It is my good or ill fortune to have taken a furnished flat at a dizzy

altitude in the neighbourhood of that London terminus which is at once

nearest the sea and the Promised Land. Immediately above the flat is a

spacious roof, which affords a pleasant retreat in the cool of the

evening and commands what the agents call an extensive prospect, and

where, at most hours, toy dogs may be met. The flat itself consists of a

number of rooms the walls of which are covered with photographs of men,

women, and children, almost as thickly as the pages of a schoolboy's

album are covered with stamps. There are more men than women, and more

women than children. The men have obsolete beards; several of the women

seem to be sisters, and have been taken together with their heads

inclining towards each other at an affectionate angle, which, although

affectionate, does not render the thought impossible that each sister

secretly is convinced that she is the handsomer. There are also sets of

children graduated like organ pipes. These photographs not only hang on

the walls but they swarm in frames about the mantelpieces and the

occasional tables. The occasional tables are so numerous and varied in

size that one might imagine this their stud farm.

The beginning of my tenancy was marked by a tragedy. The larder window

having been left open by the previous occupants, a large slate-coloured

pigeon, with schemes for a family, had made a nest and laid an egg in

it, and, at the very moment when I suddenly opened the door, was

preparing to lay another. To this achievement I personally should have

had no objection; but the porter, who was showing me round, and who has

a sense of decorum more proper to such apartments, had other views, and

before I could interfere he had removed the egg, brushed away the nest,

and closed the window. That ended his share of the drama; but mine was

to begin, for ever since that day the pigeon, with a depth of

reproachfulness in its eyes that is extremely distressing, has sat on

the kitchen window-sill making desperate efforts to get in, so that I

creep about feeling like Herod. During Baby Week it was almost

unbearable. Even when I am far from the kitchen I can hear its plaintive

injured cooing.

The flat is conspicuous in possessing, in addition to numerous other

advantages, such as a night porter to work the lift, who is never

visible, and a day porter who, having been forbidden by the powers that

be to use the lift before two o'clock in the afternoon, scrupulously

obeys the new regulation, except when he has to ascend to an upper floor

himself: the flat has, in addition to these advantages, windows that

refuse to be lifted by any but a Hercules, and doors (ten in all) not

one of which will remain open except by artificial means. Whether or not

this is a peculiarity of Westminster architecture I cannot say, but all

the doors are alike. They each quickly but remorselessly close, yet so

gently that the latch does not catch, and every breath of draught (and

we by no means stop at breaths) sways them noisily to and fro with a

sound that is excessively irritating to the nerves. I have therefore

either to go to the door and fasten it or find something with which to

fix it open. Normally, I use a chair or a weight from the kitchen

scales; but two of the rooms--the drawing-room, where the occasional

tables are most fecund, and the dining-room, where I do everything but

dine--are supplied with door-stops of their own, consisting each of an

elephant's foot mounted with brass. Picture me then, the most Occidental

of men and so long a devotee of the study and the shelf as to be less of

a big-game hunter than any one you could imagine, moving about this

intensely sophisticated flat carrying from room to room the foot of a

mammoth of the Indian jungle or the African forest (I don't know which)

in order to prevent a London door from banging. Imperial Caesar's destiny

was not less exalted or more incongruous.

If there were four of these feet I should be more at ease. But there are

only two of them, and I have been to the Zoo often enough to know that

elephants are quadrupeds. Where then are the other two? That is the

question which is wearing me out. I lie awake at night, wondering, and

then, falling into an uneasy sleep, hear a heavy stumbling tread on the

stairs and wake in terror expecting the door to burst open and the other

half of the elephant to advance upon me demanding its lost feet. It is

always a dreadful nightmare, but never more so than when the mammoth not

only towers up grey and threatening, but coos like an exiled pigeon.

ON SECRET PASSAGES

I was hearing the other day of an old house in Sussex where, while doing

some repairs, the builders' men chanced on the mouth of an underground

passage which they traced for two miles. Why should that discovery be

interesting? Why is everything to do with underground passages so

interesting? It is, I suppose, because they are usually secret, and the

very word secret, no matter how applied (except perhaps to treaties) is

alluring: secret drawers, secret cupboards, secret chambers; but the

secret passage is best, because it leads from one place to another, and

either war or love called it into being: war or love, or, as in the case

of priests' hiding holes, religious persecution, which is a branch of

war.

