Mr. CHANEY. Now, then, what difference would there be----

Mr. SERVEN. The law provides expressly the opposite in regard to the

public performance of the musical composition, and under that old

principle let the buyer look out! He is supposed to know what the law

is.

Mr. CHANEY. That being so, ought not a man who buys a musical

composition to have the right to do just as he pleases with it, the

same as a man who purchases a mowing machine? For instance, I sing some

myself. If I buy a piece of music ought I not to have a right to do

what I please with it?

Mr. SERVEN. Certainly, if your contract covers that.

Mr. CHANEY. But suppose it does not.

Mr. SERVEN. There must be an express or implied contract as to what he

is buying.

Mr. CHANEY. He buys the machine.

Mr. BONYNGE. I do not understand that he has not the same right if he

buys a piece of music he can do what he wants to with it; but the other

question is in regard to the public performance.

Mr. SERVEN. For profit; yes.

Mr. CHANEY. In the case of a musical composition, he buys it for the

purpose of public performance.

Mr. SERVEN. Not necessarily.

Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, on H. R. 11943, to Amend Title 60, Chapter 3, of the Revised Statutes of the United States Relating to Copyrights May 2, 1906. · 第 3 / 16 题