Another comrade worthy of special notice was FitzGerald, famous to-day

as the translator of Omar Khayyam, and also as the man whom two great

authors, Tennyson and Thackeray, named as their most cherished friend.

He was living a hermit's life in Suffolk, dividing his day between his

yacht, his garden, and his books; and writing, when he was in the

humour, those gossipy letters which have placed him as a classic with

Cowper and Lamb. From time to time he would come to London for a visit

to a picture gallery or an evening with his friends; and for many years

he never failed to write once a year for news of the poet, whose books

he might criticize capriciously, but whose image was always fresh in his

affectionate heart. Of his old Cambridge circle Tennyson honoured, above

all others, 'his domeship' James Spedding, of the massive rounded head,

of the rare judgement in literature, of the unselfish and faithful

discharge of all the duties which he could take upon himself. Great as

was his edition of Bacon, he was by the common consent of his friends

far greater than anything which he achieved, and his memory is most

worthily preserved in the letters of Tennyson, and of others who knew

him. In London he was present at gatherings where Landor and Leigh Hunt

represented the elder generation of poets; but he was more familiar with

his contemporaries Henry Taylor and Aubrey de Vere. It is the latter who

gives us an interesting account of two meetings between Wordsworth and

his successor in the Laureateship.[27] The occasions when Tennyson and

Browning met one another and read their poetry aloud were also cherished

in the memory of those friends who were fortunate enough to be

present.[28] Differing as they did in temperament and in tastes, they

were rivals in generosity to one another and indeed to all their

brethren who wielded the pen of the writer. To meet such choice spirits

Tennyson would leave for a while his precious solitude and his books.

London could not be his home, but it became a place of pleasant meetings

and of friendships in which he found inspiration and help.

[Note 27: _Alfred Lord Tennyson: A Memoir_, by his son, vol. i, p.

209 (Macmillan & Co.).]

[Note 28: _Robert Browning_, by Edward Dowden, p. 173 (J. M. Dent &

Co.).]

Thus it was that Tennyson spent the quiet years of meditation and study

before he achieved his full renown. This was no such sensational event

as Byron's meteoric appearance in 1812; but one year, 1850, is a clear

landmark in his career. This was the date of the publication of _In

Memoriam_ and of his appointment, on the death of Wordsworth, to the

office of Poet Laureate. This year saw the end of his struggle with

ill-fortune and the end of his long courtship. In June he was married,

at Shiplake on the Thames, to Emily Sellwood. Henceforth his happiness

was assured and he knew no more the restlessness and melancholy which

had clouded his enjoyment of life. His course was clear, and for forty

years his position was hardly questioned in all lands where the English

tongue was spoken. Noble companies of worshippers might worthily swear

allegiance to Thackeray and Browning; but by the voice of the people

Dickens and Tennyson were enthroned supreme.

To deal with all the volumes of poetry that Tennyson published between

1850 and his death would be impossible within the limits of these pages.

In some cases he reverted to themes which he had treated before and he

preserved for many years the same skill in craftsmanship. But in _Maud_,

in _The Idylls of the King_, and in the historical dramas,

unquestionably, he broke new ground.

Partly on account of the scheme of the poem, partly for the views

expressed on questions of the day, _Maud_ provoked more hostile

criticism than anything which he wrote; yet it seems to have been the

poet's favourite work. The story of its composition is curious. It was

suggested by a short lyric which Tennyson had printed privately in 1837

beginning with the words 'Oh, that 'twere possible after long grief'.

His friend, Sir John Simeon, urged him to write a poem which would lead

up to and explain it; and the poet, adopting the idea, used _Maud_ as a

vehicle for much which he was feeling in the disillusionment of middle

life. The form of a monodrama was unfamiliar to the public and has

difficulties of its own. Tennyson has combined action, proceeding

somewhat spasmodically, with a skilful study of character, showing us

the exaggerated sensibility of a nature which under the successive

influence of misanthropy, hope, love, and tragic disappointment, may

easily pass beyond the border-land of insanity. In the scene where love

is triumphant, Tennyson touches the highest point of lyrical passion;

but there are jarring notes introduced in the satirical descriptions of

Maud's brother and of the rival who aspires to her hand. And in the

later cantos where, after the fatal quarrel, the hero is driven to moody

thoughts and dark presages of woe, there are passages which seem to be

charged with the doctrine that England was being corrupted by long peace

and needed the purifying discipline of war. For this the poet was taken

to task by his critics; and, though it is unfair in dramatic work to

attribute to an author the words of his characters, Tennyson found it

difficult to clear himself of suspicion, the more so that the Crimean

War inspired at this time some of his most popular martial ballads and

songs.

