of nitrogen and 21 of oxygen; or, by

measure, about four times as much of the former as of the latter. Now,

chemists are acquainted with no fewer than five _different_ substances

which contain nothing but nitrogen and oxygen. These substances are

either gases, or can be changed into the gaseous form by heat, and they

can all be analysed in the same manner as air. The results of such

analyses show in 100 parts by weight of each substance the following

proportions of its constituents:

┌────────┬──────┬──────┬──────┬──────┬──────┐

│ │No. 1.│No. 2.│No. 3.│No. 4.│No. 5.│

├────────┼──────┼──────┼──────┼──────┼──────┤

│Nitrogen│63·64 │46·67 │36·84 │30·44 │25·93 │

│Oxygen │36·36 │53·33 │63·16 │69·56 │74·07 │

└────────┴──────┴──────┴──────┴──────┴──────┘

In casting the eye over this table, no relation will probably be

detected between the five cases. But if we write down, not the

quantities of nitrogen and oxygen contained in 100 parts of each

compound, but the quantity of oxygen which in each compound is united to

some fixed quantity of nitrogen, we shall at once detect a remarkable

law: thus, taking 28 as the fixed weight of nitrogen, for reasons which

need not be here explained:

┌────────┬──────┬──────┬──────┬──────┬──────┐

│ │No. 1.│No. 2.│No. 3.│No. 4.│No. 5.│

├────────┼──────┼──────┼──────┼──────┼──────┤

│Nitrogen│ 28 │ 28 │ 28 │ 28 │ 28 │

│{Oxygen │ 16 │ 32 │ 48 │ 64 │ 80 │

│{ or │16 × 1│16 × 2│16 × 3│16 × 4│16 × 5│

└────────┴──────┴──────┴──────┴──────┴──────┘

Chemists have a sort of shorthand method of expressing the composition

of substances, which may be conveniently illustrated by the case before

us. Let it be agreed that the letter N shall not only represent

nitrogen, but always _fourteen_ parts by weight—grains, ounces, &c.,

&c.,—of nitrogen; and that, similarly, O shall stand for _sixteen_ parts

by weight of oxygen. It is plain that the composition of the compound

No. 2 may be represented by simply writing down “NO;” and that of No. 4,

in which there is just double the proportion of oxygen, by “NOO.” But to

avoid an unnecessary repetition of the same symbol, when it has to be

taken more than once, a small figure is written after and a little below

it. Thus, for OO, “O_{2}” is written. The proportional composition of

each of the five compounds will now be obvious from the following

symbols:

┌────────────┬────────────┬────────────┬────────────┬────────────┐

│ No. 1. │ No. 2. │ No. 3. │ No. 4. │ No. 5. │

├────────────┼────────────┼────────────┼────────────┼────────────┤

│ N_{2}O │ NO │ N_{2}O_{3} │ NO_{2} │ N_{2}O_{5} │

└────────────┴────────────┴────────────┴────────────┴────────────┘

These symbols may be regarded as merely a compendious expression of the

composition of each substance—as a shorthand statement of the _facts_ of

analysis. But to the majority of chemists the symbols have a deeper

significance; for they are taken as representing the _atoms_ of each

element which enter into each smallest possible particle of a compound;

they express a certain theory of the ultimate constitution of matter.

Thus, if we suppose that there exist indivisible particles of nitrogen

and of oxygen, and that each smallest particle, or _molecule_, of the

compounds under consideration is constituted of a certain definite and

invariable number of each kind of atoms; and, further, if we suppose

that an _atom_ of oxygen is heavier than one of nitrogen in the

proportion of 16 to 14, or 8 to 7, we shall have a simple theoretical

_explanation_ of the relations in the proportions already pointed out.

In fact, these would result from the simplest combinations of the two

kinds of _atoms_; and we can picture each one of the smallest particles

of the several bodies as thus constituted:

┌────────────┬────────────┬────────────┬────────────┬────────────┐

│ No. 1. │ No. 2. │ No. 3. │ No. 4. │ No. 5. │

├────────────┼────────────┼────────────┼────────────┼────────────┤

│ ● ● │ │ ● ● │ ● │ ● ● │

│ ○ │ ● ○ │ ○ ○ ○ │ ○ ○ │ ○ ○ ○ │

│ │ │ │ │ ○ ○ │

├────────────┼────────────┼────────────┼────────────┼────────────┤

│ N_{2}O │ NO │ N_{2}O_{3} │ NO_{2} │ N_{2}O_{5} │

└────────────┴────────────┴────────────┴────────────┴────────────┘

The black circles represent nitrogen atoms, and the open ones oxygen

atoms; the symbols are placed below in order that their relation to the

supposed atomic constitution may be obvious at a glance. While the

symbol of a compound must always accord with its percentage composition,

the latter does of itself determine the symbol or formula. A number of

other circumstances, which cannot here be discussed, are taken into

account as evidence of the constitution of the molecule.

