THE BILL OF THE MAJORITY.

To the bill reported by the majority of the committee we have the

strongest objections.

_First._--It sanctions an enormous inflation of capital. It

authorizes a consolidation upon the basis of an appraisal of the value

of the several properties to be made by the parties themselves. The

railroads of this Commonwealth are prohibited by law from making stock

dividends, and yet here stock dividends are allowed to such extent as

the parties think proper. One of the greatest impositions ever

practised upon the public, from which the people of this Commonwealth

now suffer, is the watered stock of the railroads between Albany and

Chicago. The amount of stock in these roads issued without any

equivalent, upon which our traffic is now taxed, is variously

estimated at from forty-four millions to one hundred and five

millions. The annual tax levied is from three millions to six

millions, of which we pay a large share. The majority bill provides

for just such a watering of stock, to the extent of perhaps ten

millions, according to the appraisal by the parties in interest. We

believe this to be all wrong, and should not be sanctioned by the

Commonwealth.

_Second._--We utterly dissent from the opinion of the majority in

allowing the Boston and Lowell Railroad to come into such a

consolidation. The Boston and Lowell forms no part of the Tunnel line.

Every witness before the committee, except the agents of the

corporations themselves, was emphatic against such a consolidation.

See Governor Claflin's testimony, 7th Hearing, page 26.

" J. T. Joy " " " " 37.

" C. F. Adams, Jr., " " " " "

" N. C. Nash " 9th " " 4.

" Q. A. Vinal " 14th " " 10.

" Col. Faulkner " " " " 12.

" J. W. Brooks " 17th " " 13.

The Northern line has been of very great value to the business of

Boston and Massachusetts; more than any other it has effected that

reduction of rates which has returned to Boston within the past few

years a portion of the export trade. It forms the shortest line at

present existing between Boston and the Lakes, and while lake

navigation is open substantially controls the rates over the other

lines. Mr. Nathaniel C. Nash says (9th hearing, page 6), "We have

derived more advantage from that line than from any other source."

(See Railroad Commissioners' Report of 1870, page 36.) While the

Lowell railroad provided the terminus and the representation in this

Commonwealth, the other railroads in the line have cooperated in

producing this result. It has cheapened food to the people of this

Commonwealth, and of all New England. The Lowell Railroad is bound by

contracts to continue in this Northern line for twenty years to come.

Although some of the corporations are under financial difficulties,

this does not affect the operations of the line. The railroads still

exist and must continue to do business, and so far as the advantage of

the traffic extends, it matters little who owns or operates the

railroads. So impressed are the majority of the committee with the

importance of maintaining the northern line that they impose upon the

Lowell Railroad Company, as they say, the conditions of withdrawing

from the Northern line, and make provision for transfer of the

business to another line--the Boston and Maine. They propose to do

this in a manner which seems to us weak and futile. The majority bill

provides for repeal of the charter of the Great Northern Railroad

Company, passed in 1869, which authorized the Boston and Lowell

Railroad Company to consolidate with certain companies in New

Hampshire, with authority to lease or purchase other railroads leading

to Ogdensburg and other points in the North and West, and lines of

boats on the lakes. As all the other companies in this consolidated

line are in New Hampshire this charter was ineffective without the

cooperation of New Hampshire, and to this bill New Hampshire has never

assented--not from any hostility to through lines, but because it

contained objectionable features, such as the consolidation of

competing lines, the creation of a monstrous corporation with power to

combine in one gigantic monopoly all the railroads within her borders.

This charter is mere waste paper, and its repeal would have no more

effect than the burning of waste paper. The Lowell Railroad remains

bound by contracts to the Northern line, and the majority bill

effectually places the Northern and Tunnel lines under one control.

The proposal to transfer the Northern line and northern business to

the Boston and Maine Railroad seems to us an absurdity. The Boston and

Maine is practically an Eastern line; of its whole length, one hundred

and twelve miles, only twenty-six could be used in connection with the

Northern line. It never could or would give that exclusive attention

to the business necessary to make such a line successful. Its only

means of connection is over the Manchester and Lawrence Railroad, the

grades of which are too heavy for a successful freight business with

the West.

The Boston and Lowell Railroad is the natural terminus of this

Northern line, and no legislation can remove it from this position.

Moreover the majority bill, placing the Boston and Lowell Railroad and

the Fitchburg in the same control, and authorizing a lease of the

Cheshire, gives the consolidated company such a substantial control of

the whole northern business that its transfer to the Boston and Maine

would necessarily be followed by such disastrous competition as to

preclude such a connection. It must inevitably result in a

consolidation of the Tunnel and the Northern line under one

management. In creating a new line we destroy one which already

exists.

Our true policy is to maintain unimpaired our four routes to the West,

and under whatever management they may be, at all events maintain that

they shall be independent of each other. If a consolidation is to be

made of the Tunnel line we are clearly of the opinion that it should

be of the direct line only between Boston and Troy, including the

Fitchburg, Vermont and Massachusetts, Troy and Greenfield, and Troy

and Boston, and the Massachusetts Central if it desires to form part

of such a line. The Boston and Lowell Railroad, and Nashua Railroad

should be studiously kept apart from such a line, because it forms no

natural part, and does form a natural part of another line. It is

urged that the possession of terminal facilities in Boston should be

allowed a controlling influence in this matter; that the Boston and

Lowell Railroad has obtained the only convenient terminus in Boston

for a great Western line--more than is needed for its own business, or

the business of the Northern line, and therefore that the railroad

policy of the Commonwealth should be compelled to yield to its

position. To this there are two answers.

_First._--That these facilities were obtained for the Northern line,

and by urgent representations of its necessities, and if they are not

needed for that business they should be transferred to other

corporations that do need them.

The Commonwealth has full power in the case, and it is only necessary

to invoke the same power which the majority bill gives the

consolidation company to take property from the Fitchburg, to take

from the Lowell Railroad Company the property which it now represents

as not needed for its business which it has obtained under the

representation of a public necessity.

_Secondly._--The question of terminal facilities is too unimportant in

itself to be permitted to determine in the least degree the decision

of a great State policy; other facilities can be obtained as good as

the Lowell.

_Finally._--We object to the plan of the majority because it continues

the policy of placing our last remaining line to the West under the

control and management of a stock corporation.

It cannot be denied that there is great and wide-spread

dissatisfaction with our present railroad system, and its management.

We have tried in vain to control by special legislation, and it may

well be acknowledged that the trial has not been very successful.

Minority Report of the Committee on Railways in Relation to the Hoosac Tunnel and the Railroads Leading Thereto With a bill to incorporate the State Board of Trustees of the Hoosac Tunnel Railroad; also the speech delivered by Hon. E. P. Carpenter in the Senate of Massachusetts, June 3, 1873, in support of the same · 第 14 / 24 题