_The Idylls of the King_ had a different fate and achieved instant

popularity. The first four were published in 1859 and within a few

months 10,000 copies were sold. Tennyson's original design, formed early

in life, had been to build a single epic on the Arthurian theme, which

seemed to him to give scope, like Virgil's _Aeneid_, for patriotic

treatment. 'The greatest of all poetical subjects' he called it, and it

haunted his mind perpetually. But if Virgil found such a task difficult

nineteen hundred years before, it was doubly difficult for Tennyson to

satisfy his generation, with scientific historians raking the ash heaps

of the past, and pedants demanding local colour. In shaping his poem to

meet the requirements of history he was in danger of losing that breadth

of treatment which is essential for epic poetry. He fell back on the

device of selecting episodes, each a complete picture in itself, and

grouping them round a single hero. The story is placed in the twilight

between the Roman withdrawal and the conquests of the Saxons, when the

lamp of history was glimmering most faintly. In these troublous times a

king is miraculously sent to be a bulwark to the people against the

inroads of their foes. He founds an order of Knighthood bound by vows to

fight for all just and noble causes, and upholds for a time victoriously

the standard of chivalry within his realm, till through the entrance of

sin and treachery the spell is broken and the heathen overrun the land.

After his last battle, in the far west of our island, the king passes

away to the supernatural world from which he came. This last episode had

been handled many years before, and the 'Morte d'Arthur', which had

appeared in the volume of 1842, was incorporated into the 'Passing of

Arthur' to close the series of Idylls.

With what admixture of allegory this story was set out it is hard to

say--Tennyson himself could not in later years be induced to define his

purpose--but it seems certain that many of the characters are intended

to symbolize higher and lower qualities. According to some

interpretations King Arthur stands for the power of conscience and Queen

Guinevere for the heart. Galahad represents purity, Bors rough honesty,

Percivale humility, and Merlin the power of the intellect, which is too

easily beguiled by treachery. So the whole story is moralized by the

entrance, through Guinevere and Lancelot, of sin; by the gradual fading,

through the lightness of one or the treachery of another, of the

brightness of chivalry; and by the final ruin which shatters the fair

ideal.

But there is no need to darken counsel by questions about history or

allegory, if we wish, first and last, to enjoy poetry, for its own sake.

Here, as in Spenser's _Faerie Queene_, forth go noble knights with

gentle maidens through the enchanted scenes of fairyland; for their

order and its vows they are ready to dare all. Lawlessness is tamed and

cruelty is punished, and no perilous quest presents itself but there is

a champion ready to follow it to the end. And if severe critics tell us

that they find no true gift of story-telling here, let us go for a

verdict to the young. They may not be good judges of style, or safe

interpreters of shades of thought, but they know when a story carries

them away; and the _Idylls of the King_, like the Waverley Novels, have

captured the heart of many a lover of literature who has not yet learnt

to question his instinct or to weigh his treasures in the scales of

criticism. And older readers may find themselves kindled to enthusiasm

by reflective passages rich in high aspiration, or charmed by

descriptions of nature as beautiful as anything which Tennyson wrote.

In the historical plays, which occupied a large part of his attention

between 1874 and 1879, Tennyson undertook a yet harder task. He chose

periods when national issues of high importance were at stake, such as

the conflict between the Church and the Crown, between the domination of

the priest and the claim of the individual to freedom of belief. He put

aside all exuberance of fancy and diction as unsuited to tragedy; he

handled his theme with dignity and at times with force, and attained a

literary success to which Browning and other good judges bore testimony.

Of Becket in particular he made a sympathetic figure, which, in the

skilful hands of Henry Irving, won considerable favour upon the stage.

But the times were out of joint for the poetic drama, and he had not the

rich imagination of Shakespeare, nor the power to create living men and

women who compel our hearts to pity, to horror, or to delight. For the

absence of this no studious reading of history, no fine sentiment, no

noble cadences, can make amends, and it seems doubtful whether future

ages will regard the plays as anything but a literary curiosity.

