CHAP. XXIII.

_Formation of the public Processions of Flagellants. Different

success they meet with, in different Countries._

The example which so many illustrious personages had given of

voluntarily submitting to flagellation, and the pains which Monks had

been at, to promote that method of mortification by their example

likewise, as well as by the stories they related on that subject,

had, as we have seen, induced the generality of people to adopt

the fondest notions of its efficacy. But about the year 1260, the

intoxication became as it were complete. People, no longer satisfied

to practise mortifications of this kind in private, began to perform

them in sight of the Public, under pretence of greater humiliation:

regular associations and fraternities were formed for that purpose;

and numerous bodies of half-naked Men began to make their appearance

in the public streets, who after performing a few religious

ceremonies contrived for the occasion, flagellated themselves with

astonishing fanaticism and cruelty.

The first institution of public Associations and Solemnities of this

kind, must needs have filled with surprise all moderate persons

in those days, and in fact we see that Historians of different

Countries, who lived in the times when their ceremonies were first

introduced, have taken much notice of them, and recorded them at

length in their Histories or Chronicles. I will lay extracts from a

few of these different Books, before the Reader; it being the best

manner, I think, of acquainting him with the origin of these singular

flagellating solemnities and processions, which continue in use in

several Countries.

The first Author from whom we have a circumstantial account on that

subject, is that Monk of St. Justina, in Padua, whose Chronicle

Wechelius printed afterwards at Basil. He relates how the public

superstitious ceremonies we mention, made their first appearance

in the Country in the neighbourhood of Bologna, which is the spot

where, it seems, they took their first origin, and whence they were

afterwards communicated to other Countries. The following is the

above Author’s own account.

“When all Italy was sullied with crimes of every kind, a certain

sudden superstition, hitherto unknown to the world, first seized the

inhabitants of Perusa, afterwards the Romans, and then almost all

the Nations of Italy. To such a degree were they affected with the

fear of God, that noble as well as ignoble persons, young and old,

even children five years of age, would go naked about the streets,

with only their private parts covered, and, without any sense of

shame, thus walked in public, two and two, in the manner of a solemn

procession. Every one of them held in his hand a scourge made of

leather-thongs, and with tears and groans they lashed themselves on

their backs, till the blood ran; all the while weeping and giving

tokens of the same bitter affliction as if they had really been

spectators of the passion of our Saviour, imploring the forgiveness

of God and his Mother, and praying that He who had been appeased by

the repentance of so many Sinners, would not disdain theirs.

“And not only in the day time, but likewise during the nights,

hundreds, thousands, and ten thousands of these Penitents, ran,

notwithstanding the rigour of winter, about the streets, and in

churches, with lighted wax-candles in their hands, and preceded by

Priests who carried crosses and banners along with them, and with

humility prostrated themselves before the altars: the same scenes

were to be seen in small Towns and Villages; so that the mountains

and the fields seemed to resound alike the voice of Men who were

crying to God.

“All musical instruments and love songs then ceased to be heard. The

only Music that prevailed, both in Town and Country, was that of the

lugubrious voice of the Penitent, whose mournful accents might have

moved hearts of flint; and even the eyes of the obdurate Sinner could

not refrain from tears[114].

“Nor were Women exempt from the general spirit of devotion we

mention: for not only those among the common people, but also

Matrons and young Maidens of noble families, would perform the same

mortifications with modesty, in their own rooms. Then those who were

at enmity with one another, became again friends. Usurers and Robbers

hastened to restore their ill-gotten riches to their right owners.

Others, who were contaminated with different crimes, confessed them

with humility, and renounced their vanities. Gaols were opened;

prisoners were delivered; and banished persons permitted to return

to their native habitations. So many and so great works of sanctity

and christian charity, in short, were then performed by both Men and

Women, that it seemed as if an universal apprehension had seized

Mankind, that the divine Power was preparing either to consume them

by fire, or destroy them by shaking the earth, or some other of those

means which divine Justice knows how to employ for avenging crimes.

“Such a sudden repentance, which had thus diffused itself all over

Italy, and had even reached other Countries, not only the unlearned,

but wise persons also admired. They wondered whence such a vehement

fervour of piety could have proceeded; especially since such public

penances and ceremonies had been unheard of in former times, had

not been approved by the sovereign Pontiff, who was then residing

at Anagni, nor recommended by any Preacher or person of eminence,

but had taken their origin among simple persons, whose example both

learned and unlearned had alike followed.”

The Ceremonies we mention were soon imitated, as the same Author

remarks, by the other Nations of Italy: though they, at first,

met with opposition in several places, from divers Princes, or

Governments, in that Country. Pope Alexander the Fourth, for

instance, who had fixed his See at Anagni, refused at first, as

hath been above said, to give his sanction to them; and Clement VI.

who had been Archbishop of Sens, in France, in subsequent times

condemned those public flagellations by a Bull for that purpose (A.

1349). Manfredus, likewise, who was Master of Sicily and Apulia,

and Palavicinus, Marquis of Cremona, Brescia, and Milan, prohibited

the same processions in the Countries under their dominion; though,

on the other hand, many Princes as well as Popes countenanced them,

either in the same times, or afterwards.

