In the hands of Mr. Norman Lockyer the science of the physical and

chemical constitution of the sun has made rapid progress, and new facts

are continually being observed, which serve to furnish more and more

definite views. Mr. Lockyer considers that, extending to a great

distance around the sun is an atmosphere of comparatively cooler

hydrogen, or perhaps of some still lighter substance which is unknown to

us. It is this which forms what is termed the _corona_, or circle of

light which is seen surrounding the sun in a total eclipse. Immersed in

this, and extending to a much smaller distance from the nucleus of the

sun, is another envelope, termed the _chromosphere_, consisting of

incandescent hydrogen and some glowing vapours of magnesium and calcium.

The brightest part of this envelope, which lies nearest the sun, is that

which gives off the red rays by which the prominences may be observed

without an eclipse. These prominences have been shown to be tremendous

outbursts of glowing hydrogen, belched up with sometimes an enormous

velocity from below, since they have been observed to spring up 90,000

miles in a few minutes. Beneath the chromosphere, and nearer to the body

of the sun, are enormous quantities of the vapours of the different

elements—sodium, iron, &c.—to which the dark lines of the solar spectrum

are due. This stratum Mr. Lockyer calls the _reversing layer_, because

it reverses (turns to dark) the lines which would otherwise have

appeared bright, just as Kirchhoff’s sodium vapour did in the experiment

described on page 437. Beneath the reversing layer is the _photosphere_,

from which emanates the light that is absorbed in part by the reversing

layer, and which there is good reason to believe is either intensely

heated solid or liquid matter.

In 1861 Dr. Huggins devoted himself, with an ardour which has since

known no remission, to the extension of prismatic analysis to the other

heavenly bodies. The difficulties of the investigations were great.

There was first the small quantity of light which a star sends to the

spectator; this was obviated by the use of a telescope of large

aperture, which admitted and brought to a focus many more rays from the

star, and therefore the brightness of the image was proportionately

increased. Not so the size of the image: the case of the fixed stars for

this always remains a mere point. It was, of course, necessary to drive

the telescope by clockwork, so that the light of the star might be

stationary on the field of the spectroscope. As the spectrum of the

image of the star formed by the object-glass would be a mere line,

without sufficient breadth for an observation of the dark or light lines

by which it might be crossed, it is necessary to spread out the image so

that the whole of the light may be drawn out into a very narrow line,

having a length no greater than will produce a spectrum broad enough for

the eye to distinguish the lines in it. This is accomplished by means of

a cylindrical lens placed in the focus of the object-glass, and

immediately in front of the slit. Covering one-half of the slit is a

right-angled prism by which the light to be compared with that of the

star is reflected into the slit. The light is usually that produced by

taking electric sparks between wires of the metal in the manner already

described. The dispersive power of the spectroscope was furnished by two

prisms of very dense glass, and the spectrum was viewed through a

telescope of short focal length. Dr. Huggins’s observations lead him to

the conclusion that the planets Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn possess

atmospheres, as does also the beautiful ring by which Saturn is

surrounded; for he noticed in the spectrum of each different dark lines

not belonging to the solar spectrum.

[Illustration:

FIG. 229.—_The Planet Saturn._

]

