CHAPTER VIII

MENTAL IMAGES AND IDEAS

As you sit thinking, a company of you together, your thoughts run in

many diverse lines. Yet with all this diversity, your minds possess this

common characteristic: _Though your thinking all takes place in what we

call the present moment, it goes on largely in terms of past

experiences._

1. THE PART PLAYED BY PAST EXPERIENCE

PRESENT THINKING DEPENDS ON PAST EXPERIENCE.--Images or ideas of things

you have seen or heard or felt; of things you have thought of before and

which now recur to you; of things you remember, such as names, dates,

places, events; of things that you do not remember as a part of your

past at all, but that belong to it nevertheless--these are the things

which form a large part of your mental stream, and which give content to

your thinking. You may think of a thing that is going on now, or of one

that is to occur in the future; but, after all, you are dependent on

your past experience for the material which you put into your thinking

of the present moment.

Indeed, nothing can enter your present thinking which does not link

itself to something in your past experience. The savage Indian in the

primeval forest never thought about killing a deer with a rifle merely

by pulling a trigger, or of turning a battery of machine guns on his

enemies to annihilate them--none of these things were related to his

past experience; hence he could not think in such terms.

THE PRESENT INTERPRETED BY THE PAST.--Not only can we not think at all

except in terms of our past experience, but even if we could, the

present would be meaningless to us; for the present is interpreted in

the light of the past. The sedate man of affairs who decries athletic

sports, and has never taken part in them, cannot understand the wild

enthusiasm which prevails between rival teams in a hotly contested

event. The fine work of art is to the one who has never experienced the

appeal which comes through beauty, only so much of canvas and variegated

patches of color. Paul says that Jesus was "unto the Greeks,

foolishness." He was foolishness to them because nothing in their

experience with their own gods had been enough like the character of

Jesus to enable them to interpret Him.

THE FUTURE ALSO DEPENDS ON THE PAST.--To the mind incapable of using

past experience, the future also would be impossible; for we can look

forward into the future only by placing in its experiences the elements

of which we have already known. The savage who has never seen the

shining yellow metal does not dream of a heaven whose streets are paved

with gold, but rather of a "happy hunting ground." If you will analyze

your own dreams of the future you will see in them familiar pictures

perhaps grouped together in new forms, but coming, in their elements,

from your past experience nevertheless. All that would remain to a mind

devoid of a past would be the little bridge of time which we call the

"present moment," a series of unconnected _nows_. Thought would be

impossible, for the mind would have nothing to compare and relate.

Personality would not exist; for personality requires continuity of

experience, else we should be a new person each succeeding moment,

without memory and without plans. Such a mind would be no mind at all.

RANK DETERMINED BY ABILITY TO UTILIZE PAST EXPERIENCE.--So important is

past experience in determining our present thinking and guiding our

future actions, that the place of an individual in the scale of creation

is determined largely by the ability to profit by past experience. The

scientist tells us of many species of animals now extinct, which lost

their lives and suffered their race to die out because when, long ago,

the climate began to change and grow much colder, they were unable to

use the experience of suffering in the last cold season as an incentive

to provide shelter, or move to a warmer climate against the coming of

the next and more rigorous one. Man was able to make the adjustment;

and, providing himself with clothing and shelter and food, he survived,

while myriads of the lower forms perished.

The singed moth again and again dares the flame which tortures it, and

at last gives its life, a sacrifice to its folly; the burned child fears

the fire, and does not the second time seek the experience. So also can

the efficiency of an individual or a nation, as compared with other

individuals or nations, be determined. The inefficient are those who

repeat the same error or useless act over and over, or else fail to

repeat a chance useful act whose repetition might lead to success. They

are unable to learn their lesson and be guided by experience. Their past

does not sufficiently minister to their present, and through it direct

their future.

2. HOW PAST EXPERIENCE IS CONSERVED

PAST EXPERIENCE CONSERVED IN BOTH MENTAL AND PHYSICAL TERMS.--If past

experience plays so important a part in our welfare, how, then, is it to

be conserved so that we may secure its benefits? Here, as elsewhere, we

find the mind and body working in perfect unison and harmony, each doing

its part to further the interests of both. The results of our past

experience may be read in both our mental and our physical nature.