This digression on chemical formulæ will, it is hoped, enable the

general reader, who may not previously have been acquainted with them,

to perceive their significance, instead of passing them over as

unintelligible cabalistic letters when they occur in the following

pages. With this object, it may be added that the elements, hydrogen,

carbon, and chlorine, are respectively represented by H, C, and Cl; and

that the proportional quantities, which are also implied in the symbols,

and are those by which H, C, and Cl combine with other bodies, are 1,

12, and 35·5 respectively. Another point which should be understood is

that the properties and behaviour of a chemical compound are different,

and usually extremely different, from those of any of its constituents.

This is well illustrated in the subject we are considering. Atmospheric

air is a _mixture_ (not a compound) of nitrogen and oxygen gases, and

all its properties are intermediate between those of its ingredients

taken separately. Nitrous oxide, N_{2}O, has properties not possessed by

either constituent separately. For example, it is very soluble in water,

whereas oxygen is very slightly so, and nitrogen still less. The other

compounds we have referred to differ widely from nitrous oxide and from

each other in their properties.

Nitrous oxide is an invisible gas, having a slightly sweetish taste and

smell. It is dissolved by water, which, at ordinary temperatures, takes

up about three-fourths of its volume of the gas. By cold and great

pressure the gas may be condensed into a colourless liquid. The gas is

obtained in a pure state by gently heating the salt called ammonium

nitrate, which is formed by neutralizing pure nitric acid with carbonate

of ammonia. The action which occurs may be explained thus: the hydrogen

of the ammonium unites with a portion of the oxygen of the nitric acid,

forming water, whilst the remainder of the oxygen combines with the

nitrogen. As chemical actions are regarded as either separations or

unions of atoms, they can be expressed by what is called a _chemical

equation_, the left-hand side of which shows the arrangement of the

atoms before the action, and the right-hand side the arrangement after

it, the sign of equality being read as “produce” or “produces.” But the

validity of the equations, like that of the symbolic formulæ, is quite

independent of the existence of atoms; for the equation always rests on

certain facts, namely, the relations between the quantities of the

substances which enter into, and those which are produced by, a chemical

action. Thus, in the present case the action may be symbolically

expressed as follows:

H_{4}N NO_{3} = 2H_{2}O + N_{2}O

Ammonium nitrate. Water. Nitrous oxide.

The equation expresses the fact that every 80 parts by weight of

ammonium nitrate, which are used in this reaction, split up into 36 of

water and 44 of nitrous oxide.