On the other hand, nothing which he wrote has touched the human heart

more genuinely than the poems of peasant life, some of them written in

the broadest Lincolnshire dialect, which Tennyson produced during the

years in which he was engaged on the Idylls and the plays. 'The

Grandmother', 'The Northern Cobbler', and the two poems on the

Lincolnshire farmers of following generations, were as popular as

anything which the Victorian Age produced, and seem likely to keep their

pre-eminence. The two latter illustrate, by their origin, Tennyson's

power of seizing on a single impression, and building on it a work of

creative genius. It was enough for him to hear the anecdote of the dying

farmer's words, 'God A'mighty little knows what he's about in taking me!

And Squire will be mad'; and he conceived the character of the man, and

his absorption in the farm where he had lived and worked and around

which he grouped his conceptions of religion and duty. The later type of

farmer was evoked similarly by a quotation in the dialect of his county:

'When I canters my herse along the ramper, I 'ears "proputty, proputty,

proputty"'; and again Tennyson achieved a triumph of characterization.

It is here perhaps that he comes nearest to the achievements of his

great rival Browning in the field of dramatic lyrics.

Apart from the writing and publication of his poems, we cannot divide

Tennyson's later life into definite sections. By 1850 his habits had

been formed, his friendships established, his fame assured; such

landmarks as are furnished by the birth of his children, by his

journeyings abroad, by the homes in which he settled, point to no

essential change in the current of his life. Of the perfect happiness

which marriage brought to him, of the charm and dignity which enabled

Mrs. Tennyson to hold her place worthily at his side, many witnesses

have spoken. Two sons were born to him, one of whom died in 1886, while

the other, named after his lost friend, lived to write the Memoir which

will always be the chief authority for our knowledge of the man. His

homes soon became household words--so great was the spell which Tennyson

cast over the hearts of his readers. Farringford, at the western end of

the Isle of Wight, was first tenanted by him in 1853, and was bought in

1856. Here the poet enjoyed perfect quiet, a genial climate and the

proximity of the sea, for which his love never failed. It was a very

different coast to the bleak sandhills and wide flats of Mablethorpe.

Above Freshwater the noble line of the Downs rises and falls as it runs

westward to the Needles, where it plunges abruptly into the sea; and

here on the springy turf, a tall romantic figure in wide-brimmed hat and

flowing cloak, the poet would often walk. But Farringford, lying low in

the shelter of the hills, proved too hot in summer; Freshwater was

discovered by tourists too often inquisitive about the great; and so,

after ten or twelve years, he was searching for another home, some

remoter fastness set on higher ground. This he discovered on the borders

of Surrey and Sussex near Haslemere, where Black Down rises to a height

of 900 feet above the sea and commands a wide prospect over the blue

expanse of the weald. Here he found copses and commons haunted by the

song of birds, here he raised plantations close at hand to shelter him

from the rude northern winds, and here he built the stately house of

Aldworth where, some thirty years later, he was to die.

To both houses came frequent guests. For, shy as he was of paying

visits, he loved to see in his own house men and women who could talk to

him as equals--nor was he always averse to those of reverent temper, so

they were careful not to jar on his fastidious tastes. In some ways it

was a pity that he did not come to closer quarters with the rougher

forces that were fermenting in the industrial districts. It might have

helped him to a better understanding of the classes that were pushing to

the front, who were to influence so profoundly the England of the

morrow. But the strain of kindly sympathy in Tennyson's nature can be

seen at its best in his intercourse with cottagers, sailors, and other

humble folk who lived near his doors. The stories which his son tells us

show how the poet was able to obtain an insight into their minds and to

write poems like 'The Grandmother' with artistic truth. And no visitor

received a heartier welcome at Farringford than Garibaldi, who was at

once peasant and sailor, and who remained so none the less when he had

become a hero of European fame. To Englishmen of nearly every cultured

profession Tennyson's hospitality was freely extended--we need only

instance Professor Tyndall, Dean Bradley, James Anthony Froude, Aubrey

de Vere, G. F. Watts, Henry Irving, Hubert Parry, Lord Dufferin, and

that most constant of friends, Benjamin Jowett, pre-eminent among the

Oxford celebrities of the day. Among his immediate neighbours he

conceived a peculiar affection for Sir John Simeon, whose death in 1870

called forth the stanzas 'In the Garden at Swainston'; and no one was

more at home at Farringford than Julia Cameron, famous among early

photographers, who has left us some of the best likenesses of the poet

in middle and later life.