On the physical side past experience is recorded in modified structure

through the law of habit working on the tissues of the body, and

particularly on the delicate tissues of the brain and nervous system.

This is easily seen in its outward aspects. The stooped shoulders and

bent form of the workman tell a tale of physical toil and exposure; the

bloodless lips and pale face of the victim of the city sweat shop tell

of foul air, long hours, and insufficient food; the rosy cheek and

bounding step of childhood speak of fresh air, good food and happy play.

On the mental side past experience is conserved chiefly by means of

_images_, _ideas_, and _concepts_. The nature and function of concepts

will be discussed in a later chapter. It will now be our purpose to

examine the nature of images and ideas, and to note the part they play

in the mind's activities.

THE IMAGE AND THE IDEA.--To understand the nature of the image, and then

of the idea, we may best go back to the percept. You look at a watch

which I hold before your eyes and secure a percept of it. Briefly, this

is what happens: The light reflected from the yellow object, on striking

the retina, results in a nerve current which sets up a certain form of

activity in the cells of the visual brain area, and lo! a _percept_ of

the watch flashes in your mind.

Now I put the watch in my pocket, so that the stimulus is no longer

present to your eye. Then I ask you to think of my watch just as it

appeared as you were looking at it; or you may yourself choose to think

of it without my suggesting it to you. In either case _the cellular

activity in the visual area of the cortex is reproduced_ approximately

as it occurred in connection with the percept, and lo! an _image_ of the

watch flashes in your mind. An image is thus an approximate copy of a

former percept (or several percepts). It is aroused indirectly by means

of a nerve current coming by way of some other brain center, instead of

directly by the stimulation of a sense organ, as in the case of a

percept.

If, instead of seeking a more or less exact mental _picture_ of my

watch, you only think of its general _meaning_ and relations, the fact

that it is of gold, that it is for the purpose of keeping time, that it

was a present to me, that I wear it in my left pocket, you then have an

_idea_ of the watch. Our idea of an object is, therefore, the general

meaning of relations we ascribe to it. It should be remembered, however,

that the terms image and idea are employed rather loosely, and that

there is not yet general uniformity among writers in their use.

ALL OUR PAST EXPERIENCE POTENTIALLY AT OUR COMMAND.--Images may in a

certain sense take the place of percepts, and we can again experience

sights, sounds, tastes, and smells which we have known before, without

having the stimuli actually present to the senses. In this way all our

past experience is potentially available to the present. All the objects

we have seen, it is potentially possible again to see in the mind's eye

without being obliged to have the objects before us; all the sounds we

have heard, all the tastes and smells and temperatures we have

experienced, we may again have presented to our minds in the form of

mental images without the various stimuli being present to the

end-organs of the senses.

Through images and ideas the total number of objects in our experience

is infinitely multiplied; for many of the things we have seen, or heard,

or smelled, or tasted, we cannot again have present to the senses, and

without this power we would never get them again. And besides this fact,

it would be inconvenient to have to go and secure afresh each sensation

or percept every time we need to use it in our thought. While _habit_,

then, conserves our past experience on the physical side, the _image_

and the _idea_ do the same thing on the mental side.

3. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN IMAGERY

IMAGES TO BE VIEWED BY INTROSPECTION.--The remainder of the description

of images will be easier to understand, for each of you can know just

what is meant in every case by appealing to your own mind. I beg of you

not to think that I am presenting something new and strange, a curiosity

connected with our thinking which has been discovered by scholars who

have delved more deeply into the matter than we can hope to do. Every

day--no, more than that, every hour and every moment--these images are

flitting through our minds, forming a large part of our stream of

consciousness. Let us see whether we can turn our attention within and

discover some of our images in their flight. Let us introspect.

I know of no better way to proceed than that adopted by Francis Galton

years ago, when he asked the English men of letters and science to think

of their breakfast tables, and then describe the images which appeared.

