V.

It is only a minutes’ walk from the corner of Fleet Lane, to the street

of booksellers, Paternoster Row, in which the rival publishers, Bungay

and Bacon lived—Bacon in an ancient low-browed building, with a few of

his books displayed in the windows under a bust of my Lord Verulam; and

Bungay in the house opposite, which was newly painted, and elaborately

decorated in the style of the seventeenth century, “so that you might

have fancied stately Mr. Evelyn passing over the threshold, or curious

Mr. Pepys examining the books in the windows.” _The_ Row, so called—as

financiers arrogantly call Wall Street, _the_ Street—is not wider than an

alley way, and in this respect it is exactly as it was when Warrington

introduced Pendennis to the editor of the _Parlor Table Annual_, wherein

his verses were published. But though its breadth has not been

increased, the old buildings on both sides of it have given place in many

instances to towering new ones, five and six stories high, which shut out

the light, and keep the editors, compilers, printers, engravers, and

book-binders, who are the principal laborers of the Row, in an all-day

gloom. Both Bungay and Bacon had their domestic establishments over

their shops, and their wives, who were sisters, thus had an opportunity

to insult one another by looks and mute signs from their opposite

windows. Bungay and Bacon, and their belligerent spouses are now out of

the trade, and the annual _Souvenirs_ and _Keepsakes_ which made a part

of their business, belong to an extinct form of literature. The Row is

full of Grub Street curiosities; but Lady Fanny Fantail, Miss Bunion, and

the Honorable Percy Popinjay are seen within its precincts no more, and

if they still exist, they probably find a new field for their

distinguished services in the society papers.

Let anyone strike out which way he will from Fleet Street, he is sure to

find himself in the presence of something which reminds him of Dickens,

near some object which his humor has made famous, or which answers to one

of his luminous descriptions.

The slums between the Strand and Soho, and between Smithfield and

Clerkenwell, were fertile to him, and not a _gamin_ there knew the

winding alleys, and crisscross streets better than the gentleman with the

high complexion, the sparkling eye, the iron-gray beard, the well-cut

dress, and the brisk step, who might have been seen speeding through them

at all sorts of unusual hours. One day, he was heard of in Ratcliff

Highway, or among the riverside shanties of Poplar, and the next, among

the bird shops of Seven Dials, or in the courts of Lambeth. When we

contrast the little we have found of Thackeray in the neighbourhood

through which we have just been, with the variety and suggestiveness of

the reminiscences of Dickens in the same region, our search seems

disappointing.

As we have said Thackeray was not a novelist of low life. “Perhaps,” he

says in the preface to _Pendennis_: “the lovers of excitement may care to

know that this book began with a very precise plan, which was entirely

put aside. Ladies and Gentlemen, you were to have been treated, and the

writer’s and publisher’s pocket benefited by the recital of the most

active horrors. What more exciting than a ruffian (with many admirable

virtues) in St. Giles, visited constantly by a young lady from Belgravia?

What more stirring than the contrasts of society? The mixture of slang

and fashionable language? The escapes, the battles, the murders? . . . .

The exciting plan was laid aside (with a very honorable forbearance on

part of the publishers) because on attempting it, I found that I failed

from want of experience of my subject; and never having been intimate

with any convict in my life, and the manners of ruffians and gaol-birds

being quite unfamiliar to me, the idea of entering into competition with

M. Eugene Sue was abandoned.”

Thackeray's London: a description of his haunts and the scenes of his novels · 第 9 / 14 题