Nothing can deprive the secret passage of its glamour: not all the

Tubes, or subways, or river tunnelling, through which we pass so

naturally day after day. Any private excavation is exciting; to enter a

dark cellar, even, carries a certain emotion. How mysterious are crypts!

How awesome are the catacombs of Rome! How it brings back the lawless,

turbulent past of Florence merely to walk through that long passage

(not underground but overground, yet no less dramatic for that) which,

passing above the Ponte Vecchio, unites the Pitti and the Uffizi and

made it possible, unseen by the Florentines, to transfer bodies of armed

men from one side of the Arno to the other!

It was the underground passage idea which gave the Druce Case such

possibilities of mystery and romance. That a duke should masquerade as

an upholsterer was in itself an engaging idea; but without the

underground passage connecting Baker Street with Cavendish Square the

story was no more than an ordinary feuilleton. I shall always regret

that it was not true; and even now some one ought to take it in hand and

make a real romance of it, with the double-lived nobleman leaving his

own home so regularly every morning (by the trap door), doffing his

coronet and robes and changing _en route_ somewhere under Wigmore

Street, and appearing unseen (by another trap door) in the Bazaar, all

smug and punctual and rubbing his hands. It would be not only thrilling,

but such a satire on ducal dulness. And then the great Law Court scenes,

the rival heirs, the impassioned counsel, the vast sums at stake, the

sanction of the judge to open the grave, and finally the discovery that

there was no body there after all--nothing but bricks--and the fantastic

story really was fact! There has been no better plot since "Monte

Cristo," and that, you remember, would be nothing had not the Abbe Faria

excavated the secret passage from his cell through which Edmond was able

to re-enter the world and start upon his career of symmetrical

vengeance.

What, of course, gave such likelihood to the Druce allegations was the

circumstance that the Duke of Portland spent so much of his life at

Welbeck underground. A man who is known to do that must expect to be the

subject of romantic exaggerations.

Another reason for wishing the Druce story to be true is that, if it

were true, if one aristocrat thus duplicated and enriched his life,

others also would do so; for there are no single instances; and this

means that London would be honey-combed by secret underground passages

constructed to promote these entertaining deceptions, and shopping would

become an absorbing pastime, for we should never know with whom we were

chaffering. But alas...!

Just as an ordinary desk takes on a new character directly one is told

that it has a secret drawer, so does even a whisper of a secret passage

transfigure the most commonplace house. Arriving in Gloucester not so

very long ago, and needing a resting-place for the night, I

automatically chose the hotel which claimed, in the advertisement, to

date from the fourteenth century and possess an underground passage to

the cathedral. The fact that, as the young lady in the office assured

me, the passage, if it ever existed, no longer is accessible, made very

little difference: the idea of it was the attraction and determined the

choice of the inn. The Y. M. C. A. headquarters at Brighton on the Old

Steyne ceases to be under the dominion of those initials--four letters

which, for all their earnest of usefulness, are as far removed from the

suggestion of clandestine intrigue as any could be--and becomes a

totally different structure when one is told that when, long before its

conversion, Mrs. Fitzherbert lived there, an underground passage existed

between it and the Pavilion for the use of the First Gentleman in

Europe. Whether it is fact or fancy I cannot say, but that the Pavilion

has a hidden staircase and an underground passage to the Dome I happen

to know. A hidden staircase has hardly fewer adventurous potentialities

than a secret passage. I was told of one at Greenwich Hospital: in the

wing built by Charles II. is a secret staircase in the wall leading to

the apartments set apart for (need I say?) Mistress Eleanor Gwynne?

These rooms, such is the deteriorating effect of modernity, are now

offices.

LITTLE MISS BANKS

To many people wholly free from superstition, except that, after

spilling the salt, they are careful to throw a little over the left

shoulder, and do not walk under ladders unless with crossed thumbs, and

refuse to sit thirteen at table, and never bring May blossoms into the

house--to these people, otherwise so free from superstition, it would

perhaps be surprising to know what great numbers of their

fellow-creatures resort daily to such a black art as fortune-telling by

the cards.