I am about to ask each one of you to do the same thing, but I want to

warn you beforehand that the images will not be so vivid as the sensory

experiences themselves. They will be much fainter and more vague, and

less clear and definite; they will be fleeting, and must be caught on

the wing. Often the image may fade entirely out, and the idea only be

left.

THE VARIED IMAGERY SUGGESTED BY ONE'S DINING TABLE.--Let each one now

recall the dining table as you last left it, and then answer questions

concerning it like the following:

Can I see clearly in my "mind's eye" the whole table as it stood spread

before me? Can I see all parts of it equally clearly? Do I get the snowy

white and gloss of the linen? The delicate coloring of the china, so

that I can see where the pink shades off into the white? The graceful

lines and curves of the dishes? The sheen of the silver? The brown of

the toast? The yellow of the cream? The rich red and dark green of the

bouquet of roses? The sparkle of the glassware?

Can I again hear the rattle of the dishes? The clink of the spoon

against the cup? The moving up of the chairs? The chatter of the voices,

each with its own peculiar pitch and quality? The twitter of a bird

outside the window? The tinkle of a distant bell? The chirp of a

neighborly cricket?

Can I taste clearly the milk? The coffee? The eggs? The bacon? The

rolls? The butter? The jelly? The fruit? Can I get the appetizing odor

of the coffee? Of the meat? The oranges and bananas? The perfume of the

lilac bush outside the door? The perfume from a handkerchief newly

treated to a spray of heliotrope?

Can I recall the touch of my fingers on the velvety peach? On the

smooth skin of an apple? On the fretted glassware? The feel of the fresh

linen? The contact of leather-covered or cane-seated chair? Of the

freshly donned garment? Can I get clearly the temperature of the hot

coffee in the mouth? Of the hot dish on the hand? Of the ice water? Of

the grateful coolness of the breeze wafted in through the open window?

Can I feel again the strain of muscle and joint in passing the heavy

dish? Can I feel the movement of the jaws in chewing the beefsteak? Of

the throat and lips in talking? Of the chest and diaphragm in laughing?

Of the muscles in sitting and rising? In hand and arm in using knife and

fork and spoon? Can I get again the sensation of pain which accompanied

biting on a tender tooth? From the shooting of a drop of acid from the

rind of the orange into the eye? The chance ache in the head? The

pleasant feeling connected with the exhilaration of a beautiful morning?

The feeling of perfect health? The pleasure connected with partaking of

a favorite food?

POWER OF IMAGERY VARIES IN DIFFERENT PEOPLE.--It is more than probable

that some of you cannot get perfectly clear images in all these lines,

certainly not with equal facility; for the imagery from any one sense

varies greatly from person to person. A celebrated painter was able,

after placing his subject in a chair and looking at him attentively for

a few minutes, to dismiss the subject and paint a perfect likeness of

him from the visual image which recurred to the artist every time he

turned his eyes to the chair where the sitter had been placed. On the

other hand, a young lady, a student in my psychology class, tells me

that she is never able to recall the looks of her mother when she is

absent, even if the separation has been only for a few moments. She can

get an image of the form, with the color and cut of the dress, but never

the features. One person may be able to recall a large part of a concert

through his auditory imagery, and another almost none.

In general it may be said that the power, or at least the use, of

imagery decreases with age. The writer has made a somewhat extensive

study of the imagery of certain high-school students, college students,

and specialists in psychology averaging middle age. Almost without

exception it was found that clear and vivid images played a smaller part

in the thinking of the older group than of the younger. More or less

abstract ideas and concepts seemed to have taken the place of the

concrete imagery of earlier years.

IMAGERY TYPES.--Although there is some difference in our ability to use

imagery of different sensory types, probably there is less variation

here than has been supposed. Earlier pedagogical works spoke of the

_visual_ type of mind, or the _audile_ type, or the _motor_ type, as if

the possession of one kind of imagery necessarily rendered a person

short in other types. Later studies have shown this view incorrect,

however. The person who has good images of one type is likely to excel

in all types, while one who is lacking in any one of the more important

types will probably be found short in all.[4] Most of us probably make

more use of visual and auditory than of other kinds of imagery, while

olfactory and gustatory images seem to play a minor rôle.

