IN CONCLUSION.

We have carefully reviewed the history of iridotomy for nearly two

centuries, and noted how the pendulum has swung from knife-needle to

scissors, and back again. We have learned that Cheselden, the father

of iridotomy, originated the method of incision by the knife-needle,

which Heuermann modified, and Adams later revived and improved. We have

seen how Janin abandoned this procedure and originated the scissors

method, which Maunoir greatly improved and caused to hold sway for more

than half a century. We have been deeply impressed by the fact that the

mature, judicial mind of von Graefe led him to abandon the scissors and

revert to the knife-needle method. We have seen how, soon after his

death, the great influence of De Wecker had swerved the thought of

the ophthalmic world back to the adoption of the scissors method in a

greatly improved form.

Whether I have succeeded in citing sufficient facts and arguments

to establish my thesis in favor of the knife-needle, or not, I

nevertheless submit to the profession my V-shaped method of iridotomy

and capsulotomy with a confidence born of twenty years’ successful

experience in its use, and with the hope that it may prove equally

efficient in the hands of others who will take pains to study and

understand the method, and who may have the patience to put it in

practice.

History of Iridotomy Knife-Needle vs. Scissors—Description of Author's V-Shaped Method · 第 19 / 19 题