Passing to the results obtained in the case of the fixed stars, we may

remind the reader of the enormous distance of the bodies which are

submitted to the new method of analysis. Sir John Herschel gives the

following illustration of the remoteness of Sirius—supposed to be one of

the nearest of the fixed stars: Take a globe, 2 ft. in diameter, to

represent the sun, and at a distance of 215 ft. place a pea, to give the

proportionate size and distance of the earth. If you wish to represent

the distance of Sirius _on the same scale_, you must suppose something

placed _forty thousand miles_ away from the little models of sun and

earth. But not only do we know with certainty some of the substances

contained in Sirius, but the star spectroscope has taught us a great

deal about orbs so remote, that their distance is absolutely

unmeasurable. About Aldebaran we know that there are hydrogen gas and

vapours of magnesium, iron, calcium, sodium, and some four or five other

elements. Generally the lines indicate the presence of hydrogen in these

distant suns; but there is, at least, one remarkable exception in α

_Orionis_, the spectrum of which yields no trace of the hydrogen lines,

although it is evident that magnesium, sodium, calcium, &c., are

present. The spectra of celestial bodies are of several kinds. Many of

the stars have, like our sun, a continuous spectrum crossed by dark

lines. Such is that of Sirius, No. 10, Plate XVII. Others have, however,

both dark and bright lines, and some are marked by only three bright

spaces. Of the spectra of the nebulæ some have three bright lines (see

No. 11, Plate XVII.), and the bodies producing them are, therefore, to

be considered as masses of incandescent gas, while some give continuous

spectra. One of the bright lines in the spectra of the nebulæ coincides

with one of the hydrogen lines, and another—the brightest of the

three—with one of the brightest nitrogen lines; but the third does not

agree with any with which it has as yet been compared. The inference

from these appearances is that the nebulæ contain hydrogen and nitrogen,

but the absence of the other lines of these substances has not been

fully explained; although the observation of Dr. Huggins, that when the

light of incandescent nitrogen and hydrogen is gradually obscured by

interposing layers of neutral tinted glass, the lines corresponding with

those in the nebular spectra are the last to disappear, seems to suggest

a probable solution of the difficulty.

[Illustration:

FIG. 230.—_Solar Prominences, No. 1._

]

There is another very interesting line of spectroscopic research in the

power the prism gives us of estimating the velocity with which the

distances of the stars from our system are increasing or diminishing. On

closely examining the hydrogen lines of Sirius, and comparing them with

the bright lines of hydrogen rendered incandescent by electric

discharges in a Geissler tube, the spectrum of which his instrument

enabled him to place side by side with that of the star, Mr. Huggins was

surprised to find that the lines in the latter did not exactly coincide

in position with those of the former, but appeared slightly nearer the

red end of the spectrum. This indicated a longer wave-length, or

increased period of vibration, according to the theory of light, which

would be accounted for by a receding motion between Sirius and the

earth, just as the crest of successive waves of the sea would overtake a

boat going in the same direction at longer intervals of time than those

at which they would pass a fixed point, while, if the boat were meeting

the waves, these intervals would, on the other hand, be shorter. Hence

if the position of the lines in the spectrum depends on the periods of

vibration, that position will be shifted towards the red end when the

luminous body is receding from the earth with a velocity comparable to

that of light, and towards the violet end when the motion is one of

approach. The change in refrangibility observed by Mr. Huggins

corresponded with a receding velocity of 41·4 miles per second, and when

from this was subtracted the known speed with which the earth’s motion

round the sun was carrying us from the star at the time, the remainder

expressed a motion of recession amounting to about twenty miles a

second, which motion, there is reason to believe, is chiefly due to a

proper movement of Sirius. These deductions from prismatic observations

are of the highest value astronomically, since they will eventually

enable the real motions of the stars to be determined, for ordinary

observation could only show us that component of the motion which is at

right angles to the visual ray, while this gives the component along the

visual ray. In the same manner, it is inferred that Arcturus, a bright

star in the constellation _Boötes_, is approaching us with a velocity of

fifty-five miles per second.

[Illustration:

FIG. 231.—_Solar Prominences, No. 2._

]