Tennyson was not familiar with foreign countries to the same degree as

Browning, nor was he ever a great traveller. When he went abroad he

needed the help of some loyal friend, like Francis Palgrave or Frederick

Locker, to safeguard him against pitfalls, and to shield him from

annoyance. When he was too old to stand the fatigue of railway

journeys, he was willing to be taken for a cruise on a friend's yacht;

and thus he visited many parts of Scotland and the harbours of

Scandinavia. Amid new surroundings he was not always easy to please; bad

food or smelly streets would call forth loud protests and upset him for

a day; but his friends found it worth their while to risk some anxiety

in order to enjoy his keen observation and the originality of his talk.

Wherever he went he took with him his stored wisdom on Homer, Dante, and

the 'Di maiores' of literature; and when Gladstone, too, happened to be

one of the party on board ship, the talk must have been well worth

hearing. As in his youth, so now, Tennyson's mind moved most naturally

on a lofty plane and he was most at home with the great poets of the

past; and with the exception of a few poems like 'All along the valley',

where the torrents at Cauteretz reminded him of an early visit with

Hallam to the Pyrenees, we can trace little evidence in his poetry of

the journeys which he made. But we can see from his letters that he was

kindled by the beauty of Italian cities and their treasures. In every

picture-gallery which he visited he showed his preference for Titian and

the rich colour of the Venetian painters. He refused to be bound by the

conventional English taste for Alpine scenery, and broke out into abuse

of the discoloured water in the Grindelwald glacier--'a filthy thing,

and looking as if a thousand London seasons had passed over it'. In all

places, among all people, he said what he thought and felt, with

independence and conviction.

One incident connecting him with Italy is worthy of mention as showing

that the poet, who 'from out the northern island' came at times to visit

them, was known and esteemed by the people of Italy. When the Mantuans

celebrated in 1885 the nineteenth centenary of the death of Virgil, the

classic poet to whom Tennyson owed most, they asked him to write an

ode, and nobly he rose to the occasion, attaining a felicity of phrase

which is hardly excelled in the choicest lines of Virgil himself. But it

is as the laureate of his own country that he is of primary interest,

and it is time to inquire how he fulfilled the functions of his office,

and how he rendered that office of value to the State.

When he was first appointed, Queen Victoria had let him know that he was

to be excused from the obligation of writing complimentary verse to

celebrate the doings of the court. Of his own accord he composed

occasional odes for the marriages of her sons, and showed some of his

practised skill in dignifying such themes; but it is not here that he

found his work as laureate. He achieved greater success in the poems

which he wrote to honour the exploits of our army and navy, in the past

or the present. In his ballad of 'The Revenge', in his Balaclava poems,

in the 'Siege of Lucknow', he struck a heroic note which found a ready

echo in the hearts of soldiers and sailors and those who love the

services. Above all, in the great ode on the death of the Duke of

Wellington he has stirred all the chords of national feeling as no other

laureate before him, and has enriched our literature with a jewel which

is beyond price.

The Arthurian epic failed to achieve its national aim, and the

historical dramas, though inspired by great principles which have helped

to shape our history, never touched those large circles to which as

laureate he should appeal. Some might judge that his function was best

fulfilled in the lyrics to be found scattered throughout his work which

praise the slow, ordered progress of English liberties. Passages from

_Maud_ or _In Memoriam_ will occur to many readers, still more the three

lyrics generally printed together at the end of the 1842 poems,

beginning with the well-known tines, 'Of old sat Freedom on the

heights', 'Love thou thy land', and 'You ask me why though ill at ease'.

Here we listen to the voice of English Liberalism uttered in very

different tones from those of Byron and Shelley, expressing the mind of

one who recoiled from French Revolutions and had little sympathy with

their aims of universal equality. In this he represented very truly that

Victorian movement which was guided by Cobden and Mill, by Peel and

Gladstone, which conferred such practical benefits upon the England of

their day; but it is hardly the temper that we expect of an ardent poet,

at any rate in the days of his youth. The burning passion of Carlyle,

Ruskin, or William Morris, however tempered by other feelings, called

forth a heartier response in the breast of the toiling multitudes.

