ABOARD THE GOOD SHIP “DONGOLA”
The experiences of past history make us doubtful of any theory of
government ever coming in practice to produce the results which the
Constitution-framers had in mind, or of any governmental action ever
having the effect which statesmen expected it to have; for the values
with which rulers deal fluctuate continually, and missing factors have
an awkward habit of turning up unexpectedly and spoiling all the neat
equations of Cabinets and Kings. Past history (to vary the metaphor), is
largely a record of intense activity on the part of rulers in erecting
walls which tumble down on top of them, and digging pits into which
they fall themselves. James the First planted Ulster with sturdy Scots
who, instead of proving a support to his dynasty, as he had probably
expected, helped to drive James the Second from his throne. We supported
our settlers in the New World so as to counterbalance French influence in
Canada, with the result that our North American Colonies threw us over,
while the French Canadians remained faithful to us. And as past history
is strewn with falsified predictions, so future history may likewise be
paved with the miscalculations of statesmen, and the present activities
of European Governments may be found, in fifty years’ time, to have been
entirely futile, misdirected, and suicidal. To-day Mr. Lloyd George, for
example, is apparently concentrating his immense industry on the task
of converting the essentially conservative peasantry of Ireland into
Bolsheviks, and Comrade Lenin is equally busy laying the foundations of
a great capitalist state in Communistic Russia. I quoted in a previous
chapter a strange admission of Lenin to the effect that he did not quite
know towards what harbour he was drifting, and at the present moment he
is certainly tossing about in uncharted seas which, when he weighed
anchor, were the very last places in the political world where he ever
expected to find himself. He set out to kill militarism, with the result
that he is now almost the only militarist in Europe. He has one of the
largest and most enthusiastic armies in the world; schools for officers
have been established in every town, and boys from sixteen to twenty
years are taught military exercises. What is more important, the Russian
people have become, for the first time in their history, bellicose and
jingoistic. They write martial poetry which even Kipling could not
improve upon, and of which they never before had any specimens in their
popular literature. One poem to the “Red Star of Bolshevism” comes from
a section of the workmen to which Lermontov’s “Borodino” never made an
appeal; and their innumerable rude dramas in praise of militarism are
quite a novelty on the Russian stage, where patriotic operas like “A
Life for the Tsar” were never popular save on artistic grounds. Their
coarse, popular pictures depicting the triumph of Bolshevism in arms
arouse enthusiasm amongst a class which Vereshchagin’s heroic Napoleonic
canvasses left absolutely cold.
Lenin set out to kill individualism in Russia, as well as militarism, but
all he has killed has been the vague Socialistic spirit which tinged the
thoughts of most Russians, even those of the middle and upper classes. A
harsh, greedy individualism has now mastered most of the Russian people.
The old philanthropic landowner has gone, but has been replaced by a
hard-fisted _muzhik_ class resembling the most unlovely type of French
peasant, and the patriarchal old bureaucrat has been replaced by a
violent and ill-mannered Commissar, with all the worst qualities of his
predecessor and none of the good.
The Bolsheviks declared that they would extirpate all capitalists, but,
judging by innumerable indications to which I have already made allusion,
they will, if they last, find themselves largely in the hands of foreign
capitalists, of whom the Tsar’s Government was always very distrustful.
In March last, an able Lettish forestry expert in Ekaterinburg approached
the Soviet forestry department for a post, but was told that most of the
forests would be given over for exploitation to foreigners. “They know
these things better than we do,” quoth the Forestry Commissar. Moscow I
found full of secret or acknowledged representatives of great American,
British, and Continental firms, some of whom, I know, got very large
concessions. There is now in Copenhagen a great clearing-house scheme
for doing trade with Russia, and in Norway, Sweden, Germany, France,
and Italy, the “big business” men are equally active. Krassin could,
if he would, make some strange disclosures of the anxiety of British
firms to “do a deal” with him, and of the way Russified Englishmen and
“big business” generally have grovelled before him, as I once knew an
obsequious English concessionaire literally to crawl on his belly before
a former King of Siam, in accordance with the degrading Court etiquette
then prevalent; and the ultimate result will be that the anti-capitalist
movement in Russia will end by leaving Russia as much at the mercy of
foreign capitalists as China. Whatever may be said of the old Russian
bureaucracy, it must be admitted that they never allowed anybody to
plunder Russia but themselves. There will now be wholesale plunder by
Bolsheviks ready to sell the real gains of the first Revolution, and by
capitalists ready to sell their country, their civilization, and their
souls.
The Socialistic régime was expected to stop corruption in Russia, but it
is a well-known fact that corruption was never so rampant there as it
is now. The Food Control at Moscow is a scandal of the first magnitude,
50 per cent. of the food which is handed over to it being sold through
speculators and profiteers. An employee of the English Cold Storage
Company in Moscow told me that he himself transferred to the Food
Control enormous numbers of chickens and sausages, and large quantities
of butter, which were never issued to the public on cards, but which he
himself saw in the hands of speculators, who offered them for sale at
more than extravagant prices. The attempt to extirpate the profiteer has
only resulted, therefore, in the enhancement of the profiteer’s earnings
by 5,000 per cent., and even the shooting of dishonest Commissars does
not reduce the evil.
Every Commissar’s train which visits the provinces returns to Moscow
with loads of food on which much money is made. There is a soldier at
every railway station to prevent this, but the Commissar invariably
gives a paper to his subordinates entitling them to bring home as much
foodstuff as they like. When Bolshevik Missions return from abroad, they
will have similar cargoes; hence there is a keen desire on the part of
Red officials to go abroad in some official capacity. This also leads to
instances of favouritism and corruption, such as no other Government in
the world could parallel. Theoretically the most competent man is chosen,
but in practice it is a matter of intrigue, family influence, and money
to a much greater extent than in the worst days of Imperialism. The
selection of bureaucrats for important posts is accompanied by an amount
of “wire-pulling” which would shock even the city of Washington. The
relatives of Commissars get appointments which they would never obtain
under the laxest Parliamentary system of government, and the children of
Trotsky and of the other Commissars will be sure of high positions in the
Bolshevik Oligarchy.
I am sometimes tempted to think that the outcome of it all will be the
establishment of a powerful Russian bureaucracy allied to a powerful
German bureaucracy, and the conversion of anti-capitalist Russia into a
sort of Petropavlovsk Fortress-prison, with capitalists and bureaucrats
in the fortress, and an enslaved Labour class in the prison. Why, indeed,
should not the handful of desperate adventurers, who have conquered
Russia by their ideas, evolve, with the support of international capital,
into a ruling caste, even as the disreputable freebooters who conquered
England in 1066 by their swords evolved into perfectly respectable
people? But the conclusion at which I have invariably arrived, when
engaged in such surmises, is that the ideas of the Bolsheviks will not
keep their edge so long as did the swords of the Normans, and that
the feudal system, with its roots stretching down to the humblest of
the people, contained far greater promise of stability than does the
Bolshevik theory which has no hold on the peasants and no hold on most
of the workmen. There are, as I have already pointed out, 125,000,000
people in Russia, and, according to Trotsky, the Bolsheviks number
only 604,000, of whom not more than 70,000 are workmen. All the rest
are bureaucrats, and, from personal investigations which I conducted
in Moscow, I discovered that at least half of these 70,000 workmen are
engaged on what they call “political work,” though they are paid by the
factories, are inscribed on the books of the factories, and are supposed
to be working in the factories. The Bolsheviks are losing touch with the
manual workers at a very rapid rate indeed, and, in a short time, every
member of the party will be a bureaucrat. Obsessed by their impracticable
theories, they will be carried further and further from the realities of
life and of human nature, until finally they are tripped up by something
very simple and very small, as the Tsar, who had survived the Japanese
War and the revolution of 1905, was ignobly tripped up at length by
a drunken pilgrim and a shortage of bread. Wars have been caused by
diphthongs, and the heirs of the Byzantines may be overthrown by their
own misinterpretation of the one word “worker.” To that word their
leaders, who certainly know better, have consistently and dishonestly
given the meaning “manual worker,” so that when, in 1905, Count Witte
claimed, and with very good reason, to be also a worker, the deputation
of Workmen’s Deputies, which by the way included Trotsky, laughed him
to scorn. Yet now there are in Moscow alone 230,000 Bolshevik officials
who do not work with their hands, against 100,000 manual workers, of
whom considerably less than half are members of the Communist party. A
Menshevik recently asked in the _Pravda_ why so few skilled workmen are
Bolshevik, and the editor replied that he needed time before he could
answer that difficult question. “If any will not work, neither let
him eat”: out of their own mouths shall the Bolsheviks be confounded.
They misapplied that text in order to ruin others, and now it will be
misapplied by others in order to ruin them.
History has frequently furnished the spectacle of rough barbarians
descending from the hills to conquer a great pacific people, and to found
a ruling caste which in course of time becomes corrupted by luxury and
is swept away. The empire-smashing barbarians of the future will come
from the mines and workshops of nations which brutalize the lower classes
and lose at the same time their own ancient virtue; but in these rapid
days the degeneration of the conquerors will be swift, and in Russia it
shows every sign of being already complete.
A probable outcome of the present Russian experiment will be a military
reaction involving the extermination of half a million Reds, and
perhaps another half-million of more or less inoffensive Jews, and the
persecution by the Whites, for twenty years, of those Socialists and
Liberals whom Lenin hated, and who will probably have done most towards
bringing about Lenin’s fall. Then the pendulum will swing from right to
left and from left to right, until finally it settles at a federated
_bourgeois_ republic.
Of my own personal adventures there is little more to be said save that,
curiously enough, they ended on a cheerful and even comic note.
After my release by the Bolshevik Inquisition I applied for permission
to leave Russia with the British refugees who were due to leave under
the Litvinov-O’Grady agreement for the exchange of prisoners, and this
permission was granted. I could have remained as a correspondent on
very favourable terms if I had consented to write for the Bolsheviks;
I could have visited Petrograd, the South, and the Polish Front, and
accumulated a mass of material about Red Russia, but there was danger
in carrying out that programme. The fact that I was an officer might
leak out at Krasnoyarsk or at Moscow, might be disclosed by treacherous
interpreters who had been attached to us, by military documents which
had been captured, or simply by reference to the British Army List. Even
if it did not leak out, the Bolsheviks, who were anxious that I should
stay, and willing to make it worth my while to stay, would certainly try
to cut off my retreat and place me entirely at their mercy by publishing
something which I had not said, or garbling something which I had said,
with the result that, owing to my inability to contradict this, and to
the British Government’s intense suspicion of everything Bolshevik, I
might be refused admittance into England. Those who are inclined to doubt
all this do not know the Bolsheviks, and do not know the morbid tension
which Bolshevism has produced outside Russia, and of which I had a most
unpleasant personal experience as soon as I crossed the Finnish frontier.
I always told the Reds that it was absolutely necessary for me to go
home, since (as I put it) everything I wrote from Russia would be
regarded in England as having been written under duress. At the same
time, I always made it clear to them that I was no Socialist, that I did
not believe their experiment would succeed, and that when I returned to
England I would put down everything without fear or favour, what told
against them as well as what told for them.
Their answer to this was characteristic. They said in effect: “Russia is
the only country in the world where you can write with perfect freedom.
Here you can denounce King George, Lloyd George, Winston Churchill, and
all the Generals, Cabinet Ministers, clergymen, and capitalists that you
can think of. There is no limit to the violence of the language you can
use against them, and no matter what mismanagement, fraud, and debauchery
you accuse them of, you need fear no action for libel here. What greater
freedom do you want? You could never do that in England. You could never
publish in England anything that tells in favour of Bolshevism, no matter
how true it be, and no matter what denunciations of Bolshevism you
publish along with it.”
My answer to that is the foregoing narrative, in which absolutely
everything is published, and in the composition of which no suggestion
has been made to me to omit or alter a single word. That is what _I_ call
freedom.
The last days spent in Moscow by the British party were enlivened by the
efforts of certain young Russian ladies to get married to the fugitives,
so that they themselves could leave as British subjects, for it is as
difficult for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle as for a
Russian “citizen” to leave Russia. Most of the British officer-prisoners,
married and unmarried, could have brought out with them charming Russian
brides of good family, and in some cases with ample fortunes awaiting
them outside in Paris or London banks; and I do not think that, since
the Rape of the Sabines, soldiers have ever had such an embarrassing
abundance of youth and beauty to choose from. The officers resisted
heroically, though perhaps some of them, demobilized and out of work,
now regret that _gran rifiuto_; but, alas! some of the civilians fell.
It was not a serious matter, however, for the unions were contracted in
accordance with the Soviet marriage-law (which is anything but serious,
and has no legal validity outside Russia), and were only nominal unless
the parties wished to supplement them by a regular marriage on the other
side of the frontier. Some amusing situations arose in consequence of
these marriages. One aristocratic lady who had “married” an English youth
of half her age dropped him and the name he had given her as soon as
she got aboard the boat for England; another English bridegroom had, on
the contrary, considerable difficulty in getting disentangled from his
Muscovite “bride.” But no English wife need be in the least uneasy. The
whole masquerade was as innocent and delightful as a dance, and, in the
gay jingling of marriage bells mixed with the silvery laughter of Russian
girls, I read a prophecy of a day when the masculine energy of the Briton
will combine on equal terms with the delicate feminine genius of the Slav
to reorganize a shattered world and to save our Christian civilization.