When the solar spots are examined with the spectroscope, the dark image

of the slit produced by the hydrogen line, F, is observed to show a

strange crookedness when it is formed by rays from different parts of

the spot. This distortion is due to the same cause as the displacement

of the stellar lines, namely, motions of approach or recession of the

masses of glowing hydrogen. Mr. Norman Lockyer, to whom we are indebted

for the most elaborate investigations of the solar surface, has

calculated, from the position of the lines, the velocities with which

masses of heated hydrogen are seen bursting upwards, and those which

belong to the down-rushes of cooler gas. Velocities as great as 100

miles per second were, in this way, inferred to occur in some of the

storms which agitate the solar surface. Two drawings of a solar storm,

given by Mr. Lockyer, are shown in Figs. 230 and 231. These are

representations of one of the so-called red prominences, the first

giving its appearance at five minutes past eleven on the morning of

March 14th, 1869, and the last showing the same _ten minutes

afterwards_. The enormous velocity which these rapid changes imply will

be understood when it is stated that this prominence was 27,000 miles

high. “This will give you some idea,” says Mr. Lockyer, “of the

indications which the spectroscope reveals to us, of the enormous forces

at work in the sun, merely as representing the stars, for everything we

have to say about the sun the prism tells us—and it was the first to

tell us—we must assume to be said about the stars. I have little doubt

that, as time rolls on, the spectroscope will become, in fact, almost

the pocket companion of every one amongst us; and it is utterly

impossible to foresee what depths of space will not in time be gauged

and completely investigated by this new method of research.”

The light of comets has also been examined by the spectroscope, and many

interesting results arrived at. Our limits do not, however, permit us to

enter into a discussion of these interesting subjects.

Fig. 232 is a section of another of Mr. Browning’s popular instruments,

which is named by him the “Amateur’s Star Spectroscope.” It exhibits

very distinctly the different spectra of the various stars, nebulæ,

comets, &c.

[Illustration:

FIG. 232.—_Section of Amateur’s Star Spectroscope._

]

The reader who is desirous of learning more of this fascinating subject

is referred to Dr. Roscoe’s elegant volume, entitled, “Lectures on

Spectrum Analysis.” This work, which is embellished with handsome

engravings and illustrated by coloured maps and spectra, gives a clear

and full account of every department of the subject, and in the form of

appendices, abstracts of the more important original papers are

supplied, while a complete list is given of all the memoirs and

publications relating to the spectroscope which have been published.

This brief account of the spectroscope and its revelations, which is all

that our space permits us to give, will not fail to awaken new thoughts

in the mind of a reader who has obtained even a glimpse of the nature of

the subject, especially in relation to that branch of which we have last

treated, for in every age and in every region the stars have attracted

the gaze and excited the imagination of men. The belief in their

influence over human affairs was profound, universal, and enduring; for

it survived the dawn of rising science, being among the last shades of

the long night of superstition which melted away in the morning of true

knowledge. Even Francis Bacon, the father of the inductive philosophy,

and old Sir Thomas Browne, the exposer of “Vulgar Errors,” believed in

the influences of the stars; for while recognizing the impostures

practised by its professors, they still regarded astrology as a science

not altogether vain. It was reserved for the mighty genius of Newton to

prove that in very truth there are invisible ties connecting our earth

with those remote and brilliant bodies—ties more potent than ever

astrology divined; for he showed that even the most distant orb is bound

to its companions and to our planet by the same power that draws the

projected stone to the ground. And now the spectroscope is revealing

other lines of connection, and showing that not gravitation alone is the

sympathetic bond which unites our globe to the celestial orbs, but that

there exists the closer tie of a common constitution, for they are all

made of the same matter, obeying the same physical and chemical laws

which belong to it on the earth. We learn that hydrogen, and magnesium,

and iron, and other familiar substances, exist in these inconceivably

distant suns, and there exhibit the identical properties which

characterize them here. We confirm, by the spectroscope, the fact

partially revealed by other lines of research, that the stars which

appear so fixed, are, in reality, careering through space, each with its

proper motion. We learn also that the stars are the theatres of vast

chemical and physical changes and transformations, the rapidity and

extent of which we can hardly conceive. There is, for example, the case

of that wonderful star in the constellation of the Crown, which, in

1866, suddenly blazed out, from a scarcely discernible telescopic star,

to become one of the most conspicuous in the heavens, and the bright

lines its beams produced in the spectroscope revealed the fact that this

abrupt splendour was due to masses—who can imagine how vast?—of

incandescent hydrogen. This brightness soon waned, and τ _Coronæ

Borealis_ reverted once more to all but telescopic invisibility. The

seeming fixity of the stars is an illusion of the same nature as that

which prevents a casual observer from recognizing their apparent diurnal

motion, and now we have also ample evidence that permanence of physical

condition, even in the stars, is impossible. Everywhere in the universe

there is motion and change; there is no pause, no rest, but a continual

unfolding, an endless progression.

