CHAPTER XXIII.

_FORGING._

Workshop processes which are capable of being systematised are the

most easy to learn. When a process is reduced to a system it is no

longer a subject of special knowledge, but comes within general

rules and principles, which enable a learner to use his reasoning

powers to a greater extent in mastering it.

To this proposition another may be added, that shop processes may

be systematised or not, as they consist in duplication, or the

performance of certain operations repeatedly in the same manner. It

has been shown in the case of patterns that there could be no fixed

rules as to their quality or the mode of constructing them, and

that how to construct patterns is a matter of special knowledge and

skill.

These rules apply to forging, but in a different way from other

processes. Unlike pattern-making or casting, the general processes

in forging are uniform; and still more unlike pattern-making or

casting, there is a measurable uniformity in the articles produced,

at least in machine-forging, where bolts, screws, and shafts are

continually duplicated.

A peculiarity of forging is that it is a kind of hand process,

where the judgment must continually direct the operations, one blow

determining the next, and while pieces forged may be duplicates,

there is a lack of uniformity in the manner of producing them.

Pieces may be shaped at a white welding heat or at a low red heat,

by one or two strong blows or by a dozen lighter blows, the whole

being governed by the circumstances of the work as it progresses. A

smith may not throughout a whole day repeat an operation precisely

in the same manner, nor can he, at the beginning of an operation,

tell the length of time required to execute it, nor even the

precise manner in which he will perform it. Such conditions are

peculiar, and apply to forging alone.

I think proper to point out these peculiarities, not so much from

any importance they may have in themselves, but to suggest critical

investigation, and to dissipate any preconceived opinions of

forging being a simple matter, easy to learn, and involving only

commonplace operations.

The first impressions an apprentice forms of the smith-shop as a

department of an engineering establishment is that it is a black,

sooty, dirty place, where a kind of rough unskilled labour is

performed--a department which does not demand much attention.

How far this estimate is wrong will appear in after years, when

experience has demonstrated the intricacies and difficulties of

forging, and when he finds the skill in this department is more

difficult to obtain, and costs more relatively than in any other.

Forging as a branch of work requires, in fact, the highest skill,

and is one where the operation continually depends upon the

judgment of the workman, which neither power nor machines can to

any extent supplant. Dirt, hard labour, and heat deter men from

learning to forge, and create a preference for the finishing shop,

which in most places makes a disproportion between the number of

smiths and finishers.

Forging as a process in machine-making includes the forming and

shaping of the malleable parts of machinery, welding or joining

pieces together, the preparation of implements for forging and

finishing, tempering of steel tools, and usually case-hardening.

Considered as a process, forging may be said to relate to shaping

malleable material by blows or compression when it is rendered soft

by heating. So far as hand-tools and the ordinary hand operations

in forging, there can be nothing said that will be of much use

to a learner. In all countries, and for centuries past, hand

implements for forging have remained quite the same; and one has

only to visit any machine forging-shop to see samples and types

of standard tools. There is no use in describing tongs, swages,

anvils, punches, and chisels, when there is nothing in their form

nor use that may not be seen at a glance; but tools and machines

for the application of motive power in forging processes deserve

more careful notice.

Forging plant consists of rolling mills, trip-hammers,

steam-hammers, drops, and punches, with furnaces, hearths, and

blowing apparatus for heating. A general characteristic of all

forging machines is that of a great force acting throughout a short

distance. Very few machines, except the largest hammers, exceed a

half-inch of working range, and in average operations not one-tenth

of an inch.

These conditions of short range and great force are best attained

by what may be termed percussion, and by machines which act by

blows instead of positive and gradual pressure; hence we find that

hand and power hammers are the most common tools among those of the

smith-shop.

To exert a powerful force acting through but a short distance,

percussive devices are much more effective and simple than those

acting by maintained or direct pressure. A hammer-head may give a

blow equal to many tons by its momentum, and absorb the reactive

force which is equal to the blow; but if an equal force was to be

exerted by screws, levers, or hydraulic apparatus, we can easily

see that an abutment would be required to withstand the reactive

force, and that such an abutment would require a strength perhaps

beyond what ingenuity could devise.

This principle is somewhat obscure, and the nature of percussive

forces not generally considered--a matter which may be illustrated

by considering the action of a simple hand-hammer. Few people, in

witnessing the use of a hammer, or in using one themselves, ever

think of it as an engine giving out tons of force, concentrating

and applying power by functions which, if performed by other

mechanism, would involve trains of gearing, levers, or screws; and

that such mechanism, if employed instead of a hammer, must lack

that important function of applying force in any direction as the

will and hands may direct. A simple hand-hammer is in the abstract

one of the most intricate of mechanical agents--that is, its action

is more difficult to analyse than that of many complex machines

involving trains of mechanism; yet our familiarity with hammers

causes this fact to be overlooked, and the hammer has even been

denied a place among those mechanical contrivances to which there

has been applied the name of "mechanical powers."

