CHAPTER VI.

MORE ABOUT INVESTIGATION.

Outside fiction, the real detective does not disguise himself in any

elaborate or melodramatic fashion. He will not wear a false moustache or

a wig, for instance. But the beginner is taught how a difference in

dressing the hair, the combing out or waxing of a moustache, the

substitution of a muffler for a collar, a cap for a bowler will alter

his appearance. They keep a "make-up" room at headquarters, its most

conspicuous feature being a photograph of a group of dirty-looking

ruffians--detectives in disguise. But it is a disguise the more

impenetrable because there is nothing that can go wrong with it. Yet not

half a dozen times in a year is the make-up room used.

The kind of case in which a disguise is useful may be illustrated. Some

thieves had broken into St. George's Cathedral, at Southwark, and then

rifled the Bishop's Palace. The booty they secured was worth some three

thousand pounds, and they left not the faintest trace behind. The

officer charged with the investigation resolved on a long shot. He

dressed himself--I quote a newspaper report--"in a long overcoat and

slouched hat, sported a heavy chain, smoked a big cigar, and was well

supplied with gold." In this attire he made himself conspicuous about

Vauxhall. Among the "crooks" of that neighbourhood, it soon became known

that a Jew receiver--one Cohen, of Brick Lane, Whitechapel--was about,

and in a very short while the "receiver" knew all that he needed to

arrest the thieves and recover the stolen property.

"Shadowing," too, is a matter of experience. Let anyone who doubts its

difficulties try the experiment of keeping sight of a person in a

frequented thoroughfare. When a suspect knows or guesses he is being

followed--as he inevitably does, if it is continued for a day or two--it

becomes ten times more difficult. Unless incessant watchfulness is

maintained, a shadowed person will be lost sight of in five minutes.

Shadowing is, when possible, always done by detectives in pairs,

sometimes in threes. Detective No. 1 shadows the suspect, detective No.

2 shadows his colleague. Then if the suspect stops or turns suddenly No.

1 walks innocently on and No. 2 takes up the chase. It is a wearisome

task when a person has to be watched incessantly, for it may not be

possible to assign a spot with any certainty for reliefs to continue the

trail.

When the young detective begins his career he will carry a virgin

drab-coloured diary in his breast pocket, wherein he will be expected to

record every moment spent on duty, every penny he spends. If any

illusion remains in his mind that he will be turned loose on the streets

to catch thieves or murderers, it is quickly destroyed. Hard labour is

his portion. Small enquiries at pawnbrokers', searching directories to

verify addresses, running errands for his superiors, and doing all the

small odd jobs are his immediate concern.

Only now and again is he called upon to play a minor part in an arrest.

But all the while he will be learning and improving his acquaintance

with the thieves in his district. All his painfully acquired knowledge

goes for little unless he can cultivate a certain friendship with the

rogues in the vicinity of his sphere of duty.

The "informant" plays a big part in the workings of Scotland Yard. If

the old phrase, "Honour among thieves," had any truth in it, London

would be a poor place for honest men to live in. But gossip of the

underworld is easily attainable to ears that wish to catch it.

One of the problems which beset the architect of New Scotland Yard was

this same problem of the informant. An inconspicuous entrance had to be

arranged by which access could be unobtrusively gained by a person too

shy to be seen walking publicly up the main entrance of the headquarters

of police.

A great detective once told the writer how, in his early days, he set to

work to learn the world, and gained valuable acquaintance with the

deliberation that a young student might apply to the pursuit of an exact

science. He took a room in Jermyn Street, and began his studies in every

moment he could spare off duty. "I haunted night clubs; I went to

gambling houses; I was a frequenter of any resort where one was likely

to meet rogues or tricksters. I stored my memory with faces, and made

myself friendly with all sorts of people--waiters, barmen, and

hall-porters. So it was that I got hints that I should never have got by

any other method, and scores of times, years afterwards, I received

information from the channels I had formed when I began. To show the

value of some of these acquaintances I may tell you that when some idea

of my identity leaked out at one of these clubs an American crook--he

was drunk--declared openly that he would shoot me at sight. The waiter

contrived to draw the cartridges from his revolver, and to give me a

hint as I entered. And sure enough my man stood up, took aim, and pulled

the trigger of the empty weapon. I hit him on the jaw, and let it rest

at that. But if I hadn't treated that waiter right, I might have been a

dead man now."

The personal factor is an important one in dealing with informants.

There is not very often ill-feeling between criminals and detectives. A

slight straining of red-tape will sometimes have wide-reaching results.

A detective, conveying a prisoner from Liverpool to London, offered the

latter a cigar. "You're a good sort," exclaimed the man impulsively.

"Tell you what; I'm in for it, I know. But I can do you a bit of good.

It was X. and Z. who did that Hatton Garden business." And so was

provided a clue to an apparently insoluble mystery.

At the end of three months, the probationer, if he has qualified, finds

himself a fully-fledged "detective-patrol." Thereafter he has to pass an

examination whenever he is promoted, and may pass upwards through the

grades of third, second, and first class detective-sergeants to second,

first, and divisional inspector, and even eventually to chief

detective-inspector.

The everyday duties of the C.I.D. are legion. There are "Informations"

passing between headquarters and the different stations daily, almost

hourly. Stolen property has to be traced, pawnbrokers visited, convicts

on licence watched, reports made, inquiries conducted by request of

provincial police forces. It means hard, painstaking work from morning

to night.

As I have said, so far as is consistent with his duty, a man keeps on

good terms with those criminals he knows. It is a point of policy. They

know that the average detective does not wish them harm. If he has to

arrest them they know he will be scrupulously fair when it comes to

giving evidence. Often a detective will help a man out of his own pocket

when he knows that a case is really a necessitous one. He has no animus

against any person he arrests. His duty is merely to place in safe

custody the person he believes to be responsible for a breach of the

law. Conviction or acquittal matters nothing to him after that. He has

done his duty.

A wide knowledge of human nature is necessary to his calling, and he

never forgets that the power of a police officer has its limitations. A

man who brings discredit or ridicule on the department has a short-lived

official life.

There is another part of the Criminal Investigation Department which has

duties entirely distinct from that of the main body of detectives. That

is the Special Branch, under Superintendent Quinn, M.V.O.--a section

which, with the war, has suddenly become of great importance, for it has

now largely to do with the spy peril. Of its methods and organisation

little can be said, for obvious reasons.

In ordinary times it concerns itself solely with the protection of high

personages, from the King and Queen and Cabinet Ministers to

distinguished foreign visitors. The Special Branch in the days of

suffragette outrages was the chief foe of the vote-seekers. It deals,

too, with all political offences which need investigation.

There is a special squad of officers who deal with the white slave

traffic. These are assisted by a lady appointed by the Home Office. She

makes enquiries from women and children where victims might be reluctant

to confide in a man, and has other similar duties.

The department is practically self-contained, working side by side with

the uniform branch under its own officers. The point of contact is at

superintendents of divisions, who exercise a supervising control.

Scotland Yard: The methods and organisation of the Metropolitan Police · 第 6 / 15 章