CHAP. IV.

_The use of Flagellations was known among the ancient Heathens.

Several facts and observations on that subject._

It is not to be doubted, that flagellations had been invented,

and were become, in early times, a common method of punishment in

the Pagan world. Even before the foundation of Rome, we meet with

instances which prove that it was the usual punishment inflicted on

Slaves. Justin, in his Epitome of Trogus Pompeius, relates that the

Scythians more easily overcame their rebellious Slaves with scourges

and whips, than with their swords. ‘The Scythians being returned

(says Justin) from their third expedition in Asia, after having been

absent eight years from their Wives and Children, found they now had

a war to wage at home against their own Slaves. For, their Wives,

tired with such long fruitless expectation of their Husbands, and

concluding that they were no longer detained by war, but had been

destroyed, married the Slaves who had been left to take care of the

cattle; which latter attempted to use their Masters, who returned

victorious, like Strangers, and hinder them, by force of arms, from

entering the Country. The war having been supported, for a while,

with success pretty nearly equal on both sides, the Scythians were

advised to change their manner of carrying it on, remembering that

it was not with enemies, but with their own Slaves, that they had to

fight; that they were to conquer by dint, not of arms, but of their

right as Masters; that instead of weapons, they ought to bring lashes

into the field, and, setting iron aside, to supply themselves with

rods, scourges, and such like instruments of slavish fear. Having

approved this counsel, the Scythians armed themselves as they were

advised to do; and had no sooner come up with their enemies, than

they exhibited on a sudden their new weapons, and thereby struck such

a terror into their minds, that those who could not be conquered by

arms, were subdued by the dread of the stripes, and betook themselves

to flight, not like a vanquished enemy, but like fugitive slaves.’

Among the antient Persians, the punishment of whipping was also

in use: it was even frequently inflicted on the Grandees of the

Kingdom by order of the King, as we find in _Stobæus_, who moreover

relates in his forty-second Discourse, ‘That when one of them had

been flagellated by order of the King, it was an established custom,

that he should give him thanks as for an excellent favour he had

received, and a token that the King remembered him.’ This custom of

the Persians was however in subsequent times altered: they began to

set some more value on the skin of Men; and we find in Plutarch’s

_Apophthegms of Kings_, ‘That Artaxerxes, son of Xerxes, sirnamed

the _Longhanded_, was the first who ordered that the Grandees of

his kingdom should no longer be exposed to the former method of

punishment; but that, when they should have been guilty of some

offence, instead of their backs, only their clothes should be

whipped, after they had been stripped of them.’

We also find, that it was a custom in antient times, for Generals

and Conquerors, to flog the Captives they had taken in war; and

that they moreover took delight in inflicting that punishment with

their own hands on the most considerable of those Captives. We meet,

among others, with a very remarkable proof of this practice, in the

Tragedy of Sophocles, called _Ajax Scourgebearer_ (Μαστιγοφόρος): in

a Scene of this Tragedy Ajax is introduced as having the following

conversation with Minerva.

Memorials of Human Superstition being a paraphrase and commentary on the Historia Flagellantium of the Abbé Boileau, Doctor of the Sorbonne · 第 23 / 93 题