CHAPTER XXVII.

_COMPOUND HAMMERS._

Another principle to be noticed in connection with hammers and

forging processes is that of the inertia of the piece operated

upon--a matter of no little importance in the heavier kinds of work.

When a piece is placed on an anvil, and struck on the top side

with a certain force, the bottom or anvil side of the piece does

not receive an equal force. A share of the blow is absorbed by the

inertia of the piece struck, and the effect on the bottom side is,

theoretically, as the force of the blow, less the cushioning effect

and the inertia of the pieces acted upon.

In practice this difference of effect on the top and bottom, or

between the anvil and hammer sides of a piece, is much greater

than would be supposed. The yielding of the soft metal on the top

cushions the blow and protects the under side from the force. The

effect produced by a blow struck upon hot iron cannot be estimated

by the force of the blow; it requires, to use a technical term,

a certain amount of force to "start" the iron, and anything less

than this force has but little effect in moving the particles and

changing the form of a piece.

From this it may be seen that there must occur a great loss of

power in operating on large pieces, for whatever force is absorbed

by inertia has no effect on the underside. By watching a smith

using a hand hammer it will be seen that whenever a piece operated

upon is heavier than the hammer employed, but little if any effect

is produced on the anvil or bottom surface, nor is this loss of

effect the only one. The expense of heating, which generally

exceeds that of shaping forgings, is directly as the amount of

shaping that may be done at each heat; and consequently, if the

two sides of a piece, instead of one, can be equally acted upon,

one-half the heating will be saved.

Another object gained by equal action on both sides of large

pieces is the quality of the forgings produced, which is generally

improved by the rapidity of the shaping processes, and injured by

too frequent heating.

The loss of effect by the inertia of the pieces acted upon

increases with the weight of the work; not only the loss of power,

but also the expense of heating increases with the size of the

pieces. There is, however, such a difference in the mechanical

conditions between light and heavy forging that for any but a heavy

class of work there would be more lost than gained in attempting to

operate on both sides of pieces at the same time.

To attain a double effect, and avoid the loss pointed out, Mr

Ramsbottom designed what may be called compound hammers, consisting

of two independent heads or rams moving in opposite directions, and

acting simultaneously upon pieces held between them.

It would be inferred that the arrangement of these double acting

hammers must necessarily be complicated and expensive, but the

contrary is the fact. The rams are simply two masses of iron

mounted on wheels that run on ways, like a truck, and the impact

of the hammers, so far as not absorbed in the work, is neutralised

by each other. No shock or jar is communicated to framing or

foundations as in the case of single acting hammers that have fixed

anvils. The same rule applies in the back stroke of the hammers as

the links which move them are connected together at the centre,

where the power is applied at right angles to the line of the

hammer movement. The links connecting the two hammers constitute,

in effect, a toggle joint, the steam piston being attached where

they meet in the centre.

The steam cylinder which moves the hammers is set in the earth at

some depth below the plane upon which they move, and even when

the heaviest work is done there is no perceptible jar when one is

standing near the hammers, as there always is with those which have

a vertical movement and are single acting.

(1.) Why is the effect produced different on the top and

bottom of a piece when struck by a hammer?--(2.) Why does not

a compound hammer create jar and concussion?--(3.) What would

be a mechanical difficulty in presenting the material to such

hammers?--(4.) Which is most important, speed or weight, in the

effect produced on the under side of pieces, when struck by

single acting hammers?

The Economy of Workshop Manipulation A logical method of learning constructive mechanics. Arranged with questions for the use of apprentice engineers and students. · 第 27 / 41 章