This spirit of public penance and devotion was in time communicated

to other Countries; it even reached so far as Greece, as we are

informed by Nicephorus Gregoras, who wrote in the year 1361.

Attempts were likewise made to introduce ceremonies of the same

kind into Poland, as Baronius says in his Annals; but they were at

first prohibited: nor did they meet, at the same period, with more

encouragement in Bohemia, as Dubravius relates in his History of that

Country.

In Germany, however, the Sect, or Fraternity, of the Flagellants

proved more successful. We find a very full account of the first

flagellating processions that were made in that Country, in the

year 1349 (a time during which the plague was raging there) in the

Chronicle of Albert of Strasbourg, who lived during that period.

“As the plague (says the above Author) was beginning to make its

appearance, People then began in Germany to flagellate themselves

in public processions. Two hundred came, at one time, from the

Country of Schwaben to Spira, having a principal Leader at their

head, besides two subordinate ones, to whose commands they paid

implicit obedience. When they had passed the Rhine, at one o’clock

in the afternoon, crouds of people ran to see them. They then drew

a circular line on the ground, within which they placed themselves.

There they stripped off their clothes, and only kept upon themselves

a kind of short shirt, which served them instead of breeches, and

reached from the waist down to their heels: this done, they placed

themselves on the above circular line, and began to walk one after

another around it, with their arms stretched in the shape of a Cross,

thus forming among themselves a kind of procession. Having continued

this procession a little while, they prostrated themselves on the

ground, and afterwards rose one after another, in a regular manner,

every one of them, as he got up, giving a stroke with his scourge to

the next, who in his turn likewise rose, and served the following

one in the same manner. They then began disciplining themselves with

their scourges, which were armed with knots and four iron points, all

the while singing the usual Psalm of the invocation of our Lord, and

other Psalms: three of them were placed in the middle of the ring,

who, with a sonorous voice, regulated the chaunt of the others, and

disciplined themselves in the same manner. This having continued

for some time, they ceased their discipline; and then, at a certain

signal that was given them, prostrated themselves on their knees,

with their arms stretched, and threw themselves flat on the ground,

groaning and sobbing. They then rose, and heard an admonition from

their Leader, who exhorted them to implore the mercy of God on the

people, on both their benefactors and enemies, and on the souls in

Purgatory: then they placed themselves again upon their knees, with

their hands lifted towards heaven, performed the same ceremonies

as before, and disciplined themselves anew, as they walked round.

This done, they, put on their clothes again; and those who had been

left to take care of the clothes and the luggage, came forwards, and

went through the same ceremonies as the former had done. They had

among them Priests, and noble as well as ignoble persons, and men

conversant with letters.

“When the disciplines were concluded, one of the brotherhood rose,

and with a loud voice, read a letter, which he pretended had been

brought by an Angel to St. Peter’s Church, in Jerusalem: the Angel

declared in it, that Jesus Christ was offended at the wickedness

of the age, several instances of which were mentioned, such as the

violation of the Lord’s day, blasphemy, usury, adultery, and neglect

with respect to fasting on Fridays. To this the Man who read the

letter added, that Jesus Christ’s forgiveness having been implored

by the Holy Virgin and the Angels, he had made answer, that in order

to obtain mercy, sinners ought to live exiled from their Country for

thirty-four days, disciplining themselves during that time.

“The inhabitants of the Town of Spira were moved with so much

compassion for these Penitents, that they invited every one of them

to their houses: they however refused to receive alms severally, and

only accepted what was given to their Society in general, in order

to buy twisted wax-candles, and banners. These banners were of silk,

painted of a purple colour: they carried them in their processions,

which they performed twice every day. They never spoke to Women, and

refused to sleep upon feather-beds. They wore crosses upon their

coats and hats, behind and before, and had their scourges hanging at

their waist.

“About an hundred Men, in the Town of Spira, inlisted in their

Society, and about a thousand at Strasburgh, who promised obedience

to the Superiors, for the time abovementioned. They admitted nobody

but who engaged to observe all the above rules during that time, who

could spend at least four-pence a day, lest he should be obliged

to beg, and who declared that he had confessed his sins, forgiven

his enemies, and obtained the consent of his Wife. They divided at

Strasburgh: one part went up, and another part down, the Country;

their Superiors having likewise divided. The latter directed the new

brothers from Strasburgh, not to discipline themselves too harshly in

the beginning; and multitudes of people flocked from the Country up

and down the Rhine, as well as the inland Country, in order to see

them. After they had left Spira, about two hundred Boys twelve years

old, entered into an Association together, and disciplined themselves

in public.”

