CAPTAIN JOHN M'AFFERTY.

It is not Irish-born men alone whose souls are filled with a chivalrous

love for Ireland, and a stern hatred of her oppressor. There are amongst

the ranks of her patriots none more generous, more resolute, or more

active in her cause than the children born of Irish parents in various

parts of the world. In London, Liverpool, Manchester, Birmingham,

Glasgow, and all the large towns of Great Britain, throughout the United

States, and in the British colonies, many of the best known and most

thorough-going "Irishmen" are men whose place of birth was not beneath

the Irish skies, and amongst them are some who never saw the shores of

the Green Isle. One of these men was Captain John M'Afferty. He was born

of Irish parents in the State of Ohio, in the year 1838, and at their

knees he heard of the rights and wrongs of Ireland, learned to

sympathise with the sufferings of that country, and to regard the

achievement of its freedom as a task in which he was bound to bear a

part. He grew up to be a man of adventurous and daring habits, better

fitted for the camp than for the ordinary ways of peaceful life; and

when the civil war broke out he soon found his place in one of those

regiments of the Confederacy whose special duty lay in the

accomplishment of the most hazardous enterprises. He belonged to the

celebrated troop of Morgan's guerillas, whose dashing feats of valour so

often filled the Federal forces with astonishment and alarm. In the

latter part of 1865 he crossed over to this country to assist in leading

the insurrection which was then being prepared by the Fenian

organization. He was arrested, as already stated in these pages, on

board the steamer at Queenstown before he had set foot on Irish soil;

when brought to trial at Cork, in the month of December, the lawyers

discovered that being an alien, and having committed no overt act of

treason within the Queen's dominions, there was no case against him, and

he was consequently discharged. He then went back to America, took an

active part in some Fenian meetings, made a speech at one of them which

was held at Jones's Wood, and when the report of the proceedings

appeared in print, he, with a sense of grim humour, posted a copy

containing his oration to the governor of Mountjoy Prison, Dublin. In

the latter part of 1866, when James Stephens was promising to bring off

immediately the long-threatened insurrection, M'Afferty again crossed

the ocean, and landed in England. There he was mainly instrumental in

planning and organizing that extraordinary movement, the raid on

Chester, which took place on Monday, 11th of February, 1867. It is now

confessed, even by the British authorities themselves, that but for the

timely intimation of the design given by the informer Corridon,

M'Afferty and his party would probably have succeeded in capturing the

old Castle, and seizing the large store of arms therein contained.

Finding their movements anticipated, the Fenian party left Chester as

quietly as they had come, and the next that was heard of M'Afferty was

his arrest, and that of his friend and companion John Flood, on the 23rd

of February, in the harbour of Dublin, after they had got into a small

boat from out of the collier "New Draper," which had just arrived from

Whitehaven. M'Afferty was placed in the dock of Green-street

court-house for trial on Wednesday, May 1st, while the jury were absent

considering their verdict in the case of Burke and Doran. On Monday, May

the 6th, he was declared guilty by the jury. On that day week a Court of

Appeal, consisting of ten of the Irish judges, sat to consider some

legal points raised by Mr. Butt in the course of the trial, the most

important of which was the question whether the prisoner, who had been

in custody since February 23rd, could be held legally responsible for

the events of the Fenian rising which occurred on the night of the 5th

of March. Their lordships gave an almost unanimous judgment against the

prisoner on Saturday, May 18th, and on the Monday following he was

brought up for sentence, on which occasion, in response to the usual

question, he spoke as follows:--

"My lords--I have nothing to say that can, at this advanced stage of

the trial, ward off that sentence of death, for I might as well hurl

my complaint (if I had one) at the orange trees of the sunny south,

or the tall pine trees of the bleak north, as now to speak to the

question why sentence of death should not be passed upon me according

to the law of the land; but I do protest loudly against the injustice

of that sentence. I have been brought to trial upon a charge of high

treason against the government of Great Britain, and guilt has been

brought home to me upon the evidence of one witness, and that witness

a perjured informer. I deny distinctly that there have been two

witnesses to prove the overt act of treason against me. I deny

distinctly that you have brought two independent witnesses to two

overt acts. There is but one witness to prove the overt act of

treason against me. I grant that there has been a cloud of

circumstantial evidence to show my connection (if I may please to use

that word) with the Irish people in their attempt for Irish

independence, and I claim that as an American and as an alien, I have

a reason and a right to sympathise with the Irish people or any other

people who may please to revolt against that form of government by

which they believe they are governed tyrannically. England

sympathised with America. She not only sympathised, but she gave her

support to both parties; but who ever heard of an Englishman having

been arrested by the United States government for having given his

support to the Confederate States of America and placed on his trial

for high treason against the government? No such case ever has been.

I do not deny that I have sympathised with the Irish people--I love

Ireland--I love the Irish people. And, if I were free to-morrow, and

the Irish people were to take the field for independence, my sympathy

would be with them; I would join them if they had any prospect

whatever of independence, but I would not give my sanction to the

useless effusion of blood, however done; and I state distinctly that

I had nothing whatever to do, directly or indirectly, with the

movement that took place in the county of Dublin. I make that

statement on the brink of my grave. Again, I claim that I have a

right to be discharged of the charge against me by the language of

the law by which I have been tried. That law states that you must

have two independent witnesses to prove the overt act against the

prisoner. That is the only complaint I have to make, and I make that

aloud. I find no fault with the jury, no complaint against the

judges. I have been tried and found guilty. I am perfectly satisfied

that I will go to my grave. I will go to my grave like a gentleman

and a Christian, although I regret that I should be cut off at this

stage of my life--still many an noble Irishman fell in defence of the

rights of my southern clime. I do not wish to make any flowery speech

to win sympathy in the court of justice. Without any further remarks

I will now accept the sentence of the court."

Mr. Justice Fitzgerald then in the "solemn tone of voice" adopted on

such occasions proceeded to pass sentence in the usual form, fixing the

12th day of June as the date on which the execution should take place.

The prisoner heard the sentence without giving the slightest symptoms of

emotion, and then spoke as follows:--

"I will accept my sentence as becomes a gentleman and a Christian. I

have but one request to ask of the tribunal, and that is that after

the execution of the sentence my remains shall be turned over to Mr.

Lawless to be by him interred in consecrated ground as quietly as he

possibly can. I have now, previous to leaving the dock, once more to

return my grateful and sincere thanks to Mr. Butt, the star of the

Irish bar, for his able and devoted defence on behalf of me and my

friends. Mr. Butt, I thank you. I also return the same token of

esteem to Mr. Dowse, for the kind and feeling manner in which he

alluded to the scenes in my former life. Those kind allusions recall

to my mind many moments--some bright, beautiful, and glorious--and

yet some sad recollections arise of generous hopes that floated o'er

me, and now sink beyond the grave. Mr. Butt, please convey to Mr.

Dowse my grateful and sincere thanks. Mr. Lawless, I also return you

my thanks for your many acts of kindness--I can do no more."

He was not executed however. The commutation of Burke's sentence

necessitated the like course in all the other capital cases, and

M'Afferty's doom was changed to penal servitude for life.

* * * * *

Speeches from the Dock; Or, Protests of Irish Patriotism. Part I Speeches delivered after conviction by Theobald Wolfe Tone, William Orr, the brothers Sheares, Robert Emmet, John Martin, William Smith O'Brien, Thomas Francis Meagher, Terence Bellew McManus, John Mitchel, Thomas C. Luby, John O'Leary, Charles J. Kickham, Colonel Thomas F. Burke, and Captain Mackay · 第 27 / 34 题