APPENDIX.

Soon after the appointment of the Seybert Commission, I as Secretary,

was asked to make a collection of the best representative literature of

Spiritualism, and to prepare for the use of the Commission a sketch of

the rise, progress, present condition, doctrines and alleged phenomena

of this belief, as well as an account of previous investigations,

similar to the one contemplated by ourselves. For a number of months I

busied myself diligently with this work, and finally read my sketch

before the Commission, at a meeting at which Mr. Thomas R. Hazard, the

well-known Spiritualist, was present as our guest. I had at this time

seen scarcely anything of Spiritualism, but was much impressed with what

I had read, and certainly in a fully receptive attitude towards

phenomena supported by so much apparently strong testimony. Mr. Hazard

declared himself quite satisfied with the tone of the paper, saying that

he had come expecting to hear something very different, but that it was

fair and unbiased. I mention these facts to show that my present opinion

on the subject was not assumed at the outset, but has been arrived at

gradually, and is based upon my own observations.

I have been forced to the conclusion that Spiritualism, as far at least

as it has shown itself before me (and I give no opinion upon what has

not fallen within my observation), presents the melancholy spectacle of

gross fraud, perpetrated upon an uncritical portion of the community;

that the testimony of such persons as to what they see is almost

valueless, if they are habitually as inaccurate as they have been at the

séances at which I have been present with them; and that there is an

unwillingness on the part of Mediums to have their powers freely and

thoroughly investigated--a fact which makes any investigation of

Spiritualism difficult and expensive. My opinions are not based

exclusively upon what I have seen and recorded in my work with my

colleagues, but also upon observations made at various times in a

private capacity; and there is but one conclusion to be appended to them

all. I subjoin notes of séances, recorded by myself as Secretary of the

Commission. Their somewhat disjointed form arises from the fact that I

have not thought it desirable to make changes in my notes, except such

as were necessary in taking the Records, which are of value as evidence,

out of their contextual connection with records of business meetings and

matters of no interest to the public. Nothing which could be looked upon

as evidence has been purposely suppressed. I have intentionally left out

a description of several things which we have been unable to use, and

which would have merely swelled our Records; as, for example, the

account of our sealing slates for the experiments with Dr. Slade, he

afterwards having refused to have anything to do with slates sealed by

us. My notes were made during the séances, or as soon as possible after

them. They were arranged and copied in no case later than two days

after. Explanations and additions, which do not belong to the original

Records, but have been inserted later, are put in brackets.

For a justification of the opinion of Spiritualism expressed above, I

refer to the Records which follow.

Preliminary Report of the Commission Appointed by the University of Pennsylvania to Investigate Modern Spiritualism In Accordance with the Request of the Late Henry Seybert · 第 12 / 139 题