B. SPACE COMPOSITION AMONG THE OLD MASTERS

I

THE preceding pages have set forth the concrete facts of

visible beauty, and the explanation of our feelings about it.

It is also interesting, however, to see how these principles

are illustrated and confirmed in the masterpieces of art. A

statistical study, undertaken some years ago with the purpose

of dealing thus with the hypothesis of substitutional symmetry

in pictorial composition, has given abundance of material,

which I shall set forth, at otherwise disproportionate length,

as to a certain extent illustrative of the methods of such

study. It is clear that this is but one of many possible

investigations in which the preceding psychological theories

may be further illuminated. The text confines itself to

pictures; but the functions of the elements of visual form

are valid as well for all visual art destined to fill a bounded

area. The discussion will then be seen to be only ostensibly

limited in its reference. For picture might always be read

space arrangement within a frame.

In the original experimental study of space arrangements, the

results of which were given at length on page 111, the elements

of form in a picture were reduced to SIZE or MASS, DEPTH in the

third dimension, DIRECTION, and INTEREST. Direction was further

analyzed into direction of MOTION or ATTENTION (of persons or

objects in the picture), an ideal element, that is; and direction

of LINE. For the statistical study, a given picture was then

divided in half by an imaginary vertical line, and the elements

appearing on each side of this line were set off against each

other to see how far they lent themselves to description by

substitutional symmetry. Thus: in B. van der Helst's "Portrait

of Paul Potter," the head of the subject is entirely to left

of the central line, as also his full face and frontward glance.

His easel is right, his body turned sharply to right, and both

hands, one holding palette and brushes, are stretched down to

right. Thus the greater mass is to the left, and the general

direction of line is to the right; elements of interest in the

head, left; in implements, right. This may be schematized in

the equation (Lt.)M.+I.=(Rt.)I.+L.

Pieter de Hooch, "The Card-Players," in Buckingham Palace,

portrays a group completely on the right of the central line,

all facing in to the table between them. Directly behind them

is a high light window, screened, and high on the wall to the

extreme right are a picture and hanging cloaks. All goes to

emphasize the height, mass, and interest of the right side.

On the left, which is otherwise empty, is a door half the

height of the window, giving on a brightly lighted courtyard,

from which is entering a woman, also in light clothing. The

light streams in diagonally across the floor. Thus, with all

the "weight" on the right, the effect of this deep vista on

the left and of its brightness is to give a complete balance,

while the suggestion of line from doorway and light makes,

together with the central figure, a roughly outlined V, which

serves to bind together all the elements. Equation, (Lt.)V.+I.

=(Rt.)M.+I.

The thousand pictures on which the study was based<1> were

classified for convenience into groups,--Religious, Portrait,

Genre, and Landscape. It was found on analysis that the

functions of the elements came out clearly, somewhat as follows.

<1> One thousand reproductions of old masters from F. Bruckmann's

_Classischer Bilderschatz_, Munich, omitting frescoes and

pictures of which less than the whole was given.

Of the religious pictures, only the "Madonnas Enthroned" and

other altar-pieces are considered at this point as presenting a

simple type, in which it is easy to show the variations from

symmetry. In all these pictures the balance comes in between

the interest in the Infant Christ, sometimes together with

direction of attention to him, on one side, and other elements

on the other. When the first side is especially "heavy" the

number of opposing elements increases, and especially takes

the form of vista and line, which have been experimentally

found to be powerful in attracting attention. Where there are

no surrounding worshipers, we notice remarkable frequency in

the use of vista and line, and, in general, balance is brought

about through the disposition of form rather than of interests.

The reason for this would appear to be that the lack of

accessories in the persons of saints, worshipers, etc., and

the consequent increase in the size of Madonna and Child in

the picture, heightens the effect of any given outline, and so

makes the variations from symmetry greater. This being the

case, the compensations would be stronger; and as we have

learned that vista and line are of this character, we see why

they are needed.

The portrait class is an especially interesting object for

study, inasmuch as while its general type is very simple and

constant, for this very reason the slightest variations are

sharply felt, and have their very strongest characteristic

effect. The general type of the portrait composition is, of

course, the triangle with the head at the apex, and this point

is also generally in the central line; nevertheless, great

richness of effect is brought about by emphasizing variations.

