Section X. On the Elements and Atoms.

When the Occultist speaks of Elements, and of human Beings who lived

during those geological ages, the duration of which it is found as

impossible to determine—according to the opinion of one of the best

English Geologists(960)—as the nature of Matter, it is because he knows

what he is talking about. When he says Man and Elements, he means neither

man in his present physiological and anthropological form, nor the

elemental Atoms, those hypothetical conceptions, existing at present in

scientific minds, the entitative abstractions of Matter in its highly

attenuated state; nor, again, does he mean the compound Elements of

Antiquity. In Occultism the word Element in every case means _Rudiment_.

When we say “Elementary Man,” we mean either the proëmial, incipient

sketch of man, in its unfinished and undeveloped condition, hence in that

form which now lies latent in physical man during his life‐time, and takes

shape only occasionally and under certain conditions; or, that form which

for a time survives the material body, and which is better known as an

Elementary.(961) With regard to Element, when the term is used

metaphysically, it means, in distinction to the mortal, the incipient

Divine Man; and, in its physical usage, it means inchoate Matter in its

first undifferentiated condition, or in the Laya state, the eternal and

normal condition of Substance, which differentiates only periodically;

during that differentiation, Substance is really in an abnormal state—in

other words, it is but a transitory illusion of the senses.

As to the Elemental Atoms, so‐called, the Occultists refer to them by that

name with a meaning analogous to that which is given by the Hindû to

Brahmâ, when he calls him Anu, the Atom. Every Elemental Atom, in search

of which more than one Chemist has followed the path indicated by the

Alchemists, is, in their firm belief, when not _knowledge_, a Soul; not

necessarily a disembodied Soul, but a Jîva, as the Hindûs call it, a

centre of Potential Vitality, with latent intelligence in it, and, in the

case of compound Souls, an intelligent active Existence, from the highest

to the lowest order, a form composed of more or less differentiations. It

requires a Metaphysician—and an Eastern Metaphysician—to understand our

meaning. All those Atom‐Souls are differentiations from the One, and are

in the same relation to it as is the Divine Soul, Buddhi, to its informing

and inseparable Spirit, Âtmâ.

Modern Physics, in borrowing from the Ancients their Atomic Theory, forgot

one point, the most important point of the doctrine; hence they have got

only the husks and will never be able to get the kernel. In adopting

physical Atoms, they omitted the suggestive fact that, from Anaxagoras to

Epicurus, to the Roman Lucretius, and finally even to Galileo, all these

Philosophers believed more or less in _animated_ Atoms, not in invisible

specks of so‐called “brute” matter. According to them, rotatory motion was

generated by larger (read, more divine and pure) Atoms forcing other Atoms

downwards; the lighter ones being simultaneously thrust upward. The

Esoteric meaning of this is the ever cyclic curve of differentiated

Elements downward and upward through intercyclic phases of existence,

until each again reaches its starting‐point or birthplace. The idea was

metaphysical as well as physical; the hidden interpretation embracing Gods

or Souls, in the shape of Atoms, as the _causes_ of all the _effects_

produced on Earth by the _secretions_ from the divine bodies.(962) No

Ancient Philosopher, not even the Jewish Kabalists, ever dissociated

Spirit from Matter, or Matter from Spirit. Everything originated in the

One, and, proceeding from the One, must finally return to the One.

Light becomes heat, and consolidates into fiery particles; which,

from being ignited, become cold, hard particles, round and smooth.

And this is called Soul, imprisoned in its robe of matter.(963)

Atoms and Souls were synonymous in the language of the Initiates. The

doctrine of “whirling Souls,” Gilgoolem, in which so many learned Jews

have believed,(964) had no other meaning esoterically. The learned Jewish

Initiates never meant Palestine alone by the Promised Land, but they meant

the same Nirvâna as do the learned Buddhist and Brahman—the bosom of the

Eternal ONE, symbolized by that of Abraham, and by Palestine as its

substitute on Earth.