Let the reader compare a hammer with a wheel and axle, inclined

plane, screw, or lever, as an agent for concentrating and applying

power, noting the principles of its action first, and then

considering its universal use, and he will conclude that, if there

is a mechanical device that comprehends distinct principles, that

device is the common hammer. It seems, indeed, to be one of those

provisions to meet a human necessity, and without which mechanical

industry could not be carried on. In the manipulation of nearly

every kind of material, the hammer is continually necessary in

order to exert a force beyond what the hands may do, unaided by

mechanism to multiply their force. A carpenter in driving a spike

requires a force of from one to two tons; a blacksmith requires a

force of from five pounds to five tons to meet the requirements

of his work; a stonemason applies a force of from one hundred to

one thousand pounds in driving the edge of his tools; chipping,

calking, in fact nearly all mechanical operations, consist more

or less in blows, such blows being the application of accumulated

force expended throughout a limited distance.

Considered as a mechanical agent, a hammer concentrates the power

of the arms, and applies it in a manner that meets the requirements

of various purposes. If great force is required, a long swing and

slow blows accomplish tons; if but little force is required, a

short swing and rapid blows will serve--the degree of force being

not only continually at control, but also the direction in which

it is applied. Other mechanism, if employed instead of hammers

to perform a similar purpose, would require to be complicated

machines, and act in but one direction or in one plane.

These remarks upon hammers are not introduced here as a matter

of curiosity, nor with any intention of following mechanical

principles beyond where they will explain actual manipulation, but

as a means of directing attention to percussive acting machines

generally, with which forging processes, as before explained, have

an intimate connection.

Machines and tools operating by percussive action, although they

comprise a numerous class, and are applied in nearly all mechanical

operations, have never received that amount of attention in

text-books which the importance of the machines and their extensive

use calls for. Such machines have not even been set off as a class

and treated of separately, although the distinction is quite clear

between machines with percussive action, and those with what may

be termed direct action, both in the manner of operating and in

the general plans of construction. There is, of course, no lack of

formulæ for determining the measure of force, and computing the

dynamic effect of percussive machines acting against a measured or

assumed resistance, and so on; but this is not what is meant. There

are certain conditions in the operation of machines, such as the

strains which fall upon supporting frames, the effect produced upon

malleable material when struck or pressed, and more especially of

conditions which may render percussive or positive acting machines

applicable to certain purposes; but little explanation has been

given which is of value to practical men.

Machines and tools that operate by blows, such as hammers and

drops, produce effect by the impact of a moving mass by force

accumulated throughout a long range, and expending the sum of

this accumulated force on an object. The reactive force not being

communicated to nor resisted by the machine frames, is absorbed by

the inertia of the mass which gave the blow; the machinery required

in such operations being only a weight, with means to guide or

direct it, and mechanism for connection with motive power. A

hand-hammer, for example, accumulates and applies the force of the

arm, and performs all the functions of a train of mechanism, yet

consists only of a block of metal and a handle to guide it.

Machines with direct action, such as punches, shears, or rolls,

require first a train of mechanism of some kind to reduce the

motion from the driving power so as to attain force; and secondly,

this force must be balanced or resisted by strong framing, shafts,

and bearings. A punching-machine, for example, must have framing

strong enough to resist a thrust equal to the force applied to the

work; hence the frames of such machines are always a huge mass,

disposed in the most advantageous way to meet and resist this

reactive force, while the main details of a drop-machine capable

of exerting an equal force consist only of a block and a pair of

guides to direct its course.

Leaving out problems of mechanism in forging machines, the

adaptation of pressing or percussive processes is governed mainly

by the size and consequent inertia of the pieces acted upon. In

order to produce a proper effect, that is, to start the particles

of a piece throughout its whole depth at each blow, a certain

proportion between a hammer and the piece acted upon must be

maintained. For heavy forging, this principle has led to the

construction of enormous hammers for the performance of such work

as no pressing machinery can be made strong enough to execute,

although the action of such machinery in other respects would best

suit the conditions of the work. The greater share of forging

processes may be performed by either blows or compression, and no

doubt the latter process is the best in most cases. Yet, as before

explained, machinery to act by pressure is much more complicated

and expensive than hammers and drops. The tendency in practice is,

however, to a more extensive employment of press-forging processes.

(1.) What peculiarity belongs to the operation of forging to

distinguish it from most others?--(2.) Describe in a general way

what forging operations consist in.--(3.) Name some machines

having percussive action.--(4.) What may this principle of

operating have to do with the framing of a machine?--(5.) If a

steam-hammer were employed as a punching-machine, what changes

would be required in its framing?--(6.) Explain the functions

performed by a hand-hammer.

The Economy of Workshop Manipulation A logical method of learning constructive mechanics. Arranged with questions for the use of apprentice engineers and students. · 第 23 / 41 章