“Know the stars yonder,

The stars everlasting,

Are fugitive also,

And emulate, vaulted,

The lambent heat-lightning

And fire-fly’s flight.”

ROENTGEN’S X RAYS.

[Illustration:

FIG. 232_a_.—_Living Hand. Exposure, 4 Minutes._

]

On page 507 reference will be made to certain remarkable effects

observed by Mr. Crookes when the electric discharges from an induction

coil are passed through very highly exhausted tubes. These

phosphorescent and mechanical effects Mr. Crookes attributed to streams

of “radiant matter” shot off from the _negative_ pole with immense

velocities—the matter not being that of the electrode itself, but

particles of the extremely rarefied residual gas, which, being

comparatively few, could mostly traverse the tube in straight lines

without coming into collision with their fellows, and thus a class of

phenomena, different from the striated discharges in the ordinary and

less highly exhausted Geissler tubes, comes into view. The emanations

from the negative pole, or _cathode_, in highly rarefied gases became

known as the “cathode rays,” and they began to be further examined by

other observers, and more particularly in 1894 by Hittorf, and by M.

Lenard, a Hungarian physicist, who found that they pass through thin

plates of metal, and through wood and other substances not transparent

to ordinary light. It was also observed by Lenard, and also previously

by Hertz, that there are several kinds of cathode rays, which differ

from each other as regards their powers of exciting phosphorescence,

capability of being deflected by a magnet, and the degrees in which they

are absorbed by various media. But universal attention was drawn to this

subject by the announcement, at the end of 1895, of certain discoveries

made by Dr. W. K. Roentgen, a professor of physics at Wurzburg. He

covered a highly-exhausted Crookes’ tube with black cardboard, and found

that when the discharge of a large induction coil was passed through the

tube in a dark room, a piece of paper coated on one side with

platino-cyanide of barium, and held near the covered tube, glowed with a

brilliant fluorescence, no matter which side of the paper was turned

towards the tube; and even at a distance of two yards some fluorescence

was still visible. On experimenting with various bodies interposed

between the covered tube and the fluorescent screen, it was found that

the emanations passed through nearly every substance with more or less

facility. The screen lit up when placed behind a book of a thousand

pages, also behind two packs of cards. A single layer of tin-foil

scarcely threw a shadow, and several thicknesses were required to

produce a distinct effect. Deal boards, an inch thick, offered little

resistance. A very thick plate of aluminium (6/10 inch) reduced the

fluorescence, but still allowed some rays to pass. The hand held before

the fluorescent screen showed a dark shadow of the bones only, with but

a faint outline of their fleshy investment. Copper, silver, gold,

platinum, and lead, in comparatively small thicknesses, intercept these

rays. Thus a plate of lead only five hundredths of an inch thick almost

stops them. Increase of thickness increases the resistance to their

passage in all cases; but the comparative transparency of a body cannot

be deduced from its thickness and density. Many other bodies besides

platino-cyanide of barium become fluorescent under the influence of

these rays, such as certain kinds of glass, Iceland spar, rock-salt,

etc. Dr. Roentgen is convinced that these rays are not the cathode rays

or any part of them; but as the theoretical nature of the new rays has

not yet been explained, he has preferred to provisionally call them the

X rays, a denomination doubtless suggested by the use of the symbol _x_

in algebra to represent unknown quantities.