Surely no educated Jew ever believed this allegory in its literal sense,

that the bodies of Jews contain within them a principle of Soul which

cannot rest, if the bodies are deposited in a foreign land, until, by a

process called the “whirling of the Soul” the immortal particle reaches

once more the sacred soil of the “Promised Land.”(965) The meaning of this

is evident to an Occultist. The process was supposed to be accomplished by

a kind of metempsychosis, the psychic spark being conveyed through bird,

beast, fish, and the most minute insect.(966) The allegory relates to the

_Atoms of the body_, each of which has to pass through every form, before

all reach the final state, which is the first starting‐point of the

departure of every Atom—its primitive Laya state. But the primitive

meaning of Gilgoolem, or the “Revolution of Souls,” was the idea of the

reïncarnating Souls or Egos. “All the Souls go into the Gilgoolah,” into a

cyclic or revolving process; _i.e._, they all proceed on the cyclic path

of re‐births. Some Kabalists interpret this doctrine to mean only a kind

of purgatory for the souls of the wicked. But this is not so.

The passage of the Soul‐Atom “through the seven Planetary Chambers” had

the same metaphysical and physical meaning. It had the latter when it was

said to dissolve into Ether. Even Epicurus, the model Atheist and

Materialist, knew so much and believed so much in the ancient Wisdom, that

he taught that the Soul—entirely distinct from immortal Spirit, when the

former is enshrined _latent_ in it, as it is in every atomic speck—was

composed of a fine, tender essence, formed from the _smoothest, roundest,

and finest atoms_.(967)

And this shows that the ancient Initiates, who were followed more or less

closely by all profane Antiquity, meant by the term Atom, a Soul, a Genius

or Angel, the first‐born of the ever‐concealed Cause of all causes; and in

this sense their teachings become comprehensible. They asserted, as do

their successors, the existence of Gods and Genii, Angels or Demons, not

outside, nor independent of, the Universal Plenum, but within it. Only

this Plenum, during the life‐cycles, is infinite. They admitted and taught

a good deal of that which modern Science now teaches—namely, the existence

of a primordial World‐Stuff or Cosmic Substance, eternally homogeneous,

except during its periodic existence; then, universally diffused

throughout infinite Space, it differentiates, and gradually forms sidereal

bodies from itself. They taught the revolution of the Heavens, the Earth’s

rotation, the Heliocentric System, and the Atomic Vortices—Atoms being in

reality Souls and Intelligences. These “Atomists” were spiritual, most

transcendental, and philosophical Pantheists. It is not they who would

have ever conceived or dreamed that monstrous contrasted progeny, the

nightmare of our modern civilized race: inanimate material and self‐

guiding Atoms, on the one hand, and an extra‐cosmic God on the other.

It may be useful to show what the Monad was, and what its origin, in the

teachings of the old Initiates.

Modern exact Science, as soon as it began to grow out of its teens,

perceived the great, and to it hitherto esoteric, axiom, that nothing,

whether in the spiritual, psychic, or physical realm of Being, could come

into existence out of nothing. There is no cause in the manifested

Universe without its adequate effects, whether in Space or Time; nor can

there be an effect without its primal cause, which itself owes its

existence to a still higher one—the final and absolute Cause having to

remain to man for ever an incomprehensible Causeless Cause. But even this

is no solution, and must be viewed, if at all, from the highest

philosophical and metaphysical standpoints, otherwise the problem had

better be left unapproached. It is an abstraction, on the verge of which

human reason—however trained in metaphysical subtleties—trembles,

threatening to collapse. This may be demonstrated to any European, who

would undertake to solve the problem of existence, by the articles of

faith of the true Vedântin for instance. Let him read and study the

sublime teachings of Shankarâchârya, on the subject of Soul and Spirit,

and the reader will realize what is now said.(968)

While the Christian is taught that the human Soul is a breath of God,

being created by him for sempiternal existence, having a beginning, but no

end—and therefore never to be called eternal—the Occult Teaching says:

Nothing is created, it is only transformed. Nothing can manifest itself in

this Universe—from a globe down to a vague, rapid thought—that was not in

the Universe already; everything on the subjective plane is an eternal

_is_; as everything on the objective plane is an _ever‐becoming_—because

all is transitory.

