CHAP. XIX.

_The subject of the merit of flagellations, continued. Holy

persons, though without any public authority, have used them

occasionally, in order to give weight to their admonitions._

The general esteem for flagellations, which had led people to

consider them as an infallible method of atoning for past sins, also

induced them to think they would be extremely useful to strengthen

those admonitions with which it is the duty of good Christians

to assist each other. Hence we find that Saints, who, like other

persons, have been pretty free with their advices to other men, have

frequently assumed a power to corroborate them by flagellations.

Among those instances of corrections bestowed by Saints upon persons

who did not ask them for their advice, none can be quoted more

remarkable than that of St. Romuald, who, on a certain occasion,

severely flagellated his very Father, whose conduct he disapproved,

as Cardinal Damian relates, who, we may observe, greatly approves

the action of the Saint. The following is the account given by the

Cardinal. ‘After he had received permission for that purpose from

his Superiors, he set out upon his intended journey, without either

horse or cart, but only with a stick in his hand, and with his feet

bare; and, from the remotest borders of France, at last reached

Ravenna. There finding his Father determined to return to the World,

he put him in the stocks; he tied him with heavy chains, dealt hard

blows to him, and continued using him with this pious severity, till,

by the favour of God, he had brought his soul back to a state of

salvation[99].’

To those flagellations bestowed by Saints upon persons who did not

ask for them, we may safely add those with which they have, at

different times, served such Ladies, as, smitten with their charms

(with the Saints charms, I mean) have ventured to make them proposals

totally inconsistent with their virtue. These proposals the Saints

not only constantly rejected magnanimously, but moreover seldom

dismissed the Ladies who attempted them, without making them feel the

points of their disciplines. This was the manner in which St. Edmund,

who was afterwards Bishop of Canterbury, behaved on an occasion

like those we mention, as the learned Claude Despence, a Parisian

Theologian, relates in his Book on _Continence_. St. Edmund, the

above Writer says, during the time he was pursuing his studies in

Paris, was solicited by a young Woman to commit with her the sin of

fornication; he thereupon bade her come to his study, where, after

tearing off her clothes, he flagellated her naked, so severely, that

he covered her whole body with stripes[100].

Brother Mathew, of Avignon, a Capuchin Friar who lived about the year

1540, and spent many years in Corsica with a reputation of sanctity,

gave just such another capital instance of virtue as that exhibited

by St. Edmund. The Saint having been charitably received in a certain

Castle in Piedmont, where he was then begging about the Country, a

young Lady, extremely handsome, and of noble birth, came during the

night, stripped to her shift, to visit him, in the room that had

been assigned to him, and approaching the bed in which he was asleep,

solicited him to commit the carnal sin. But the holy Friar, instead

of answering her, ‘took up his discipline, made with sound and

well-knotted Spanish small cords, and flagellated her so briskly upon

her thighs, her posteriors, and back, that he not only made her blush

with shame, but moreover left upon her skin numberless visible marks

of the lecture he gave her[101].’

To these instances of the holy severity with which Saints have

treated such Ladies as ventured to make attempts upon their virtue,

may be added that of Bernardin of Sienna, according to the account

given by Surius; for the virtue of Saints has been exposed to more

dangers than the vulgar think of. ‘One day (says Surius) as Bernardin

was gone abroad to buy some bread, a Woman, the Wife of a Citizen

of Sienna, called him to her house: as soon as he had got into

it, she locked the door, and said, Unless you now let me have my

wish, I declare I will cover you with shame, and say that you have

offered violence to me. Bernardin, finding himself drawn into such a

dangerous situation, prayed to God, within himself, not to forsake

him; for he greatly detested that crime. God did not disregard his

prayer; he presently suggested to him to tell the Woman, that since

she would absolutely have it so, she must strip off her clothes. To

this the Woman made no objection; and she had scarcely done when

Bernardin exhibited his whip, which he happened to have about him,

and laying fast hold of her, began to exert it vigorously; nor did he

give up fustigating her, till her lustful ardour was extinguished.

She loved the holy Man the better for that afterwards; and so did her

Husband, when he knew how things had been transacted[102].’

[Illustration: _Page._ 264.]

[Illustration: (end of chapter mark)]

Memorials of Human Superstition being a paraphrase and commentary on the Historia Flagellantium of the Abbé Boileau, Doctor of the Sorbonne · 第 57 / 93 题