Up to this time an ice-bound sea, void of life, had stretched away like a
Siberian steppe to the horizon, but now the mighty waters had burst their
chains, and the humble craft of the fisherman went freely to and fro on
the rippling surface. I thanked God for the passing away of that dreadful
winter which I had often thought would be my last, and I prayed that the
great Russian people might soon be freed in like manner from the frozen,
life-destroying immobility of Communism.
For five long months the only news I had had from home were the tidings
of discontent, disorder, mutiny, and revolution published in the
Bolshevik newspapers, but all these shapes of horror faded away when
I went aboard the British naval transport which lay awaiting us in
Helsingfors Bay with a British destroyer alongside. An armed bluejacket
saluted briskly at the gangway, and the interior of the great ship
presented the same impressive picture of ordered freedom as the _Kent_
had presented at Vladivostock seven thousand miles away. The bugles were
as merry and confident as ever; the “Aye, aye, sir!” of the sailors as
ready and cheerful as of yore. Amid these reassuring sights and sounds I
close this narrative of captivity.
[Illustration: TWO SNOW SCENES ON THE FINNISH FRONTIER. _To face p. 310._]
APPENDIX
The following miscellaneous notes were written by me in shorthand while
a prisoner in Siberia and Russia, but I had no time to decipher them
till the foregoing pages were already in the hands of the printer, and
till I myself had left England again for the Russian frontier. I hope
that, under these circumstances, and in consideration of the fact that
nearly all of them were written amid the scenes which I describe, and
even jotted down sometimes in the street and in the darkness, their crude
form, their want of connection, and their appearance as an appendix will
be excused by the reader.
KOLCHAK’S GOLD TRAIN
Gold to the value of £44,000,000 left Omsk in a special train of forty
cars which came into collision at Tatarskaya, near Omsk, with another
train and caught fire, with the result that boxes full of gold to the
value of hundreds of thousands of pounds sterling were thrown out of the
train like so many boxes of “bully” beef, were left lying on the track
for days, and were finally “lost.” The rest of the gold was captured by
the Reds at Nizhniudinsk, near Irkutsk.
BURNING OF A RED CROSS TRAIN
This disaster took place at Kochenovo, forty versts to the west of
Novo-Nikolaevsk. I heard of it while still with the Whites, and the Reds
afterwards gave me full particulars of it. They said that they rescued
some of the patients, and that they found the charred remains of over two
hundred typhus patients in the débris of the train. They added that in
some of the abandoned trains they found prison vans with barred windows,
but that in all cases the prisoners had been butchered by the Whites.
Whether this was true or not I do not know, but at Novo-Nikolaevsk and
Omsk I found the railway stations adorned with ghastly photographs of
mutilated corpses as they had, in Kolchak’s time, been adorned with
similar photographs of Red butcheries.
WRITINGS ON STATION WALLS
“DEAR MASHA,—I have gone on by the echelon of the Osvyetverkh,
November 11. I will wait for you and the children in the Dom
Petrov, Bolshoi Prospekt, No. 12.—IVAN.”
Ivan, it will be seen, neglects to give the name of the town where he
proposes to wait.
“To DOMINICA IVANOVNA GLYEBOVA,—We cannot get any further,
and are staying here in Bolotnaya in the Square opposite the
Church, Dom Rykachev, No. 8. Vanna is sick of typhus.—SERGIUS
AND NATASHA.”
Sometimes one found rude, pencilled notices from Colonels who had
apparently lost their regiments.
“Colonel Butenko is living here in Sadovaya, No. 18.”
Still another specimen, unsigned:
“Will anyone who knows the whereabouts of Olga and Tatiana
Petrova, please tell the commandant at this station?”
Reading long afterwards the copies I had made of those notices, I was
touched by the confidence shown by all the writers that there must be
a secure haven of refuge somewhere. At Novo-Nikolaevsk, Tomsk was the
abiding city, the inviolable sanctuary which Trotsky could never violate;
at Taiga it was Marinsk; at Marinsk it was Achinsk; at Achinsk it was
Krasnoyarsk. At the time I first read those appeals I had, however, the
same illusions myself; but now I see something symbolical in this futile
hunt for security. “We have here no abiding city.”
THE PROPAGANDA HALL AT EKATERINBURG
This hall was always crowded with young soldiers and workmen, who
listened most attentively to the violin recitals, piano playing, old
ballads, and classical music, and seemed to be fascinated by the endless
succession of artistes, some of whom were very good. It had, however, two
great drawbacks: it contributed to the spread of poisonous doctrine, and
it contributed to the spread of typhus. One of my travelling companions
visited it once only, and shortly afterwards fell sick of this disease.
The entertainments and lectures seemed to go on for ever, but the
audience never grew tired. There were all sorts of common people in the
crowd—Cossacks, Kirghiz, miners, young peasants with the bodies of giants
and the faces of children. Workmen sometimes came in with bags of flour,
which they deposited on the ground while they listened to what was going
on. It reminded me of workmen and market women I had seen coming into
an Italian cathedral in the noonday heat to pray: these Propaganda Halls
are the Cathedrals of Bolshevism. Soldiers also came in, the permanently
fixed bayonets on the muzzles of their rifles white with hoar-frost.
In one of the cartoons a man with a plough stood on a terrestrial globe,
beneath which was the inscription “The World is Thine.” Innumerable other
notices vaunted the superiority of Labour and the defeat of Capitalism
and Imperialism. “The Rule of the Proletariat,” said one of these
notices, “is the Death of the Bourgeois Horde.”
BOLSHEVIK JOURNALISM
Nearly everybody dabbled in journalism; and foreign correspondents always
ran the risk of seeing their most casual conversation at Commissars’
tables reproduced in a distorted form next morning by some Communist
newspaper. Cabinet ministers in the West are sometimes rather afraid of
talking to newspapermen lest their remarks be published without their
permission and in an incorrect form. Journalists from the West have, for
precisely the same reason, a well-grounded fear of talking to Bolshevik
Cabinet Ministers. The average Red leader writes as much as he talks,
and he talks as much as the most talkative English M.P. The Russians
are, indeed, a very talkative race; they talk with the inexhaustible
rapidity of Greeks or women. Not that I despise them for this natural
accomplishment: on the contrary I envy them; and I must say that their
conversation is sometimes of extraordinary charm and brilliancy. But
the conversation of such of them as have got the Bolshevik bee in their
bonnets can only be described as devastating, though the Reactionaries
who think that England has not helped enough run these Red bores very
close. The “loquacity valve” which works so stiffly in some other
races does not exist in the Russians at all. Talking is apparently an
imperious necessity for them, and they droop and wither if deprived of
all possibility of satisfying that necessity. I am told that many of the
Russian prisoners of war in Germany went mad: I think it was because they
had nobody to talk with.
Powerful articles are published occasionally in the Moscow papers, but
the general tone of the Bolshevik Press is extremely low, for most of
the regular Pressmen belong to the type which used to make a precarious
living by bringing trifling items of intelligence to the old newspaper
offices, though they themselves seldom succeeded in getting beyond the
hall-porter. I know one editor who wrote a series of violent articles
against a Soviet official, because the latter once occupied the permanent
place assigned to this editor in the local theatre. Another paper
published a frightful onslaught on a lady, the wife of an educational
Commissar, because, on visiting the Opera House once, she complained
(and with excellent reason) of the smell which emanated from the
Proletariat audience. The attack on Mrs. North, wife of the British
chaplain at Moscow, in the official organ of the Soviet Government,
was the most vulgar, disgraceful, and unmanly thing that I ever read
in print. The non-existence of a Libel Law encourages cowardly scribes
to attack in the most brutal manner people whom it is safe to attack,
especially women of good family married to technical functionaries of
the Soviet, but none of these scribblers would dare to attack Mrs. Lenin
or Mrs. Trotsky any more than they would have dared in the old days to
attack the Tsarina.
The untruthful nature of the news which appears in the _Pravda_ has
become so notorious among the higher Commissars themselves that they
have a saying to the effect that “You never find Pravda (Truth) in the
_Pravda_.”
THE PEASANTS
If the outer world is nervous about Bolshevism, the Bolsheviks are even
more nervous about the outer world and about the permanency of their own
régime. They are so nervous that, excepting high officials and fanatical
secret agents, none of Lenin’s subjects are ever allowed to leave Russia.
Many of the Bolshevik Chinovniks have asked me confidentially if I
thought their system of government would last, and were very anxious to
know what change will, in my opinion, take place, and whether the change
will be brought about by foreign interference, by internal trouble, or
by a gradual modification in the Socialist system itself. I have seen
with my own eyes that these people, who profess to be so very, very sure,
are, in reality, very doubtful of their own success. They are overawed
in the first place by the stupendous strength of the world-organization
against which they have set out to do battle and are profoundly depressed
by the obvious disinclination of the World’s workers to join Jack the
Giant-killer in his forlorn campaign against the giant. They are also
very much afraid of their own peasants who stand sullenly aside, refuse
to bring produce to market, hoard all the money they can lay hands on,
and leave the towns to starve. Despite his tone of supreme confidence,
Lenin has many sleepless nights on account of the _muzhik_. That dark,
enigmatical mass of a hundred millions presses down on him like a
nightmare, and he has been forced to recognize the fact that the peasant
is anything but an altruist, being extremely selfish and close-fisted,
being, in fact, a small capitalist. “I have found,” said he, “that the
_muzhik_ has a dual personality. One personality will joyfully take all
the Soviet Government gives it. The other refuses the least help to the
Soviet Government.”
This Sphinx is cunning, cautious, and evasive. One of the Commissars
told me that the class of “poor” peasants—still catalogued as “poor,”
though they are now rich—are much more difficult to deal with than the
old _kulak_ whom they have plundered and replaced. Meanwhile the attitude
of the Bolshevik newspapers towards the peasantry is very interesting and
suggestive, for those newspapers faithfully reflect the hopes and fears
of the Omnipotent Five. Sometimes they attack the peasants with violence,
but, as a rule, they write about him with a hopefulness which they do
not feel. They publish many articles on “What to do in the Villages,”
proving to their own satisfaction apparently that the peasants’ sons,
when they return from the Red Army, will carry the armed doctrine of the
revolution into the farmhouses (but omitting to state that they will also
carry, in many cases, those diseases which seem to be almost inseparable
from the noble profession of arms), and that they will make the villages
supply the workmen with bread, since, without bread, the workmen will be
unable to deliver the ploughs, clothing, boots, etc., which the villagers
need so badly. An energetic agitator, who had (of course) served a
sentence of penal servitude under the Tsar, once described to me with
great satisfaction how he had corrupted the peasantry in his native
village. At first he had to be very cautious, and could not speak against
the Tsar, the priests, or the landowners, but little by little he made
headway “until now”—and with a bland smile he waved his hand towards the
street adorned throughout its entire length with Red flags. As a matter
of fact, however, Lenin would be as much out of place in the average
Russian village as the Dean of St. Paul’s would be in a Sinn Fein school
at Ballinasloe. This was clearly shown during the attempts, which the
Bolsheviks made, to establish Communist colonies in Samara Government
and elsewhere throughout Russia. Those colonies were established in the
confiscated estates of landowners, and were filled with long-haired
enthusiasts from Moscow, but there was as great a gulf between them
and the peasants as there would have been between the peasants and an
American Brook Farm colony dumped down among them. The _muzhiks_ simply
said, “These are new landlords come here. Let’s kill them,” and in
the riots which ensued several people were killed and wounded on both
sides. Finally, the Red Army was sent to restore order. The peasants
were flogged, but the long-haired enthusiasts had fled, and all these
Communist experiments came to naught.
To all the frantic appeals of the Reds to co-operate with them in
the creation of a great Socialistic Russia, the peasant opposes an
inscrutable passivity. As a matter of fact, he dislikes to be worried by
any form of government, and no more desires to build up a great Socialist
Russia than he ever desired to build up a great Imperialist Russia. His
objection to military service is as great as was the objection of the
Bolsheviks when they came into power, but, as the Reds now conscribe the
peasants as readily as the Tsarists, the peasants feel vaguely that they
have been swindled. On one point only do the Marxists and the _muzhiks_
feel alike. Neither of them care in the least whether chunks as large as
France and Germany put together are bit off the Empire, for the Marxists
have no fatherland, and the _muzhik’s_ Empire is confined to the limits
of his native village.
I once saw a list of instructions to Bolshevik agitators, which laid
down the rule: “Keep things moving all the time. When one cry has become
stale, get up another and cry it out at the top of your voice. The next
cry will be ‘Electrification of the Villages.’ Always have something new.
Don’t let the pace flag. Keep the people so busy that they won’t have
time to think.”
And, sure enough, in a week or two afterwards the cry “Electrification of
the Villages” resounded all over Russia. It is, in truth, rather a silly
cry considering how many of the Russian peasants are nearer the Stone
Age than the Age of Electricity, and the slight effect that it has had
on the _muzhiks_ shows that Lenin does not understand them at all; but,
after all, politicians in every country act very often on the same great
principle. What about “Three Acres and a Cow,” “Land for the Soldiers,”
“Hang the Kaiser,” “Make Germany Pay,” and a number of similar slogans in
our own country? The principle of keeping everybody busy is important,
and leads to Lenin making all women, even married women, work all day
in Government offices, so that they will have no time at night to worry
themselves and their husbands about politics. The inertia which is such a
marked characteristic of the Muscovite mind makes the Russian difficult
to rouse, but it also makes him continue working at high pressure once he
has been thoroughly warmed up, and the Bolsheviks are cleverly utilizing
this psychological trait in the national character in order to keep
things “humming,” and to prevent people from falling back into their old
state of sluggishness.