4. THE FUNCTION OF IMAGES

Binet says that the man who has not every type of imagery almost equally

well developed is only the fraction of a man. While this no doubt puts

the matter too strongly, yet images do play an important part in our

thinking.

IMAGES SUPPLY MATERIAL FOR IMAGINATION AND MEMORY.--Imagery supplies the

pictures from which imagination builds its structures. Given a rich

supply of images from the various senses, and imagination has the

material necessary to construct times and events long since past, or to

fill the future with plans or experiences not yet reached. Lacking

images, however, imagination is handicapped, and its meager products

reveal in their barrenness and their lack of warmth and reality the

poverty of material.

Much of our memory also takes the form of images. The face of a friend,

the sound of a voice, or the touch of a hand may be recalled, not as a

mere fact, but with almost the freshness and fidelity of a percept. That

much of our memory goes on in the form of ideas instead of images is

true. But memory is often both aided in its accuracy and rendered more

vital and significant through the presence of abundant imagery.

IMAGERY IN THE THOUGHT PROCESSES.--Since logical thinking deals more

with relations and meanings than with particular objects, images

naturally play a smaller part in reasoning than in memory and

imagination. Yet they have their place here as well. Students of

geometry or trigonometry often have difficulty in understanding a

theorem until they succeed in visualizing the surface or solid involved.

Thinking in the field of astronomy, mechanics, and many other sciences

is assisted at certain points by the ability to form clear and accurate

images.

THE USE OF IMAGERY IN LITERATURE.--Facility in the use of imagery

undoubtedly adds much to our enjoyment and appreciation of certain

forms of literature. The great writers commonly use all types of images

in their description and narration. If we are not able to employ the

images they used, many of their most beautiful pictures are likely to be

to us but so many words suggesting prosaic ideas.

Shakespeare, describing certain beautiful music, appeals to the sense of

smell to make himself understood:

... it came o'er my ear like the sweet sound

That breathes upon a bank of violets,

Stealing and giving odor!

_Lady Macbeth_ cries:

Here's the smell of the blood still:

All the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand.

Milton has _Eve_ say of her dream of the fatal apple:

... The pleasant sav'ry smell

So quickened appetite, that I, methought,

Could not but taste.

Likewise with the sense of touch:

... I take thy hand, this hand

As soft as dove's down, and as white as it.

Imagine a person devoid of delicate tactile imagery, with senseless

finger tips and leaden footsteps, undertaking to interpret these

exquisite lines:

Thus I set my printless feet

O'er the cowslip's velvet head,

That bends not as I tread.

Shakespeare thus appeals to the muscular imagery:

At last, a little shaking of mine arm

And thrice his head thus waving up and down,

He raised a sigh so piteous and profound

As it did seem to shatter all his bulk

And end his being.

Many passages like the following appeal to the temperature images:

Freeze, freeze, thou bitter sky,

Thou dost not bite so nigh

As benefits forgot!

To one whose auditory imagery is meager, the following lines will lose

something of their beauty:

How sweet the moonlight sleeps upon this bank!

Here we will sit and let the sounds of music

Creep in our ears; soft stillness and the night

Become the touches of sweet harmony.

Note how much clear images will add to Browning's words:

Are there not two moments in the adventure of a diver--one when a

beggar he prepares to plunge, and one, when a prince he rises with

his pearl?

POINTS WHERE IMAGES ARE OF GREATEST SERVICE.--Beyond question, many

images come flooding into our minds which are irrelevant and of no

service in our thinking. No one has failed to note many such. Further,

we undoubtedly do much of our best thinking with few or no images

present. Yet we need images. Where, then, are they most needed? _Images

are needed wherever the percepts which they represent would be of

service._ Whatever one could better understand or enjoy or appreciate by

seeing it, hearing it, or perceiving it through some other sense, he can

better understand, enjoy or appreciate through images than by means of

ideas only.

5. THE CULTIVATION OF IMAGERY

IMAGES DEPEND ON SENSORY STIMULI.--The power of imaging can be

cultivated the same as any other ability.