No attempt seems to have been made to turn Davy’s suggestion to

practical account; but in courses of chemical lectures at the hospitals

and elsewhere the peculiar physiological properties of nitrous oxide

have, since Davy’s announcement, always been demonstrated by some person

inhaling the gas. In the medical schools the students often operated on

a comrade who was under the influence of nitrous oxide to the extent of

bestowing sundry pinches and cuffs, which fully proved the anæsthetic

qualities of the nitrous oxide. In 1818 Faraday pointed out the

similarity between the effects of _ether_ and of nitrous oxide, and from

that time Professor Turner regularly included among the experiments of

his course of chemistry the inhalation of the vapour of ether by one of

the students. This was done by simply pouring a little ether into a

bladder of air, and by means of a tube drawing the mixed air and vapour

into the mouth. Until 1844 the effects of nitrous oxide and of ether

vapour remained without application, although thus continually

demonstrated in lectures. At the close of that year, Mr. Horace Wells, a

dentist, of Hartford, Connecticut, U.S.A., witnessed the usual

experiments with nitrous oxide at a public lecture. At his request the

lecturer attended at Mr. Wells’s residence the following day, to

administer to him the nitrous oxide, in order that he might try its

efficacy in annulling pain, for he was himself to have a tooth extracted

by a brother dentist. His exclamation on finding the operation

painlessly over was, “A new era in tooth-pulling!” Mr. Wells continued

his experiments on the use of nitrous oxide in dental operations, but he

did not apparently obtain uniform results, for he pronounced its effects

uncertain, and he gave it up. On the occasion when Mr. Wells’s tooth was

extracted, Dr. W. T. G. Morton was present, and he soon afterwards found

that under the influence of ether vapour, teeth might be painlessly

extracted and surgical operations performed. Dr. Morton attempted to

conceal the substance he used under the name of “letheon,” for which he

obtained a patent. But the well-known and characteristic odour of ether

declared the nature of the “letheon;” and Dr. Bigelow having in

consequence tried ether, found it to produce all the effects of

“letheon.” So the matter was no longer a secret. Dr. Morton was,

therefore, the person who first applied ether vapour, and the extraction

of a tooth was the occasion of its first application. This was in 1846.

It was used for the first time in England on the 19th of December, 1846,

also for the extraction of a tooth; and two days afterwards Mr. Liston,

the eminent surgeon, performed the operation of amputating the thigh

while his patient was under the influence of ether. The employment of

ether in surgical operations quickly spread, and its administration in

hospitals became general throughout Europe and America.

The chemical constitution of ether, and its relation to alcohol, may be

indicated by the following formulæ:

HOH HO(C_{2}H_{5}) (C_{2}H_{5})O(C_{2}H_{5})

Water. Alcohol. Ether.

If we suppose one of the hydrogen atoms in the molecule of water to be

removed and replaced by the group (C_{2}H_{5}), the result is alcohol.

If, now, (C_{2}H_{5}) be substituted in the alcohol for the remaining

atom of hydrogen, we get a particle of _ether_. Ether was discovered in

1540, and described as sweet oil of vitriol, but its real nature was

first pointed out by Liebig. It is prepared by distilling a mixture of

sulphuric acid and alcohol. It is a colourless transparent liquid,

extremely volatile, and possessing a peculiar and powerful odour. It

evaporates so rapidly that a drop allowed to fall from a bottle on a

warm day may be converted into vapour before it reaches the ground. When

its vapour is inhaled in sufficient proportion mixed with air, it soon

produces a complete insensibility to pain. In the case of a full-grown

man who inhales air containing 45 per cent. of the vapour, about 2 drams

per minute of the liquid are consumed. The air is allowed to stream over

the surface of the liquid in a proper apparatus, where it takes up the

vapour, and the two pass through a flexible tube to a piece fitting over

the mouth and nostrils of the patient. The effects produced are

progressive, and may be thus described:

For about two minutes after the beginning of the inhalation, the patient

retains his mental faculties, and has some power of controlling his

movements, but in a confused and disordered manner. At the end of the

third minute he is unconscious; there are no voluntary movements, but

muscular contractions may agitate the frame. At the end of the fourth

minute, the only perceptible movements are the motions of the chest in

respiration. If the inhalation be discontinued at the end of the fourth

minute, when 1 oz. of ether will have evaporated, similar stages are

passed through in reverse order during recovery. The condition reached

at the end of the fourth minute continues about two minutes; the

intermediate state lasts three or four minutes; the condition of

confused intellect and will about five minutes. This is succeeded by a

feeling of intoxication and exhilaration, which continues for ten or

fifteen minutes. It was probably this excitement of the system produced

by ether which has caused it to be superseded—in Britain, at least—in

about twelve months after its adoption, by _chloroform_.

Chloroform appears to have been independently discovered in 1831, by

Soubeiran, and by an American chemist, Guthrie. It is usually procured

by distilling a mixture of bleaching powder, spirits of wine, and water.

Chloroform is a colourless volatile liquid, of an odour much more

agreeable than that of ether. Its composition is represented by

CHCl_{3}. The merit of having first applied the singular properties of

this substance to the alleviation of human suffering belongs to the late

Sir J. Y. Simpson, of Edinburgh. Its use as an anæsthetic was apparently

suggested to this eminent professor by Mr. Waldie, of Liverpool. It was

first applied at Edinburgh on the 15th November, 1847; and when its

efficacy had been proved, it was soon extensively used, and in Europe,

at least, almost entirely superseded ether, as being more rapid and

certain in its action, not producing injurious excitement, and being

pleasanter to inhale. A notion prevailed that chloroform was not only

more powerful in its operation than ether, but also more safe. In

January, 1848, its administration, however, proved fatal to a patient;

and since then a certain number of casualties of this kind have occurred

with chloroform, ether, and other anæsthetics.