In order to “keep things humming,” the Bolsheviks not only insist on the
Proletariat working: they also insist on their playing. Life among the
Reds is not only therefore a constant round of work, it is also a round
of amusements, lectures, Red picnics, Red athletic exhibitions, Red
swimming shows, and Red skating competitions. Certain days are devoted,
by Government decree, to certain “stunts.” There is a “Children’s Day,”
a “Woman’s Day,” a “Red Soldier’s Day,” a “Red Hospital Day,” a “House
Cleaning Week,” and many other fixtures of the same kind, which replace
the ancient religious holidays.
In order to give greater interest and a better organization to these
movements, newspapers are published temporarily in connection with each
of them. I have already spoken of how such newspapers are published by
the G.H.Q. of the Labour Army.
MOSCOW
The first night I ventured out into the streets of Moscow was one of
almost unbelievable gloom and depression. I was not met by brass bands
and Soviet motor-cars, as most of the English investigators have been
met; nevertheless, I venture to think that I saw as much of the real
Russia as they did. The first thing that struck me early in the night
was the great number of people, including feeble old men and delicate
young women, who were engaged in dragging along the street little sleighs
laden with firewood; and in some pitiful cases this work was rendered
impossible of accomplishment owing to the physical weakness of those
engaged in it, and to the fact that in many places the snow had all
melted, with the result that the sleighs got hopelessly embedded in
the mud or wedged immovably among the loose cobble-stones. Some of the
young ladies were in a state of utter exhaustion; apparently they had
been engaged all day in collecting fuel; their whole time was taken up
in attending to the most primitive necessities of themselves and those
dependent on them. Subsequent investigation showed me that this theory of
mine was correct, and that the Communist system tends inevitably to crush
all expression of genius, as it has never before been crushed even under
the most barbarous of the Ottoman Sultans. If a Shakespeare or a Shelley
arises in Red Russia, and refuses to make himself the mouthpiece for the
coarse, semi-educated leaders of the Reds, he will have to spend all his
time in getting himself bread, water, fuel, and clothing, and will have
no leisure left for any higher work.
When the night advanced and the darkness increased, there was not a
gleam of light in the streets, for there were no street lamps and no
shop-windows. There were also no trams for passengers, but, once an
hour or so, a solitary tramcar rushed madly uptown, flashing fire from
the electric wires overhead as it tore onwards. I was nearly run over
once or twice by these insane chariots, for the only possible place
for a pedestrian was right in the middle of the tramway track, and on
each side of the track there rose to the height of at least four feet a
solid rampart of frozen and excessively slippery snow and mud, which was
quite invisible in the darkness. I had some bad falls in consequence,
and on one occasion smashed my only pair of spectacles, with the result
that the chaos around me became more of a Dante’s inferno than ever. It
only needed those furious tramcars to give the last touch of unreality
and insanity to the whole incredible tableau. The desertion of the
streets, the disorder, the gloom charged with menace, the terrifying
and inexplicable sounds that smote the ear, combined to create the best
impression of the lower regions that it is possible to imagine. I have
often been at night, during the Great War, in deserted and shattered
villages of No Man’s Land, with corpses lying in the streets and enemies
hidden in the cellars, but none of them ever filled me with such fear as
did this Bolshevik Garden of Eden.
The night was bitterly cold, yet all the glass in the single crazy
tramcar had been broken, and the driver, who was the sole occupant, was
muffled up as if for an Arctic expedition. These cars carried, I believe,
the mails, or had some other sane reason for their insane speed; but
the enigma remained why, if they could run, other cars could not run
with passengers. Making all allowances, they seemed to be symbolical of
Bolshevism.
Three kinds of noise broke the midnight stillness of Moscow: first,
the rushing sound of these rickety tramcars lurching unsteadily over
the worn and uneven rails, with wildly clanging bells, and amid a
continuous shower of electric sparks which illuminated with a sickly and
unnatural light the dilapidated houses and the emaciated faces of the few
passers-by; secondly, a curious hooting of railway or other engines which
went on all night, and which, to me at least, remained mysterious and
inexplicable; thirdly, and most ominous of all, occasional stray shots in
the distance. I have compared the scene to a scene at the Front, but I
could almost imagine myself at times to be lost in the dark recesses of
an equatorial forest, listening to the nocturnal cries of wild animals.
BOLSHEVIK MODERNISM
The Communists claim to be ultra-modern, to be the last word in
scientific progress; and, in proof of this, they point to their
extraordinarily wide use of Wireless for newspaper purposes; and to
their vast schemes for the electrification of agriculture—schemes which
will introduce electric ploughing in one part of an Empire, where
the peasants in other parts are still ploughing with boughs of trees
dragged by bullocks. They point also to the extensive use they are
making, for Governmental and propaganda purposes, of that remarkable
system of advertisement by suggestion which is one of the most striking
developments of the twentieth century. They are utilizing the cinema for
educational work, and they speak with enthusiasm of the widespread use
they will make of other modern inventions, when the opening up of trade
relations with foreign countries enables them to import the necessary
apparatus. They will teach geography and history by the cinema, as well
as by the older methods. They will teach foreign languages and the
correct pronunciation of their own language by the aid of the gramophone
and the dictaphone. They will restore the theatre to its ancient position
as an educational instrument. In their schools they have already replaced
the Bible by Karl Marx, and substituted Esperanto for Latin and Greek,
and their next step will probably be to make Trotsky take the place of
Demosthenes. Not only have they adopted the Julian Calendar which, owing
to religious scruples, Old Russia boggled at for two hundred years, and
which even Peter the Great was not brave enough to carry through, but
they have also adopted the Daylight Saving Bill—though that measure is of
doubtful utility in Russia owing to the length of the days in summertime
and to their shortness in winter, as well as to the fact that the country
is mainly agricultural—and have even improved on it by putting on the
clock not once but three times a year.
The Omnipotent Five—Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Kamenev, and
Kristinsky—propose, in short, to cut themselves adrift altogether
from the past, and to turn their faces entirely towards the future.
They will harness modern science to the Socialist chariot, as Wilhelm
harnessed it to the Militarist; and, indeed, Russian Communism bears in
some respects a close resemblance to Prussian Militarism. The idea of
doing what Lenin is doing is not, of course, new. Russian professors
toyed with that idea before the Great War; Professor Struve, Wrangel’s
Minister of Foreign Affairs, was the first to translate Karl Marx into
Russian (an achievement for which he is now very sorry); and the Russian
Intelligentsia themselves are largely to blame for the general weakening
of faith in Christianity, and the general strengthening of belief in the
infallibility of science that has taken place in Russia during the last
twenty years. But, though apparently so up to date, this Bolshevik system
of education is thoroughly wrong, as the whole Bolshevik theory is wrong.
That theory, as it is now seen working in practice, has all the hardness
of the early Egyptian priestcraft; and, if it lasts for any length of
time, it will inevitably become a fossilized and intensely materialistic
religion of empty symbols, of barren rites and ceremonies. Though young,
it has already acquired all the jargon, mummery, hair-splitting, futile
and involved controversy and rotatory argument of an old and debased
superstition. The pundits of the Reds are more addicted to red tape
than the most retrograde Chinovniks of the Empire ever were. They quote
decrees, rescripts, and precedents with all the verbose obscurity of Old
Régime lawyers quoting ukazes and legal enactments; and, owing to the
many barbarous contractions they have invented, it is sometimes difficult
even for one knowing Russian to follow them. These Bolshevik decrees are
innumerable, and most of them are silly, but respect for them is imposed
by terror. Mr. Thomas, the acting British consul in Ekaterinburg, told me
once of a clown in a circus who, for joking somewhat coarsely about the
amazing legislative fecundity of the Soviet Government, was immediately
taken from the stage and shot.
Hypocrisy and insincerity permeate Bolshevism through and through. Even
now, while professing to be merely servants of the people, most of the
Bolshevik leaders live in comparative luxury. They wear on public
occasions the humble dress and high boots of the Russian working-man.
Trotsky, the most autocratic War Minister in the world, dresses as a
private soldier, shovels snow, and runs about the Kremlin with his own
messages. The big-wigs at the F.O. act as their own office-boys, and
carry on diplomatic conversations while repairing the handle of a door or
nailing up pictures on the wall. A time may come when the successor of
Tsar Lenin will appear on ceremonial occasions leaning on a symbolical
spade, and wearing on his bowler hat the republican crest of a crossed
hammer and scythe, as Wilhelm used to lean on a sword which he never
used, and to wear on his Imperial crown a Cross which taught him nothing.
But it will all be idle show. Lenin the Thirteenth, or whatever his
name and number is, will be none the less an autocrat because of his
wearing emblems, whose significance will have become lost in the mists of
antiquity.
Bolshevism, as I saw it, made the same impression on me as was made by
a carnivorous plant which I once saw trapping flies in the Kew Gardens.
Attracted by the bright red colour of the fatal plant, the giddy fly
alights unsuspectingly on the pitcher, crawls in, is stupefied by the
juice and the faint perfume, and, in the end, is slowly dissolved and
absorbed. I have seen the Red flag of Bolshevism have the same effect on
many young and ardent natures. I have seen living men swallowed by an
organism which is itself dead. Their initiative, their creative energy,
their immortal souls, are sucked out of them, and nothing is left but
mere husks of themselves, “hard, indigestible remains,” like that part of
the fly which is rejected by the insectivorous Nepenthes and Sarracenias
after the process of digestion has been completed.
TYPHUS
The mortality from typhus in Siberia ranged from 5 per cent. to 8 per
cent. in 1918, but in 1920 it reached 10 per cent. to 11 per cent. In
Taiga on February 1 nearly all the large railway stations had been
converted into typhus hospitals, and most of the cases lay on the bare
floor without blankets. I am told that many buildings in the town were
equally full, and that there were over 20,000 cases in Taiga alone.
There were two huge piles of unidentified dead bodies, one near the
station, the other some distance off; and in one hospital surgeons were
busily engaged in amputating gangrened limbs that had been frost-bitten.
There was only one doctor for every one hundred typhus cases. In the
district between Omsk and Krasnoyarsk practically all the medical men
had been attacked by typhus, and 50 per cent. of them had succumbed,
among them being the best doctors in Siberia. One doctor told me that
he found the mortality to be lowest among young illiterate peasants,
and highest among middle-aged people engaged in intellectual work. Not
the least horrible feature of the typhus horror in Russia is this fact,
that it reduces still lower the percentage of literates, always low in
Russia, and brought down to an infinitesimal figure by the murders and
the proscriptions of the Reds. The doctor I refer to had served with
Kolchak, and left Omsk in a staff train containing eight hundred staff
officers who had some chance of changing their linen; nevertheless, at
Krasnoyarsk, he had twenty-six corpses on the train. Sanitary conditions
on the other trains were frightful, and the percentage of deaths was
consequently greater. In the echelon of the Izhevsky Division about 50
per cent. of the passengers died.
It would be difficult for me to exaggerate the horror produced on my mind
by what I saw of the great typhus epidemic in Siberia and Russia. My
whole journey from Omsk to Krasnoyarsk, and from Krasnoyarsk to Moscow,
was overshadowed by this scourge, as well as by the venereal and the
other diseases which are fast eating away the vitality of the Russian
race, and my fears on the score of typhus were increased by what I saw of
the filthy personal habits of the Russians; some of them could not shake
the folds of their dress without sprinkling lice on everybody in their
immediate vicinity. My worst experience was in Moscow, where a man fell
ill of typhus in the compartment which I occupied in a railway carriage.
I fled from him in horror, and spent most of my time in the corridor, but
I could not keep my eyes off that fatal door inside which my belongings
were piled close to his. This patient had accumulated a large supply of
rusks, Siberian butter, and rum, but even his starving companions were
afraid to touch them. The terror of those awful, voiceless, creeping
things, whose bite is sickness, unconsciousness, physical collapse, and
sometimes death, protected those stores more effectively than anything
else could have done. For weeks afterwards I could not sit on the bunk
where the sick man had piled his clothes without being filled with a
morbid dread; and never, as long as I live, shall I be able to look a
body parasite in the face without a shiver, or to dread its infinitesimal
bite any less than I would dread the bite of a mad dog. Going through
Russia at the present moment is, owing to typhus alone, as dangerous as
going “over the top” was in France. The Soviet Republic is protected,
for this winter at least, against outside aggression by a triple shield
of hunger, typhus, and cold, but the strongest of these three is the
typhus. Instead of making one charitable towards the sick, this epidemic
develops in the healthy a deadly hatred of typhus patients, as if they
were murderers who meditated an attempt on one’s life, and for this
hatred the sick people themselves are sometimes to blame on account
of their criminal carelessness, their intense selfishness, and their
utter disregard for others. In the present atmosphere of Red Russia all
human charity withers away like flowers in Polar snow. Not even on the
battlefields of the Great War was death such an overpowering factor
in the situation as it is now in Russia. Behind Lenin’s head grins a
skeleton, and one can hardly ever converse with any Muscovite about his
friends and relations without hearing, sooner or later, the dreadful
word “dead.” Sometimes when I spoke to a man about his wife or children,
he took out of his pocket a photograph of a beautiful young woman and a
group of healthy children, and again I heard the phrase “died of typhus”
pronounced in as unconcerned a tone as that in which an Englishman might
say, “Gone to Brighton for the week-end.”