In the first place, we may put down as an absolute requisite _such an

environment of sensory stimuli as will tempt every sense to be awake and

at its best_, that we may be led into a large acquaintance with the

objects of our material environment. No one's stock of sensory images is

greater than the sum total of his sensory experiences. No one ever has

images of sights, or sounds, or tastes, or smells which he has never

experienced.

Likewise, he must have had the fullest and freest possible liberty in

motor activities. For not only is the motor act itself made possible

through the office of imagery, but the motor act clarifies and makes

useful the images. The boy who has actually made a table, or a desk, or

a box has ever afterward a different and a better image of one of these

objects than before; so also when he has owned and ridden a bicycle, his

image of this machine will have a different significance from that of

the image founded upon the visual perception alone of the wheel he

longingly looked at through the store window or in the other boy's

dooryard.

THE INFLUENCE OF FREQUENT RECALL.--But sensory experiences and motor

responses alone are not enough, though they are the basis of good

imagery. _There must be frequent recall._ The sunset may have been never

so brilliant, and the music never so entrancing; but if they are never

thought of and dwelt upon after they were first experienced, little will

remain of them after a very short time. It is by repeating them often in

experience through imagery that they become fixed, so that they stand

ready to do our bidding when we need next to use them.

THE RECONSTRUCTION OF OUR IMAGES.--To richness of experience and

frequency of the recall of our images we must add one more factor;

namely, that of their _reconstruction_ or working over. Few if any

images are exact recalls of former percepts of objects. Indeed, such

would be neither possible nor desirable. The images which we recall are

recalled for a purpose, or in view of some future activity, and hence

must be _selective_, or made up of the elements of several or many

former related images.

Thus the boy who wishes to construct a box without a pattern to follow

recalls the images of numerous boxes he may have seen, and from them all

he has a new image made over from many former percepts and images, and

this new image serves him as a working model. In this way he not only

gets a copy which he can follow to make his box, but he also secures a

new product in the form of an image different from any he ever had

before, and is therefore by so much the richer. It is this working over

of our stock of old images into new and richer and more suggestive ones

that constitutes the essence of constructive imagination.

The more types of imagery into which we can put our thought, the more

fully is it ours and the better our images. The spelling lesson needs

not only to be taken in through the eye, that we may retain a visual

image of the words, but also to be recited orally, so that the ear may

furnish an auditory image, and the organs of speech a motor image of the

correct forms. It needs also to be written, and thus given into the

keeping of the hand, which finally needs most of all to know and retain

it.

The reading lesson should be taken in through both the eye and the ear,

and then expressed by means of voice and gesture in as full and complete

a way as possible, that it may be associated with motor images. The

geography lesson needs not only to be read, but to be drawn, or molded,

or constructed. The history lesson should be made to appeal to every

possible form of imagery. The arithmetic lesson must be not only

computed, but measured, weighed, and pressed into actual service.

Thus we might carry the illustration into every line of education and

experience, and the same truth holds. _What we desire to comprehend

completely and retain well, we must apprehend through all available

senses and conserve in every possible type of image and form of

expression._

6. PROBLEMS IN INTROSPECTION AND OBSERVATION

1. Observe a reading class and try to determine whether the pupils

picture the scenes and events they read about. How can you tell?

2. Similarly observe a history class. Do the pupils realize the events

as actually happening, and the personages as real, living people?

3. Observe in a similar way a class in geography, and draw conclusions.

A pupil in computing the cost of plastering a certain room based the

figures on the room _filled full of plaster_. How might visual imagery

have saved the error?

4. Imagine a three-inch cube. Paint it. Then saw it up into inch cubes,

leaving them all standing in the original form. How many inch cubes have

paint on three faces? How many on two faces? How many on one face? How

many have no paint on them? Answer all these questions by referring to

your imagery alone.

5. Try often to recall images in the various sensory lines; determine in

what classes of images you are least proficient and try to improve in

these lines.

6. How is the singing teacher able, after his class has sung through

several scores, to tell that they are flatting?

7. Study your imagery carefully for a few days to see whether you can

discover your predominating type of imagery.

The Mind and Its Education · 第 8 / 18 章