The source of the X rays, Roentgen states, is at the place where the

cathode rays strike the walls of the exhausted tube, and produce the

most brilliant phosphorescence; but they cannot be cathode rays which

have merely passed through the glass, for, contrary to what has been

observed with respect to the latter, they cannot be deflected by a

magnet. Nor is glass the only substance in which they can be generated,

for they were obtained from an apparatus in which the cathode rays were

made to impinge upon a plate of aluminium nearly one-tenth of an inch

thick. Photographic dry plates are also sensitive to the X rays, and

their power to pass through wood, ebonite, etc., makes the experiments

of testing the opacity, or otherwise, of various objects for them quite

easy. It is necessary merely to place the object on the closed cover of

the dark slide, and place the whole under the vacuum tube; all the

exposure, which is somewhat prolonged in most cases, may be made in

ordinary light. But the light-tight boxes, in which photographic plates

are packed, cannot, of course, be brought near the apparatus, as they

are completely permeable to the X rays, and their whole contents may be

rendered useless. The impression obtained on the photographic plate is

not so much a photograph as a _shadow_ of the interposed object—a shadow

more or less dense in the positive print according to the permeability

of the object, and the length of the exposure. These photographic

results have sometimes been called “shadowgrams,” “radiograms,”

“radiographs,” “skiagraphs,” etc. The word _skiagraph_ appears the most

appropriate designation. That the emanations from the phosphorescing

substance on which the cathode rays impinge are entitled to be also

called rays, appears from the regularity of the shadows thrown on the

fluorescent screen or photographic plate; and the fact of their

propagation in straight lines was proved by Dr. Roentgen obtaining a

_pin-hole_ photograph of the phosphorescing part of the vacuum tube,

when the latter was enveloped in black paper. Why a _pin-hole_ and not a

lens was used for taking this photograph will presently appear.

[Illustration:

FIG. 232_b_.—_Skiagraph of a Hand, by Dr. Roentgen. The Third Finger

has a Ring on it._

]

One of Dr. Roentgen’s experiments excited the attention and interest of

the general public, as well as of the scientific world, in the most

extraordinary degree, and though its announcement was received in some

quarters with incredulity, experimenters in all parts of the world

immediately set themselves at work to test the truth of the alleged

discovery. Electrical apparatus of different kinds, with various

adjustments, were employed, with results that were in some cases

failures, in others confirmations of the German professor’s statements,

and not unfrequently the variations in the conditions gave rise to

increased knowledge of the phenomena generally. The experiment just

alluded was one in which a dry photographic plate contained in one of

the camera dark slides, now so familiar to every one, was placed (with

the slide still closed by its wooden cover of nearly one quarter of an

inch thick) a few inches below the Crookes’ tube, and the hand of a

living-person being extended on the outside of the cover, a shadow of

the bones of the hand, as if seen through the surrounding tissues, was

obtained. Much popular misconception as to the powers of the “new

photography” arose from want of knowledge of the process by which these

strange pictures were obtained, the common notion being that these

photographs were produced by some method of using a camera, and that

outlines of people’s bodies and skeletons could be taken

instantaneously, not only through their clothes, but through doors and

walls. Much nearer the mark was the allusion of a scientific writer as

to the possibility of the new process realising Dickens’ description of

Marley’s ghost: “His body was transparent, so that Scrooge, observing

him, and looking through his waistcoat, could see the two buttons on his

coat behind.” The value of the new discovery for medical and surgical

purposes was immediately recognised, and very soon its application was

successfully practised.

Dr. Roentgen found that the X rays are incapable of refraction, in this

respect differing from ordinary light (see pages 397 and following), and

among the experiments which most impressed and astonished his auditors

when he was lecturing at Potsdam on his new discovery before the

Imperial Court of Germany, was one in which he showed the X rays passing

in a straight line through water without undergoing refraction. The rays

pass without interruption equally through the substances, whether these

be coherent or in a layer of fine powder of the same thickness, and this

again shows that there can be no regular reflection or refraction.

Prisms and lenses, whether of glass, ebonite, or aluminium, fail to

afford evidence of refractive action, hence the X rays cannot be focused

like those of ordinary light, and that is why the photograph of the

vacuum tube had to be taken by a pin-hole. Again, glass lenses could not

be used, because this substance, so transparent to light, is

particularly opaque to the X rays, and would in a great degree intercept

them, while lenses of ebonite and of aluminium, which were tried, were

inoperative on account of the irrefrangibility of the rays.

Discoveries and Inventions of the Nineteenth Century · 第 48 / 93 段