If the above remarks seem overstrained and morbid, the explanation lies
in the fact that they were all written, not in a clean British home, but
in that pestiferous railway carriage at Moscow, and that I transcribe
them here without the change of a syllable. Had I not had the writing
of these notes to occupy my mind with, I do not know what I should have
done during the interminable waits in railway carriages at desolate,
typhus-stricken stations on the Trans-Siberian, and especially during the
nightmare weeks that I passed side-tracked with a dying man in a dismal
swamp of mud and melting snow, outside a deserted halt on the outskirts
of Lenin’s Red Capital.
It is doubtful whether the wild educational efforts of the Bolsheviks
will ever compensate for the ravages of typhus among the Russian
_literati_, and for the other factors which have militated against the
spread of public instruction. For several years past most of the schools
in Russia have been used as hospitals and barracks. The old teachers have
mostly run away, and those who have taken their places have enthusiasm,
but not competence; and, as a result of these two circumstances joined
to the decimation of the _literati_, the new generation in Russia will
have hardly anything in common with the old. The stage has been swept
clear for an entirely new set of actors filled with most poisonous
ideas, devoid of any trace of Christianity, and bound to constitute for
centuries a centre of infection for the world. If any of the best parts
of the old civilization are retained, it will be due to the action of
many Russian mothers in teaching their children the great truths which
Lenin has set himself to crush. For the moment, however, it would seem as
if Lenin will simply drive Russia back into savagery, instead of teaching
her anything new. Most people are occupied so much in seeking for food,
clothing, and warmth, that they have no time to think of higher things,
and are rapidly drifting into barbarism. No books save poisonous ones
are published. There is a great scarcity of school-books and of Russian
classical writers. Nearly all the young men are either in the field
fighting, or else they are hiding in the woods to avoid conscription,
so that for some years they have read nothing, and the gentlest of
them have become very much roughened. Growing children have become
accustomed to the most awful sights of war, so that the new generation
is already ruined. The peasant is in a state of panic. Harried, robbed,
and flogged, first by one side and then by another, he sees his horses,
carts, sleighs, sons, and foodstuffs requisitioned. Many of the workmen
are trying to study, but, while their stomachs are empty, their heads
are full of wrong ideas, misty notions, and impossible expectations.
The interference of the Government with everything cannot be a success,
and the whole outlook for Russia is excessively gloomy. But nothing in
the present situation makes a more painful impression on one than the
dreadful wastage of human life which is going on unchecked.
CONDITIONS IN EKATERINBURG
I might add to the description of conditions in Ekaterinburg, which
I have given in Chapter XII., the following remarks, which I wrote
in shorthand in a notebook, while wandering about the streets of
Ekaterinburg:
“One shop advertised ‘Boots. Quick Repairs. All Kinds of Footwear.
Children’s Shoes a Speciality.’ I entered and found not a single boot
in the place, and not even a scrap of leather. I went to a dentist’s,
dentist fled; to a tailor’s, tailor present and correct, but no cloth,
thread, needles, or buttons; to a watchmaker’s, no watches; to a _café_,
no coffee; to a grocer’s, no groceries; to a milkman’s, no milk; to a
beer-hall, no beer; to a tea-house, no tea; to a carpenter’s, carpenter
sick of typhus; to a butcher’s, no meat save possibly the very small
quantity which may have covered the bones of a moribund, half-frozen
old man, sitting helplessly in an icy shop before an empty pair of
scales. What made these disappointments all the more heartrending was
the fact that, for the benefit of the illiterate, there were pictorial
representations on each shop of the articles supposed to be sold
within—fat cows, foaming pails of milk, tankards of beer, firkins of
butter, loaves of bread, and so on.”
THE RUSSIAN WHITES
My opinion of the Russian Whites I shall set down frankly, as it is of
importance, for our own future guidance, that my own countrymen, who have
not had an opportunity to go abroad, should know something of the class
they have been asked once, and may be asked again, to reimpose on Russia.
They are a class which has forgotten nothing and learnt nothing, and is
in every way unfit to rule. As soon as the White officers in Siberia
began to recover from the effects of the Red Terror to which they had
been subjected, they reverted at once to the courses which had brought
about their downfall. They intrigued in the most shameless manner for
posts in the rear, so that Kolchak had more officers in his G.H.Q. than
Foch had in his at the time of the Armistice. Thousands of those who
should have been at the Front spent practically all their time revelling
in Omsk. Regimental commanders neglected their soldiers for months, and
then treated them with brutal severity. Every British officer who served
with Denikin or Kolchak can give dozens of examples of this. I shall
confine myself to one. A regiment was sent from Tomsk to the Front in
the middle of 1919, but at Omsk the men sent a deputation to their C.O.
to say that they had no boots or clothing, and could not go further;
and, as a matter of fact, they had been swindled of their pay, rations,
and clothing by their own officers. The C.O. had several members of this
deputation shot and the remainder brutally flogged, with the result that
the whole regiment passed over to the Reds a few months afterwards. This
sort of thing made such a bad impression on our British troops, that they
became more or less demoralized, and, if a large British Army had been
sent into Russia, it would have become utterly corrupted. The Russian
Generals whom we supported became almost invariably reactionaries of
the worst type; their punitive expeditions into the villages turned all
Siberia against them; and, if they had ever reached Moscow, they would
have undoubtedly established there a régime in comparison with which the
Government of the Tsar would have seemed absurdly democratic.
In 1918 I travelled to Ekaterinburg in a Czech train, into which a
Russian General introduced himself without permission. Having done so, he
promptly got drunk at the expense of his involuntary hosts, whom he began
abusing as “mere prisoners of war, nothing more.” Under the Czech flag he
smuggled past his own Customs a large quantity of cigarettes, on which,
at Omsk, he made a profit of 20,000 roubles. Some of the Russian officers
who joined the British Mission frankly explained that they did so because
(1) they were not obliged to go to the Front, and (2) they were paid both
by the British and by the Russians.
The Intelligentsia spent half their time criticizing the British troops
for not going into the firing-line, and the other half in “wangling”
safe jobs for their own officer-sons in the rear. Kolchak’s newspapers
in Siberia were not allowed to make the faintest criticism on the
utterly inefficient Government of Omsk, but they were not prevented from
filling their columns with abuse of the English for not helping them
enough. I think they were even encouraged to make these attacks, as it
was considered that this display of independence tended to remove the
impression that Kolchak was a puppet of Whitehall—which he was.
The Russian _bourgeoisie_ are a kindly, soft, and gentle people, but,
brought up as they were under the protecting tyranny of the Tsardom, they
reminded me of domesticated animals let loose in a savage jungle. To put
it differently, the Russian Intelligentsia seems to be suffering from
shell-shock (or what I might call revolution-shock), with the result that
they turn all their venom on the Good Samaritans who minister to them,
and address no reproaches to the Levites who pass by on the other side
of the street and take no notice. In such cases the physician should be
firm as well as kind, but unfortunately we have in England many people
suffering as badly as the Russians from revolution-shock, who persist in
saying that we did not do half enough for Kolchak and Denikin.
To give one out of innumerable personal experiences, during the retreat
from Omsk a number of middle-class Russians, including young ladies and
aged people, were placed under the protection of the British party I
was with, and but for them none of us would have been captured. Among
them, wearing uniform and carrying a sword, was a young Russian who,
even in fleeing from the battlefield under a foreign flag, could not
restrain himself from criticisms of England for not having given Kolchak
sufficient assistance; and when, owing to their own utter helplessness,
the whole party was ultimately captured, they overwhelmed us with abuse.
Previous to that they had shown themselves to be impossible travelling
companions. We had very little water in our carriage, but they used all
of it for washing clothes, and then used the water we had obtained with
great difficulty for cooking purposes. One of our officers had a batman,
Private Smith, who had kindly consented to cook for all the officers, but
the Russians wanted us to force him to cook for them too, and could not
be made to understand that a British soldier cannot be forced to be a
batman at all, much less to cook for a crowd of foreign civilians. Their
attitude on this small question was the attitude of Kolchak and Denikin
on larger questions. Kolchak and Denikin wanted us to employ the British
Army in a way which would certainly have led to wholesale mutiny, and
probably have caused revolution at home and the bankruptcy of our Empire.
And, because we did not take their advice, they hated us like poison.
I speak thus frankly about them, because there is a danger that these
things will be overlooked by some British officials and officers anxious
for employment in Russia, and not sufficiently alive to the expense and
danger to their own country which further intervention in Russia would
entail.
WHITE TROOPS WHO JOINED THE REDS
During the first week I spent as a prisoner of war at Krasnoyarsk
the number of White officers who registered at the Red Commandant’s
office (where, by the way, we found Makarov, one of the British Mission
interpreters, acting as a Bolshevik employee, and professing to be a
red-hot Bolshevik himself) was: 20 Generals, 175 Staff officers, and
4,380 higher officers. The White soldiers who were drafted like cattle
into the Red Army, without having to go through any formality, numbered
24,000. For some weeks the peasants in villages near Krasnoyarsk busied
themselves in digging out of the snow guns, Generals, “Brass Hats,” and
rifles, which they surrendered, cold but more or less intact, to the
conquerors. One village presented to the Reds, as a peace-offering or
Christmas-box, one White General (slightly frost-bitten) and a battery
of 6-inch howitzers which had been supplied to Kolchak by the British
Government. The Staff officers, the Colonels, and even the great Brass
Generals were promptly reduced to the ranks, formed into awkward squads,
and drilled by a Red corporal in the barrack square. Some of them
seemed to have forgotten the very elements of drill, but the corporal
was merciful to them, and even prefaced on one occasion the welcome
command “Dismiss!” with the respectful Russian phrase for “Messieurs
les officiers,” though I am afraid that he spoke in sarcasm. About
two hundred White officers refused to serve in the Red Army, and were
consequently sent to work as convicts in the Ural mines. For these brave
men I was sincerely sorry, but I cannot honestly say that I was moved
to tears by the spectacle of the lazy and corrupt old Generals, who had
joined the ranks of the Red Army, being made to do an honest stroke of
work, probably for the first time in their lives. Many of the White
officers not only joined the Reds, but worked enthusiastically for them,
and were given positions of trust. A trusted Adjutant of General Sakharov
was in the Red force which captured us.
General Dutov’s adjutant, Bogdanov, who was captured by the Reds in
September of that year, is now a Red Propagandist who has had great
success among the Cossack _stanitzi_, and many of the Russian officers,
who were attached to the British Missions in Siberia and elsewhere in
Russia, are now working far harder for the Reds than ever they worked
against them. Lieutenant Hahn, an ex-Guards officer who was attached
to the British Military Mission in Omsk, is now at the head of the Red
Extraordinary Commission in Irkutsk, and unfortunately this is only one
name out of many. This weakness on the part of the Russian Imperialists
themselves had far more to do with the defeat of the anti-Bolshevik
effort in 1919 than any weakness on the part of the Entente, yet the
Entente is bitterly blamed for that defeat by the Russian reactionaries,
who never by any chance think of asking themselves if there was any fault
on their side. I have remarked in Chapter XIX. how aptly the words of
Burke on the French Terrorists may be applied to the Bolshevik leaders.
His indictment of the “Marais” of 1798 is no less applicable to the
Russian anti-Bolsheviks, whose flabbiness has disgusted most of the
British officers who have had to do with them during the last two years.
“They are nothing more nor better than men engaged in desperate designs
with feeble minds. They are not honest; they are only ineffectual and
unsystematic in their iniquity.” “They can serve no cause,” he says in
another place, “because they have no cause at heart.... They have not
been guilty of great crimes, but it is only because they have not energy
of mind to rise to any height of wickedness.” “They are of a tame, timid,
languid, inert temper wherever the welfare of others is concerned.”
As for the railway material lost by the Whites in Siberia, the Reds
told me that they captured 20,000 railway waggons between Omsk and
Krasnoyarsk, and over 3,000 locomotives, 600 of which were taken at
Novo-Nikolaevsk alone. Nearly all these engines were derelicts that had
cumbered the line for years, or machines that had “gone cold” or been
damaged during the retreat, so that the Siberian line is in an extremely
bad condition as regards engines. The captured trucks are useless,
for the Reds have already more waggons than they can make use of. The
enlightened policy of Sverdlov, the Bolshevik Minister of Railways, in
employing ex-railway officials of the Omsk Government, is giving rise to
much opposition on the part of the workmen, who threatened at Omsk to
take from the train in which I travelled seven of these “Kolchakovsky
officers,” as they called them. These officials, being at the mercy of
every workman, find it hard to get any work done. One of them told me
that he would much prefer to be a workman. The Executive Committee of
the Communists in Moscow has come to the assistance of the “_bourgeois_
specialists,” however, both by direct decrees and by explanatory
articles in the Bolshevik Press, to the effect that, being at present
indispensable to the State, they must be retained and even paid high
salaries, until the workmen produce thoroughly Bolshevik engineers
of equal competence to take their places. Lenin cannot see that the
professional self-respect of these new experts must necessarily make them
as much a class apart from the ignorant workmen, as did the professional
pride of the old experts.