The Monad—a truly “indivisible thing,” as defined by Good, who did not

give it the sense we now do—is here rendered as the Âtmâ, in conjunction

with Buddhi and the higher Manas. This trinity is one and eternal, the

latter being absorbed in the former at the termination of all conditioned

and illusive life. The Monad, then, can be traced through the course of

its pilgrimage and in its changes of transitory vehicles, only from the

incipient stage of the manifested Universe. In Pralaya, the intermediate

period between two Manvantaras, it loses its name, as it loses it when the

real One Self of man merges into Brahman, in cases of high Samâdhi (the

Turîya state), or final Nirvâna; in the words of Shankara:

When the disciple having attained that primeval consciousness,

absolute bliss, of which the nature is truth, which is without

form and action, abandons this illusive body that has been assumed

by the _Âtmâ_ just as an actor (abandons) the dress (put on).

For Buddhi, the Anandamaya Sheath, is but a mirror which reflects absolute

bliss; and, moreover, that reflection itself is yet not free from

ignorance, and is _not_ the Supreme Spirit, since it is subject to

conditions, is a spiritual modification of Prakriti, and is an effect;

Âtmâ alone is the one real and eternal substratum of all, the Essence and

Absolute Knowledge, the Kshetrajña. Now that the Revised Version of the

Gospels has been published and the most glaring mistranslations of the old

versions are corrected, one can understand better the words in 1 _John_ v.

6: “It is the Spirit that beareth witness because the Spirit is truth.”

The words that follow in the mistranslated version about the “three

witnesses,” hitherto supposed to stand for “the Father, the Word, and the

Holy Ghost,” show the real meaning of the writer very clearly, thus still

more forcibly identifying his teaching in this respect with that of

Shankarâchârya. For what can the sentence mean, “there are three that bear

witness ... the Spirit and the Water and the Blood”—if it bears no

relation to, nor connection with, the more philosophical statement of the

great Vedântin teacher, who, speaking of the Sheaths—the principles in

man—Jîva, Vijñânamaya, etc., which _are_, in their physical manifestation,

“Water and Blood” or Life, adds that Âtmâ, Spirit, alone is what remains

after the subtraction of the Sheaths and that it is the Only Witness, or

synthesized unity. The less spiritual and philosophical school, solely

with an eye to a Trinity, made three witnesses out of “one,” thus

connecting it more with Earth than with Heaven. It is called in Esoteric

Philosophy the “One Witness,” and, while it rests in Devachan, is referred

to as the “Three Witnesses to Karma.”

Âtmâ, our seventh principle, being identical with the Universal Spirit,

and man being one with it in his essence, what is then the Monad proper?

It is that homogeneous spark which radiates in millions of rays from the

primeval Seven;—of which Seven something will be said further on. It is

the EMANATING SPARK FROM THE UNCREATED RAY—a mystery. In the esoteric, and

even exoteric Buddhism of the North, Âdi‐Buddha (Chogi Dangpoi Sangye),

the One Unknown, without beginning or end, identical with Parabrahman and

Ain Suph, emits a bright Ray from its Darkness.

This is the Logos, the First, or Vajradhara, the Supreme Buddha, also

called Dorjechang. As the Lord of all Mysteries he cannot manifest, but

sends into the world of manifestation his Heart—the “Diamond Heart,”

Vajrasattva or Dorjesempa. This is the Second Logos of Creation, from whom

emanate the seven—in the exoteric blind the five—Dhyâni‐Buddhas, called

the Anupâdaka, the “Parentless.” These Buddhas are the primeval Monads

from the World of Incorporeal Being, the Arûpa World, wherein the

Intelligences (on that plane only) have neither shape nor name, in the

exoteric system, but have their distinct seven names in the Esoteric

Philosophy. These Dhyâni‐Buddhas emanate, or create from themselves, by

virtue of Dhyâna, celestial Selves—the super‐human Bodhisattvas. These,

incarnating at the beginning of every human cycle on Earth as mortal men,

become occasionally, owing to their personal merit, Bodhisattvas among the

Sons of Humanity, after which they may reäppear as Mânushi, or Human,

Buddhas. The Anupâdaka, or Dhyâni‐Buddhas, are thus identical with the

Brâhmanical Mânasaputra, Mind‐born Sons—whether of Brahmâ, or of either of

the other two Trimûrtian Hypostases; they are identical also with the

Rishis and Prajâpatis. Thus, a passage is found in _Anugîtâ_, which, read

esoterically, shows plainly, though under another imagery, the same idea

and system. It says:

