Listen to what John Redmond said on 9th August, 1902:--

"Never for one single hour since the Union was passed has Ireland been

a constitutionally governed country.... Never for one hour has the

English Government of Ireland obtained the assent or approval or

confidence of the people of Ireland.... Never for one hour since then

has the English Government of Ireland rested upon anything but =naked

force=. =No single reform, large or small, has ever been obtained by

purely constitutional means....= We submit to the English usurpation

of the government of Ireland, but we do so =only because we have no

adequate means of successful resistance=."

On 4th September, 1907, John Redmond described the Act of Union, which

gave him his seat in the English Parliament, as "a great criminal act of

usurpation carried by violence and fraud," which "no lapse of time and no

mitigation of its details can ever make binding upon our honour or our

conscience." Resistance to this Union, he continued, is "a sacred duty,

and the methods of resistance will remain for us merely a question of

expediency," physical force "would be absolutely justifiably if it were

possible."

Pretty strong, is it not? The English Government is merely an alien

usurper with no moral authority whatever, to be resisted and fought by

every effective means. Yet how did the same John Redmond take his seat at

Westminster and draw his L400 a year? By taking the following oath:--

"I, John Redmond, do swear that I will be faithful and bear true

allegiance to his Majesty, King George V., his heirs and successors,

according to law, so help me God."

And so by means of this oath of loyalty to the "unconstitutional"

usurpation of "naked force," the Irish member avails himself of that

"great criminal act of usurpation carried by violence and fraud," he takes

his seat with men from Lancashire or Bucks, he gets his cheque.

Is this playing the game? Is it honest and honourable? If the English

occupation of Ireland is immoral and tyrannical, can we swear loyalty to

it? If the Act of Union is a criminal fraud, can we accept and acknowledge

it, by going to Westminster? Let every lover of truth answer this question

with an emphatic No! Let us as a Nation answer No with an unanimous

defiant shout.

To go to Westminster is not only unpractical and futile, it is a betrayal

of the sacred cause of Irish Nationality and =it has been advertised as

such by the English Government=. The great argument for deceiving the

world with regard to Ireland is the presence of Irishmen in the English

Parliament--why we are "over-represented" there! There is, therefore, only

one way of making Ireland cease to be a "domestic" problem and of bringing

it out into the full light of international affairs; and that is by making

a full and final repudiation of the English Parliament. That would be an

unmistakeable manifesto to the whole world, a proclamation that Ireland

demands her full rights from a world which has definitely recognised the

autonomy of small nationalities.

=THE PEACE CONFERENCE.=

That is how we can appeal to the Peace Conference, by fearlessly

proclaiming our refusal to be swallowed up in England's Empire. There is

no need, thank God, of arguing that we should strive to make the most of

the Peace Conference. Even Mr. Dillon has come to admit the idea, though

he is unfortunately so intent on scoring off opponents that he has tried

to degrade the Conference into a contemptible set of unscrupulous Powers.

Sinn Fein is in no way built exclusively on the hopes of the Peace

Conference; the movement was founded by Arthur Griffith years before the

war, if indeed it is not coeval with the Irish age-long struggle for

freedom. Nor are we such sentimental fools as to rely merely on gush. We

do indeed hope for the triumph of moral principles in international

affairs, and especially we hope that democracy is coming into its rightful

inheritance. But meantime we rely primarily on ourselves and our own

determination. Still, we will see that no high-sounding principles shall

be paraded before the world unless the voice of Ireland is heard. We will

see to it that pharisaism shall be confronted by an Ireland clamouring for

independence. And we shall not be friendless. Our race has power in

America, in Australia. Ireland's freedom, too, is essential for the

American conception of the freedom of the seas.

The issue is now before us. We are in the birth-time of big changes. Let

us not lose the great chance of freedom. Let the Irish Democracy once and

for all declare that Ireland is a Nation entitled to sovereign

independence.

Mr. Dillon's attempt to degrade the Peace Conference to the level of the

Westminster Assembly, where everything is settled by party pressure,

bribes and private arrangements, is most astonishing testimony to the

corrupting and demoralising influence of London on Irish members. His mind

is still moving in the old rut of political trickery, huckstering and

chicanery; instinctively and as the result of long experience, he reduces

Ireland's claims to the condition of a man looking for a job or a vote. He

regards our case not as a question of right and justice, but as one to be

compromised and pared down in the good old Westminster fashion.

Something like real Democracy, however, is coming to stay. Great and

sacred principles have been invoked, and the workers of the world are not

going to let them be quietly buried. Nor will Ireland. We are determined

to apply the acid test to these noble professions of faith. The President

of the American Republic, who has espoused the cause even of little

Schleswig, will be confronted with the case for an Irish Republic. There

can be no League of Nations, no firm foundation of international justice,

so long as Ireland is denied that freedom which Letts, Finns, Slavs and

Poles have won.

On behalf of His Holiness, Cardinal Gasparri, Papal Secretary of State,

issued a statement (24th August, 1918) in which we read:--

"History teaches us that a form of government imposed by arms does not

and cannot live."

On 6th November, 1918, Pope Benedict XV. wrote to the Archbishop of

Warsaw:--

"Thanks be to God, the resurrection of Poland is now finally dawning.

Now that Poland has regained her Full Independence, it is our most

fervent prayer that she may once more take her place in the community

of nations and resume her career as a champion of civilisation and

Christianity."

Surely our Holy Father is looking forward to the day when he can address

similar congratulations to Ireland, the Island of Saints and Scholars.

Let every Irish man and woman who reads this vote for Ireland's

Independence.

=FOR THE GLORY OF GOD AND THE HONOUR OF ERIN.=

Transcriber's Notes:

Passages in italics are indicated by _italics_.

Passages in bold are indicated by =bold=.

The Issue: The Case for Sinn Fein · 第 8 / 8 题