TRADE WITH CAPITALIST COUNTRIES
As for trade with capitalist countries, there are two schools of thought
among the Bolsheviks. Lenin, Trotsky, Zinoviev, and several other leaders
think that, even if it be a danger, it is absolutely necessary at
present, as otherwise they will never be able to overcome their transport
difficulties, or to get their factories going. But they contend that it
will be an even greater danger to outer Powers than to themselves, owing
to the facilities it will give their propaganda in foreign countries.
They admit that trade between a Government on one side and private
firms on the other will be very difficult, but are convinced that all
difficulties will be eventually overcome by the whole outside world
becoming Bolshevik. They confess that the Soviet Government does not
stand much chance of surviving unless all the other Governments in Europe
become Bolshevik too. Hence their nervousness and the extreme importance
they attach to foreign propaganda.
The second school of thought is represented by Bukharin, Radek, and the
Cheka, which is fearful of the effect of foreign trade on the Bolshevik
movement in Russia. Radek has expressed that misgiving in the _Izvestia_,
where he declared that the Entente, having failed to conquer them by
force of arms, now intends to conquer them by a much more dangerous
weapon—namely, the opening up of trade relations—which will involve the
flooding of Russia with agents of capitalism. This second school thinks
that the Soviet system must be given time to harden, as the Shogunate
system in Japan required a century to harden before it had cemented the
Japanese race, and rendered totally impossible the conquest of Daï-Nippon
either by Christian ideas or by Christian arms.
One Bolshevik said to me quite confidently: “The re-establishment of
commercial relations between Russia and the outside world will ultimately
lead to the overthrow first of the financial system, and secondly of
the political system of the European States. The gold value has ceased
to exist in Russia: we mean to abolish all money; and a new value,
based perhaps on the price of bread, will have to be created. The
change is bound to affect, sooner or later, the financial and political
system of the rest of Europe. Trade cannot be carried on between a
Socialist Government which has no currency, and a number of private
firms in capitalistic Governments which have a currency, without new and
far-reaching changes resulting in the capitalistic countries.”
THE IMPERIAL FAMILY
The birth of each of the Tsar’s daughters had, in turn, been a bitter
disappointment to the parents, so that the girls grew up neglected
Cinderellas, who, perhaps, for this very reason, became all the more
beautiful in mind and body. The Imperial couple were morbidly anxious to
have a boy. Every Saint in the Russian calendar was appealed to, while
the intercession of living “Saints,” like Father John of Kronstadt,
was continually implored, and God only knows how many pilgrimages
were undertaken, and how many prayers and Masses were offered up in
monasteries and convents, for the same end. The Empress became morbidly
obsessed by the idea of bringing a man-child into the world, and there
is no knowing how many night-long petitions she offered up to God in her
oratory for that purpose, or how much money she bestowed on pious quacks
of the Rasputin type. She even pressed science into her service, as well
as religion, and the Austrian doctor Schenk was brought at great expense
to Tsarskoe Selo, in order to put into practice there his theory for
pre-determining the sex of infants. He failed, and the Tsarina turned
again to Heaven with a fervour that seems to have permanently affected
her mind. When, finally, God granted her a son, her joy was soon alloyed
by the discovery that he was tainted with the hereditary disease of her
family, and she addressed herself once more to religious quacks with
results which finally cost her both her throne and her life. It has
been pointed out to me since this book was placed in the hands of the
publisher that, owing to his illness, the lad’s education was certainly
neglected; and it is at all events certain that this young Prince never
lived to attain his sixteenth year. On the other hand, the comparative
neglect in which the girls were allowed to grow up counterbalanced the
pride natural to their high position, with the result that they had, at
the time of their murder, developed into unaffected, charming, and highly
accomplished young women. Had the Tsaritsa not been born, or had his
father, on seeing the sickly condition of his son, proclaimed the eldest
daughter his successor, the nation might have rallied around this young
woman, with the result perhaps that there would have been no revolution,
and that Olga would have proved herself as great as Catherine without
Catherine’s vices.
The Grand Duchesses were, at the time of their death, in the full glory
of young womanhood, but the face of their mother bore those tragic signs
of middle age which she could no longer conceal by elaborate coiffures,
perfect dress, and a dazzling display of pearls calculated to withdraw
the spectator’s eye from the faded face. The Empress had a passion for
jewelry, which was carried so far in 1906, when I lived in Petrograd,
that it was thought to indicate monomania. This helps to explain why she
brought so much jewelry with her into exile.
Yurovsky’s drowning of the Tsar’s last words reminds us of how Santerre
cried out with uplifted hand “Tambours!” at the execution of Louis the
Sixteenth, in order to drown the voice of the condemned King.
LENIN
Lenin’s strong convictions, combined with his extreme narrowness of mind,
make him a terrible antagonist. His convictions are so strong that all
reasoning is lost on him, and he has none of that foresight which leads
to doubt. He has more than once shown that he is ready to sacrifice
himself for his ideas, and that the very instinct of self-preservation
is obliterated in him. This intensity of faith gives great power of
suggestion to his words, and leads to his imposing himself in an
astonishing manner on the Communist party. He has succeeded in arousing
in their souls that formidable force known as Faith, the most tremendous
of all forces at the disposal of humanity. Like all crowds, the Communist
party bows to strength of will, energy, and conviction. In comparison
with Lenin, Lloyd George is only a subtle rhetorician without moral
earnestness or strong convictions.
Lenin is hypnotized by the philosophical ideas of Marx, and is employing
his gigantic propaganda organization to spread them, exactly as
Robespierre was hypnotized by the philosophical ideas of Rousseau, and
employed the propaganda organization of the French Republic to make
them known. He believes that he has the secret of earthly happiness,
and people who believe very strongly that they are in possession of the
secret of earthly or eternal happiness inevitably display intolerance and
fanaticism, accompanied by a blind submission to a political or religious
formula, an inability to discuss that formula, a tendency to regard
as enemies all those who refuse to accept it, and an intense itch for
propaganda.
Despite his warlike panoply and his constant desire to overawe, the
ex-Kaiser represented a lesser danger to the world than does Lenin with
his unassuming manner, his unfashionable exterior, and the real modesty
with which he regards himself as merely the foam on top of a great
seismic wave, with whose formation he had nothing to do. As a matter of
fact, he is perhaps the most startling figure which has appeared in the
world during this century, and there is more of peril to civilization
in his hard laugh than there was in all the theatrical mouthings of
the Kaiser, or in all the barbaric militarism of Peter and Catherine.
Even now the cloaked and belted figure of Wilhelm is gradually becoming
transformed before our eyes into that of a respectable country gentleman,
whose end will probably be peaceful and even edifying. But the awful
fascination exercised over men’s minds by the Red Tsar, by this terrible
_homme qui rit_ of these apocalyptic times, increases daily, as he
comes more and more within the dark shadow of the unknown, unavoidable
cataclysm in which he will finally go down, dragging perhaps our
civilization with him. Meanwhile, however, the world, having spent all
its strength in overthrowing Prussianism, finds itself naked and unarmed
in front of a far greater menace.
The following is a specimen of Lenin’s hard style of eloquence:
“I read in the English newspapers that all the victories of the
Bolsheviks are due to their propaganda. This is very flattering, but,
as a matter of fact, the people of Siberia and of South Russia have had
a lengthy experience of both Red and White Propaganda, and they have
apparently made up their minds that the Red Propaganda is true and the
White Propaganda untrue. The Red Propaganda was not more skilful than
the White Propaganda, backed up as the latter was by the unlimited
paper and the inexhaustible technical resources of England, France, and
America. The only advantage it had was that it was true. In the judgment
of the people the actions of Kolchak and Denikin spoke louder than their
propaganda, and gave that propaganda the lie. As Denikin advanced, the
great landowners by whom he was surrounded took possession of their
estates again, and chased away the peasants, despite all Denikin’s
proclamations to the effect that he would let the peasants keep the land
which they had taken.”
Another specimen:
“Formerly it was said, ‘Each for himself and God for us all,’ and how
much suffering did not the application of this principle cause in the
world! Our motto is: ‘Each for all, and without God we will nevertheless
go forward.’ ... We used to send 700 million poods of bread out of
this country every year, and this export trade enriched a small group
of Russian and foreign millionaires, but left the Russian workmen and
peasants starving. That system is bad on the face of it, and it will now
be changed. In future the Russian workmen and peasants will first be fed,
and if there is anything left over it will be exported abroad.”
As a final example of Lenin’s style I shall quote from the
_Social-Democrat_ of November 11, 1914, his statement of the position he
took up during the Great War:
“The duty of the Socialist during the armed Imperialistic conflict of the
_bourgeoisie_ of all nations is to preach the Class War, and to do all
that in him lies to convert this struggle of the nations into universal
Civil Strife. Down with the sentimental, foolish, and stupid cry of
‘Peace at any price!’ Let us raise aloft the banners of civil war!”
It almost seems at times as if, in Lenin, Antichrist had at last
appeared on earth. Christ’s greatest commandment was love; Lenin’s is
hate. He teaches workmen to hate their employers, peasants to hate
their landlords, Jews to hate Christians, soldiers and sailors to hate
officers, laymen to hate priests, citizens to hate their magistrates,
apprentices to hate their masters, shoppers to hate shopkeepers, the
poor to hate those who are less poor, the ignorant to hate those who are
less ignorant. And there is no denying the fact that, in the present
period of universal bitterness and universal disillusion, of intense
hatred among subject peoples for their masters, among beaten nations
for their conquerors, and, even among conquerors for each other, he has
hit upon a principle of action which may lead to the undermining and
collapse of our whole civilization. The distrust and suspicion with which
he is inoculating Europe, at a time when Christian charity and mutual
confidence are absolutely necessary, may very well be the end of Europe;
and, unfortunately, he is assisted very much by the fact that it is
easier to make men hate than love, criticize than approve, distrust than
confide; by the discovery of obvious defects in our economic system, and,
worst of all, by a continual succession of mistakes and miscalculations
on the part of the statesmen who are opposed to him.
THE SOVIET GOVERNMENT
Russia is ruled by a Committee rather than by a party, and a Committee
has always been the most impersonal, and, in consequence, the most
oppressive form of tyranny, owing to the fact that the leaders who direct
it are freed from all responsibility, and are in a position to do just
as they please, because they are supposed to speak and act in the name
of a collectivity. The Committees of the French Revolution carried out
proscriptions such as the most savage tyrant never ventured upon, and,
owing to the ignorance of the lower classes in Russia and the apathy of
the upper classes, the Bolshevik Committee has been able to perpetrate
atrocities such as even Robespierre would have boggled at. The Bolshevik
Government is irresponsible, impersonal, and perpetual; and no more
oppressive despotism could be imagined.
To look at it from a somewhat different angle, its principal weakness is
that it contains too many orators and writers, and too few technical and
administrative experts, and that it has to deal with a disorganization
worse even than the disorganization of Europe after the fall of the
Roman Empire. The majority of the technical experts are not in sympathy
with Bolshevism. Many of them are strongly opposed to it. Some are dull,
old, routine, red-tape bureaucrats handed down from Tsarist days, and
constituting a drag rather than an assistance, but it is impossible for
the Reds to dispense with them at the present moment owing to their
special knowledge and their extensive experience. Even if specialists
arise from the midst of the Proletariat, as Lenin says they will, they
also will be anti-Bolshevik. It is impossible for them to be otherwise.
Lenin’s power really rests on the great mass of skilled and unskilled
labour. The shock-battalions which overcame Denikin, Yudenich, and
Kolchak were composed almost entirely of skilled workmen, but they are
rapidly ceasing to be workmen and are becoming professional soldiers or
office-holders.
It is surprising how many of the Russian revolutionaries employed by
the Soviet are not Bolsheviks: in fact, it is difficult to find a
thorough Bolshevik among them. They defend themselves, however, by saying
that they had to support Lenin because he was the only man capable of
overthrowing Kerensky, who was such a weak doctrinaire that, if he
had not been upset by a Revolution from the Left, he would certainly
have been unseated by a Counter-Revolution from the Right. They also
maintain that the Russian Revolution could not possibly have been a
direct movement from an abnormal state of things, such as existed under
the Tsardom, to a normal condition with liberty for all. The previous
abnormality rendered unavoidable the creation of a temporary abnormality
in the opposite direction. The popular ignorance was so great, and the
disorganization of life so profound, that people would simply not have
worked at all had a dictatorship of the Proletariat not been established.
The Social-Revolutionaries with their pathetic belief in the peasant
as opposed to the workman, their weak philanthropy, and their endless
talking and theorizing, joined to a total incapacity for action and
a fixed delusion in favour of giving complete liberty to everybody,
would have lost for Russia the fruits of the first Revolution. The
Social-Revolutionaries were dreamers, who thought they could build an
enduring structure on the ancient Socialism of the Russian peasant, on
that Socialism which was shown in the _mir_. But the _mir_ no longer
exists, nor the Socialism of the peasant either. They would have built on
sand. Only the Bolsheviks, that is, the workmen themselves, could ever
have made a tired, hungry, and disorganized Proletariat toil for ten
hours a day.