Whatever entities there are in this world, moveable or immoveable,

they are the very first to be dissolved [at Pralaya]; and next the

developments produced from the elements [from which the visible

universe is fashioned]; and (after) these developments [evolved

entities], all the elements. Such is the upward gradation among

entities. Gods, Men, Gandharvas, Pishâchas, Asuras, Râkshasas, all

have been created by Nature [Svabhâva, or Prakriti, plastic

Nature], not by actions, nor by a cause [not by any physical

cause]. These Brâhmanas [the Rishi Prajâpati?], the creators of

the world, are born here (on earth) again and again. And whatever

is produced from them is dissolved in due time in those very five

great elements [the five, or rather seven, Dhyâni‐Buddhas, also

called “Elements” of Mankind], like billows in the ocean. These

great elements are in every way (beyond) the elements that make up

the world [the gross elements]. And he who is released, even from

these five elements [the Tanmâtras],(969) goes to the highest

goal. The Lord Prajâpati [Brahmâ] created all this by the mind

only [by Dhyâna, or abstract meditation and mystic powers, like

the Dhyâni‐Buddhas].(970)

Evidently then, these Brâhmanas are identical with the terrestrial

Bodhisattvas of the heavenly Dhyâni‐Buddhas. Both, as primordial,

intelligent “Elements,” become the Creators or the Emanators of the Monads

destined to become human in that cycle; after which they evolve

themselves, or, so to say, expand into their own Selves as Bodhisattvas or

Brâhmanas, in heaven and earth, to become at last simple men. “The

creators of the world are born here, on earth again and again”—truly. In

the Northern Buddhist system, or the popular exoteric religion, it is

taught that every Buddha, while preaching the Good Law on Earth, manifests

himself simultaneously in three Worlds: in the Formless World as a Dhyâni‐

Buddha, in the World of Forms as a Bodhisattva, and in the World of

Desire, the lowest or our World, as a man. Esoterically the teaching

differs. The divine, purely Âdi‐Buddhic Monad manifests as the universal

Buddhi, the Mahâ‐Buddhi or Mahat, in Hindû philosophies, the spiritual,

omniscient and omnipotent Root of divine Intelligence, the highest Anima

Mundi or the Logos. This descends “like a flame spreading from the eternal

Fire, immoveable, without increase or decrease, ever the same to the end”

of the cycle of existence, and becomes Universal Life on the Mundane

Plane. From this Plane of conscious Life shoot out, like seven fiery

tongues, the Sons of Light, the Logoi of Life; then the Dhyâni‐Buddhas of

contemplation, the concrete forms of their formless Fathers, the Seven

Sons of Light, _still themselves_, to whom maybe applied the Brâhmanical

mystic phrase: “Thou art THAT”—Brahman. It is from these Dhyâni‐Buddhas

that emanate their Chhâyâs or Shadows, the Bodhisattvas of the celestial

realms, the prototypes of the super‐terrestrial Bodhisattvas, and of the

terrestrial Buddhas, and finally of men. The Seven Sons of Light are also

called Stars.

The star under which a human Entity is born, says the Occult Teaching,

will remain for ever its star, throughout the whole cycle of its

incarnations in one Manvantara. _But this is not his astrological star._

The latter is concerned and connected with the _Personality_; the former

with the _Individuality_. The Angel of that Star, or the Dhyâni‐Buddha

connected with it, will be either the guiding, or simply the presiding,

Angel, so to say, in every new rebirth of the Monad, _which is part of his

own essence_, though his vehicle, man, may remain for ever ignorant of

this fact. The Adepts have each their Dhyâni‐Buddha, their elder “Twin‐

Soul,” and they know it, calling it “Father‐Soul,” and “Father‐Fire.” It

is only at the last and supreme Initiation, however, when placed face to

face with the bright “Image” that they learn to recognize it. How much did

Bulwer Lytton know of this mystic fact, when describing, in one of his

highest inspirational moods, Zanoni face to face with his Augoeides?

The Logos, or both the unmanifested and the manifested Word, is called by

the Hindûs, Îshvara, the Lord, though the Occultists give it another name.