It may be that the claim of Tennyson to popular sovereignty will, in the

end, rest chiefly on the pleasure which he gave to many thousands of his

fellow-countrymen, a pleasure to be renewed and found again in English

scenes, and in thoughts which coloured grey lives and warmed cold

hearts, which shed the ray of faith on those who could accept no creeds

and who yet yearned for some hope of an after-life to cheer their

declining days. That he gave this pleasure is certain--to men and women

of all classes from Samuel Bamford,[29] the Durham weaver, who saved his

pence to buy the precious volumes of the 'thirties, to Queen Victoria on

her throne, who in the reading of _In Memoriam_ found one of her chief

consolations in the hour of widowhood.

[Note 29: See _Memoir_, by Hallam, Lord Tennyson, vol. i, p. 283

(Macmillan).]

It was given to Tennyson to live a long life, and to know more joy than

sorrow--to be gladdened by the homage of two hemispheres, to lament the

loss of his old friends who went before him (Spedding in 1881,

FitzGerald in 1883, Robert Browning in 1889), to write his most famous

lyric 'Crossing the Bar' at the age of 80, and to be soothed and

strengthened to the end by the presence of his wife. For some weeks in

the autumn of 1892 he lay in growing weakness at Aldworth taking

farewell of the sights and sounds that he had loved so long. To him now

it had come to hear with dying ears 'the earliest pipe of half-awakened

birds' and to see with dying eyes 'the casement slowly grow a glimmering

square'. Early on October 5 he had an access of energy, and called to

have the blinds drawn up--'I want', he said, 'to see the sky and the

light'. The next day he died, and a week later a country wagon bore the

coffin to Haslemere. Thence it passed to Westminster, where his dust was

to be laid beside that of Browning, among the great men who had gone

before. In what mood he faced death we can learn from his own words:

Spirit, nearing yon dark portal at the limit of thy human state,

Fear not thou the hidden purpose of that Power which alone is great,

Nor the myriad world, His shadow, nor the silent Opener of the Gate![30]

[Note 30: 'God and the Universe,' from _Death of Oenone_, &c.

Macmillan, (1892.)]

[Illustration: CHARLES KINGSLEY

From a drawing by W. S. Hunt in the National Portrait Gallery]

CHARLES KINGSLEY

1819-75

1819. Born at Holne on Dartmoor, June 12.

1830-6. Father rector of Clovelly.

1832. Grammar School at Helston, Cornwall.

1836. Father rector of St. Luke's, Chelsea. C. K. to King's College,

London.

1838-42. Magdalene College, Cambridge.

1842. Ordained at Farnham. Curate of Eversley.

1844. Marriage to Fanny Grenfell. Friendship with F. D. Maurice.

1844. Rector of Eversley.

1848. Chartist riots. 'Parson Lot' pamphlets.

1850. _Alton Locke_ published.

1855. _Westward Ho!_ published.

1857. _Two Years Ago_ published.

1859. Chaplain to the Queen.

1860. Professor of Modern History at Cambridge.

1864. Tour in the south of France.

1869. Canon of Chester.

1870. Tour to the West Indies.

1873. Canon of Westminster.

1874. Tour to California.

1875. Death at Eversley, January 23.

CHARLES KINGSLEY

PARISH PRIEST

If Charles Kingsley had been born in Scandinavia a thousand years

earlier, one more valiant Viking would have sailed westward from the

deep fiords of his native home to risk his fortunes in a new world, one

who by his courage, his foresight, and his leadership of men was well

fitted to be captain of his bark. The lover of the open-air life, the

searcher after knowledge, the fighter that he was, he would have been in

his element, foremost in the fray, most eager in the quest. But it was

given to him to live in quieter times, to graft on the old Norse stock

the graces of modern culture and the virtues of a Christian; and in a

peaceful parish of rural England he found full scope for his gifts.

There he taught his own and succeeding generations how full and

beneficent the life of a parish priest can be. Our villages and towns

produced many notable types of rector in the nineteenth century, Keble,

Hawker, Hook, Robertson, Dolling, and scores of others; but none touched

life at more points, none became so truly national a figure as Charles

Kingsley in his Eversley home.

Victorian worthies · 第 13 / 29 段