Flagellating processions and Solemnities of the same kind, were

likewise introduced into France, where they met, at first, with but

indifferent success; and even several Divines opposed them. The most

remarkable among them was John Gerson, a celebrated Theologian,

and Chancellor of the University of Paris, who purposely wrote a

Treatise against the ceremonies in question, in which he particularly

condemned the cruelty and great effusion of blood with which these

disciplines were performed. ‘It is equally unlawful (Gerson asserted)

for a Man to draw so much blood from his own body, unless it be for

medical reasons, as it would be for him to castrate or otherwise

mutilate himself. Else it might upon the same principle be advanced,

that a Man may brand himself with red-hot irons; a thing which nobody

hath, as yet, either pretended to say, or granted, unless it be false

Christians and Idolaters, such as are to be found in India, who

think it a matter of duty for one to be baptized through fire.’

Under King Henry the Third, however, the processions of Disciplinants

found much favour in France; and the King we mention, a weak and

bigoted Prince, not only encouraged these ceremonies by his words,

but even went so far as to inlist himself in a Fraternity of

Flagellants. The example thus given by the King, procured a great

number of Associates to the Brotherhood, and several Fraternities

were formed at Court, which were distinguished by different colours,

and composed of a number of Men of the first families in the Kingdom.

These processions, thus formed of the King and his noble train of

Disciplinants, all equipped like Flagellants, frequently made their

appearance in the public Streets of Paris, going from one Church

to another; and in one of those naked processions, the Cardinal of

Lorrain, who had joined in it, caught such a cold, it being about

Christmas time, that he died a few days afterwards. The following is

the account to be found on that subject, in the _President J. A. de

Thou’s_ History of his own times.

“While the civil war was thus carrying on, on both sides, scenes of

quite a different kind were to be seen at Court; where the King, who

was naturally of a religious temper, and fond of ceremonies unknown

to Antiquity, and who had formerly had an opportunity to indulge this

fancy in a Country subjected to the Pope’s dominion, would frequently

join in the processions which masked Men used to perform, on the days

before Christmas.

“For more than an hundred years past, a fondness for introducing new

modes of worship into the established Religion, had prevailed; and a

sect of Men had risen, who, thinking it meritorious to manifest the

compunction they felt for their offences, by outward signs, would put

on a sack-cloth, in the same manner it was ordered by the antient

Law; and from a strained interpretation they gave of the passage in

the Psalmist, _ad flagella paratus sum_, flagellated themselves in

public; whence they were called by the name of _Flagellants_. John

Gerson, the Chancellor of the University of Paris, and the purest

Theologian of that age, wrote a Book against them. Yet the holy

Pontiffs, considering then that Sect with more indulgence than former

ones had done, shewed much countenance to it; so that multitudes of

Men, all over Italy, in these days inlist in it, as in a kind of a

religious militia, thinking to obtain by that means forgiveness of

their sins. Distinguished by different colours, blue, white, and

black, in the same manner as the Green and Blue factions, though

proposing to themselves different objects, were formerly in Rome,

they likewise engrossed the attention of the public, and in several

places gave rise to the warmest contentions.

“The introduction which was made of these ceremonies into France,

where they had till then been almost unknown, forwarded the designs

of certain ambitious persons, the contempt they brought on the

person of the King, having weakened much the regal authority. While

the King mixed thus with processions of Flagellants, and the most

distinguished among his Courtiers followed his example, Charles,

Cardinal of Lorrain, who was one of the party, was, by the coldness

of the evening, thrown into a violent fever, attended with a most

intense pain in his head; and a delirium as well as continual

watchfulness having followed, he expired two days before Christmas.”

The Historian we have just quoted says, in another place, that the

King was principally induced to perform the above superstitious

processions, by the solicitations of his Confessor, Father Edmund

Auger, who wrote a Book on that subject, and of John Castelli, the

Apostolic Nuntio in France; and that the weak complaisance shewn to

him on that occasion, by the Chancellor Birague, and the Keeper of

the Seals, Chiverny, encouraged him much to pursue his plan in that

respect, notwithstanding the strong advices to the contrary, that

were given him by Christopher de Thou, President of the Parliament,

and Pierre Brulart, President of the _Chambre des Enquêtes_.

As there was, in those times, a powerful party in France, that

opposed the Court, and even was frequently at open war with it, there

was no want of Men, in Paris, who found fault with the disciplining

processions of the King. When they first made their appearance,

some, as the above Historian relates, laughed at them, while others

exclaimed that they were an insult both to God and Man. Even

Preachers joined in the party, and pointed their sarcasms from the

pulpit against those ceremonies.

The most petulant among these popular Preachers, was one Maurice

Poncet, of the Abbey of Melun, who, using expressions borrowed from

a Psalm, compared the King and his brother Disciplinants, to Men

who would cover themselves with a wet sack-cloth, to keep off the

rain: he was at last banished to his Monastery. The example which

the Court, and the Metropolis, had set, was followed in a number of

Country Towns, where fraternities of Flagellants were instituted;

and among them particular mention is made of the Brotherhood of the

_Blue Penitents_, in the City of Bourges, on account of the Sentence

passed in the year 1601, by the Parliament of Paris, in consequence

of a motion of Nicolas Servin, the King’s Advocate General, which

expressly abolished it[115].

[Illustration: (end of chapter mark)]

Memorials of Human Superstition being a paraphrase and commentary on the Historia Flagellantium of the Abbé Boileau, Doctor of the Sorbonne · 第 65 / 93 题