Îshvara, say the Vedântins, is the highest consciousness in Nature. “This

highest consciousness,” answer the Occultists, “is only a synthetic unit

in the World of the manifested Logos—or on the plane of illusion; for it

is the sum total of Dhyân Chohanic consciousness.” “O wise man, remove the

conception that _Not‐Spirit is Spirit_”—says Shankarâchârya. Âtmâ is Not‐

Spirit in its final Parabrahmic state; Îshvara, or Logos, is Spirit; or,

as Occultism explains, it is a compound unity of manifested living

Spirits, the parent‐source and nursery of all the mundane and terrestrial

Monads, _plus_ their divine Reflection, which emanate from, and return

into, the Logos, each in the culmination of its time. There are seven

chief Groups of such Dhyân Chohans, which groups will be found and

recognized in every religion, for they are the primeval Seven Rays.

Humanity, Occultism teaches us, is divided into seven distinct Groups,

with their sub‐divisions, mental, spiritual, and physical. Hence there are

seven chief planets, the spheres of the indwelling seven Spirits, under

each of which is born one of the human Groups which is guided and

influenced thereby. There are only seven planets _specially_ connected

with Earth, and twelve houses, but the possible combinations of their

aspects are countless. As each planet can stand to each of the others in

twelve different aspects, their combinations must be almost infinite; as

infinite, in fact, as the spiritual, psychic, mental, and physical

capacities in the numberless varieties of the _genus homo_, each of which

varieties is born under one of the seven planets and one of the said

countless planetary combinations.(971)

The Monad, then, viewed as One, is above the seventh principle in Kosmos

and man; and as a Triad, it is the direct radiant progeny of the said

compound Unit, not the Breath of “God,” as that Unit is called, nor

creating out of _nihil_; for such an idea is quite unphilosophical, and

degrades Deity, dragging It down to a finite, attributive condition. As

well expressed by the translator of the _Crest‐Jewel of Wisdom_—though

Îshvara is “God.”

Unchanged in the profoundest depths of Pralayas and in the

intensest activity of Manvantaras, [still] beyond [him] is ÂTMÂ,

round whose pavilion is the darkness of eternal MÂYÂ.(972)

The “Triads” born under the same Parent‐Planet, or rather the Radiations

of one and the same Planetary Spirit or Dhyâni‐Buddha are, in all their

after lives and rebirths, sister, or “twin” souls, on this Earth. The idea

is the same as that of the Christian Trinity, the “Three in One,” only it

is still more metaphysical: the Universal “Over‐Spirit,” manifesting on

the two higher planes, those of Buddhi and Mahat. These are the three

Hypostases, metaphysical, but never personal.

This was known to every high Initiate in every age and in every country:

“I and my Father are one,” said Jesus.(973) When he is made to say,

elsewhere: “I ascend to _my_ Father and _your_ Father,”(974) it meant that

which has just been stated. The identity, and at the same time the

illusive differentiation of the _Angel_‐Monad and the _Human_‐Monad is

shown in the sentences: “My Father is _greater_ than I”;(975) “Glorify

_your_ Father _which is in Heaven_”;(976) “Then shall the righteous shine

forth as the sun in the kingdom of _their_ Father” (not _our_

Father).(977) So again Paul asks: “Know ye not ye are the _temple_ of God,

and that the _Spirit of God dwelleth_ in you?”(978) All this was simply

meant to show that the group of disciples and followers attracted to him

belonged to the same Dhyâni‐Buddha, Star, or Father, and that this again

belonged to the same planetary realm and division as he did. It is the

_knowledge_ of this Occult Doctrine that found expression in the review of

_The Idyll of the White Lotus_, when T. Subba Row wrote:

Every Buddha meets at his last Initiation all the great Adepts who

reached Buddhahood during the preceding ages ... every class of

Adepts has its own bond of spiritual communion which knits them

together.... The only possible and effectual way of entering into

such brotherhood ... is by bringing oneself within the influence

of the Spiritual light which radiates from one’s own Logos. I may

further point out here ... that such communion is only possible

between persons whose souls derive their life and sustenance from

the same divine Ray, and that, as seven distinct Rays radiate from

the “Central Spiritual Sun,” all Adepts and Dhyân Chohans are

divisible into seven classes, each of which is guided, controlled,

and overshadowed by one of the seven forms or manifestations of

the divine Wisdom.(979)