My own strongest objection to Bolshevism is that its existence in Russia
strengthens reaction in every other country, and continues the abnormal
situation brought about in the domestic politics of those countries by
the war.
MY BOLSHEVIK TRAVELLING COMPANIONS
On the occasion of my journey to Ekaterinburg with Soviet engineers,
I found that, after the train started, my companions solemnly formed
themselves into what they called a Soviet, but which I would call an
ordinary mess, and formally invited me to join, which, of course, I
did. Communistic ideas run in this way through all the life of the good
Bolshevik, but the result is rather amusing than otherwise. I have often
heard a Red say, out of habit, to a comrade, “This is mine”; and the
reply, given in the voice of a fanatic stating a religious dogma, was
always the same: “It is not yours. It is ours. There is no longer private
property.” As a matter of fact, there _was_ private property; each
Bolshevik had at least his own clothes, while many of them had much more
property which was absolutely his own.
I found some of my companions on this journey wearing honest Bradford
cloth, and eating with trusty Sheffield steel which, being smiths
themselves and having had lamentable experience of Japanese knives,
they thoroughly appreciated. Among the Russian workmen the manufactured
products of Great Britain have done more, in my opinion, to sustain a
belief in England’s greatness than all the victories of Nelson and all
the glory of our Old Nobility. The Bolsheviks say that the workmen who
make such excellent wares will one day rule England and be their brothers.
As I have just alluded to dress, I might here remark that, if Bolshevism
continues much longer, there is a serious likelihood of the Russians
reverting to the ancient Scythian costume of skins. I have seen very
many peasants wearing trousers made out of ordinary sacking with the name
of some guano firm on the seat.
We had, by the way, as a servant in our train a most respectable-looking
individual with mutton-chop whiskers, whom at first, despite my constant
practice to think evil of nobody, I was inclined to put down as having
been an habitual lawyer. On being jokingly addressed once as “old
_bourgeois_,” this respectable-looking personage fairly exploded with
wrath. “Even in jest,” he spluttered, “you should not apply that term to
any human being.”
But, on the other hand, as I afterwards discovered in Moscow, the term
“Tavarisch” (Comrade) has become a term of contempt among the technical
and political experts employed by the Reds. To them it means an unkempt,
unshaven person enveloped in a dirty sheepskin coat and without the
slightest knowledge or experience to fit him for the post into which he
has been pitchforked.
THE RED LABOUR ARMY
All the news in the _Tocsin_, the organ of the Red Labour Army, was set
out just as war news used to be set out in the English newspapers during
the Great War. Under the general heading of “News from the Front,” there
was a collection of dispatches from the different Labour “Fronts,” and
one of the early issues of the _Tocsin_ bore, as a “screaming” headline,
the words, “Our First Victory.” Beneath it was a triumphant account of
the repair by the Red Labour Army of a bridge over the Kama at Perm,
which the retreating Whites had blown up. The Red journalists go on the
principle that “peace hath her victories, no less renowned than war,” and
accordingly celebrate the battles of peace with headlines as large as
those which announced in English newspapers the Battle of the Marne.
I might here add that in those newspapers they have even got a “Roll of
Honour,” containing the names of workmen who died in mines, factories,
and hospitals. For example, an account of a Red soldier who died while
carrying out anti-typhus measures was headed: “The First Victim in the
Great War. Soldier Dies while Fighting the Worst Enemy of the Republic.”
The Bolsheviks are trying to arouse as much enthusiasm among boys over
industrial triumphs as the militarists used to arouse among boys over
military triumphs. Pictures of charging cavalry are replaced in boys’
magazines by pictures of miners saving entombed comrades. Instead
of soldiers charging trenches, happy workmen charge into their own
factories, eager to resume work. Blazing camp-fires on the battlefield
are replaced by the red glow of colossal blast-furnaces. A youth
hammering at an agricultural instrument on an anvil replaces the youth
in military dress who hammers in an opponent’s head with the butt-end of
his rifle. There is a glorification in boys’ papers, not of piracy, but
of farming; not of mechanism for destroying life, but of mechanism for
preserving it and adding to its comfort.
WORKMEN IN FACTORIES
Trotsky has admitted that 30 per cent. of the skilled workmen in
industrial areas have fled to the villages, where most of them opened
little one-man repairing shops. Mr. Keeley, an American engineer, who
was allowed to make very careful investigations, discovered the exact
percentage to be 60. In one Moscow factory which he visited, Mr. Keeley
found the names of 1,600 workmen inscribed in the books, but over 400 of
these were permanently engaged on “political work” and never turned up at
the factory, though they were paid by it. The work of the remainder was
60 per cent. below the pre-war work of the same number of men, but I am
told that the same decrease of output is noticeable in Western factories.
THE MILITARY POSITION IN SIBERIA
The only foreign mercenaries I saw in the Red Army were (1) an
International Battalion in process of formation at Ekaterinburg. It
was composed of ex-prisoners of war—Magyars, Letts, and Germans—and
the British soldiers were invited to join it, but did not do so; (2) a
battalion of Chinese soldiers quartered in an extemporized barrack near
the Municipal Theatre in Ekaterinburg. They were all coolies who had been
brought into Russia by the Imperial Government to constitute a Labour
Battalion during the Great War, and who, after the war, were prevented
by the Allies from returning to China. They are armed, equipped, and
drilled in the Russian fashion, and have fought on various fronts, but
when I saw them they were not doing military work, being only employed
in shovelling snow from the railway track. It would be unjust to say
that they are especially ferocious, or that they are the mainstay of the
Soviet Government.
At Novo-Nikolaevsk, on my return journey with the Reds, I found the
German ex-Rittmeister, von Blücher, acting as commander of the 30th
Division, which was stationed at Novo-Nikolaevsk, and as military
commandant of the town. It was lucky for us that he was not in command
of the force which captured us, for he is anti-English, and, being a
Prussian, holds strict views about the treatment of war prisoners. He is
a capable officer, however, and his relegation to the rear is probably
due to Communist distrust of military talent even among themselves.
The 3rd Army is at Ekaterinburg, and is now the 1st Labour Army. All the
houses on Lenin Street, the principal street, from the Café “Orange”
to the house opposite the town theatre, are occupied by the barracks
and offices of a semi-military, semi-police force, which is now to be
met with in all the large towns of Russia, and which is known as “the
Force for the Internal Defence of the Republic.” The soldiers of this
battalion fall in every morning, punctually at 9 a.m., in the street
outside their quarters. They are inspected, and, after inspection, they
divide into half a dozen different groups, and march off in good order
to different parts of the town. They are well armed with Russian rifles,
have plenty of ammunition, and are well dressed. This battalion remains
under arms, and is not to be incorporated in the Labour Army. All the
other troops in town are comfortably housed in barracks, well fed,
well equipped, and well armed. The same remark applies to the troops
in Omsk and Novo-Nikolaevsk. There were no troops in Taiga when I went
through, all of them having moved east. The G.H.Q. 5th Army was at Tomsk,
but preparations were being made for its reception in Krasnoyarsk on
January 28, the day I left that town. Those entrusted with making these
preparations said that the whole 5th Army was coming to Krasnoyarsk, and
that they would remain four days there and then move east. An artillery
brigade, several squadrons of cavalry, and a detachment of military
engineers were also expected in Krasnoyarsk. At Omsk and Novo-Nikolaevsk
I saw four or five military trains conveying Red troops eastwards. The
Reds are certainly sending large forces into Eastern Siberia, and they
are just as certainly sending on in advance Commissars provided with
false passports, who say that they will easily undermine and overthrow
the S.R. republics in Eastern Siberia. I met one of those envoys at the
house of a Bolshevik functionary in Krasnoyarsk. He was leaving for
Vladivostock the same day.
Besides the “Force for the Internal Defence of the Republic,” each town
has a large police force, but it is called a “National Militia.” These
forces, taken together, should be strong enough to maintain internal
order.
The map, which was shown me to illustrate Trotsky’s grandiose scheme
for converting an army of soldiers into an army of labourers, gave the
location of all the Red troops in the Urals. They stretch, roughly
speaking, from Ekaterinburg to Chelyabinsk, and include a detachment of
about 5,000 Red cavalry whose horses were being used, on February 1,
to carry wood to the railway line and to cart away snow. The horsemen
themselves were employed in similar work. Several military engineering
units were stationed at Zlatoust and another industrial town in the
Urals, and were helping to repair the railway and the factories, but
Trotsky refused to let them be broken up, though only in that way could
their technical experience be fully utilized. A Bolshevik official
pointed out to me some soldiers belonging to a unit which had come
from Orenburg, and drew my attention to the fact that they were being
kept together so as to be prepared in case of any aggression from the
direction of India or Persia.
In the Krasnoyarsk, Minusinsk, Irkutsk, and Trans-Baikal regions,
the Reds are encouraging the formation of partisan bands, strictly
subordinate to them. S. Mamantov, the leader of the Minusinsk partisans,
says that he is at the head of 10,000 men, armed entirely with rifles
taken from trains which he held up. Those rifles were, he thinks, being
sent by the English, French, and Japanese, to Kolchak at Omsk. There
is now a plentiful supply of arms and ammunition in Siberia, not only
for the regular Red Army, but also for all the partisan bands which
the Soviet Government may raise. On the other hand, these arms may be
ultimately turned against the Reds, for Bolshevism has swallowed in
Siberia more White troops than it can ever digest, and in some towns
I could hardly tell whether I was amongst Bolshevik or anti-Bolshevik
soldiers. Besides, the Red Army organization leaks very much. All the
way from Omsk to Ekaterinburg Red stragglers tried to board trains, and
were repulsed from them with far more brusqueness than was ever shown to
the White stragglers boarding Kolchak’s trains. Their condition in the
bitterly cold weather was pitiable. They had no food, were not allowed
to sleep in the stations or in the towns, and proposed to travel on
foot to destinations as distant as the Volga and beyond. On expressing
my surprise once to a Commissar at the roughness with which he treated
soldiers and workmen, I was told that only the representative of a
Workers’ Government could act in that manner towards lazy members of
the Proletariat. “In England,” quoth this Commissar, “your capitalist
Government is afraid of the workmen, and consequently it is always
flattering them, throwing them sops, and making them promises which it
can never fulfil. By this means it is trying to postpone the evil day
when the workers will seize everything, but here the workers _have_
seized everything, and we, as their representatives, have a perfect
right to speak in a tone of authority to railwaymen, factory-hands, and
soldiers, who are not doing their duty to the State.”
THE EDUCATION OF THE PROLETARIAT
In the chapter entitled “Trotsky in Ekaterinburg,” I speak of “butchers’
boys who had qualified for professorships.”
A typical paragraph of this kind, which was headed “A Peasant’s Son,”
tells how Ivan Polukarov, the son of a Siberian peasant, entered the Red
Academy of the General Staff two years ago when he was twenty-three, and
became, at the end of that time, an able Staff officer. The papers are
full of news about the opening of new schools for workmen by the Soviet
Government and the Professional Unions. There are long descriptions of a
school for artists opened recently at Nizhni-Novgorod—free courses in
studio work, drawing, painting, and sculpture; school for agricultural
experts opened at Tambov—220 students; handicraft schools in Spassky
(Ryzansky Government) for bookbinders, coopers, and basket-makers. It is
announced that all the Russian factories are working overtime, and that
the workmen are giving the money thus earned to the Red Army, which also
receives from the Government the articles thus manufactured. I know,
however, that the number of Russian factories which are doing any work at
all is very negligible. There is certainly a great intellectual ferment,
but not much solid work is done owing, as the Reds themselves confessed
to me, to the following reasons: (1) There are too many Government
departments, and they only get in one another’s way; (2) the departmental
machinery is excessively complicated; (3) the departmental chiefs waste
their time in letting crowds of people see them, and have consequently
no time to do any real work; (4) heads of departments draw up ambitious
programmes which are “scrapped” on account of those heads being very
frequently changed; (5) a great waste of energy in all directions and a
great overlapping of work. Almost everything of technical or scientific
value which the Bolsheviks have done is based on plans, specifications,
and preparatory work which were carried out under the Old Régime. All the
technical reports which I saw the Bolshevik chiefs working on had been
compiled in the time of the Tsar.
My eye was once caught by the following headline in a Bolshevik
newspaper: “Illiteracy Must No Longer Exist.” The article of which it was
the caption told of how the Soviet of Krasnokokshaisky Uyezd, Kazunsky
Government, had decided “to abolish illiteracy in the case of all persons
of both sexes between the ages of seventeen and fifty.” As there were not
enough teachers to carry out this laudable decree, literate peasants were
made to teach the illiterates. This “revolt against illiteracy,” as the
Bolsheviks call it, is common all over Russia, and it is considered such
a disgrace for a soldier in the Red Army to be unable to read and write
that comrades able to do so teach him.
A Commissar once described to me the career of Budyonin, the Red cavalry
leader who was once an officer’s batman and is now one of the Soviet’s
most successful Generals. “There is always,” he added, “at least as much
talent in the masses as in an equal number of the classes; and, owing to
their great numerical superiority, the whole bulk of the masses have far
more talent latent in them than all the _bourgeoisie_ and aristocracy
put together. We are basing our whole system of government on that
principle, and the facts of life are on our side. Take England. A son
of the governing classes there gets an expensive education at Oxford,
and may, when he leaves Oxford, enter public life and rise easily, if
he has even moderate talent, to the top of the tree. A poor man, though
he may have far greater talent, has nothing like the same chance.