Yet quite respectable, God-fearing, church-going old ladies, and

probably old gentlemen too, treasure this practice, to say nothing of

younger and therefore naturally more frivolous folk; and many make the

consultation of the two-and-fifty oracles a morning habit.

Particularly women. Those well-thumbed packs of cards that we know so

well are not wholly dedicated to "Patience," I can assure you.

All want to be told the same thing: what the day will bring forth. But

each searcher into the dim and dangerous future has, of course,

individual methods--some shuffling seven times and some ten, and so

forth, and all intent upon placating the elfish goddess, Caprice.

There is little Miss Banks, for example.

Nothing would induce little Miss Banks to leave the house in the morning

without seeing what the cards promised her, and so open and

impressionable are her mind and heart that she is still interested in

the colour of the romantic fellow whom the day, if kind, is to fling

across her path. The cards, as you know, are great on colours, all men

being divided into three groups; dark (which has the preference), fair,

and middling. Similarly for you, if you can get little Miss Banks to

read your fate (but you must of course shuffle the pack yourself), there

are but three kinds of charmers: dark (again the most fascinating and to

be desired), fair, and middling.

It is great fun to watch little Miss Banks at her necromancy. She takes

it so earnestly, literally wrenching the future's secrets from their

lair.

"A letter is coming to you from some one," she says. "An important

letter."

And again, "I see a voyage over water."

Or very seriously, "There's a death."

You gasp.

"No, it's not yours. A fair woman's."

You laugh. "Only a fair woman's!" you say. "Go on."

But the cards have not only ambiguities, but strange reticences.

"Oh," little Miss Banks will say, her eyes large with excitement,

"there's a payment of money and a dark man."

"Good," you say.

"But I can't tell," she goes on, "whether you pay it to him or he pays

it to you."

"That's a nice state of things," you say, becoming indignant. "Surely

you can tell."

"No, I can't."

You begin to go over your dark acquaintances who might owe you money,

and can think of none.

You then think of your dark acquaintances to whom you owe money and are

horrified by their number.

"Oh, well," you say, "the whole thing's rubbish, anyway."

Little Miss Banks's eyes dilate with pained astonishment.

"Rubbish!"--and she begins to shuffle again.

GENTLEMEN BOTH

Not all of us have the best manners always about us. The fortunate are

they whose reaction is instant; but those also are fortunate who, after

the first failure--during the conflict between, say, natural and

acquired feelings--can recapture their best, too.

At a certain country house where a shooting party was assembled a

picture stood on an easel in a corner of the dining-room. It was a

noticeable picture by reason of its beauty and also by reason of a gash

in the canvas. Coffee was on the table when one of the guests, looking

round the walls, observed it for the first time, and, drawing his host's

attention to its excellence, asked who was the painter; and the host,

who was an impulsive, hearty fellow, full of money, after supplying the

information and corroborating the justice of the criticism, remarked to

the whole company, "Now here's a sporting offer. You see that cut across

the paint in the middle"--pointing it out as he spoke--"well, I'll give

any one a thousand pounds who can guess how it was done."

They all rose and clustered before the easel; for a thousand pounds are

worth having a try for, even when one is rich--as most of them were.

"It was done only last week," the host continued, "and it was such a

queer business that I don't intend to have it repaired. Now then, all of

you, a thousand of the best for the correct answer."

He rubbed his hands and chuckled. It was a sure thing for him, and there

would be a lot of fun in the suggestions.

The guests having re-examined the cut with minuteness, one by one,

seated themselves again, and pencils and paper were provided so that the

various possible solutions might be written down. The real business then

began--no sound but pencils writing and the host chuckling.

Now it happened that one of the party, a year or so before, had seen

somewhere in Yorkshire a picture with a not dissimilar rent, caused, he

had been told, by a panic-stricken bird which had blundered into the

room and couldn't get out again. Remembering this, and remembering also

that history sometimes repeats itself, he wrote on his piece of paper

that, according to his guess, the canvas was torn by a bird which had

flown into the room and lost its head.

All the suggestions having been written down, the host called on their

writers to read them, a jolly, confident smile lighting up his features,

which grew more jolly and more confident as one after another incorrect

solution was tendered.

And then came the turn of the man who had remembered about the bird, and

who happened to be the last of all. "My guess is," he read out, "that

the picture was damaged by a bird."

