MEMORANDUM FOR THE SEYBERT COMMISSION.

I called this morning (Saturday, 14th November, 1885), on Mr. W. M.

Keeler, and told him, in effect, in the very words as well as I can

remember, as follows: that I had received his letter of the 6th inst.,

containing his terms, and had consulted the Commission in regard to

them; and that our conclusion had been quickly reached. He must know how

very simple a process this 'composite photography' is, and that among

photographers there is no mystery whatever in it. For his own process he

claimed a Spiritual Agency--this agency we were willing to accept (in

my own case I was anxious to accept it) if, after a thorough

investigation, his process could not be explained by well-known physical

laws. The conditions he demanded were such as to render any

investigation simply silly. His exclusive use of the dark room, which

could have nothing to do with Spiritual forces, for the Spirits had

already done their work in the Camera, utterly precluded us from

discovering whether his processes were in anywise different from

ordinary photography. He wished to know in what way this prevented us

from detecting fraud if the operations took place in a private house

where he was a stranger. I replied that without for a moment impugning

his honesty, he must know that unless we were present with him in the

dark room, we could not affirm that our marks had not been duplicated on

substituted plates.

Furthermore, that we had regarded his terms as intentionally

prohibitory. The demand for three hundred dollars was so extraordinary

that we could regard it in no other light than as a desire to avoid an

investigation altogether. I asked him what his ordinary charge was, and

he replied two dollars for each sitting, and that he made from twenty to

forty dollars a day, when he settled down to work.

That there might be no misunderstanding, I repeated my reply to his

wife: that we were ready to investigate, if we could be allowed to watch

the very points where material agency ceases and spiritual begins, but

these very points Mr. Keeler forbade us to examine, and that the failure

rested with him.

At one time his vexation (which was manifest) a little ran away with his

discretion. He asked, with somewhat of a sneer, 'How did you expect to

investigate it?' I replied that 'I could not answer for others, but for

myself I should have liked to have him say, when we of the Commission

met him, The Spirits are present, through my Mediumship, here is my

Camera in which the Spirits will manifest themselves on the sensitized

plates, take it, and so long as I am present with my influence, do what

you please.' He laughed outright and said 'That would be a good thing.'

I endeavored throughout the interview to impress him with our utter

incredulity in the spiritual nature of his photographs, and yet to give

him no loop to hang a charge of discourteous or illiberal treatment on.

I asked him to give me, in my private capacity, a sitting at his

earliest convenience, and that I should not be satisfied with less than

a cherub on my head, one on each shoulder, and a full-blown angel on my

breast. He laughingly assented.

Preliminary Report of the Commission Appointed by the University of Pennsylvania to Investigate Modern Spiritualism In Accordance with the Request of the Late Henry Seybert · 第 75 / 139 题