It is then the Seven Sons of Light,—called after their planets and often

identified with them by the rabble, namely, Saturn, Jupiter, Mercury,

Mars, Venus, and _presumably_ the Sun and Moon, for the modern critic, who

goes no deeper than the surface of old religions(980)—which are, according

to the Occult Teachings, our heavenly Parents, or synthetically our

“Father.” Hence, as already remarked, Polytheism is really more

philosophical and correct, as to fact and Nature, than is anthropomorphic

Monotheism. Saturn, Jupiter, Mercury, and Venus, the four exoteric

planets, and the three others, which must remain unnamed, were the

heavenly bodies in direct astral and psychic communication, morally and

physically, with the Earth, its Guides, and Watchers; the visible orbs

furnishing our Humanity with its outward and inward characteristics, and

their Regents or Rectors with our Monads and spiritual faculties. In order

to avoid creating new misconceptions, let it be stated that among the

three Secret Orbs, or Star‐Angels, neither Uranus nor Neptune were

included; not only because they were unknown under these names to the

ancient Sages, but because they, like all other planets, however many

there may be, are the Gods and Guardians of other septenary Chains of

Globes within our System.

Nor do the two great planets last discovered depend entirely on the Sun,

as do the rest of the planets. Otherwise, how can we explain the fact that

Uranus receives 1/390th part of the light received by our Earth, while

Neptune receives only 1/900th part; and that their satellites show a

peculiarity of inverse rotation found in no other planets of the Solar

System? At any rate, what we say applies to Uranus, though the fact has

again been disputed recently.

This subject will, of course, be considered as a mere vagary, by all those

who confuse the universal order of Being with their own systems of

classification. Here, however, simple facts from Occult Teachings are

stated, to be either accepted or rejected, as the case may be. There are

details which, on account of their great metaphysical abstraction,

_cannot_ be entered upon. Hence, we merely state that only seven of our

planets are as intimately related to our Globe, as the Sun is to all the

bodies subject to him in his System. Of these bodies the poor little

number of _primary_ and _secondary_ planets known to Astronomy, looks

wretched enough, in truth.(981) Therefore, it stands to reason that there

are a great number of planets, small and large, that have not been

discovered yet, but of the existence of which ancient Astronomers—all of

them initiated Adepts—must certainly have been aware. But, as the relation

of these to the Gods was sacred, it had to remain arcane, as did also the

names of various other planets and stars.

Besides this, even the Roman Catholic Theology speaks of “_seventy_

planets that preside over the destinies of the nations of this globe;”

and, save the erroneous application, there is more truth in this tradition

than in exact modern Astronomy. The seventy planets are connected with the

seventy elders of the people of Israel,(982) and the Regents of these

planets are meant, not the orbs themselves; the word seventy is a play and

a blind upon the 7 × 7 of the subdivisions. Each people and nation, as we

have already said, has its _direct_ Watcher, Guardian and Father in

Heaven—a Planetary Spirit. We are willing to leave their own national God,

Jehovah, to the descendants of Israel, the worshippers of Sabaoth or

Saturn; for, indeed, the Monads of the people chosen by him are his own,

and the _Bible_ has never made any secret of it. Only the text of the

Protestant English _Bible_ is, as usual, in disagreement with those of the

Septuagint and the Vulgate. Thus, while in the former we read:

When the Most High [not Jehovah] divided to the nations their

inheritance ... he set the bounds of the people according to the

number of the children of Israel.(983)

In the _Septuagint_ the text reads “according to the number of the

Angels,” Planet‐Angels, a version more concordant with truth and fact.

Moreover, all the texts agree that “the Lord’s [Jehovah’s] portion is his

people; Jacob is the lot of his inheritance”;(984) and this settles the

question. The “Lord” Jehovah took Israel _for his portion_; what have

other nations to do with that particular national Deity? Let then, the

“Angel Gabriel” watch over Iran and “Mikael‐Jehovah” over the Hebrews.

These are not the Gods of other nations, and it is difficult to see why

Christians should have selected a God against whose commandments Jesus was

the first to rise in rebellion.