For instance, the body and head are, in the great majority of

cases, turned in the same way, giving the strongest possible

emphasis to the direction of attention,--especially powerful,

of course, where all the interest is in the personality. But

it is to be observed that the very strongest suggestion of

direction is given by the direction of the glance; and in no

case, when most of the other elements are directed in one way,

does the glance fail to come backward. With the head on one

side of the central line, of course the greatest interest is

removed to one side, and the element of direction is brought

in to balance. Again, with this decrease in symmetry, we see

a significant increase in the use of the especially effective

elements, vista and line. In fact, the use of the small deep

vista is almost confined to the class with heads not in the

middle. The direction of the glance also plays an important

part. Very often the direction of movement alone is not

sufficient to balance the powerful M.+I. of the other side,

and the eye has to be attracted by a definite object of interest.

This is usually the hand, with or without an implement,--like

the palette, etc., of our first examples,--or a jewel, vase,

or bit of embroidery. This is very characteristic of the

portraits of Rembrandt and Van Dyck.

In general, it may be said that (1) portraits with the head in

the centre of the frame show a balance between the direction

of suggested movement on one side, and mass or direction of

attention, or both together, on the other; while (2) portraits

with the head not in the centre show a balance between mass

and interest on one side, and direction of attention, or of

line, or vista, or combinations of these, on the other.

Still more unsymmetrical in their framework than portraits, in

fact the most unfettered type of all, are the genre pictures.

As these are pictures with a human interest, and full of action

and particular points of interest, it was to be expected that

interest would be the element most frequently appearing. In

compositions showing great variations from geometrical symmetry,

it was also to be expected that vista and line, elements which

have been noted comparatively seldom up to this point, should

suddenly appear strongly; for, as being the most strikingly

"heavy" of the elements, they serve to compensate for other

variations combined.

The landscape is another type of unfettered composition. It

was of course to be expected that in pictures without action

there should be little suggestion of attention or of direction

of movement. But the most remarkable point is the presence

of vista in practically every example. It is, of course,

natural that somewhere in almost every picture there should

be a break to show the horizon line, for the sake of variety,

if for nothing else; but what is significant is the part played

by this break in the balancing of the picture. In about two

thirds of the examples the vista is inclosed by lines, or

masses, and when near the centre, as being at the same time the

"heaviest" part of the picture, it serves as a fulcrum or centre

to bind the parts--always harder to bring together than in the

other types of pictures--into a close unity. The most frequent

form of this arrangement is a diagonal, which just saves itself

by turning up at its far end. Thus the mass, and hence usually

the special interest of the picture, is on the one side, on

the other the vista and the sloping line of the diagonal. In

very few cases is the vista behind an attractive or noticeable

part of the picture, the fact showing that it acts in opposition

to the latter, leading the eye away from it, and thus serving at

once the variety and richness of the picture, and its unity. A

complete diagonal would have line and vista both working at the

extreme outer edge of the picture, and thus too strongly,--

unless, indeed, balanced by very striking elements near the

outer edge.

This function of the vista as a unifying element is of interest

in connection with the theory of Hildebrand,<1> that the landscape

should have a narrow foreground and wide background, since that

is most in conformity with our experience. He adduces Titian's

"Sacred and Profane Love" as an example. But of the general

principle it may be said that not the reproduction of nature,

but the production of beauty, is the aim of composition, and that

this aim is best reached by focusing the eye by a narrow background,

i.e. vista. No matter how much it wanders, it returns to that

central spot and is held there, keeping hold on all the other

elements. Of Hildebrand's example it may be said that the

pyramidal composition, with the dark and tall tree in the centre,

effectually accomplishes the binding together of the two figures,

so that a vista is not needed. A wide background without that

tree would leave them rather disjointed.

<1> Op cit., p. 55.

In general, it may be said that balance in landscape is effected

between mass and interest on one side and vista and line on the

other; and that union is given especially by the use of vista.

The Psychology of Beauty · 第 9 / 34 题