There was a roar of laughter, which gradually subsided when it was

observed that the host was very far from joining in it. In fact, his

face not only had lost all its good humour, but was white and tense.

When there was silence he said, with a certain biting shortness:

"Somebody must have told you."

"Nobody told me," was the reply. "But you don't really mean to say I've

guessed right?"

"If you call it a guess--yes," said the host, whose mortification had

become painful to witness.

"Well," said the other quickly and pleasantly, "'guess' perhaps isn't

the right word, and, of course, I shouldn't therefore claim the reward.

You see----," and he then explained how he had remembered the odd

experience in Yorkshire, and in default of any inventiveness of his own

had used it. "So, of course," he added, rising and moving towards the

window, "the offer is off. Remembering isn't guessing; quite the

reverse. What a gorgeous moon!"

The others also rose, only too willingly, for the situation had become

trying; the matter dropped, at any rate as a theme of general

conversation; and gradually and uncomfortably bed-time was reached.

Several of the party were at breakfast the next morning when their host

made his first appearance; and they noticed that he had regained his

customary gay serenity. Walking up to the guest whose memory had been so

embarrassing, he handed him a slip of paper.

"I'm sorry, old man," he said, "to have been in such a muddle last

night, but the accuracy of that shot of yours dazed me. Of course the

offer stands. All this cheque needs is for you to fill in the name of

whatever hospital or charity you prefer."

"Thanks," said the other as he put it in his pocket-book.

ON EPITAPHS

Not long ago I was staying in a village where the shortest cut to the

inn lay through the churchyard, and passing and repassing so often I

came to know the dead inhabitants of the place almost better than the

living. Not with the penetrating knowledge of the author of "Spoon River

Anthology"--that very extraordinary and understanding book,--but in a

kindly superficial way. Indeed, considering that they were total

strangers and their acquaintance not now to be made by any but the

followers of those doughty knights of the round (or square) seance

table, Sir Oliver and Sir Conan, some of these dead people were absurdly

often in my thoughts; but that was because of their names. Such names!

Many of course were no longer legible, for Father Time had either

obliterated them with his patient finger, dipped now in lichen and now

in moss, or upon them his tears had fallen too steadily. But many

remained and some of them were wonderful. Has it ever been explained why

the dead have more remarkable names than the living? Did any one ever

meet "in the form" a Lavender Wiseways? Yet there was a Lavender

Wiseways lying beneath one of those stones. There was her sister too,

lying close beside--Lavinia Wiseways. Neither had married; but then how

could they have performed a deed which would have lost them such

distinction! And who now exchanges market greetings, with a gaitered

gentleman named Paradine Ebb? Yet once there was a Paradine Ebb, farmer,

not such a great distance from London, to shake by the hand, and chat

to, and buy fat stock from, and, I hope, share a cordial glass with. And

who--but if I continue I shall betray the village's name, and that is

against good manners. Too many real names get into print in these

inquisitive days.

It was not however of strange dead names that I was thinking when I took

up my pen, but of the epitaphs on the tombstones, sometimes so brief and

simple, sometimes so long and pompous, and almost always withholding

everything of real importance about the occupants of the narrow cells

beneath and almost always affecting to despise the precious gift of

life. Why should not some one, greatly daring, go so far as to bid the

mason engrave a tribute to the world that is being left behind? Would

that be so impious? There is no indication that any of these dead ever

enjoyed a moment.

Something like this, for instance--

HERE LIES

HENRY ROBINSON

WHO LIVED IN THE BELIEF--AND,

WITH MANY FAILURES, DID HIS

BEST TO ACT OF TO IT--THAT IF

YOU SPEND YOUR TIME IN TRYING

TO MAKE THINGS A LITTLE EASIER

AND MERRIER IN THIS WORLD, THE

NEXT CAN TAKE CARE OF ITSELF.

The whole insincere suggestion of most churchyards now is that life has

been spent in a vale of tears: a long tribulation, merely a preparation

for another and better world. But we know that that is not usually the

case, and we know that many lives, although unrelated to graveyard ideas

of decorum and insurance, are happier than not. There is in the God's

Acre of which I am writing more than one appeal to the living to be wary

of earthly serenity: surely a very unfair line for the dead to take and

not unremindful of the fable of the fox and his tail. An elaborate stone

close by the lych gate has a series of dreary couplets warning the

passer-by that the next grave to be dug may be his; and on the

assumption that he is being too happy he is adjured to a morbid

thoughtfulness. The dead might be kinder than that, more generous, more

altruistic! I should like a headstone to bear some such motto as

"DIE AND LET LIVE."