The planetary origin of the Monad, or Soul, and of its faculties was

taught by the Gnostics. On its way to the Earth, as on its way back from

the Earth, each soul born in, and from, the “Boundless Light,”(985) had to

pass through the seven planetary regions either way. The pure Dhyâni and

Devas of the oldest religions had become, in course of time, with the

Zoroastrians, the Seven Devs, the ministers of Ahriman, “each chained to

his planet”;(986) with the Brâhmans, the Asuras and some of the

Rishis—good, bad and indifferent; among the Egyptian Gnostics it was

Thoth, or Hermes, who was the chief of the Seven whose names are given by

Origen as Adonai, genius of the Sun; Tao, of the Moon; Eloi, of Jupiter;

Sabaoth, of Mars; Orai, of Venus; Astaphai, of Mercury; and Ildabaoth

(Jehovah), of Saturn. Finally, the _Pistis‐Sophia_, which the greatest

modern authority on exoteric Gnostic beliefs, the late Mr. C. W. King,

refers to as “that precious monument of Gnosticism”—this old document

echoes the archaic belief of the ages, while distorting it to suit

sectarian purposes. The Astral Rulers of the Spheres, the planets, create

the Monads, or Souls, from their own substance out of “the tears of their

eyes, and the sweat of their torments,” endowing the Monads with a spark

of their substance which is the Divine Light. It will be shown in Volume

II why these “Lords of the Zodiac and Spheres” have been transformed by

sectarian Theology into the Rebellious Angels of the Christians, who took

them from the Seven Devs of the Magi, without understanding the

significance of the allegory.(987)

As usual, that which _is_, and _was_ from its beginning, divine, pure, and

spiritual in its earliest unity, became—by reason of its differentiation

through the distorted prism of man’s conceptions—human and impure, as

reflecting man’s own sinful nature. Thus, in time, the planet Saturn

became reviled by the worshippers of other Gods. The nations born under

Saturn—the Jewish, for instance, with whom he became Jehovah, after being

considered as a son of Saturn, or Ilda‐Baoth, by the Ophites, and in the

Book of Jasher—were eternally fighting with those born under Jupiter,

Mercury, or any other planet, except Saturn‐Jehovah; genealogies and

prophecies notwithstanding, Jesus _the Initiate_ (or Jehoshua)—the type

from whom the “historical” Jesus was copied—was not of pure Jewish blood,

and thus recognized no Jehovah; nor did he worship any planetary God

beside his own “Father,” whom he knew, and with whom he communed, as every

high Initiate does, “Spirit to Spirit and Soul to Soul.” This can hardly

be taken exception to, unless the critic explains to every one’s

satisfaction the strange sentences put into the mouth of Jesus during his

disputes with the Pharisees by the author of the Fourth Gospel:

I know that ye are Abraham’s seed(988).... I speak that which I

have seen with my Father; and ye do that which ye have seen with

your Father.... Ye do the deeds of your Father.... Ye are of your

Father, the Devil.... He was a murderer from the beginning, and

abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he

speaketh a lie he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the

father of it.(989)

This “Father” of the Pharisees was Jehovah, for he was identical with

Cain, Saturn, Vulcan, etc.—the planet under which they were born, and the

God whom they worshipped. Evidently there must be an Occult meaning sought

in these words and admonitions, however mistranslated, since they are

pronounced by one who threatened with hell‐fire anyone who says to his

brother simply Raca, fool.(990) And evidently, again, the planets are not

merely spheres, twinkling in Space, and made to shine for no purpose, but

they are the domains of various Beings with whom the uninitiated are so

far unacquainted, but who have, nevertheless, a mysterious, unbroken, and

powerful connection with men and globes. Every heavenly body is the temple

of a God, and these Gods themselves are the temples of God, the Unknown

“_Not_ Spirit.” There is nothing profane in the Universe. All Nature is a

consecrated place, as Young says:

Each of these Stars is a religious house.

Thus can all exoteric religions be shown to be the falsified copies of the

Esoteric Teaching. It is the priesthood which has to be held responsible

for the reaction of our day in favour of Materialism. It is by worshipping

and enforcing on the masses the worship of the shells of pagan

ideals—personified for purposes of allegory—that the latest exoteric

religion has made of Western lands a Pandemonium, in which the higher

classes worship the golden calf, and the lower and ignorant masses are

made to worship an idol with feet of clay.

The Secret Doctrine, Vol. 1 of 4 The Synthesis of Science, Religion, and Philosophy · 第 10 / 18 章