The patient is often made to inhale the vapour of chloroform by merely

holding before his mouth and nostrils a sponge or handkerchief, on which

a small quantity of the liquid has been poured. Dr. Snow contrived an

apparatus for administering the vapour with more regularity. A metal box

adapted to the shape of the face is made to cover the mouth and

nostrils. This piece has two valves, one of which admits the air and

vapour from an elastic tube connected with the apparatus containing the

chloroform, and prevents its return; the other valve is a flap opening

outwards, which allows the expired air to escape. There is also an

adjustment for admitting directly into the mouthpiece more or less

atmospheric air.

The sensations first experienced when chloroform is inhaled are said to

be agreeable. Many persons have described the feeling as resembling

rapid travelling in a railway carriage; there is a singing in the ears,

and when the power of vision ceases, and the person is no longer

conscious of light, the sensation is that of entering a tunnel. After

this there is a lessened sensibility to pain; and in the next stage the

unconsciousness to outward impressions is deeper, but the mental

faculties, though impaired, are not wholly suspended, for the patient

may speak, and usually dreams something which he afterwards remembers.

When the person is still more under the influence of the chloroform, no

voluntary motions take place, although there may be some inarticulate

muttering. Dr. Snow describes several conditions which may be observed

in patients undergoing operations under the influence of chloroform.

First, the patient may preserve the most perfect quietude without a sign

of consciousness or sensation; this is the most usual condition. Second,

he may moan, or cry, or flinch under the operation, without, however,

having the least memory of any pain when he recovers. Third, the patient

may talk, laugh, or sing during the operation; but what he says is

altogether devoid of reference to what is done. Fourth, he may be

conscious of what is taking place, and may look on while some minor

operation is proceeding, without feeling it, or without feeling it

painfully. This is often the condition of the patient as the effect is

passing off, while some smaller operation is still proceeding. Fifth,

the patient may complain he is being hurt; but afterwards, when the

effect of the chloroform has passed off, he will assert that he felt no

pain whatever. When the chloroform has been inhaled for but a short

time, the patient becomes conscious in about five minutes after its

discontinuance; but with a longer inhalation the period of

unconsciousness may last for perhaps ten minutes. The return of

consciousness takes place with tranquillity: not unfrequently the

patient’s first speech, even after a serious operation, often being an

assertion that the chloroform has not taken effect.

In the strongest degree of ether and chloroform effects, all the muscles

of the body are relaxed; the limbs hang down, or rest in any position in

which they are placed; the eyelids droop over the eyes, or remain as

they are placed by the finger; the breathing is deep, regular, and

automatic; there is often snoring, and this is, indeed, characteristic

of the deepest degree of unconsciousness; the relaxation of the muscles

renders the face devoid of expression, and with a placid appearance, as

if the person were in a sound natural sleep. He is perfectly passive

under every kind of operation. The breathing and the action of the heart

proceed all the while with unimpaired regularity. It is, however, known

by experiments on animals that if the inhalation be prolonged beyond the

period necessary to produce these effects, the respiratory functions are

interfered with by the insensibility extending to the nerves on which

they depend. The breathing of an animal thus treated becomes irregular,

feeble, or laborious, and death ensues. However nearly dead from

inhalation of ether vapour the animal may be, provided respiration has

not actually ceased, it always recovers when allowed to breathe fresh

air. Of course, the etherization is never carried to this stage with

human beings.

Air containing 2 grs. of chloroform in 100 cubic inches suffices to

induce insensibility; but 5 grs. in 100 cubic inches is found a more

suitable proportion. Dr. Snow, who strongly disapproved of the uncertain

and irregular mode of administering chloroform on a handkerchief or

sponge, contrived the inhaling apparatus already described. The air

before reaching the mouth and nostrils of the patient passes through a

vessel containing bibulous paper moistened with chloroform. This vessel

he surrounds with water at the ordinary temperature of the air, in order

to supply the heat absorbed by the conversion of the liquid into vapour,

so that the formation of the latter may go on regularly. The same

thoughtful arrangement formed part of the ether-inhaler he had

previously contrived.

Discoveries and Inventions of the Nineteenth Century · 第 82 / 93 段