But not only do the epitaphs suggest that life below is a snare; they

are by no means too encouraging about the life above. The spirit they

proclaim is a very poor one. Nothing can make death attractive; but even

if some golden-mouthed advocate should arise whose eloquence half

persuaded, the churchyard would beat him: the damp of it, the gloom of

it, the mouldiness of it, the pathetic unconvincing efforts at

resignation which the slabs record! We ought to be braver; more

heartening to others. A rector who allowed none but cheerful epitaphs

would be worth his tithes.

Would there be any very impossible impropriety in such an inscription as

this--

HERE LIES

JOHN SMITH

WHO FOUND EARTH PLEASANT AND

REJOICED IN ITS BEAUTIES AND ENJOYED

ITS SAVOURS; WHO LOVED

AND WAS LOVED; AND WHO WOULD

FAIN GO ON LIVING. HE DIED

RELUCTANTLY, BUT WISHES WELL TO

ALL WHO SURVIVE HIM.

CARPE DIEM.

Reading that, the stranger would not necessarily (I hope) be transformed

into a detrimental Hedonist.

And now and then a human foible might be recorded by the stonemason

without risk of undermining society's foundations. When our friends are

dead why should we not disclose a little? Some secrets are better out.

Here for example--

HERE LIES

(in no expectation of immortality)

THOMAS BROWN

HE WAS NO FRIEND OF THE

CHURCH, BUT HE PAID HIS WAY,

INTERFERED WITH NONE OF HIS

NEIGHBOURS, AND HIS WORD WAS

HIS BOND.

What would happen if Thomas Brown's friends paid for such lapidary style

as that? Would the world totter? Again--

HERE LIES

MARY JONES

THE WIFE OF WILLIAM JONES.

HONOUR HER MEMORY, FOR SHE

WAS LENIENT WHEN HER HUSBAND

WAS IN LIQUOR.

I should also like to see memorial verses beginning:

Physicians sore

Long time I bore.

IN AND ABOUT LONDON

I

A LONDON THRILL

The scene was Gerrard Street: a rather curious thoroughfare notable for

possessing three or four restaurants dear to Bohemia, the great West End

telephone exchange, the homes of Dryden and Edmund Burke, a number of

cinema offices, and many foreign inhabitants.

The time was three o'clock in the afternoon.

In the middle were two or three big vans, loading or unloading and

filling the roadway, thus cutting the street into two so effectively

that I, approaching from the east, had no knowledge of anything

happening in the western half. I therefore attached no significance to

the hurrying steps of a policeman in front of me, but was a little

surprised to see him pick his way almost on tiptoe between the vans--yet

not sufficiently surprised to anticipate drama.

But the drama was there, awaiting me, on the other side of the vans, and

the policeman--this being London drama--was naturally one of the

performers. For there never was a street play yet--comedy, tragedy, or

farce--without a policeman in the cast. It is a convention to say--as

every one has in his time said and will say again--that a policeman is

never there when he is wanted; but that is true only in the dull sense:

what we mean is that the policeman is never there before the curtain

rises, or, in other words, in time to prevent the performance

altogether. How tame if he were! As a matter of fact, by delaying his

arrival until the affair is in good train he takes his proper part as a

London entertainer; that is to say, he is there when he is

wanted--wanted to complete the show.

It was thus on the present occasion.

On passing the vans I was suddenly aware that the curtain had risen; for

on the south pavement were some fifteen or twenty people watching two

women at the house opposite, one of whom, a young one in a long brown

overcoat, was trying to get past the half-opened door, while the other,

an older one, in black, repulsed her from within. Just as I arrived the

policeman darted from between the vans, seized the young woman's arm,

and said, "That's enough of that. You come along with me." Her

reluctance was intense, but she did not resist; in fact, she had about

her a suggestion of having expected it.

One of the spectators remarked, "Quite time, too"; another added, "She

was arstin' for it." The other woman disappeared into the house, and we

all began to move in a westward direction.

Adventures and Enthusiasms · 第 11 / 14 段