Ill-educated and handicapped, he struggles till he is forty at making
himself financially independent; and at forty his spirit is broken and
he cannot do much. There are exceptions, of course, but only a fool will
say that in England the son of a poor man has, as a rule, an equal chance
with a scion of your ‘great governing families.’ Every revolution proves
that what you call ‘the lower classes’ is an inexhaustible reservoir of
talent, and that the oligarchs are generally dull, pompous, and selfish
old men whose master passion in life is to keep the monopoly of power as
much as possible in their own families. The present decay of governmental
authority in capitalist countries is partly due to the fact that, under
the extreme stress of the war, the various imperialistic Governments were
compelled to let outsiders have access to their political and military
secrets, and to see the various Grand Lamas hidden away in the recesses
of their Courts, Cabinets, and War Offices, with the result that a large
number of honest men are disgusted by the fools they met with in high
places and by the idiocy of the policies which those fools pursued. The
High Priests of the Temple of Capitalism are now trying to replace the
veil that hid the faces of those oracles from the profane gaze of the
vulgar, but it is too late. The spell is broken; the sordid secrets are
revealed; and the end of it all will most certainly be—Bolshevism.
“Compare the disgusting flabbiness of the Romanovs and of the ‘gentry,’
officer, and _bourgeois_ classes in this country with the alertness and
resolution of the Russian workmen.
“You English think that a cavalry leader like Haig can only arise in
an aristocratic family. The Russian Imperialists thought so too, and
therefore they selected Mamontov to lead Denikin’s cavalry. We opposed to
him Budyonin, an officer’s batman, who soon swept Mamontov off the face
of the earth. You say that Budyonin is no longer one of the people, that
he must necessarily develop like Murat, Hector MacDonald, Sir William
Robertson, and other talented plebeians, and join a higher class. But
he will do nothing of the kind, for he is a strong Bolshevik, and will
always be one of the Proletariat. This is the difference between our
revolution and all the revolutions that have gone before. Our statesmen
and soldiers will always remain with the people, not only because of
their own strong Communist principles, but also because, once they ceased
to belong to the people, they would be destroyed either by the people or
by the old gang, which having, like all _emigrés_, learnt nothing and
forgotten nothing, would come back wanting their old places.”
The utterer of the above tirade was M. Dovgolevsky, a Socialist who has
passed most of his life in Western Europe, and who is now trying to
reorganize the Russian railways. The weak point in his argument is this:
The ruling class in the West may be as weak and foolish as he makes them
out to be, but the same number of workmen would prove to be infinitely
more corrupt. They have already proved so in Russia. A ruling class must
be raised above temptation of corruption by some kind of pride—pride of
caste, pride of birth, or pride of intellect; but rule by a Proletariat
or by those “Money-bags of Mammon,” whom Carlyle so roundly denounced,
and to which, unfortunately, we are all tending, is bound to be a corrupt
and despicable kind of rule. Both the English and the German bureaucrat
were comparatively honest, because they had one or other of the above
kinds of pride, though in many cases they were worse off financially than
if they had been in business. For the same reason the British officer
at the head of a patrol generally showed more self-sacrifice than a
non-commissioned officer would have done. Our British Army probably
contains some of the stupidest officers and the smartest N.C.O.’s in the
world, yet if the former were all displaced suddenly by the latter, as in
Russia, who that knows the army can doubt that the private would suffer
by the change?
INDEX
Achinsk, 4
Advertising, science of, 97
Afghanistan, Amir of, envoys from Lenin, 223
Agafonov, Gregory, 137
Alapaievsk, 83
Alexandra, Tsarina of Russia:
murdered, 132-138, 172;
cremated, 154-166;
mode of concealing her jewels, 158, 167;
life at Tobolsk, 183;
attends Mass, 184;
birth of a son, 328;
appearance, 329;
passion for jewelry, 329
Alexis, Tsarevich of Russia:
at Ekaterinburg, 127;
murdered, 132-138, 172;
cremated, 154-166;
lameness, 173;
education, 178, 180
Alexis, Tsarevich of Russia, prophecy of, 136
Alferov, Michael, 155
Anarchists, doctrine, 202
Anastasia, Grand Duchess:
murdered, 132-138, 172;
cremated, 154-166
Anthony, Bishop, 264
Balabanova, 205
Barrakatula, Professor, at Moscow, 222
_Bednota_, the, 293
Birkmanns, John, 203, 205
Bleezdale, Mr., 275
Blücher, General von, in command at Novo-Nikolaevsk, 84, 335
Bogdanov, 326
Bogotol, 21
Boivoud, Victor, 140
Bokhara, revolution, 223
Bolotnaya, 12
Bolsheviks, the, policy, xi, 42-46, 77, 106, 113, 292;
atrocities, 37;
characteristics, 47, 49, 54, 62, 244;
use of the colour red, 64;
elections, 119;
wish to evangelize English workmen, 203;
International propaganda, 204, 206;
revolutionary views, 210-219, 286;
literature, 212-215;
theatres, 217;
“atmosphere,” 232;
news agency, 252-261;
creed, 289;
seductive appeal of their theory, 294;
emblems, 294;
position, 298;
number, 306;
journalism, 313;
list of instructions, 316;
modernism, 318-320;
system of education, 319
Bolshevism, vii, ix, 24, 339;
system of government, 53, 332;
Socialist journalists, 90;
resemblance to Puritanism, 108;
the Red Star of, 112;
war-cry, 114;
result of, 320, 333
“Boris Gudenov,” 194
Botkin, Dr., 127, 132, 181;
murdered, 136;
cremated, 154-166
British, the, characteristic of frankness, 280
British Army, 324, 340
British Military Mission:
at Omsk, 1;
flight from, 1-22;
captured at Krasnoyarsk, 22
British Railway Mission at Omsk, 1
British Red Cross supplies, 68
Buchan, John, 199
Budyonin, career, 338, 339
Bugatch, 21
Burke, Edmund, on the French Terrorists, 248, 326
“Butter General,” 6
Butter, price of, 123
“Byloe,” 30
Carlyle, Thomas, 286, 340
Carroll, Lewis, “Jabberwock,” 104
Cheliabinsk, 201, 336
Chesterton, G. K., 90, 91, 199
Chicherin, 63;
assistants, 199;
inspects telegrams by radio, 247;
mode of living, 247;
characteristics, 248;
office, 249;
nationality, 268
Churchill, Rt. Hon. Winston, 98
Clarke, Colonel, 95
Clynes, J. R., 151
Communism:
principles, 24, 53, 88, 274;
patriarchal, 62;
result of the system, 120-123, 317;
modernism, 318-320
Communist Youth, League of, 117, 152
Communists, craving for propaganda, 204;
number, 299
Constantinople, 222
Corpses, treatment of, 15, 33, 35
Cromwell, Oliver, 108
Czechs, the:
conquest of Siberia, xi;
advance on Ekaterinburg, 168;
messenger service, 201
_Daily Herald_, the, 78, 91, 296
D——, Mr. Justice, 44
Demedova, 127, 132;
murdered, 137;
cremated, 154-166
Denikin, General, defeat, x, 88
Derevenko:
murdered, 158, 177;
charges against, 181
Derzhinsky, M., head of the extraordinary commission, 48, 268
Dickinson, Mr., 90
Dolgoruki, Prince, 183;
murdered, 171
_Dongola_, the, 310
Dostoievsky, extract from, 290
Dovgolevsky:
electrical engineer, 76;
study of social questions, 77;
on the Russian workmen, 339
Doyle, Sir Arthur Conan, 199
Dryagina, Vassa, 168
Dutov, General, 326
Ekaterinburg, 74, 88, 92, 108;
measures against typhus, 95-97;
Propaganda Hall, 109-113, 312;
names of streets, 115;
number of Government offices, 115;
of professional unions, 116;
museum, 118;
meeting of the Provincial Soviet, 119;
libraries, 120;
eating-houses, 120;
working of the Communist theory, 120-123;
Government Provisioning Department, 122;
Ippatievsky Dom, 124-129;
number of newspapers, 257;
conditions in, 323
Eliot, Sir Charles, 85
Engineers, insufficient pay and position, 81
_En Route_, the, 93, 100
Ermakov, Peter, 165
Esthonia, peace with, 292
Extraordinary Commission, institution, 300
Falk, electrical engineer, 269
Feinberg, Commissar, 296
Feinberger, Press censor, 242, 246
Finland, 298;
International propaganda, 293
Florinsky, Mr., 216
Francis, Mr., American Ambassador, 241
Freemasonry, in Russia, 268
French Canadians, 302
French Press:
corruption, 259;
Revolution, result of the, 295
Gendrikova, Countess, murdered, 171
George, Rt. Hon. D. Lloyd, 102;
saying of, 300;
policy in Ireland, 302
German envoys, in Russia, 226, 231;
prisoners of war, in Moscow, 230
Gialliard, Peter, 157, 180
Gibbs, Mr., tutor to the Tsarevich, 176
Goldmann, Emma, 203, 205
Goldstein, Colonel, 285
Gold train, 6, 311
Goloshokin:
Commissar at Ekaterinburg, 129, 131, 144;
announces the murder of the Tsar, 130;
at the burial of the Imperial Family, 140, 154, 159-166;
death, 148
Gorbunov, 139, 164
Graves, General, 85
Great Britain, result of a Soviet Government, 197
Gulyaev, the Commissar, 169
Hahn, Lieutenant, 326
Hand-shaking, fine on, 62, 92
Horrocks, Captain, 46, 49, 57, 69
Horses:
number of ownerless, 65-67;
death, 66
Husie, Mr., 221
India, British rule in, 222
Internationalism or anti-nationalism, 288, 291, 292
Ippatiev, Mr., 124
Ippatievsky Dom, 124-129, 161;
plan of, 129
Ireland, condition of, 112
Irkutsk, 71
Irtysh River, 1
Isetsky factory, 159;
plan of, 161;
mine, 154, 155, 160
Ivan, the train conductor, 24
Ivanov, Feodor, 169
Ivanov:
at Ekaterinburg, 117;
revolutionary views, 118;
presides at a meeting of the Provincial Soviet, 119
Ivantsev, Colonel, 19
Izhevsky Division, number of deaths from typhus, 32, 321
_Izvestia_, the, 328
_Izvoshchik_, or driver, 14, 48, 195
James I., King, 302
James, Private, 13
Janin, General, 85
Japan, 298
Jews, number of, in the Soviet Government, 267
Johnston, Colonel, 84
Journalists, foreign, in Russia, 233-240, 243
Kalmykov, 36
Kapp, abortive revolution in Berlin, 251
Karlin, Dr., 205
Keeley, Mr., 228, 335
Kendrikova, 180
Kensit, John, 112
_Kent_, the, 310
Kerzhentsev, Comrade:
“The Irish Revolution,” 111;
director of the _Rosta_, 256, 258
Kew Gardens, carnivorous plant, 320
Klementovich, Colonel, 76
Knox, General Sir Alfred, 85;
leaves Omsk, 1;
military attaché at Tannenberg, 8
Kobylinsky, Colonel, 181
Kochenovo, Red Cross train, burnt, 311
Kolchak, Admiral:
defeat of his army, viii, 8, 88, 124;
gold reserve train, 6, 311;
retreat, 15, 17, 67;
War Office at Omsk, 85;
cartoon, 110
Kopchiki Forest, 153, 160;
village, 161
Korea, independence of, 220
Korff, 22
Kostusov, Alexander:
at the cremation of the Imperial Family, 140, 154, 159-166;
discovery of relics, 163
Krasnoyarsk, 8, 22, 41;
system of registration, 52, 56, 60;
Concentration Camp, 58;
cases of typhus, 58, 320;
Red fête, 64;
number of ownerless horses, 65-67;
of English uniforms, 67
Krassin Mission, 80
Kremlin, 252
Krivtsov, Alexander, 165
Kropotkin, Prince, ix
Kukhtenkov, Prokofy, 164, 165
Labashev, Leonidas, 138, 164
Labour Army:
scheme, 74, 83, 88, 92, 105, 334, 336;
failure, 106
Landau-Aldanov, “Lenin und der Bolshewismus,” 290
Lenin, M., 48, 90, 108;
pictures of, 113, 114;
interview with Yurovsky, 143;
appearance, 143, 224;
Bolshevik envoys, 222;
speech at the Ninth Communist Convention, 224;
day’s work, 225;
character of his censorship, 245;
belief in his dogma of internationalism, 288, 291;
characteristics, 289, 290, 329, 330;
failure of his policy, 303;
fanaticism, 330;
style of eloquence, 330;
gospel of hate, 331
Lenov, Peter Alexeivich, 139, 164
Lermontov: “Borodino,” 303;
“Demon,” 178
Leroy-Beaulieu, P., on the Jewish mind, 102
Letemin, Kouzma Ivanovich, 167, 171
Letemin, Michael Ivanovich, 167
Litvinov, interest in foreign journalists, 240
Litvinov-O’Grady, agreement, 307
Lockhart, Mr., Consul-General in Moscow, 103
London, increase of the postal rate, 198
Lovatnykh, Basil, 165;
at the cremation of the Imperial Family, 140, 154, 159-166;
discovery of relics, 163
Lukhanov, 138, 164
Lunacharsky, Commissar of Fine Arts, 90, 218, 293
Lvov, Mr., 200
Lvov, Prince, 200
Macdonald, Ramsay, 151
Macready, General Sir Nevill, 71
Makarov:
effect of Bolshevik oratory, 25;
at Krasnoyarsk, 325
Mamantov, S., 337, 339
Mamontov-Sibiriak, 115
Mamyshkin, Sergius Pavlov, 165
_Manchester Guardian_, the, 91
Mansur, Dr., agent of the Soviet, 222
Maria, Grand Duchess:
murdered, 132-138, 172;
cremated, 154-166
Martel, Captain, 52, 54, 64
Marx, Karl:
warning, 91;
appeal to workers, 109;
busts of, 112, 115
McCullagh, Captain Francis:
member of the British Military Mission, at Omsk, 1;
flight from, 2-22, 325;
travelling in a sleigh, 12-15, 18-20;
at Taiga, 20;
captured at Krasnoyarsk, 22, 41, 287, 325;
leaves the train, 47;
quarters at Krasnoyarsk, 50;
impecuniosity, 51, 56;
ordered to register, 52;
on the danger of Bolshevism, 53;
registered, 58, 60;
negotiations with a Commissar, 59;
gives lessons, 61;
poses as a civilian, 69;
access to Commissar circles, 70-74;
war correspondent, 71;
telegrams to Moscow, 73;
journey to Ekaterinburg, 74-88, 108, 324, 333;
destruction of identity clues, 82, 270;
at Novo-Nikolaevsk, 84;
Omsk, 84-87;
at a meeting of the Provincial Soviet, 119;
interview with Yurovsky, 146-152;
journey to Moscow, 186-191, 317;
life in Moscow, 206;
attack of “trench foot,” 206;
guest of the Soviet Government, 220;
enters the Kremlin, 252;
interview with Tikhon the Patriarch, 262;
arrested by the Vecheka, 269-272;
searched, 270, 275;
cell, 276;
life in prison, 276-285;
food, 282;
examined, 283;
released, 285;
leaves Russia, 307;
on board the _Dongola_, 310
Mercier, Cardinal, 262
Merezhkovsky, saying of, 36
Metvietev, Paul, 125, 131;
murders the Tsar, 134;
flight, 166;
destroys traces of the crime at Ippatievsky House, 167;
journey to Moscow, 186, 191
Michael, Grand Duke, murdered, 171
Mikhailov, war correspondent of the _Pravda_, 15, 203
_Miropomazanie_, the, 184
Mogilevsky, 268, 283
_Morning Post_, the, 78
Moscow, 187, 191;
condition, 192-196, 198, 317;
food, 193, 207;
result of Soviet Government, 196, 207;
iron tyranny, 198;
anarchists, 202;
the Polish churches, 208;
disappearance of newspapers, 215;
destruction of official documents, 216;
plays, 217;
Third International, 220, 297;
capitalists, 226-229;
diplomatists, 229;
German prisoners, 230;
the People’s Commissariat of Foreign Affairs, 241, 249, 296;
the Kremlin, 252;
Food Control at, 304
Moscow-Kursk railway strike, 288
Mrachkovsky, Commissar, present at the murder of the Tsar, 131
Mulkner or Kamerinsk, 230
Murray, Sergeant, 19
_Muzhik_, the, 122, 195, 303, 314
_Nation_, the, 90
Nekrasov, the democratic poet, 176;
“Moroz Krasny Nos,” 178;
“Russian Women,” 178
_New Statesman_, the, 90
_New York World_, the, 72
Newspapers, disappearance of, 215
Nicholas II., Tsar of Russia:
account of his murder, 124-138, 172;
fondness for children, 127;
appearance, 132, 173;
removal of his body, 138-140;
cremated, 154-166;
rumours of his being sent to Perm, 169;
treatment by the Reds, 173;
attends Mass, 174;
courtly manners, 175;
life at Tobolsk, 183;
publication of his public speeches, 217
Nikolsk, seized by the Japanese, 251
Ninth Communist Convention, 224, 253
Nizhniudinsk, 311
North, Rev. Frank, xii, 206
North, Mrs., attacked by the Russian Press, 314
Northcliffe, Lord, 90, 91, 256
Novo-Nikolaevsk, 4, 84, 335;
captured by the Reds, 12;
number of deaths from typhus, 31, 32
Okhotsk, Sea of, 179
Olga, Grand Duchess:
murdered, 132-138, 172;
cremated, 154-166
Omsk, British Military Mission at, 1;
captured by the Reds, 2;
money, worthless, 11, 48, 51;
bridge blown up, 83;
cases of typhus, 84, 320;
retreat from, 325
Orenburg, 336
_Osaka Asahi_, the, 220
_Osaka Mainichi_, the, 221
Oyash, 12
Pak-oi, head of the Korean Committee at Moscow, 220
Pankratov, V. S.:
jailer of the Tsar, 175;
characteristics, 176;
statement on the Imperial Family, 176-184
Pan-Mohammedan Congress, 222, 297
Parasites, the, 286, 297
Partin, Nicholas:
at the burial of the Imperial Family, 140, 154, 159-166;
discovery of relics, 163
Pascal, Captain, 290
Peasants, the, 314-316
People’s Commissariat of Foreign Affairs, 241, 249, 296
Pepelaiev, General, 12
Perm, 67;
bridge replaced, 83, 90;
number of newspapers, 257
Petrograd, “The Union of Five Oppressed,” 202
Petrov, 180
Plekhanov, Mr., arrested, 198
Pobydonostsev, Procurator of the Most Holy Synod, 289
Polar Sea, 5, 29, 179
Poles, the, 7, 21
Polish churches:
in Moscow, 208;
clergy, 266
Polukarov, John, 337
Pometkovsky, Captain, 154;
discovery of the murder of the Tsar, 155-157
_Pravda_, the, 15, 145, 203, 314
Press, development of the, 91;
censorship, 242
Preston, Mr., 129
Proletariat, the, 49, 50, 286, 297, 337
Propaganda Hall, 109-113;
charts and cartoons, 110
Propaganda, system of, vii, 97
Puritanism, 24;
resemblance to Bolshevism, 108
Radek, 90;
“The Bolshevik Party,” 291;
on the effect of foreign trade on Bolshevism, 328
Railways, destruction, 83, 188, 327
Rasputin, pictures of, 134
Razin, Stenka, 115
Red Army, 288, 335;
cartoons on, 111;
supply of arms, 337
_Red Flag, The_, 64
Red Labour Army, 334;
_see_ Labour
_Red Road, The_, 64
“Red Star of Bolshevism,” 303
_Red Tocsin, The_, 64, 89, 334
_Red Workman, The_, 64
Reds, the, ix;
at Irtysh River, 1;
capture Omsk, 2;
Novo-Nikolaevsk, 12;
revolutionary enthusiasm, 23;
atrocities, 27;
English uniforms, 67;
massacre of White officers, 70;
treatment of the Imperial Family, 173;
propaganda, 210-219;
on the freedom of Russia, 308;
joined by the Whites, 325
Reformation, result of the, 295
Revel, 233
_Review of Reviews_, the, 92
Rodzianko, Count, 177
Roman Catholic Church, in Russia, 265-267
Rooney, Sergeant, 61
Ropp, Bishop, imprisoned, 265
Rosenberg, Press censor, 242, 246
_Rosta_, the, 252-257, 260
Russia:
history, 29-31;
debauchery, 36;
peasant refugees, 37;
dislocation of families, 38, 200;
notices on station walls, 38, 312;
fate of girls, 39;
change in customs, 61;
patriarchal Communism, 62;
prejudice against manual labour, 63, 94;
_subbotnik_ movement, 151;
result of the Soviet Government, 190, 196, 207;
German envoys, 226, 231;
capitalists, 229, 304;
foreign journalists, 233-240, 243;
Foreign Office, 235, 237;
system of Press censorship, 242-245;
use of wireless, 258, 260;
separation of Church and State, 263;
position of the clergy, 264;
Roman Catholic Church, 265-267;
system of education, 267, 338;
characteristics of the people, 287, 303, 313;
number of Communists, 299;
Extraordinary Commission, 300;
corruption, 304;
population, 306;
military reaction, 307;
peasants, 314-316;
epidemic of typhus, 320-323;
trade with capitalist countries, 327
Russia, Grand Duchesses of:
imprisoned in Ippatievsky Dom, 127;
murdered, 131-138, 172;
cremated, 154-166
“Russian Friends of American Freedom” Association, 203, 223
“Russian Socialist Telegraph Agency,” or the _Rosta_, 252-257, 260
Sadul, Captain, 103, 222
Sakharov, General, 4, 23, 326
Samoilov, Alexander, 170
Schmidt, Herr, 228
Schneider, Countess, 180
Semashko, Dr., Commissar of Public Health, 31
Semenov, concubine, 36
Serbia, raid on German trenches, viii
Serezhnikov, Mr., 230
Sergiev, war correspondent of the _Pravda_, 145, 203
Shaw, George Bernard, 90, 91
Sheremetievsky, Andrew, 154, 155
Shitinkin, 21
Siberia, 29;
conquered by the Czechs, xi;
treatment of the peasants, 17;
refugees, 28;
epidemic of typhus, 31, 320-323;
military revival meetings, 257;
military position in, 335
Sirovi, General, 85
Sleighs, travelling by, 12-15, 18-20
Smith, Private, 325
_Social-Democrat_, extract from, 331
Soviet Government, ix, 299, 332;
system of advertisement, 97;
result in Russia, 190, 196, 207;
number of Jews, 267;
marriage-law, 309
_Sovietsky Sibir_, the, 85
Spain, 296
Spassky, 338
Staroduma, 168
Stead, W. T., 90
Streokin, on the murder of the Tsar, 134, 172
Struve, Professor, 319
_Subbotnik_ movement, 151
Supranovitch, 76
Sverdlov, Commissar, Vice-Minister of Ways and Communications, 72,
76, 327;
death, 107
Taiga, 20, 84;
number of cases of typhus, 34, 320
Tambov, 338
Tashkent, 223
Tatarskaya, 311
Tatiana, Grand Duchess:
murdered, 132-138, 172;
cremated, 154-166;
compositions, 180
Tatishchev, Count, 183;
murdered, 171
Tattelberg, Madame, 182
Third International Organization, 297
Thomas, Mr., at British Consulate in Ekaterinburg, 128, 319
Tikhon, the Patriarch:
interview with Captain F. McCullagh, 262;
characteristics, 262;
encyclical, 263;
position, 264
Timereva, Madame, 36
Tomsk, 23;
Red G.H.Q. in, 85
“Train-jumping,” 9
Trans-Baïkalia, 221
Trotsky:
fine on hand-shaking, 62, 92;
at Ekaterinburg, 63, 92;
scheme of a Labour Army, 74, 83, 88, 92, 105, 336;
style of journalism, 90;
appearance, 92;
capacity for work, 93;
transport reorganization, 93;
exercise, 94;
measures against typhus, 95-97;
speech on “The Fight Against Economic Ruin,” 98;
treatment of the working classes, 99;
train, 99;
police protection, 100, 194;
adaptability, 101;
characteristics, 102, 106;
style of oratory, 103-105;
position, 107;
pictures of, 113, 115, 117;
in the Kremlin, 252;
nervous strain, 300;
autocracy, 320
Trotsky, Mrs., 94
Turks, fanaticism, 55
Tsarskoe Selo, 134
Typhus:
epidemic of, 6, 16, 320-323;
train burnt, 6, 311;
number of deaths from, 31-35, 84;
treatment of patients, 33;
measures against, 95-97
“Typhus General,” 6
Ufa, 32
Ulster, 302
Uniat Church, 266, 267
Ural factories, 98
Varakovshev, Alexander, 170
Vecheka, the, 272;
police officials, 274;
Governor, 275, 282
Voitsekhovsky, General, 31
Vologda, Province, 264
Vyrobova, Madame, 165 _note_
Walters, Sergeant-Major, 18, 26
Webb, Sydney, 90
Wells, H. G., 90, 91
Whites, the, 323-327;
advance on Krasnoyarsk, 26;
atrocities, 71;
massacre of, 149;
join the Reds, 325
William II., ex-Kaiser, 330
Wireless service in Russia, 258, 260
Witte, Count, 306
Workmen in Factories, 335
Xenofontov, 283, 284
Yakimov, Anatoly, 134, 137;
on the murder of the Tsar, 172
Yaroslav, 187
Yates, Mr., 48
Yenisei, the, 59
Yudenich, advance on Petrograd, 104
Yurovskaya, Miss, 99, 152
Yurovsky:
murders the Tsar, 108, 125, 130-138, 329;
wounded, 137, 139, 151;
at the burial of the Imperial Family, 140, 154, 159-166;
fear of vengeance, 141;
appointed Inspector of Life Insurance, 142, 150;
interview with Lenin, 143;
flight to Petrograd, 143;
return to Ekaterinburg, 144;
house, 145;
interview with Captain F. McCullagh, 146-152;
appearance, 147;
death of his mother, 148;
President of the Extraordinary Commission, 149;
Bolshevik theories, 151;
son and daughter, 152;
picks up relics, 162
Zinoviev, 90, 327
Zlatoust, 336
PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY BILLING AND SONS, LTD., GUILDFORD, AND ESHER